actinides physics and chemistry
X-ray absorption spectroscopy and actinide electrochemistry: a setup dedicated to radioactive samples applied to neptunium chemistry
aCEA, DES, ISEC, DMRC, Université de Montpellier, Marcoule, France, bCEA, DES-Service d'Etudes Analytiques et de Réactivité des Surfaces (SEARS), CEA, Université Paris-Sacly, 911191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France, cESTA–École Supérieure des Technologies et des Affaires, 90004 Belfort Cedex, France, and dSynchrotron SOLEIL, L'Orme des Merisiers Saint-Aubin, BP 48, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France
*Correspondence e-mail: thomas.dumas@cea.fr, michel.schlegel@cea.fr
A spectroelectrochemical setup has been developed to investigate radioactive elements in small volumes (0.7 to 2 ml) under oxidation–reduction (redox) controlled conditions by in situ measurements performed during neptunium redox reactions. Cycling experiments on the NpO22+/NpO2+ redox couple were applied to qualify the cell electrodynamics using XANES measurements and its ability to probe modifications in the neptunyl hydration shell in a 1 mol l−1 HNO3 solution. The results are in agreement with previous structural studies and the NpO22+/NpO2+ standard potential, determined using Nernst methods, is consistent with measurements based on other techniques. Subsequently, the NpO2+, NpO22+ and Np4+ ion structures in solution were stabilized and measured using The resulting fit parameters are again compared with other results from the literature and with theoretical models in order to evaluate how this spectroelectrochemistry experiment succeeds or fails to stabilize the oxidation states of actinides. The experiment succeeded in: (i) implementing a robust and safe device to investigate unstable radioactive species, (ii) evaluate in a reproducible manner the NpO22+/NpO2+ standard potential under dilute conditions and (iii) clarify mechanistic aspects of the actinyl hydration sphere in solution. In contrast, a detailed comparison of fit parameters shows that this method is less appropriate than the majority of the previously reported chemical methods for the stabilization of the Np4+ ion.
The cell design is presented together withKeywords: X-ray absorption spectroscopy; XAS; actinide; electrochemistry; radioactive sample; neptunium chemistry.
1. Introduction
In situ in combination with electrochemical techniques is a powerful combination for determining the coordination of metal ions at a controlled in various electrolytes (Nockemann et al., 2009; Achilli et al., 2016). Such an in situ approach is nowadays commonly applied for d-block elements and rare earth compounds, but is still very limited for actinide elements (An). These elements display unusual redox properties and complexation behaviour (Brown, 1978). Understanding the equilibria between oxidized and reduced species, the formation of intermediate unstable species and the magnitude of relevant redox couples under the conditions of interest is essential for predicting An chemistry in industrial and natural environments. Specifically, the characterization of intermediate species or unstable oxidation states is of fundamental interest in understanding how the internal structures of An molecular complexes affect their reactivity and the exchange between oxidation states.
To investigate these reactions at the molecular scale using et al., 1997). The limited volume of this cell (5 ml) allowed for the characterization of radioactive samples using a limited amount of hazardous radionuclide with a concentration range (10−2 to 10−4 mol l−1) that corresponds to measurements. Thus, this cell has been used to investigate An redox chemistry under acidic conditions (Soderholm et al., 1999), alkaline conditions (Williams et al., 2001) and on frontier elements such as berkelium (Antonio et al., 2002). Subsequent research monitoring actinide and radioactive elements coordination during in situ electroactive processes was performed with less active nucleides, such as U (Hennig et al., 2005) or Tc (Antonio et al., 2002; Poineau et al., 2006). Although high-activity samples (Np and Pu) were used in several experiments in recent years, their combination with an electrochemical setup was hampered for various safety reasons. To contribute to this effort and to overcome these limitations, we have developed an electrochemical–XAS setup available for high-activity samples. The setup was designed taking into account specific requirements: (i) a small sample volume to limit radioactivity and permit the study of highly radioactive materials; (ii) the possibility to perform reproducible electrochemical reactions in situ (i.e. directly on the beamline) with highly radioactive material during an experiment; (iii) (moderate) flexibility in the choice of working, reference and counter electrodes; (iv) easy access and handling to limit the risk of spillover during sample preparation; (v) tightness and number of barriers satisfying the synchrotron safety requirements for the handling of radioactive samples; and (vi) a small overall size to facilitate transport between the synchrotron facility and actinide laboratories. The cell has been successfully implemented on the MARS beamline at the SOLEIL synchrotron (LLorens et al., 2014). The first set of experiments was performed in 1 M NHO3 to follow in situ structural and electronic changes of the neptunium ions under potentiometric control. The results demonstrate the capacities and limits of such a microcell setup and are discussed in comparison with purely Np electrochemistry results (i.e. laboratory scale and no X-ray techniques) (Cohen & Hindman, 1952; Cohen et al., 1954; Takao et al., 2009; Hindman et al., 1958; Sornein et al., 2009; Kihara et al., 1999; Kim et al., 2004, 2005; Cohen, 1961; Zielen et al., 1958) or previous structural studies (Bonin et al., 2009; Allen et al., 1997; Di Giandomenico et al., 2009; Combes et al., 1992; Reich et al., 2000; Soderholm et al., 1999; Hennig et al., 2005; Williams et al., 2001; Den Auwer et al., 1999; Scheinost et al., 2016; Antonio et al., 1997, 2001, 2012; Ikeda-Ohno et al., 2008, 2009).
a spectroelectrochemical cell was designed at Argonne National Laboratory (USA) (AntonioWhile the main aim was to check the ability of the setup to proceed safely with the combination of electrochemistry and
measurements under confined conditions, a more critical evaluation of the structural results is also proposed. The systematic comparison of the structural parameters extracted from (i) this work, (ii) formal works and (iii) theoretical calculations is proposed. This allows for a better understanding of the main benefits of such an electrochemical cell concept, but also some limitations that should not be ignored.2. MARS electrochemical–XAS setup
The setup was designed to facilitate electrochemical control of a limited volume (700 to 2000 µl) of radioactive solution or suspension while at the same time guaranteeing double confinement of these hazardous samples and allowing relatively easy handling in the laboratory and on the beamline. The setup was made of an inner cell and an outer envelope (Fig. 1). The inner cell is made of PEEK, a material that is relatively inert, and thus can be used for acidic, basic and even non-aqueous solutions compatible with this material (such as room-temperature ionic liquids and organic solutions like dodecane or heptane). Two X-ray windows are obtained by locally thinning the inner cell walls down to 200 µm. This design limits the risk of leaking at the X-ray windows, while providing a moderate X-ray attenuation (95% of the X-ray transmitted at 17 keV). This cell is enclosed in a secondary containment, also made of PEEK, to prevent dispersion in case of inner cell failure. The inner cell is rotated at 45° with respect to the incident beam, and three windows made of 90 µm Kapton film sealed with three screwed clamping rings to the second envelope provide paths for the incident beam, the transmitted beam and the fluorescence signal. The path length of the transmitted X-ray beam in the inner cell is about 11 mm.
The volumes of liquid that can be introduced in the inner cell vary between 750 (the minimum volume to soak up the windows) and 2000 µl. The bulk solution is steered (600 rpm) by a magnetic bar driven by a stirrer located outside the second envelope. Bulk electrolysis is then performed in the inner cell.
The electrodes are screwed and glued onto the lid of the inner cell to further limit possible leaking of fluids. The nature and distribution of electrodes can be tailored to meet the need of a specific experiment. For example, the et al., 2018, 2020). The counter-electrode can plunge directly into the solution or, alternatively, it can be isolated from the main solution by a tube closed by a porous frit acting as a salt bridge. This setup somewhat hinders parasitic reactions on the electrode surface which might disturb the desired reaction of actinide redox transformation.
can be made of platinum or any other metallic material, or even carbon. Our conventional is an Ag/AgCl microelectrode (World Precision Instruments). However, any other microelectrode could in principle be used, provided it can fit through the inlet (4 mm in diameter) and be reasonably short (a few cm) and sturdy. In a more recent experiment, a homemade dedicated to room-temperature ionic liquids was also used in the same cell (BengioThe setup performance was assessed by experiments of Np redox in 1 M HNO3. The is a platinum coiled electrode and the is Pt wire separated from the buck by a tube closed by a porous frit. The is a 2 mm-diameter Ag/AgCl microelectrode from World Precision Instrument. Preliminary tests with the counter-electrode bathed directly in the experimental solution failed to achieve quantitative oxidation (or reduction) up to the target although the target potentials had been validated previously by spectroelectrochemical UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy. Instead of a progressive change in under the applied conditions, competitive side reactions seems to occur and are manifested by important current flow but no significant changes in redox speciation. For the later experiments, the counter-electrode was placed in the frit-sealed tube, which resulted in a reproducible experiment that is presented in the following results.
3. Experimental
3.1. Sample preparation
The sample preparation was performed in a V stock solution was checked with a UV–Vis spectrometer (Carry). A sample of 0.1 mM NpV was transferred to the inner cell via a dedicated holder. The filling hole was then closed with a screw and sealed with epoxy glue. Basic tests were performed in the laboratory to check for a correct electrochemical behaviour of the cell. The second envelope was then closed and the cell can be easily shipped due to its relatively small size.
laboratory at the ATALANTE facility (CEA Marcoule, France) in a dedicated glove-box. The purity of the of the Np3.2. experiment
The electrochemical cell was installed on the CX3 station of the MARS beamline, which is dedicated to et al., 2009; LLorens et al., 2014). A 13-element HPGe solid-state detector (ORTEC) was used to collect the Np signal in fluorescence mode. The energy calibration of the monochromator was performed at the yttrium K-edge. All measurements were performed at room temperature.
(Jeanson3.3. Bulk electrolysis
Bulk electrolysis was performed over a period of 30 min using a remote-controlled potentiostat (μAutolab, Metrohm) located in the experimental hutch. Chrono-amperometric sequences of 30 min were alternated with acquisition of data. It is worth mentioning that shorter electrolysis times or simultaneous electrolysis–XAS acquisition may artificially suggest hysteresis on Np redox couples under the chosen conditions, a consequence of incomplete or ongoing electrolysis. Moreover, the recorded chronoamperogram, even indicating the exponential shape expected for electrolysis, never reached a null current during the experiment, indicating parasitic reactions.
Data processing was carried out using the Athena code (Ravel & Newville, 2005). The E0 energy was set at the maximum of the The signal was extracted by subtracting a linear pre-edge background and a combination of cubic spline functions for the atomic absorption background and for normalizing the signal by the Lengeler–Eisenberg procedure. Fourier transforms (FT) were obtained by Fourier transform in k3χ(k) between 2.5 and 11 Å−1. Selected FT contributions were fitted in R-space over individual radial distances and Debye–Waller factors (σ2) for every considered distance, using backscattering amplitude and phase shift functions obtained with FEFF8.2 (Rehr & Albers, 2000) performed on structures optimized by density functional theory (DFT) calculations (see §4, DFT calculations). The amplitude reduction factor E02 was set at 0.9. All fitting operations were performed. The R factor (%) and errors in distances were provided by ARTEMIS (Ravel & Newville, 2005).
4. DFT calculations
The geometry and frequency calculations were performed with GAUSSIAN16 (Frisch et al., 2016) at the DFT level of theory. A small core quasi-relativistic effective core potential (RECP-60 electrons) (Cao & Dolg, 2004; Küchle et al., 1994) by the Stuttgart–Cologne group and its corresponding TZ-valence basis set were used for the neptunium ion. The PBE0 functional was used with the def-TZVP (Schäfer et al., 1994) basis sets for O and H atoms. Aqueous solvation effects were taken into account using two explicit hydration shells. Effects beyond the second hydration shell were described through an implicit solvation model. The Integral Equation Formalism Polarizable Continuum Model (IEFPCM) was used as implemented in GAUSSIAN16.
The ab initio Debye–Waller factors (σ2) were calculated at 300 K for each scattering path from the dynamical matrix extracted from the DFT frequency calculations with the DMDW module of FEFF9 (Rehr et al., 2010; Rehr & Albers, 2000).
5. Results
5.1. NpVI/NpV
The first electrolysis experiment was performed with an initial NpV solution. XANES and spectra were recorded after 30 min of electrolysis for each potential step at 850, 950, 975, 1000, 1025 and 1150 mV/(Ag/AgCl) in the oxidation (anodic) direction, and at 1150, 1050, 975, 950, 925, 900, 875, 800 and 750 mV/(Ag/AgCl) in the reduction (cathodic) direction (Fig. 2). All XANES spectra display a white line, which is shifted from 17616 to 17619.5 eV as NpV is oxidized to NpVI. The high-energy shoulder of the located near 17628 eV and attributed to multiple scattering in the neptunyl moiety, is also shifted to higher energy, i.e. 17634 eV, consistent with a trans-dioxo structure for both +V and the +VI oxidation states. Conversely, a shift of the white line and of the shoulder back to their initial values is measured during the reduction steps of NpVI back to NpV. From NpV to NpVI, the white line increases in intensity. An at 17617.7 eV repeats itself in both the oxidation and the reduction sequences, suggesting that only two components were simultaneously present in solution for each sequence. Transitional spectra were reproduced by linear combination fits using the two extrema spectra for NpV and NpVI, resulting in NpIV/NpV ratios for each potential. As pointed out by Soderholm et al. (1999), a direct estimation of the redox species is only possible if there is no change in the experimental setup during the data acquisition except for the imposed potential in the solution.
The relative NpVI/NpV concentrations are determined with a linear combination fit from the two extrema spectra. This can be used in a Nernst plot as log([NpVI/NpV]) plotted as a function of the applied potential (Fig. 3). Both data sets from the oxidation (red) and reduction (blue) experiments are well aligned within error bars. This evidences the reversibility of the NpVI/NpV redox system, confirming that the electrochemical setup operates as expected. From the Nernst plot, a of the NpVI/NpV redox couple in 1 M NHO3 is determined by linear regression (Fig. 3, red and blue dotted lines), according to
where E is the potential, E0′ is the apparent standard potential, R is the perfect (J mol−1 K−1), T is temperature (K), n is the number of electrons in the reaction, F is the and [NpVI] and [NpV] are the relative concentrations in NpVI and NpV, respectively, as determined by the linear combination fit of the neptunium L3-edge spectra.
The slopes, ranging between 55.5 and 58.2 mV (±8 mV), are in reasonable agreement with a single T = 298 K). The two formal potentials obtained from the oxidation and reduction experiments are 918.7 and 918.4 mV/(Ag/AgCl), respectively. Herein, the NpVI/NpV given with a maximum uncertainty of ±10 mV is in good agreement with similar studies performed in perchloric acid (Soderholm et al., 1999; Antonio et al., 2001) or recent work from Chatterjee et al. (2017) in nitric acid using equivalent spectrophotometric methods.
(expected value of 59 mV at5.1.1. analysis
From electrolysis experiments and analysis of XANES spectra, we demonstrated that the setup provides a fairly robust and reliable method to isolate NpVI and NpV oxidation states by electrolysis. With the potentials set at 1150 and 750 mV/(Ag/AgCl), we expect to stabilize pure species for analysis. This controlled potential may stabilize the Np upon long measurements, thereby balancing for the in situ due to beam damage. The purpose of the following section is to evaluate whether the electrochemically purified solution results in a more reliable solution to isolate both neptunium oxidation-state ions in a simple solution. In order to compare the results with previous measurements on similar systems, we propose to compare the significant fit parameters (CN and DWF) on a single plot. First, Fig. 4 shows the k3-weighted oscillations and Fourier transform (FT) for both NpV- and NpVI-stabilized solutions. Neptunyl ion hydrates show two main oscillations corresponding to two FT peaks typical for hydrated actinyl oxocation (Allen et al., 1997; Bolvin et al., 2001; Di Giandomenico et al., 2009; Duvail et al., 2019). The structural parameters from simple two oxygen shell fits are summarized in Table 1. The coordination spheres of NpVI and NpV are formed by two O atoms from the neptunyl moiety (Oyl) at short R(Np–Oyl) distances of 1.75 and 1.82 Å, respectively, and by about 4.4 and 4.9 equatorial O atoms (Oeq) from water molecules at longer R(Np–Oeq) distances of 2.41 and 2.51 Å, respectively. Overall, these results are in line with published values and confirm that a single predominates in solution. Distances correspond to the values reported in the literature within a maximum deviation of 0.02 Å (Combes et al., 1992; Allen et al., 1997; Antonio et al., 1997, 2001; Den Auwer et al., 1999; Reich et al., 2000; Bolvin et al., 2001; Williams et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2004; Denecke et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2005; Ikeda-Ohno et al., 2008; Di Giandomenico et al., 2009; Hennig et al., 2009; Takao et al., 2009). However, the hydration numbers (NOeq) are known to be much less accurately determined from the fits and are still actively discussed. For NpVI, the NOeq values from previous measurements range between 4.6 and 5.3. For NpV, the NOeq values are between 3.6 and 5.2.
|
The large dispersions reported in the literature are likely due to the mathematical correlation observed in a fitting procedure between the number of scattering atoms in a given shell (N), the Debye–Waller factor (σ2) and the value of the total amplitude reduction factor ( #!S0 2). Although there is no physical meaning between these physical parameters, upon an fit the three parameters N, #!S0 2 and σ2 result in similar effects on the oscilation amplitudes. It is therefore difficult to address coordination numbers from a single signal with perfect accuracy, especially if the k range is short.
In order to estimate the magnitude of these correlations and allow a good comparison between previous i.e. fixed or floating CN values and σ2), a more complete data analysis is proposed hereafter. This analysis follows a method proposed by Ikeda-Ohno et al. (2008). NOeq is successively fixed from 3 to 6 and, for each step, a best fit is performed. This results in the determination of a conditional σ2 variation as a function of N. The results can be displayed on a σ2N plot, as proposed by Ikeda-Ohno et al. (2008) (Fig. 5). The best NOeq and σ2 combinations (corresponding to Table 1; values for NpV and NpVI) are plotted as triangles in Fig. 5.
fits performed under different conditions (For NpV (Fig. 5, red dashed line) and NpVI (Fig. 5, blue dashed line) the σ2 values were found to vary approximately linearly with NOeq. The NpV trend is similar to that reported by Ikeda-Ohno et al. (2008) for NpV. The corresponding R factors follow a parabolic variation (not shown) with a minimum at NOeq = 4.9 for NpV and a minimum at NOeq = 4.6 for NpVI. However, for both NpVI and NpV, reasonable fit parameters were obtained for all tested NOeq values (i.e. RF < 5% and σ2 < 0.015 Å2). This is the reason why this semi-empirical methodology was applied to compare the data with previous results whatever the method used to fit the data. Since the fit can be performed assuming multiple NOeq values, a relevant comparison with any single data point from previous reports needs to be achieved toward the full NOeq range.
On Fig. 5, the grey diamonds are previous fit parameters determined under similar chemical conditions (i.e. noncomplexing and acidic solution). Both ex situ measurements (i.e. chemical preparation) (Hennig et al., 2009; Ikeda-Ohno et al., 2008; Di Giandomenico et al., 2009; Allen et al., 1997; Reich et al., 2000; Combes et al., 1992) and in situ measurements by spectroelectrochemistry (Antonio et al., 2001) are compared with NpV and NpVI fit parameters from this work. For a given NOeq value, the σ2 values (dashed blue and red lines) determined in this work are comparable with or lower than previously published σ2 parameters. This is a good indication for a lower disorder/higher purity in this work where NpV and NpVI were purified electrochemically.
Concomitantly, a comparison of the NpV and NpVI structures is in agreement with the expected changes in the neptunyl ion coordination. The σ2 values tend to be lower for NpVI than for NpV for a given NOeq. This result agrees well with the decrease in atomic charge and bonding strength between water and neptunyl units from NpVI to NpV (Choppin & Rao, 1984; Denning, 2007).
At this stage, we conclude that the sample preparation, as well as the continuous application of σ2. However, this better oxidation-state purification does not solve the difficult question of the hydration structure of actinyl ions in solution. To evaluate this point further, additional information may be extracted to narrow down the actual NOeq values. With this same aim, Ikeda-Ohno et al. (2008) suggested that the NOeq values be derived from the more accurately determined interatomic distances applying the bond valence model (Brown, 1978). Although this approach proved to be satisfying for the well-known coordination chemistry of UVI, application to Np is plagued by the limited number of crystallographic references and by uncertainties in the valence unit and the charges of the neptunyl moieties, so that NOeq values still range between 4 and 6. Another way to constrain the accurate is to associate analysis with quantum chemical calculations (Vila et al., 2012). For some actinide molecular compounds, it is possible to generate metrical parameters from a DFT calculation (Acher et al., 2016, 2017; Dalodière et al., 2018). The calculation provides distances and σ2 values ab initio from a selected structure. The NpO2(H2O)4(H2O)82+, NpO2(H2O)5(H2O)102+, NpO2(H2O)4(H2O)8+ and NpO2(H2O)5(H2O)10+ complexes in the presence of a continuum solvent model were selected to produce the parameters reported in Table 2. The accuracy of the optimized geometry was checked by direct comparison of Np—Oeq bond lengths with the measurements. This type of calculation provides an estimated value for the thermal σ2 for a given and for both NpV and NpVI. It was possible to compare it with the experimental fit values in Fig. 5 (red and blue open circles). For both NpVI and NpV, interestingly, σ2 follows the same trend as already observed for experimental fit parameters. However, this trend is obviously not due to the correlation of fit parameters since the two values (CN and σ2) are determined independently. This inquires a physical interrelation between a bonding strength and the actinyl in actinyl solvation. This effect fundamentally impedes the direct determination of actinyl solvatation using the amplitude of the equatorial scattering shell in the signal. Again, using distances from both and DFT to discriminate between penta- and tetrahydrated neptunyl ions seems a more reliable method. For NpV with five water molecules, both the calculation and the fit converge for a 2.51 Å bond. For NpVI with five water molecules, 2.41 and 2.42 Å bond lengths are obtained from the fit and the calculation, respectively. Overall, the results support the fact that five water molecules coordinate both the NpVI and the NpV ions.
is a good way to maintain a pure during X-ray measurements resulting in a low conformational
|
5.2. NpV/NpIV
To evaluate further the electrochemistry setup, a second electrolysis experiment was performed following the previous one. After stabilizing the +V V purity was checked again using XANES and Next, the NpV reduction was investigated by a stepwise decrease of the applied potential to 0, −100, −150, −200 and −250 mV/(Ag/AgCl). In HNO3 solution, the NpIV ion is difficult to stabilize due to its reoxidation with HNO2 in equilibrium with nitrate ions (Taylor et al., 1998; Koltunov et al., 1997). The corresponding XANES spectra are displayed on Fig. 4. Consistent with previous XANES measurements, the Np L3-edge drastically changes due to cleavage of the two Np—O bonds in the neptunyl moiety (Bonin et al., 2009; Denecke et al., 2005; Hennig et al., 2009; Scheinost et al., 2016). Actinide reduction from +V to +IV results in an increase of the white line intensity and a decrease in the amplitude of the higher-energy shoulder at 17637 eV. However, the edge inflection point is almost stabilized by the reduction. XANES spectra are consistent with previous ex situ studies and indicate an almost complete reduction of NpV to NpIV. More unexpected is the corresponding potential at which this electroreduction occurred. As shown in Fig. 6, it was mostly NpV that was detected in solution at the potential step of 0 mV. At −100 and −150 mV, the spectra indicate mixed NpV/NpIV contributions. Quantitative NpV reduction is eventually achieved at −200 and −250 mV.
by a 1 h electrolysis at 750 mV/(Ag/AgCl), the NpAccording to recent work (Chatterjee et al., 2017), reduction to NpIV is expected to occur at approximately 50 mV/(Ag/AgCl) in 1 M HNO3. Moreover, one would also expect a reduction to the NpIII below −100 mV/(Ag/AgCl). The NpIV/NpIII was determined at approximately −50 mV (Guillaumont et al., 2003). In such a case, the resulting neptunium L3 spectra would be a combination of the two redox species. However, NpIII is unstable under aerobic conditions and only NpIV seems to be present in the solution after this enforced electrolysis (Hindman et al., 1949; Sjoblom & Hindman, 1951; Sullivan et al., 1976; Cohen, 1976).
5.2.1. analysis
From electrolysis experiments and analysis of XANES spectra, we demonstrated that it is possible to obtain NpIV by electrolysis at −250 mV. The k3-weighted Np L3-edge spectrum of NpIV hydrate shows a single-frequency oscillation (Fig. 7) and the corresponding FT displays a single peak which can be reliably modelled with a single Np—O coordination shell. The structural parameters from this fit are summarized in Table 3. The best fit values correspond to approximately 9.5 O atoms (from water molecules), with an average R(Np–O) distance of 2.39 Å.
|
The Np—O distance corresponds to the values reported in the literature of 2.37–2.41 Å (Combes et al., 1992; Allen et al., 1997; Reich et al., 2000; Williams et al., 2001; Bolvin et al., 2001; Antonio et al., 2001). The NH2O value also falls within the range of previous results for NpIV aqua complexes, i.e. between 8.7 and 11.6 (Combes et al., 1992; Allen et al., 1997; Reich et al., 2000; Williams et al., 2001; Bolvin et al., 2001; Antonio et al., 2001).
As for NpV and NpVI, a clear correlation between σ2 and NO can be drawn with restricted NO fits. Fixing NO from 8 to 11 allows the determination of the corresponding σ2. These values approximately align as a function of NO (Fig. 8, green dashed line), together with the best fit values (triangle). The corresponding data determined previously on analogous systems are compared (grey diamond). Interestingly, almost all previous studies report a lower σ2 value for a given NO compared with the present report. The more distorted geometry of the 8 to 11 water molecule coordination shell results in σ2 values (from 0.0065 to 0.012 Å2) much larger than observed for the neptunyl hydration shell. This time the comparison with previous studies clearly indicates a residual disorder in the neptunium coordination sphere for the in situ prepared Np4+. This may be explained by either (i) a residual NpO2+ contribution in the spectrum, (ii) over-reduction resulting in the formation of NpIII with a coordination shell at about 2.5 Å (Antonio et al., 2001; Brendebach et al., 2009) or (iii) complexation of NpIV by nitrate (by analogy with PuIV chemistry in nitric acid this must be quite insignificant; Allen et al., 1996), or a combination of points (i), (ii) and (iii).
6. Conclusions
The main aim of this study was to develop a spectroelectrochimical cell and to qualify this setup for further applications on radioactive samples. During the experiment, it was possible to investigate the neptunium coordination during redox processes in a simple 1 M HNO3 solution.
The technical parameters of the microcell design are presented herein and its first application to transuranic elements, performed safely, are reported. The cell design minimizes the volume of radioactive solution and facilitates transport and handling on the beamline. Low actinide concentration and volume minimize the sample activity and allows XANES and 22+/NpO2+ redox couple was quite possible and resulted in reliable standard potential determination. It was then possible to measure both NpV and NpVI spectra under fully consistent conditions. This was a good opportunity to compare the NpV and NpVI hydration spheres, and to implement a statistical comparison with formal literature results, as well as theoretical models. The evolution in the equatorial actinyl hydration is well characterized and is consistent with theoretical expectations. Moreover, a detailed comparison with previous structural data using established that the stabilization of NpV and NpVI oxidation by in situ electrochemistry appears to be the most reliable way to maintain a pure during X-ray measurements. On the other hand, the reduction to NpIV never fully succeeded in maintaining pure NpIV in solution. From the point of view of electrochemistry, a clear offset in the expected standard potential must be applied to begin the NpV reduction. The resulting NpIV EAXFS spectra reveal hydrated Np4+ as the main species, but comparison with a previous chemically stabilized NpIV solution indicates a more disordered coordination sphere. Altogether, it seems that, while the results are fully satisfying for the oxidized neptunium species, the cell must be used with care to study reduced neptunium forms. As a final point, this cell, primarily designed to confine radioactive samples for user safety, was also efficient for performing measurements on nonradioactive samples. Its design for radioactive samples appears to be versatile and extremely convenient for preventing moisture and oxygen contaminating air-sensitive samples in the reverse direction. By doing so, the in situ stabilization and characterization of LnII in room-temperature ionic liquid samples was made possible with this cell (Bengio et al., 2018, 2020) and other applications of this kind are expected.
measurements within a reasonable timescale. From an electrochemistry point of view, such a static confinement concept is not ideal. On one hand, cycling the NpOReferences
Acher, E., Dumas, T., Tamain, C., Boubals, N., Solari, P. L. & Guillaumont, D. (2017). Dalton Trans. 46, 3812–3815. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Acher, E., Hacene Cherkaski, Y., Dumas, T., Tamain, C., Guillaumont, D., Boubals, N., Javierre, G., Hennig, C., Solari, P. L. & Charbonnel, M. C. (2016). Inorg. Chem. 55, 5558–5569. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Achilli, E., Minguzzi, A., Visibile, A., Locatelli, C., Vertova, A., Naldoni, A., Rondinini, S., Auricchio, F., Marconi, S., Fracchia, M. & Ghigna, P. (2016). J. Synchrotron Rad. 23, 622–628. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Allen, P. G., Bucher, J. J., Shuh, D. K., Edelstein, N. M. & Reich, T. (1997). Inorg. Chem. 36, 4676–4683. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Allen, P. G., Veirs, D. K., Conradson, S. D., Smith, C. A. & Marsh, S. F. (1996). Inorg. Chem. 35, 2841–2845. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Antonio, M. R., Soderholm, L. & Song, I. (1997). J. Appl. Electrochem. 27, 784–792. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Antonio, M. R., Williams, C. W. & Soderholm, L. (2002). Radiochim. Acta, 90, 851–856. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Antonio, M. R., Williams, C. W., Sullivan, J. A., Skanthakumar, S., Hu, Y. J. & Soderholm, L. (2012). Inorg. Chem. 51, 5274–5281. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Antonio, R., Soderholm, L., Williams, C. W., Blaudeau, J. P. & Bursten, B. E. (2001). Radiochim. Acta, 89, 17–26. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bengio, D., Dumas, T., Arpigny, S., Husar, R., Mendes, E., Solari, P. L., Schlegel, M. L., Schlegel, D., Pellet–Rostaing, S. & Moisy, P. (2020). Chem. Eur. J. 26, 14385–14396. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bengio, D., Dumas, T., Mendes, E., Solari, P. L., Husar, R., Schlegel, M., Moisy, P. & Pellet-Rostaing, S. (2018). Rare Metal Technology 2018, pp. 99–112. Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series. Switzerland: Springer Nature. Google Scholar
Bolvin, H., Wahlgren, U., Moll, H., Reich, T., Geipel, G., Fanghänel, T. & Grenthe, I. (2001). J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 11441–11445. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bonin, L., Guillaumont, D., Jeanson, A., Den Auwer, C., Grigoriev, M., Berthet, J. C., Hennig, C., Scheinost, A. & Moisy, P. (2009). Inorg. Chem. 48, 3943–3953. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Brendebach, B., Banik, N. L., Marquardt, C. M., Rothe, J., Denecke, M. A. & Geckeis, H. (2009). Radiochim. Acta, 97, 701–708. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Brown, I. D. (1978). Chem. Soc. Rev. 7, 359–376. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Cao, X. Y. & Dolg, M. (2004). J. Mol. Struct. Theochem. 673, 203–209. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S., Bryan, S. A., Casella, A. J., Peterson, J. M. & Levitskaia, T. G. (2017). Inorg. Chem. Front. 4, 581–594. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Choppin, G. R. & Rao, L. F. (1984). Radiochimica Acta, 37, 143–146. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Cohen, D. (1961). J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 18, 207–210. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Cohen, D. (1976). Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. 172, 28. Google Scholar
Cohen, D. & Hindman, J. C. (1952). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74, 4679–4682. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Cohen, D., Sullivan, J. C. & Hindman, J. C. (1954). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76, 352–354. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Combes, J. M., Chisholm-Brause, C. J., Brown, G. E., Parks, G. A., Conradson, S. D., Eller, P. G., Triay, I. R., Hobart, D. E. & Miejer, A. (1992). Environ. Sci. Technol. 26, 376–382. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Dalodière, E., Virot, M., Dumas, T., Guillaumont, D., Illy, M. C., Berthon, C., Guerin, L., Rossberg, A., Venault, L., Moisy, P. & Nikitenko, S. I. (2018). Inorg. Chem. Front. 5, 100–111. Google Scholar
Den Auwer, C., Revel, R., Charbonnel, M. C., Presson, M. T., Conradson, S. D., Simoni, E., Le Du, J. F. & Madic, C. (1999). J. Synchrotron Rad. 6, 101–104. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Denecke, M. A., Dardenne, K. & Marquardt, C. M. (2005). Talanta, 65, 1008–1014. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Denning, R. G. (2007). J. Phys. Chem. A, 111, 4125–4143. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Di Giandomenico, M. V., Naour, C. L., Simoni, E., Guillaumont, D., Moisy, P., Hennig, C., Conradson, S. D. & Den Auwer, C. (2009). Radiochim. Acta, 97, 347–353. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Duvail, M., Dumas, T., Paquet, A., Coste, A., Berthon, L. & Guilbaud, P. (2019). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 7894–7906. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Frisch, M. J., et al. (2016). GAUSSIAN16. Revision B.01. GaussView Version 5.0. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA. Google Scholar
Guillaumont, R., Fanghänel, T., Fuger, J., Grenthe, I., Neck, V., Palmer, D. A. & Rand, M. H. (2003). Update on the Chemical Thermodynamics of U, Np, Pu, Am and Tc, Vol. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar
Hennig, C., Ikeda-Ohno, A., Tsushima, S. & Scheinost, A. C. (2009). Inorg. Chem. 48, 5350–5360. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Hennig, C., Tutschku, J., Rossberg, A., Bernhard, G. & Scheinost, A. C. (2005). Inorg. Chem. 44, 6655–6661. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Hindman, J. C., Magnusson, L. B. & LaChapelle, T. J. (1949). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 71, 687–693. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Hindman, J. C., Sullivan, J. C. & Cohen, D. (1958). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 1812–1814. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Ikeda-Ohno, A., Hennig, C., Rossberg, A., Funke, H., Scheinost, A. C., Bernhard, G. & Yaita, T. (2008). Inorg. Chem. 47, 8294–8305. Web of Science PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ikeda-Ohno, A., Hennig, C., Tsushima, S., Scheinost, A. C., Bernhard, G. & Yaita, T. (2009). Inorg. Chem. 48, 7201–7210. Web of Science PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Jeanson, A., Dahou, S., Guillaumont, D., Moisy, P., Auwer, C. D., Scheinost, A., Hennig, C., Vidaud, C., Subra, G. & Solari, P. L. (2009). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 190, 012185. CrossRef Google Scholar
Kihara, S., Yoshida, Z., Aoyagi, H., Maeda, K., Shirai, O., Kitatsuji, Y. & Yoshida, Y. (1999). Pure Appl. Chem. 71, 1771–1807. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kim, S. Y., Asakura, T. & Morita, Y. (2005). Radiochim. Acta, 93, 767–770. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kim, S. Y., Asakura, T., Morita, Y., Uchiyama, G. & Ikeda, Y. (2004). J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 262, 311–315. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Koltunov, V. S., Taylor, R. J., Savilova, O. A., Zhuravleva, G. I., Denniss, I. S. & Wallwork, A. L. (1997). Radiochim. Acta, 76, 45–54. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Küchle, W., Dolg, M., Stoll, H. & Preuss, H. (1994). J. Chem. Phys. 100, 7535–7542. Google Scholar
LLorens, I., Solari, P. L., Sitaud, B., Bes, R., Cammelli, S., Hermange, H., Othmane, G., Safi, S., Moisy, P., Wahu, S., Bresson, C., Schlegel, M. L., Menut, D., Bechade, J. L., Martin, P., Hazemann, J. L., Proux, O. & Den Auwer, C. (2014). Radiochim. Acta, 102, 957–972. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Nockemann, P., Thijs, B., Lunstroot, K., Parac-Vogt, T. N., Görller-Walrand, C., Binnemans, K., Van Hecke, K., Van Meervelt, L., Nikitenko, S., Daniels, J., Hennig, C. & Van Deun, R. (2009). Chem. Eur. J. 15, 1449–1461. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Poineau, F., Fattahi, M. & Grambow, B. (2006). Radiochim. Acta, 94, 559–563. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ravel, B. & Newville, M. (2005). J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 537–541. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rehr, J. J. & Albers, R. C. (2000). Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 621–654. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rehr, J. J., Kas, J. J., Vila, F. D., Prange, M. P. & Jorissen, K. (2010). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 5503–5513. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Reich, T., Bernhard, G., Geipel, G., Funke, H., Hennig, C., Roßberg, A., Matz, W., Schell, N. & Nitsche, H. (2000). Radiochim. Acta, 88, 633–638. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Schäfer, A., Huber, C. & Ahlrichs, R. (1994). J. Chem. Phys. 100, 5829–5835. Google Scholar
Scheinost, A. C., Steudtner, R., Hübner, R., Weiss, S. & Bok, F. (2016). Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 10413–10420. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sjoblom, R. & Hindman, J. C. (1951). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73, 1744–1751. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Soderholm, L., Antonio, M. R., Williams, C. & Wasserman, S. R. (1999). Anal. Chem. 71, 4622–4628. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sornein, M. O., Mendes, M., Cannes, C., Le Naour, C., Nockemann, P., Van Hecke, K., Van Meervelt, L., Berthet, J. C. & Hennig, C. (2009). Polyhedron, 28, 1281–1286. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. C., Gordon, S., Cohen, D., Mulac, W. & Schmidt, K. H. (1976). J. Phys. Chem. 80, 1684–1686. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Takao, K., Takao, S., Scheinost, A. C., Bernhard, G. & Hennig, C. (2009). Inorg. Chem. 48, 8803–8810. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Taylor, R. J., Koltunov, V. S., Savilova, O. A., Zhuravleva, G. I., Denniss, I. S. & Wallwork, A. L. (1998). J. Alloys Compd. 271–273, 817–820. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Vila, F. D., Lindahl, V. E. & Rehr, J. J. (2012). Phys. Rev. B, 85, 024303. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Williams, C. W., Blaudeau, J. P., Sullivan, J. C., Antonio, M. R., Bursten, B. & Soderholm, L. (2001). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 4346–4347. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zielen, A. J., Sullivan, J. C. & Cohen, D. (1958). J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 7, 378–383. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.