view article
Figure 10
Left: comparison of sinograms after different denoising procedures on the Shepp–Logan phantom with noise as in (14)[link] with [{\rm{std}}(\eta_{{}_{{\rm{P}}}})] = 0.02 and signal peak 2560. Top to bottom: [Y = \ln[A+\pi/(1+\eta_{{}_{{\rm{P}}}})]]; Z; Münch et al. (2009BB1)BB20; Vo et al. (2018BB1)BB26; proposed procedure based on BM3D denoising. Right: corresponding estimation errors. Note how both of the comparison methods create strong artifacts around the areas with the highest contrast, as pointed by the arrows. These artifacts are not present in either the noisy image Z or the BM3D-based estimate.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Volume 28| Part 3| May 2021| Pages 876-888
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577521001910
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS