research papers
Versatile compact heater design for in situ nano-tomography by transmission X-ray microscopy
aNational Synchrotron Light Source II, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA, bDepartment of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA, cDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA, and dChemistry Division, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: karen.chen-wiegart@stonybrook.edu, xiao@bnl.gov
A versatile, compact heater designed at National Synchrotron Light Source-II for in situ X-ray nano-imaging in a full-field transmission X-ray microscope is presented. Heater design for nano-imaging is challenging, combining tight spatial constraints with stringent design requirements for the temperature range and stability. Finite-element modeling and analytical calculations were used to determine the heater design parameters. Performance tests demonstrated reliable and stable performance, including maintaining the exterior casing close to room temperature while the heater is operating at above 1100°C, a homogenous heating zone and small temperature fluctuations. Two scientific experiments are presented to demonstrate the heater capabilities: (i) in situ 3D nano-tomography including a study of metal dealloying in a liquid molten salt extreme environment, and (ii) a study of pore formation in icosahedral quasicrystals. The progression of structural changes in both studies were clearly resolved in 3D, showing that the new heater enables powerful capabilities to directly visualize and quantify 3D morphological evolution of materials under real conditions by X-ray nano-imaging at elevated temperature during synthesis, fabrication and operation processes. This heater design concept can be applied to other applications where a precise, compact heater design is required.
Keywords: transmission X-ray microscopes; in situ heating; material characterizations; nano-tomography.
1. Introduction
Direct visualization and quantification of the 3D morphology of materials under real conditions are crucial for understanding the processing structure–property correlations associated with a wide variety of novel material systems (Gatalo et al., 2019; Topsøe, 2003; Johnson et al., 2019; Li et al., 2015). The reaction rates and materials evolution mechanisms occurring during these real-world processes are highly dependent on the operating temperature, which activates different chemical reactions and physical transport phenomena (Chen-Wiegart, Wang et al., 2012; Voorhees, 1985; Waldmann et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2019; Moniri et al., 2019; Han et al., 2019; Shahani et al., 2016; Gibbs et al., 2015). Therefore, the ability to study these processes at variable and elevated temperatures is critical to a broad range of scientific disciplines utilizing materials.
Recent advances in full-field X-ray nano-imaging with transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM) (Ge et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2018; Cheng et al., 2017) have generated unprecedented capabilities to analyze materials at sub-30 nm resolution in 3D. Impactful applications include energy storage (Tsai et al., 2018; Landa-Medrano et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2019), catalysis (Gonzalez-Jimenez et al., 2012), metals and alloys (Kaira et al., 2019; Milhet et al., 2018), high-pressure studies (Mao et al., 2019), and fuel cells (Chen-Wiegart, Harris et al., 2012; Harris et al., 2015; Izzo et al., 2008). Recently, the Full-field X-ray Imaging (FXI) beamline at National Synchrotron Light Source-II (NSLS-II) demonstrated that full nano-tomography images can be performed within 1 min (Ge et al., 2018), enabling dynamical and kinetic studies with much higher temporal and spatial resolutions than previously possible.
To enable in situ heating studies with the FXI TXM, and for rapid X-ray nano-imaging more generally, it is important to design a versatile heater that is compact, stable and repeatable. Owing to the short (∼11 mm) working distance of the adjacent TXM optics at FXI and the requirement of a stable temperature up to ∼1100°C driven by many materials applications, the heater design requires careful consideration of the competing demands. Prior heater design efforts have taken a variety of approaches to tackle similar challenges. For micro-tomography, Fife et al. demonstrated a laser-based heater design for in situ micro-tomography at the TOMCAT beamline at the Swiss Light Source (Fife et al., 2012), and Bale et al. studied sequences of micro-crack damage in ceramic matrix composites under mechanical load at temperatures up to 1750°C using a heater design developed at the Advanced Light Source (Bale et al., 2013; Barnard et al., 2017). For nano-tomography, Kiss et al. designed a resistance-based heater to study Ni powder oxidation from 670 to 830°C at a TXM (Kiss et al., 2015). At FXI, the development of a new heater design is driven by space constraints, the ability to heat a rotating sample for rapid nano-tomography data collection and the capability to reach temperatures up to 1100°C.
In this work, we present a description of the design, analysis and performance for an in situ heater for X-ray nano-imaging. We include the results from two scientific-use cases to highlight the heater design versatility: (i) 3D tomography under liquid molten salt extreme environment to study metal corrosion and dealloying, and (ii) rapid 3D tomography to study the formation of extended defects in complex intermetallics.
2. Furnace design
2.1. Heater design
The heater was designed to be compact and lightweight to comply with the tight spatial constraints of the TXM sample environment and optics. The heater is required to facilitate heating a sample up to ∼1100°C while maintaining an outer surface temperature below 40°C. At FXI, the distance between the pinhole and the sample positions is 11 mm, thereby introducing a size constraint in the heater design.
An exploded view of the heater design is shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 1(a) depicts the overall structure of the heater and Fig. 1(b) shows a zoomed-in view of the heating element. The key part of the heater consists of a ceramic insulated resistive heating coil packaged inside a water-cooled copper casing. The casing design consists of two halves for easy installation of the heater unit inside it. The heater unit is composed of a resistive heater coil made from a continuous segment of Kanthal A-1 wire (22AWG, 0.0253 inch diameter) and a thermally insulating ceramic layer. A special core-pin assembly was designed to help ensure that the coil wire is kept clear of the TXM field of view [Figs. 1(c) and 1(d)]. Assembly of the heater unit was completed by casting ceramic paste (Aremco Ceramacast 510, a castable ceramic) around the core-pin assembly inside a cylindrical mold.
Seven penetrations radially distributed through the casing in the horizontal plane (sample plane) allow passageways for the incoming and outgoing X-ray beams, visual access for the side-facing camera, as well as onboard temperature sensor placement. The heater also includes copper top and bottom caps for enclosing the heater unit inside a cooling environment. Different versions of the top cap, with and without an opening hole, are selectable to accommodate different sample geometries. A pair of U-shape copper cooling pipes were brazed onto the copper casing halves. The heater was machined in-house. The heater assembly was mounted on a motorized stage stack for precise positioning [Fig. 1(e)].
2.2. Finite-element modeling analysis on heater design
A steady-state thermal finite-element model of the heater assembly was constructed to assist in predicting the performance and optimizing operational parameters. Analysis results in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b) show that, while the temperature at the sample position reached ∼1100°C [Fig. 2(a)], the temperature of the copper casing remains less than 40°C [Fig. 2(b)]. For further details on finite element modeling analysis see Section S1 of the supporting information.
2.3. Furnace tests
A K-type thermocouple (A) was used to calibrate the actual temperature at the sample position. The thermocouple was fixed onto the beamline standard kinematic mounting base plate and protruded into the furnace chamber from below. The thermocouple tip was aligned and centered at the TXM field of view. This configuration simulated a generic sample mounting scheme in which a sample would be mounted on top of a thin ceramic rod or thin-walled quartz tube with ceramic wool inside to hold the sample in place. During the temperature ramping stage, the thermocouple tip moves due to (c) shows the temperature offset difference between two thermocouples, as expected due to their different positions. The calibration was reproducible through multiple thermal cycles.
of the thermocouple. The motion was tracked with the imaging detector, and the tip was moved back manually to the same location in the images. During temperature holding stage, the thermocouple was thermally equilibrated, so the tip did not move in the image field of view. This thermocouple position-adjustment procedure is also used in other sample experiments. Another K-type thermocouple (B) was inserted from the side of the heater, used for the closed-loop power feedback control. To calibrate the temperature offset, the sample position temperature was ramped from room temperature to 1100°C in 100°C increments. Fig. 2The temperature distribution within the sample heating zone was characterized over a 1 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm 3D grid, with 0.1 mm step size. The cooling and heating rates of the heater were also tested. The temperature distribution results in Fig. 2(d) show that the temperature distribution around the sample heating zone has gradients less than 5.7°C mm−1 in the transverse plane and 13.7°C mm−1 in the vertical direction. Within the microscope field-of-view region, which is about 30–50 µm for 30 nm spatial resolution at 8 keV, the temperature variation is therefore negligible in all directions for practical purposes. The results also show the heater has good temperature stability. In the test temperature range, the temperature fluctuated around the target temperature within ±1.6°C (standard deviation).
3. Applications
The furnace has been used in various in situ heating experiments conducted with the TXM at the FXI beamline of NSLS-II. Two example cases are presented here to demonstrate the capability.
3.1. 3D nano-tomography under a liquid molten salt extreme environment to study metal corrosion and dealloying
Molten salts are one of the leading candidates for high-temperature heat-transfer fluids and play a critical role in the development of future nuclear and solar energy (Misra & Whittenberger, 1987; Williams et al., 2006; Sridharan et al., 2012; Sohal et al., 2010; Ruh & Spiegel, 2006; Raiman & Lee, 2018). The ability to observe the morphological evolution of alloys in molten salt in real time to understand the behaviors and kinetics, while at the elevated temperatures, is a vital advancement. The results of an in situ study of the 3D morphological evolution with time of a Ni-20Cr wire in a molten 50:50 mol% MgCl2:KCl salt mixture, sealed in an Ar-filled quartz capillary, are shown in Fig. 3 (for further details see Section S2 of the supporting information). Rapid morphological evolution caused by corrosion is seen from the pristine sample in Fig. 3(a) after only 16 min in the molten salt at 800°C [Fig. 3(b)]. This structure continues to corrode and forms a bicontinuous 3D network of pores by 33 min [Fig. 3(c)], analogous to the dealloying process which forms nano- and meso-porous structures for functional applications (Erlebacher et al., 2001; Zhao et al., 2017, 2019; Chen-Wiegart et al., 2013). The corrosion process slows in 33–185 min [Figs. 3(c) and 3(d)] as the Cr has probably been depleted and Ni itself corrodes at a slower rate. At this later time point, structural coarsening is expected as surface diffusion drives changes in surface curvature to lower the overall free energy of the system. The result demonstrates the feasibility of studying materials evolution in molten salts or other extreme environments under in situ conditions.
3.2. 3D nano-tomography at elevated temperature to study pore formation in icosahedral quasicrystals
Quasicrystals (QCs) are solids that exhibit long-range order but no periodicity. Since their discovery over 30 years ago (Shechtman et al., 1984), a vast number of quasicrystal-forming alloys have been discovered from which single QCs with a high degree of structural perfection can be grown (Tsai et al., 1987; Ritsch, 1996). Nevertheless, defects such as pores [so-called `negative crystals' (Sunagawa, 1981)] are still present and are thought to be influenced by the peculiar properties of QCs. Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the extended porosity in QCs, and particularly in the icosahedral Al–Pd–Mn phase. The first concerns the condensation of vacancies (Beeli et al., 1998) and the second invokes a structure model which considers `hierarchical porosity' as an intrinsic feature (Janot et al., 1998).
To assess the validity of these hypotheses, we investigated the structural transformation of a melt-spun Al70Pd20Mn10 alloy (in the form of a micropillar) during heat treatment. No inherent porosity was detected at the earliest stage of annealing; however, we observe the of pores at the surface of the sample after 42 min of annealing. As the pores grow, they develop facets [Figs. 4(a) and 4(b)] fully consistent with the solid–vapor Wulff shape of QCs (Beeli et al., 1998; Mancini et al., 1998). Altogether these results point to the strong influence of vacancy diffusion on porosity formation. Pore formation requires a vacancy S of thermal vacancies (Gastaldi et al., 2006), which we calculate to be S ≫ 1 (see Section S3 of the supporting information), assuming that all vacancies existing at the melting temperature (Tm) condense into pores below Tm. Vacancies may also be created during high-temperature oxidation: the metal cations diffuse from the oxide/alloy interface into the oxide, leaving behind an equal number of vacancies. The vacancies then coalesce into voids beneath the oxide layer (Oleksak et al., 2018). The behavior of these vacancies is not considered in conventional oxidation theory (Wagner, 1933), which assumes that they are constantly annihilated at the oxide/alloy interface (Gibbs & Hales, 1977). The observation of multiple pores on the external surfaces via scanning electon microscopy (SEM) [Fig. 4(c)] further supports this idea.
4. Conclusions
A compact in situ heater has been designed, fabricated and commissioned at NSLS-II. The module demonstrated a high level of stability for targeted TXM imaging experiments. The excellent performance, simplicity and versatility of its design make this heater suitable for use in a broad range of scientific applications in materials research and beyond. We should point out that the design presented here is targeted specifically at TXM applications. The field of view in TXM experiments is small (<50 µm) so a temperature gradient up to 10°C mm−1 would be acceptable. To work with a larger sample and field of view, it would be necessary to scale up the furnace size to provide a larger uniform hot zone. Furthermore, the small furnace chamber space in the present TXM setup makes it difficult to integrate other types of sample environment controls into the furnace itself. However, it is possible to integrate certain controls into the sample holder design. For instance, it is possible to design a sample holder to include a quartz capillary to flow gas through sample during an experiment. Nonetheless, the current furnace design demonstrates an approach that provides precise heat management at the sample position and in the ambient environment around the sample. Modifications to this basic design could lead to a customized furnace design that is suitable for versatile tasks that address user-specific experimental requirements.
5. Related literature
The following references are cited in the supporting information: Dovbenko et al. (2005); Dowd et al. (1999); Gursoy et al. (2014); Rivers (2012); Sato et al. (2003).
Supporting information
Supporting Sections S1 to S3 and Figures S1 to S4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577520004567/mo5216sup1.pdf
Acknowledgements
Michael Maklary, James Biancarosa, Steve Bennett, Barrett Clay and Steven LaMarra are acknowledged for their technical support. Jun Ma is acknowledged for the control engineering support. We thank these NSLS-II staff for helpful discussion: Andrew Kiss, Stuart Campbell, Daniel Olds, Andrew Walter and Lori Stiegler. Chen-Wiegart group members are acknowledged for conducting the molten salt part of the FXI beamtime experiment together and assisting with preliminary analysis: Cheng-Hung Lin, Xiaoyang Liu, Lijie Zou, Qingkun Meng and Chonghang Zhao. Shahani group members are acknowledged for assisting in collecting rapid 3D tomography data George R. Lindemann and Paul Chao. The authors thank: Phillip Halstenberg, Shannon M. Mahurin and Sheng Dai of Oak Ridge National Laboratory for the purified salt mixture.
Funding information
This research used resources and the FXI beamline (18-ID) of the National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II), a US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) (contract No. DE-SC0012704). This work was supported as part of the Molten Salts in Extreme Environments Energy (MSEE) Frontier Research Center, which is funded at BNL by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (contract No. DE-SC0012704). MSEE work at Stony Brook University is supported by subcontract from BNL. MSEE and NSLS-II supported the development of the apparatus described in this article in equal shares. For the work on quasicrystals, IH and AS acknowledge support from the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (award No. DE-SC0019118).
References
Bale, H. A., Haboub, A., MacDowell, A. A., Nasiatka, J. R., Parkinson, D. Y., Cox, B. N., Marshall, D. B. & Ritchie, R. O. (2013). Nat. Mater. 12, 40–46. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Barnard, H. S., MacDowell, A. A., Parkinson, D. Y., Mandal, P., Czabaj, M., Gao, Y., Maillet, E., Blank, B., Larson, N. M., Ritchie, R. O., Gludovatz, B., Acevedo, C. & Liu, D. (2017). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 849, 012043. CrossRef Google Scholar
Beeli, C., Godecke, T. & Luck, R. (1998). Philos. Mag. Lett. 78, 339–348. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Cheng, J. H., Assegie, A. A., Huang, C. J., Lin, M. H., Tripathi, A. M., Wang, C. C., Tang, M. T., Song, Y. F., Su, W. N. & Hwang, B. J. (2017). J. Phys. Chem. C, 121, 7761–7766. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Chen-Wiegart, Y. K., Harris, W. M., Lombardo, J. J., Chiu, W. K. S. & Wang, J. (2012). Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 253901. Google Scholar
Chen-Wiegart, Y. K., Wada, T., Butakov, N., Xiao, X. H., De Carlo, F., Kato, H., Wang, J., Dunand, D. C. & Maire, E. (2013). J. Mater. Res. 28, 2444–2452. CAS Google Scholar
Chen-Wiegart, Y. K., Wang, S., Chu, Y. S., Liu, W. J., McNulty, I., Voorhees, P. W. & Dunand, D. C. (2012). Acta Mater. 60, 4972–4981. CAS Google Scholar
Dovbenko, O., Velikanova, T. & Balanetskyy, S. (2005). Ternary Alloy Systems. Phase Diagrams, Crystallographic and Thermodynamic Data. Group IV: Physical Chemistry. Subvolume A. MSIT Publishing. Google Scholar
Dowd, B. A., Campbell, G. H., Marr, R. B., Nagarkar, V., Tipnis, S., Axe, L. & Siddons, D. P. (1999). Proc. SPIE, 3772, 224–236. CrossRef Google Scholar
Erlebacher, J., Aziz, M. J., Karma, A., Dimitrov, N. & Sieradzki, K. (2001). Nature, 410, 450–453. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Fife, J. L., Rappaz, M., Pistone, M., Celcer, T., Mikuljan, G. & Stampanoni, M. (2012). J. Synchrotron Rad. 19, 352–358. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gastaldi, J., Schenk, T., Reinhart, G., Klein, H., Härtwig, J., Mangelinck-Noël, N., Grushko, B., Nguyen Thi, H., Pino, P., Billia, B. & Baruchel, J. (2006). Philos. Mag. 86, 335–340. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gatalo, M., Ruiz-Zepeda, F., Hodnik, N., Dražić, G., Bele, M. & Gaberšček, M. (2019). Nano Energy, 63, 103892. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Ge, M., Coburn, D. S., Nazaretski, E., Xu, W., Gofron, K., Xu, H., Yin, Z. & Lee, W.-K. (2018). Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 083109. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Gibbs, G. & Hales, R. (1977). Corros. Sci. 17, 487–507. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Gibbs, J. W., Mohan, K. A., Gulsoy, E. B., Shahani, A. J., Xiao, X., Bouman, C. A., De Graef, M. & Voorhees, P. W. (2015). Sci. Rep. 5, 11824. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Jimenez, I. D., Cats, K., Davidian, T., Ruitenbeek, M., Meirer, F., Liu, Y. J., Nelson, J., Andrews, J. C., Pianetta, P., de Groot, F. M. F. & Weckhuysen, B. M. (2012). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 11986–11990. CAS Google Scholar
Gürsoy, D., De Carlo, F., Xiao, X. & Jacobsen, C. (2014). J. Synchrotron Rad. 21, 1188–1193. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Han, I., Xiao, X., Sun, H. & Shahani, A. J. (2019). Acta Cryst. A75, 281–296. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Harris, W. M., Lombardo, J. J., Nelson, G. J., Lai, B., Wang, S., Vila-Comamala, J., Liu, M., Liu, M. & Chiu, W. K. S. (2015). Sci. Rep. 4, 5246. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Izzo, J. R., Joshi, A. S., Grew, K. N., Chiu, W. K. S., Tkachuk, A., Wang, S. H. & Yun, W. B. (2008). J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, B504–B508. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Janot, C., Loreto, L., Farinato, R., Mancini, L., Baruchel, J. & Gastaldi, J. (1998). Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Ser. 553, 55–66. CrossRef Google Scholar
Johnson, K. J., Wiegart, L., Abbott, A. C., Johnson, E. B., Baur, J. W. & Koerner, H. (2019). Langmuir, 35, 8758–8768. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kaira, C. S., Stannard, T. J., De Andrade, V., De Carlo, F. & Chawla, N. (2019). Acta Mater. 176, 242–249. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kiss, A. M., Harris, W. M., Nakajo, A., Wang, S., Vila-Comamala, J., Deriy, A. & Chiu, W. K. S. (2015). Microsc. Microanal. 21, 290–297. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Landa-Medrano, I., Sorrentino, A., Stievano, L., de Larramendi, I. R., Pereiro, E., Lezama, L., Rojo, T. & Tonti, D. (2017). Nano Energy, 37, 224–231. CAS Google Scholar
Li, L., Chen-Wiegart, Y. K., Wang, J., Gao, P., Ding, Q., Yu, Y.-S., Wang, F., Cabana, J., Wang, J. & Jin, S. (2015). Nat. Commun. 6, 6883. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, X., Vonk, D., Jiang, H., Kisslinger, K., Tong, X., Ge, M., Nazaretski, E., Ravel, B., Foster, K., Petrash, S. & Chen-Wiegart, Y. K. (2019). ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2, 1920–1929. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mancini, L., Janot, C., Loreto, L., Farinato, R., Gastaldi, J. & Baruchel, J. (1998). Philos. Mag. Lett. 78, 159–167. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mao, W. L., Lin, Y., Liu, Y. J. & Liu, J. (2019). Engineering, 5, 479–489. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Milhet, X., Nait-Ali, A., Tandiang, D., Liu, Y. J., Van Campen, D., Caccuri, V. & Legros, M. (2018). Acta Mater. 156, 310–317. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Misra, A. K. & Whittenberger, J. D. (1987). Proceedings of 22nd Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC), 10–14 August, 1987, Philadelphia, PA, p. 9226. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Google Scholar
Moniri, S., Xiao, X. & Shahani, A. J. (2019). Sci. Rep. 9, 3381. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Oleksak, R. P., Kapoor, M., Perea, D. E., Holcomb, G. R. & Doğan, Ö. N. (2018). npj Mater. Degrad. 2, 25. CrossRef Google Scholar
Raiman, S. S. & Lee, S. (2018). J. Nucl. Mater. 511, 523–535. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ritsch, S. (1996). Philos. Mag. Lett. 74, 99–106. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Rivers, M. L. (2012). Proc. SPIE, 8506, 850628. Google Scholar
Ruh, A. & Spiegel, M. (2006). Corros. Sci. 48, 679–695. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sato, K., Baier, F., Rempel, A. A., Sprengel, W. & Schaefer, H. E. (2003). Phys. Rev. B, 68, 214203. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Shahani, A. J., Xiao, X. & Voorhees, P. W. (2016). Nat. Commun. 7, 12953. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Shechtman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D. & Cahn, J. W. (1984). Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1951–1953. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sohal, M. S., Ebner, M. A., Sabharwall, P. & Sharpe, P. (2010). Engineering Database of Liquid Salt Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties, https://www.osti.gov/biblio/980801-engineering-database-liquid-salt-thermophysical-thermochemical-properties. Google Scholar
Sridharan, K., Allen, T., Anderson, M. & Simpson, M. (2012). Thermal Properties of LiCl-KCl Molten Salt for Nuclear Waste Separation Idaho Falls. Technical Report. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA; Idaho National Laboratory, ID, USA (https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1058922/). Google Scholar
Sunagawa, I. (1981). Bull. Minéral. 104, 81–87. CAS Google Scholar
Topsøe, H. (2003). J. Catal. 216, 155–164. Google Scholar
Tsai, A. P., Inoue, A. & Masumoto, T. (1987). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 26, L1994–L1996. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Tsai, P. C., Wen, B. H., Wolfman, M., Choe, M. J., Pan, M. S., Su, L., Thornton, K., Cabana, J. & Chiang, Y. M. (2018). Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 860–871. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Voorhees, P. W. (1985). J. Stat. Phys. 38, 231–252. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Wagner, C. (1933). Z. Phys. Chem. 21, 25–41. Google Scholar
Waldmann, T., Wilka, M., Kasper, M., Fleischhammer, M. & Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M. (2014). J. Power Sources, 262, 129–135. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Williams, D., Toth, L. & Clarno, K. (2006). Technical Report ORNL/TM-2006/12. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, USA (https://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/Files/Pub57476.pdf). Google Scholar
Xu, Y. H., Hu, E. Y., Zhan, K., Wang, X. L., Borzenets, V., Sun, Z. H., Pianetta, P., Yu, X. Q., Liu, Y. J., Yang, X. Q. & Li, H. (2017). ACS Energy Lett. 2, 1240–1245. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Xu, R., Zhang, K., Lee, S., Mu, L., Liu, P., Waters, C. K., Spence, S., Xu, Z., Wei, C., Kautz, D. J., Yuan, Q., Dong, Y., Yu, Y., Xiao, X., Lee, H., Pianetta, P., Cloetens, P., Lee, J., Zhao, K., Lin, F. & Liu, Y. (2019). Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1900674. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhao, C., Wada, T., De Andrade, V., Gürsoy, D., Kato, H. & Chen-Wiegart, Y. K. (2018). Nano Energy, 52, 381–390. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zhao, C. H., Kisslinger, K., Huang, X. J., Lu, M., Camino, F., Lin, C. H., Yan, H. F., Nazaretski, E., Chu, Y., Ravel, B., Liu, M. Z. & Chen-Wiegart, Y. K. (2019). Mater. Horiz. 6, 1991–2002. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zhao, C. H., Wada, T., De Andrade, V., Williams, G. J., Gelb, J., Li, L., Thieme, J., Kato, H. & Chen-Wiegart, Y. K. (2017). Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 9, 34172–34184. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.