view article
Figure 3
Comparison of results from two selected slices. (a) Microscopy image showing that the sample has been damaged by slicing to a small (top) or high (bottom) degree. Reconstruction results from (b) SASTT and (c) 3D sSAXS on the same virtual and physical slice, respectively. The cylinders represent the direction of the main orientation; the length represents the degree of orientation and the colour represents the symmetric intensity, normalized with the maximum value. (d) Map of the dot product calculated between the vectors from the two methods and (e) the corresponding histogram of the dot product as well as the average dot product as a function of the section number, marking the position of the two selected sections shown here, and the region of sections where fewer cracks occurred (red bracket). The red square in (d) marks the voxel where the q-resolved reconstruction, shown in Fig. 5[link], was validated.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Volume 27| Part 3| May 2020| Pages 779-787
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577520003860
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS