research papers
In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopic studies of photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) to less toxic As(V) by TiO2 nanotubes
aDepartment of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan, and bDepartment of Safety, Health and Environmental Engineering, National United University, Miaoli 36003, Taiwan
*Correspondence e-mail: wanghp@mail.ncku.edu.tw
Arsenic in groundwater caused the black-foot disease (BFD) in many countries in the 1950–1960s. It is of great importance to develop a feasible method for removal of arsenic from contaminated groundwater in BFD endemic areas. Photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) to less toxic As(V) is, therefore, of significance for preventing any arsenic-related disease that may occur. By in situ synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy, the formation of As(V) is related to the expense of As(III) disappearance during by TiO2 nanotubes (TNTs). Under UV/Vis light irradiation, the apparent first-order for the photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) to As(V) is 0.0148 min−1. It seems that As(III) can be oxidized with photo-excited holes while the not-recombined electrons may be scavenged with O2 in the channels of the well defined TNTs (an opening of 7 nm in diameter). In the absence of O2, on the contrary, As(III) can be reduced to As(0), to some extent. Cu(II) (CuO), as an was impregnated on the TNTs surfaces in order to gain a better understanding of during It appears that As(III) can be oxidized to As(V) while Cu(II) is reduced to Cu(I) and Cu(0). The molecular-scale data are very useful in revealing the oxidation states and interconversions of arsenic during the photocatalytic reactions. This work has implications in that the toxicity of arsenic in contaminated groundwater or wastewater can be effectively decreased via solar-driven which may facilitate further treatments by coagulation.
Keywords: arsenic; in situ XANES; TiO2 nanotube; photocatalysis.
1. Introduction
Arsenic, which may cause brain, liver, lung, kidney, bladder and skin damage, has frequently been found in wastewater and groundwater in Bangladesh, India, Taiwan, Vietnam, Japan, Argentina, Mexico, Germany and USA (Singh et al., 2015; Matta & Gjyli, 2016; Cicero et al., 2017; Nazari et al., 2017; Gomaa et al., 2018). Arsenic-contaminated groundwater may be caused by natural weathering, dissolution of arsenic-bearing minerals as well as human activities such as burning of fossil fuels, mining, wood preservatives, pesticides and fertilizers. The maximum contaminant allowance of arsenic in drinking water was decreased from 50 to 10 µg L−1 by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the World Health Organization (Nazari et al., 2017; Marinho et al., 2019; Vera et al., 2016). It is worth noting that As(III) has a greater toxicity (by 60 times approximately) and mobility than As(V) (Cicero et al., 2017; Nazari et al., 2017; Vera et al., 2016; López-Muñoz et al., 2017; Byrne et al., 2018).
The common arsenic compounds that occur naturally are neutral H3AsO3 [As(III)] and HAsO42- [As(V)] when the groundwater pH is less than 9.2 (Emmanuel et al., 2019). Concentrations of arsenic (somewhat >500 p.p.m.) in wastewater could be decreased by with iron and aluminium salts; nevertheless, this has suffered from relatively low effectiveness and additional hazardous sludge to be treated (López-Muñoz et al., 2017; Lata & Samadder, 2016). Pre-oxidation of As(III) to As(V) may facilitate the (Pires et al., 2015). Chlorine, sodium hypochlorite, chlorine dioxide, ozone, hydrogen peroxide, permanganate (or manganese dioxide) and Fenton's reagents were frequently used in the oxidation of As(III) in wastewater (Ebrahiem et al., 2017; Butnariu et al., 2019). However, carcinogenic by-products such as halogenated hydrocarbons in those chemical oxidation processes may be formed (Lata & Samadder, 2016).
Molecular-scale data such as ; Huang et al., 2003; Lin & Wang, 2000; Liu & Wang, 2004). By in the previous studies, we found that copper oxide clusters are involved in catalytic decomposition of NO and oxidization of chlorophenols (in supercritical water) (Huang et al., 2003). These molecular-scale data turned out to be very useful in revealing the nature of the catalytic active species and reaction paths involved (Kang & Wang, 2013; Huang et al., 2003; Lin & Wang, 2000; Liu & Wang, 2004). In separate experiments, by XANES, arsenic humic substance complexes were found to be associated with the black-foot disease that occurred in the seashore towns of Southwest Taiwan in the 1960s (Wang et al., 2003). Studies on the photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) to less toxic As(V) are, therefore, of significance for preventing any arsenic-related disease that may occur.
(CN), bond distance and of select elements in a complicated matrix can be determined by X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine-structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy (Kang & Wang, 2013TiO2, possessing unique characteristics such as effective band-gap energy (3.0 eV) and high photo-stability, oxidation potential and availability, has been widely used in photocatalytic degradation of toxic organics, splitting of H2O, and reduction of NO to N2 (Meng et al., 2015; Mikhaylov et al., 2013; Ali & Metwally, 2014). Photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) effected by TiO2, considered an environmentally friendly and economically attractive method, has gained great attention (Ryu & Choi, 2006; Yazdani et al., 2017; Lescano et al., 2014). However, a better understanding of the chemical structure of arsenic during photocatalytic oxidation is still lacking in the literature (Ryu & Choi, 2006). TiO2 nanotubes (TNTs) containing a defined channel structure could be used for molecular-scale studies of arsenic during photocatalytic oxidation (Ge et al., 2016; Crişan et al., 2018; Nakata & Fujishima, 2012; Zhang et al., 2015; Lijuan et al., 2016). Thus the main objective of this work was to study the photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) effected by TNTs. Specifically, an in situ XANES spectroscopic cell that allows synchrotron X-ray as well as UV/Vis light irradiation simultaneously onto the TNTs during was used to reveal the photocatalytic reaction paths.
2. Materials and methods
The TNT photocatalysts were prepared by hydrothermal treatments of 12.5 g of nano TiO2 (P25, Degussa) and 100 ml of NaOH (10 M, Merck) in a Teflon-lined autoclave at 380 K (under autogenous pressure) for three weeks to yield lamellar TiO2 (Zhang et al., 2015). The TNTs were obtained by scrolling the lamellar TiO2 at a pH value of 7 (adjusted with a 0.2 N sulfuric acid solution) (Lijuan et al., 2016). Copper [Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (Fluka, 99%)] was impregnated on the TNT to yield a 5% CuO/TNT sample, which was dried at 333–345 K for 3 h and calcined at 573 K for 4 h before experiments.
Photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) (NaAsO2) (Fluka) (10 mM) by the TNT was conducted with a home-made total reflectance photoreactor under UV/Vis light irradiation (250–800 nm) using a 300 W high-pressure Xe arc lamp (Newport, Model 6258). Images of the TNT photocatalyst were determined by high-resolution (TEM) (JEM-3010, Jeol). Surface areas of the samples were measured on a Micromeritics analyzer (ASAP 2020).
The in situ Ti K-edge XANES and spectra of arsenics compounds were determined on the wiggler beamline (17C) at the Taiwan National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center. Nano TiO2 (P25), TNT and CuO/TNT (100 g L−1) were used for photocatalytic oxidation under irradation [300 W high-pressure Xe arc lamp (Newport, Model 6258)]. A XANES spectroscopic cell that allows synchrotron X-ray and UV/Vis light simultaneously onto the photocatalysts during was employed (Hsiung et al., 2006). A Si(111) double-crystal monochromator was used for selection of energy with an energy resolution (ΔE/E) of 1.9 × 10−4. Beam energy was calibrated by the adsorption edge of an arsenic powder at an energy of 11867 eV. All experimental data were collected in the fluorescence mode (Lytle detector). The of arsenic in the TNT photocatalyst was determined at the half-height (precisely determined by the derivative) of the XANES spectrum after the pre-edge baseline subtraction and normalization to the maximum post-edge absorption. Semi-quantitative analyses of the edge spectra were conducted by the least-square fitting of the linear combination of standard spectra such as NaAsO2 and Na2HAsO4 (Fluka). On average, an uncertainty limit of 5% corresponding to an error of ∼2.0% in the fitting results was found. The isolated data were normalized to the edge jump and converted to the wavenumber scale. Coordination numbers of arsenic were systematically varied in the course of the analysis within a given fitting range. Fitting model compounds was performed using FEFFIT from UWXAFS 3.0 in combination with the multiple-scattering code FEFF 8.0 simulation programs (Kang & Wang, 2013; Hsiung et al., 2006).
3. Results and discussion
The TEM image of the TNT photocatalyst is shown in Fig. 1. It is clear that the TNTs have a one-dimensional multi-wall tubular structure with a pore opening of about 7 nm and a length between 50 and 100 nm. In Fig. 2, a hysteresis loop at P/P0 > 0.60 is found, which may be associated with the mesoporous structure in the TNT. The TNT has a higher surface area (286 m2 g−1), which is mainly contributed by its mesopores, than the nano TiO2 (47 m2 g−1).
The in situ XANES spectra of arsenic during photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) by the TNT are shown in Fig. 3. The white-line absorptions of model compounds such as NaAsO2 [As(III)] and Na2HAsO4 [As(V)] are observed at 11872 and 11876 eV, respectively. Under UV/Vis light irradiation for 210 min, the white-line absorption of arsenic is blue-shifted to 11876 eV, suggesting that the adsorbed As(III) on the TNT photocatalysts has been oxidized and forms As(V) (see Fig. 3). The component-fitted XANES spectra of arsenic under the UV/Vis light irradiation for 60 min (shown in the inset of Fig. 3) reveal oxidation (about 46%) of As(III) to As(V) on the TNT surface.
The k range 4.0–13.5 Å−1. Their Debye–Waller factors (σ2) are less than 0.01 Å2 (see Table 1). The first-shell bond distances (As—O) of As(III) (NaAsO2) and As(V) (Na2HAsO4) are 1.76 and 1.67 Å, respectively. Adsorption of As(III) on the TNT (without UV/Vis light irradiation) leads to an increase of averaged As—O bond distance (1.76 → 1.77 Å) and CN (2.8 → 3.9) if compared with the NaAsO2 model compound. Moreover, a decrease of the averaged first-shell As—O bond distance (from 1.77 to 1.67 Å) and an increase of its CN (3.9 → 5.3) is also found during photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) on the TNT photocatalyst.
spectra of arsenic during photocatalytic oxidation effected by the TNT photocatalyst have also been recorded and analyzed in the
|
In Fig. 4, the interconversion of As(III) to As(V), as the formation of As(V) is at the expense of As(III) disappearance during is observed. Complete oxidation of As(III) on the TNT photocatalysts is observed after 210 min of UV/Vis light irradiation. Note that on the nano TiO2 (P25), the interconversion of As(III) to As(V) is not very effective, i.e. approximately 17% by the nano TiO2 versus 90% by the TNT for 180 min irradiation (see Fig. 4). This has significant implications in that, in the well defined channels of the TNT, enhanced photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) may occur. Generally, hydroxyl radicals and superoxide radicals (yielded via photoexcited electron–hole pairs) may oxidize As(III) to form As(IV) species [such as AsIV(OH)4, AsIVO3−, HAsIVO3− and AsIVO32−] (López-Muñoz et al., 2017). Nevertheless, the As(IV) intermediate species are not found by in situ XANES (see Fig. 4) in this study. Oxidation of As(III) to yield As(V) is the main photocatalytic reaction by the TNT in the presence of O2 (in air). Dutta and co-workers found that photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) effected by nano TiO2 following the zero-order kinetics (López-Muñoz et al., 2017). In the present work, photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) on the nano TiO2 also proceeds in the zero-order reaction kinetics. It seems that photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) to As(V) occurs mainly on the internal surfaces of the well defined mesopore in the TNT.
The photocatalytic interconversion of As(III) to As(V) on the CuO/TNT is also shown in Fig. 4. CuO could promote separation of electron–hole pairs and enhance photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) on nano TiO2 (López-Muñoz et al., 2017). In the present study, about 28% of As(V) is formed from photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) by the CuO/TNT for 210 min irradiation. It seems that the CuO [Cu(II)] may perturb oxidation between photocatalytically excited holes and adsorbed As(III) on TNT surfaces.
The illustration for the photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) effected by the TNT is shown in Fig. 5. The in situ XANES spectra indicate that As(III) can be photocatalytically oxidized to mainly As(V) by the TNT in the presence of O2 (in air) under UV/Vis light irradiation for 210 min. On the nano TiO2, the zero-order reaction is 8.56 µM min−1, while the apparent reaction (k) for the pseudo first-order interconversion of As(III) to As(V) [ln (C0/C) = kt] catalyzed by TNT is 0.0148 min−1.
It is clear that, in the presence of O2 (in air), As(V) is the exclusive species yielded from effected by TNT. It seems that dissolved oxygen acts as an electron scavenger [see Fig. 5(a)]. Note that, in Fig. 6, the XANES spectra between those for As(0) and As(III) are observed after effected by TNT for 210 min irradiation, suggesting that As(III) can be reduced to yield As(0), to some extent, in the absence of O2.
Also, to enhance separation of photo-excited electron–hole pairs, photocatalytic oxidation of As(III) is carried out in the presence of 5% CuO/TNT [Fig. 5(b)]. CuO [Cu(II)] can also scavenge electrons. In Fig. 7, after effected by the CuO/TNT for 90 and 180 min irradiation, lower copper [Cu(I) and Cu(0)] is found at the expense of the Cu(II) disappearance while As(III) is oxidized to As(V) on the TNT. Note that the intense band (white line) at 8994–9002 eV can be attributed to the 1s-to-4p transition, indicating the existence of the Cu(II) species, while Cu(0) and Cu(I) species are found at 8982 and 8982–8984 eV, respectively.
4. Conclusions
Observations by in situ XANES spectroscopy suggest that As(III) can be oxidized with photo-excited holes while the not-recombined electrons may be scavenged with O2 on the surfaces of TNTs during The apparent first-order for the photocatalytic inter-conversion of As(III) to As(V) is 0.0148 min−1. Without O2, As(III) can be reduced, to some extent. When Cu(II) (CuO) was dispersed on the TNT surfaces, an can cause As(III) to be oxidized to As(V) while low-oxidation state coppers [Cu(I) and Cu(0)] are formed. The molecular-scale data obtained using the in situ synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy may implement a better and energy-efficient method for oxidation of arsenic by solar-driven to reduce toxicity, and may facilitate further treatment by coagulation.
Acknowledgements
The financial support of the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology, Bureau of Energy, and National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC) are gratefully. We also thank Y. W. Yang and Jyh-Fu Lee of the NSRRC for their assistance with the X-ray absorption experiments.
References
Ali, B. & Metwally, M. (2014). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 7146–7160. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Butnariu, I. C., Stoian, O., Voicu, Ş., Iovu, H. & Paraschiv, G. (2019). Ann. Fac. Eng. Hunedoara, 17, 175–179. CAS Google Scholar
Byrne, C., Subramanian, G. & Pillai, S. C. (2018). J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 6, 3531–3555. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Cicero, C. E., Mostile, G., Vasta, R., Rapisarda, V., Signorelli, S. S., Ferrante, M., Zappia, M. & Nicoletti, A. (2017). Environ. Res. 159, 82–94. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Crişan, M., Mardare, D., Ianculescu, A., Drăgan, N., Niţoi, I., Crişan, D., Voicescu, M., Todan, L., Oancea, P., Adomniţei, C., Dobromir, M., Gabrovska, M. & Vasile, B. (2018). Appl. Surf. Sci. 455, 201–215. Google Scholar
Ebrahiem, E. E., Al-Maghrabi, M. N. & Mobarki, A. R. (2017). Arab. J. Chem. 10, S1674–S1679. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Emmanuel, B., Makhatha, E. & Nheta, W. (2019). Energy Proc. 157, 966–971. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ge, M., Cao, C., Li, S., Tang, Y., Wang, L., Qi, J., Huang, J., Zhang, K., Al-Deyab, S. S. & Lai, Y. (2016). Nanoscale, 8, 5226–5234. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gomaa, H., Shenashen, M. A., Yamaguchi, H., Alamoudi, A. S., Abdelmottaleb, M., Cheira, M. F. & El-Safty, S. A. (2018). J. Cleaner Production, 182, 910–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hsiung, T. L., Wang, H. P., Lu, Y. M. & Hsiao, M. C. (2006). Radiat. Phys. Chem. 75, 2054–2057. CAS Google Scholar
Huang, Y. J., Paul Wang, H. & Lee, J. F. (2003). Appl. Catal. Environ. 40, 111–118. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kang, H. Y. & Wang, H. P. (2013). Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 7380–7387. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lata, S. & Samadder, S. R. (2016). J. Environ. Manage. 166, 387–406. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lescano, M., Zalazar, C. & Brandi, R. (2014). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 3865–3875. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Lijuan, H., Zheng, M., Zhihe, L., Gang, L., Jiantai, M. & Xingcai, A. (2016). RSC Adv. 6, 6643–6650. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Lin, K. S. & Wang, H. P. (2000). Langmuir, 16, 2627–2631. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Liu, S. H. & Wang, H. P. (2004). J. Environ. Qual. 33, 1280–1287. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
López-Muñoz, M. J., Arencibia, A., Segura, Y. & Raez, J. M. (2017). Catal. Today, 280, 149–154. Google Scholar
Marinho, B. A., Cristóvão, R. O., Boaventura, R. A. R. & Vilar, V. J. P. (2019). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 2203–2227. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Matta, G. & Gjyli, L. (2016). J. Chem. Pharm. Sci. 9, 718–725. CAS Google Scholar
Meng, J. P., Shang, C. L., Yu, C. L. & Chang, C. H. (2015). J. Hazard. Mater. 288, 168–175. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Mikhaylov, R. V., Lisachenko, A. A., Shelimov, B. N., Kazansky, V. B., Martra, G. & Coluccia, S. (2013). J. Phys. Chem. C, 117, 10345–10352. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Nakata, K. & Fujishima, A. (2012). J. Photochem. Photobiol. Photochem. Rev. 13, 169–189. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Nazari, A. M., Radzinski, R. & Ghahreman, A. (2017). Hydrometallurgy, 174, 258–281. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Pires, V. G. R., Lima, D. R. S., Aquino, S. F. D. & Libânio, M. (2015). Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 32, 409–419. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Ryu, J. & Choi, W. (2006). Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 7034–7039. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Singh, R., Singh, S., Parihar, P., Singh, V. P. & Prasad, S. M. (2015). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 112, 247–270. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vera, R., Fontàs, C. & Anticó, E. (2016). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24, 10939–10948. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Wang, H. C., Wang, H. P., Peng, C. Y., Liu, H. L. & Huang, H. L. (2003). Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 71, 798–803. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Yazdani, M., Bhatnagar, A. & Vahala, R. (2017). Chem. Eng. J. 316, 370–382. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Jiang, Z., Huang, H., Lim, L. Y., Li, W., Deng, J., Gong, D., Tang, Y., Lai, Y. & Chen, Z. (2015). J. R. Soc. Chem. 5, 79479–79510. CAS Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.