actinide physics and chemistry
In situ beam reduction of Pu(IV) and Bk(IV) as a route to trivalent transuranic coordination complexes with hydroxypyridinone chelators
aChemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, and bDepartment of Nuclear Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: corwin.booth@gmail.com, rjabergel@lbl.gov
The solution-state interactions of plutonium and berkelium with the octadentate chelator 3,4,3-LI(1,2-HOPO) (343-HOPO) were investigated and characterized by X-ray absorption spectroscopy, which revealed in situ reductive decomposition of the tetravalent species of both actinide metals to yield Pu(III) and Bk(III) coordination complexes. X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) measurements were the first indication of in situ synchrotron redox chemistry as the Pu threshold and white-line position energies for Pu-343-HOPO were in good agreement with known diagnostic Pu(III) species, whereas Bk-343-HOPO results were found to mirror the XANES behavior of Bk(III)-DTPA. Extended X-ray absorption fine structure results revealed An—OHOPO bond distances of 2.498 (5) and 2.415 (2) Å for Pu and Bk, respectively, which match well with bond distances obtained for trivalent actinides and 343-HOPO via density functional theory calculations. Pu(III)- and Bk(III)-343-HOPO data also provide initial insight into actinide periodicity as they can be compared with previous results with Am(III)-, Cm(III)-, Cf(III)-, and Es(III)-343-HOPO, which indicate there is likely an increase in 5f covalency and heterogeneity across the actinide series.
1. Introduction
Over the past decade there has been a surge in interest in the coordination chemistry of trivalent and tetravalent transuranic elements due to the distinctive chemical properties of the actinides, increased availability of materials, and improvements in instrumentation development and data processing (Carter, Pallares et al., 2020), particularly for and diffraction techniques (Galbis et al., 2010; Cary et al., 2015; Ferrier et al., 2017; Kelley et al., 2018; Müller et al., 2021; Jones et al., 2021). Recent highlights of these efforts include the first of Bk(III) (Silver et al., 2016), stabilization of Bk(IV) in aqueous solution (Deblonde et al., 2017), measurement of the first bond distance with Es(III) (Carter, Shield et al., 2021), and a significant improvement in our understanding of how covalency and heterogeneity affect 5f-orbital bonding (Allred et al., 2015; Cross et al., 2017; Kelley et al., 2017; Su et al., 2018; Stein et al., 2019; Wilson et al., 2020; Bessen et al., 2021). Even with these advances, transuranic coordination chemistry remains largely underdeveloped, and there is a need to further delineate trends in structure, bonding, and periodicity, as well as evaluate metal–ion redox stability under a range of conditions.
Multidentate hydroxypyridinone (HOPO) and catecholamide (CAM) ligands are a class of ligands known to chelate both actinide and lanthanide cations exceptionally well. In addition, they have also been shown to be effective in vivo decorporation agents of trivalent and tetravalent actinides (Gorden et al., 2003; Kullgren et al., 2013; Captain et al., 2016; Abergel, 2017; Ricano et al., 2019; Arnedo-Sanchez et al., 2021; Pallares et al., 2021). Exemplary in these efforts is the octadentate chelator 3,4,3-LI(1,2-HOPO), denoted 343-HOPO hereafter, which has been studied with a range of trivalent and tetravalent p-, d- and f-block metals (Abergel et al., 2009; Sturzbecher-Hoehne et al., 2011; Deblonde et al., 2013, 2017; Deblonde, Lohrey et al., 2018; Carter, Deblonde et al., 2020; Carter, Shield et al., 2021). In both coordination chemistry and in vivo systems, there are significant indications that 343-HOPO chelation-driven redox chemistry is possible (Xu et al., 2000; Deblonde et al., 2013, 2017, 2019; Carter et al., 2018; Carter, Smith et al., 2020, 2021), wherein oxidation or reduction of the metal ions are induced depending on redox couple accessibility and complexation thermodynamics. Stability of the resulting complexes in solution has not been fully developed, however, as shown by the recent example of X-ray beam-induced reduction of a Ce(IV)-343-HOPO complex during measurements (Bailey et al., 2021).
Herein, we detail two additional examples of reductive decomposition of tetravalent plutonium and berkelium complexes during LIII-edge experiments, which are likely the result of radiolysis within the sulfonic acid buffer matrices induced from the intense high-energy X-ray beam. Although we recently used solution-state methodologies to characterize both trivalent and tetravalent aqueous actinide systems (Deblonde, Kelley et al., 2018; Kelley et al., 2018; Carter, Smith et al., 2020, 2021; Carter, Shield et al., 2021), we have not done so with redox-active ligands, such as 343-HOPO, and metals with an accessible +IV/+III redox couple. Plutonium and berkelium are two transuranic actinides that meet these criteria, with standard +IV/+III redox couples of 0.97 and 1.60 V (in 1 M HClO4 versus NHE) for Pu and Bk, respectively (Boukhalfa et al., 2007; Antonio et al., 2002). Detailed solution-state electronic and structural information for both Pu(III) and Bk(III) complexes with 343-HOPO were obtained via XANES and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopies upon reductive decomposition of tetravalent Pu and Bk complexes. These results are particularly notable as Pu(III) and Bk(III) solution-state complexes are relatively rare, with being a key characterization tool that has developed our understanding of the chemical behavior of both species. Pu(III) systems are more prevalent compared with Bk(III), in which studies have explored the interactions of Pu(III) with simple aquo and inorganic monodentate and bidentate ligands (Allen et al., 1997, 2000; Ankudinov et al., 1998; Conradson et al., 2004; Popa et al., 2015; Vitova et al., 2018; Brendebach et al., 2009), organic chelators (Audras et al., 2017; Arab-Chapelet et al., 2016) and in environmentally relevant systems (Dardenne et al., 2009; Kirsch et al., 2011; Schmeide et al., 2006; Marquardt et al., 2004). In contrast, only two examples of studies to characterize Bk are known in either the Bk(III) or Bk(IV) (Antonio et al., 2002; Deblonde, Kelley et al., 2018).
2. Experimental methods
Caution! 249Bk (t1/2 = 330 days, 61 T Bq g−1) and 249Cf (t1/2 = 351 years, 150 GBq g−1) are highly radioactive β- and α-emitting radionuclides, respectively, and decay to α- and γ-emitting isotopes, whereas 242Pu (t1 = 3.75 × 105 years, 0.15 GBq g−1) is an α-emitting radionuclide. These isotopes, as well as their decay daughters, present significant health risks and were manipulated only in facilities specifically designed for the safe handling of long-lived radioactive materials. All measurements were taken either in controlled facilities and/or using multiple containment procedures.
2.1. Materials
The ligand 343-HOPO was prepared and characterized as previously described (Abergel et al., 2010) and ligand stock solutions were assembled by direct dissolution of weighted portions into water or dimethylformamide (DMF). 249BkCl3 and 242PuO2 were received from Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and a stock solution of 242Pu(IV) was prepared as described previously (Gorden et al., 2007). All other chemicals used in this study were obtained from commercial suppliers and were used as received.
2.2. Preparation of samples
2.2.1. Pu-343-HOPO
The Pu-343-HOPO M. Additionally, 5 µl of DMF was added to ensure solubility of the metal–chelate complex. The pH of the sample was buffered to 7–8 using 50 mM HEPES and approximately 65 µl was loaded into indium- and epoxy-sealed, triply contained, aluminium holders with Kapton windows (developed in-house) within ten days of synchrotron measurement (Pugmire et al., 2019).
sample was assembled from aliquots of the metal and ligand stock solutions with a metal:ligand ratio of 1:2 and the final Pu concentration was 1 m2.2.2. Bk-343-HOPO and Bk-DTPA
Bk-343-HOPO and Bk-DTPA 249Bk and 249Cf (Deblonde, Kelley et al., 2018; Kelley et al., 2018), and details are included here for completeness. For both 343-HOPO and DTPA, samples containing both 249Bk(III) and 249Cf(III) (ratio Cf/Bk = 1.9) were prepared using a 249BkCl3 stock solution in 0.1 M HCl that had decayed for 510 days to allow for in-growth of the 249Cf daughter. The Bk/Cf samples were prepared using a metal:ligand ratio of 1:1.3 to ensure complete metal–ion complexation and assembled from aliquots of the metal stock solution with either a 343-HOPO stock solution in water or a DTPA stock solution at pH 4. The metal–ligand complexes were diluted with CAPS buffer (Sigma–Aldrich, BioUltra, >99%) to volumes of ∼65 µl to yield final concentrations of 0.11 mM for 249Bk and 0.20 mM for 249Cf. The pH values of the samples were buffered to 7–8 and each solution was loaded into separate, triply contained, aluminium holders (analogous to Pu) within ten days of synchrotron measurement.
samples were previously prepared as part of samples containing both2.3. data collection and processing
XANES and LIII-edges on beamline 11-2 at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL) using an Si(220) (ϕ = 0°) double-crystal monochromator detuned by 50%. Samples were held in an LHe-cooled cryostat at 50 K throughout analysis and all measurements were collected in fluorescence mode using a 100-element Canberra Ge detector and corrected for dead-time. Pu and Bk XANES spectra were calibrated to Zr (K-edge, 17995.88 eV) and Mo (K-edge, 20000.36 eV) standards, respectively (Kraft et al., 1996). Processing of the data is described in the supporting information, including an important discussion on multiple scattering.
spectroscopy data were collected at the Pu and Bk3. Results
3.1. Synthesis of An-343-HOPO complexes
Acidic stock solutions of 242Pu(IV) and 249Bk(III) were combined with a slight excess of the 1-hydroxy-2-pyridinone ligand (343-HOPO; Fig. 1) and buffered to a pH value of 7–8 to ensure metal binding. No efforts were made to exclude air or moisture. Final concentrations – based on the metal – of Pu-343-HOPO and Bk-343-HOPO samples were 1 mM (19.4 µg) and 0.11 mM (1.7 µg), respectively. Both Pu and Bk were expected to be fully coordinated to the deprotonated ligand, bound through the oxygen atoms of carbonyl and hydroxyl groups of the hydroxypyridinone moiety to form octadentate coordination complexes (Sturzbecher-Hoehne et al., 2015). Additionally, we anticipated both Pu and Bk ions to be in the +IV akin to previous studies in our laboratory that have demonstrated the chelation-driven stabilization of Ln(IV) and An(IV) metal-ions by 343-HOPO in solution (Deblonde et al., 2013, 2017, 2019; Sturzbecher-Hoehne et al., 2015; Carter, Smith et al., 2020, 2021). To analyze Pu and Bk oxidation states and complexation behaviors with 343-HOPO, we used which is uniquely positioned to assess the transuranic actinide elements, particularly those where limited mass quantities are available, such as Bk.
3.2. XANES measurements of Pu-343-HOPO and Bk-343-HOPO
XANES measurements were collected on the prepared actinide solutions to determine the oxidation states of the Pu and Bk metal cations in the presence of 343-HOPO; Fig. 2 shows the calibrated An LIII-edge XANES data for both samples. Despite expectations of Pu and Bk to be tetravalent in the presence of 343-HOPO, the XANES data instead strongly suggest both metals are in the +III and as such are denoted hereafter Pu(III)-343-HOPO and Bk(III)-343-HOPO. The E0, as measured by the energy of the peak in the first derivative, is 18057.4 ± 0.1 eV for the buffered solution of 242Pu(IV) and 343-HOPO, while the white-line position EWL, or rather the position of the peak in the spectrum, is found at 18060.7 ± 0.1 eV by fitting to the experimental data. The analogous values obtained for the buffered solution of 249Bk(III) and 343-HOPO are located at E0 = 19438.1 ± 0.1 eV and EWL = 19442.9 ± 0.1 eV, respectively.
The XANES metrical parameters are comparable with previous reports of these actinides in the trivalent et al. (2004) demonstrated that plutonium E0 values can vary by up to 1 eV within a single of Pu, subject to effects from the matrix environment, local disorder, and ligand coordination. A selection of standards from Conradson et al. (2004) have been calibrated to the Zr K-edge reported by Kraft et al. (1996) and compared with Pu(III)-343-HOPO. In particular, Pu(III) in perchlorate (1 M) solution, solid-state Pu(IV)O2, and Pu(IV) in perchlorate (1 M) solution have E0 values of 18056.5, 18058.8, and 18059.7 eV, and white-line positions at 18060.8, 18065.1, and 18065.2 eV, respectively. By utilizing these literature reports as a basis for oxidation-state assignment, the Pu(III)-343-HOPO data – with E0 equal to 18057.4 ± 0.1 eV and an EWL value at 18060.7 ± 0.1 eV – are consistent with Pu(III) rather than Pu(IV).
ConradsonBy comparison with Pu and other actinides, Bk XANES data are very rare in the literature. In fact, there has only been one other report by Antonio et al. (2002) where was used to study Bk speciation. Unfortunately, this pioneering work was performed within an electrochemical cell that had poor instrumental resolution, and therefore it is difficult to compare with our results. While Antonio et al. (2002) could not obtain an absolute measurement of E0 and EWL, they did observe a relative separation of +5.5 eV when Bk was oxidized from +III to +IV in acidic aqueous solution. We can compare our measurements with Bk(III) in the presence of the DTPA ligand, which does not have the same oxidative control as 343-HOPO. Therefore, Bk is expected to remain in its most stable (+III) upon complexation to DTPA. These data were originally used only for analysis by Deblonde, Kelley et al. (2018) and are shown here for the first time in Fig. 2(b). Bk(III)-DTPA has an E0 = 19438.2 ± 0.1 eV and an EWL = 19442.2 ± 0.1 eV, and agreement between Bk(III)-343-HOPO and Bk(III)-DTPA white-line positions strongly support the assignment of the +III in the Bk(III)-343-HOPO sample. Taken together with Pu(III)-343-HOPO data, these results indicate reductive decomposition of the tetravalent Pu and Bk complexes during LIII-edge experiments despite the presence of, and by, 343-HOPO.
3.3. Examination of actinide coordination behavior via EXAFS
supporting information), we first detail these results, obtained from the wavevector k, of 2.5 to a maximum of 10.0 Å−1. Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) show the k3-weighted Bk LIII-edge spectra and corresponding Fourier transforms with all fitting parameters included in Table S1 of the supporting information. The fit for Bk(III)-343-HOPO converges easily with or without constraining the amplitudes to the coordination numbers; metrical parameters of note include a (N) equal to 8.1 (3), consistent with complete 343-HOPO binding to yield the anionic complex [Bk(III)(343-HOPO)]−. Found by fixing the amplitude reduction factor to S02 = 1.0 [akin to Bk(III)-DTPA (Kelley et al., 2018)], the N value is obtained from a preliminary fit assuming nominal values for each N, and is consistent with other An(III)-343-HOPO species (Kelley et al., 2018). Additionally, the average Bk–OHOPO bond length was found to be 2.415 (2) Å with a Debye–Waller factor of σ2 = 0.0094 (4). DFT calculations from Kelley et al. (2018) were used to understand the interactions between Bk and 343-HOPO in water, estimating a Bk(III)—OHOPO distance of 2.43 Å and Bk(IV)—OHOPO of 2.37 Å. As the calculated Bk(III)—OHOPO bond distances are consistent with those observed in Bk(III)—343-HOPO, the fit therefore supports the identification of a Bk(III) species. This fit also demonstrates that the degree of multiple scattering observed in experimental data is similar to that in DFT structure calculations (Kelley et al., 2018), yet it should be noted that excluding MS does not change the results from the other shells significantly.
measurements were collected on the prepared actinide solutions to not only supplement Pu and Bk oxidation-state assignments but also to improve our understanding of the coordination behavior and periodicity of these transuranic elements through the lens of 343-HOPO As the Bk data were simpler to handle with regards to multiple scattering (MS; see processing details in theDespite challenges related to multiple scattering (outlined in the supporting information), high-quality Pu(III)-343-HOPO data were obtained from the wavevector k of 2.5 to a maximum of 12.0 Å−1. Figs. 3(c) and 3(d) show the k3-weighted Pu LIII-edge spectra and corresponding Fourier transforms with all fitting parameters included in Table S3. This fit also constrains the coordination numbers to avoid correlations between the MS path and the Pu–C/N shell. Because of the role of MS in the Pu(III)-343-HOPO data, the degree of 343-HOPO coordination is not as conclusive as with Bk(III)-343-HOPO, although the data are consistent with full coordination and a Pu(III)—OHOPO bond distance of 2.498 (5) that aligns with previous reports of Pu(III) solution studies (Conradson et al., 2004). DFT calculations from Kelley et al. (2018) were also used to understand the interactions between Pu and 343-HOPO in water, estimating a Pu(III)—OHOPO distance at 2.46 Å that is lengthened compared with Pu(IV) (2.38 Å), which is consistent with the Pu—OHOPO bond distance observed in Pu(III)-343-HOPO. Thus, the fit supports the identification of a Pu(III) species.
4. Discussion
XANES and et al., 2015; Deblonde et al., 2017), reductive decomposition of Pu(IV)-343-HOPO and Bk(IV)-343-HOPO was observed in measurements to yield Pu(III)-343-HOPO and Bk(III)-343-HOPO. These studies provide a rare example of trivalent Pu(III) and Bk(III), wherein the oxidative controls of 343-HOPO were outmatched by external factors, namely high-flux synchrotron radiation at an energy of ∼18000–19000 eV. The XANES spectrum collected for Pu(III)-343-HOPO illustrates E0 and white-line energies that align with those expected for Pu(III). Although matrix effects can influence these energies, when combining the XANES results with the model showing a Pu—OHOPO distance of ∼2.5 Å, the data strongly suggest Pu(III) is the dominant in Pu(III)-343-HOPO. Oxidation-state determination of Bk is inherently more challenging, simply because there are only two other examples of Bk data (Antonio et al., 2002; Deblonde, Kelley et al., 2018). As such, we supported the assignment of Bk(III)-343-HOPO by direct comparison with a known Bk(III) compound, Bk(III)-DTPA.
measurements were leveraged to understand the complexation of two transuranic elements, Pu and Bk, with the chelator 343-HOPO in buffered solutions. Despite the precedent of chelation-driven redox chemistry as a pathway to stabilize the tetravalent of these elements (Sturzbecher-HoehneIn both cases, 343-HOPO was found to coordinate Pu(III) and Bk(III) to yield octadentate complexes with first coordination sphere An(III)—OHOPO distances of 2.498 (5) and 2.415 (2) Å, respectively. We note that Pu-343-HOPO has been studied once previously, but with samples prepared under very different conditions from those used in this work and with less emphasis on the XANES features, and, as such, precludes meaningful comparisons (Aupiais et al., 2017). We hypothesize the Pu and Bk reduction likely resulted from radiolysis provided by the high-energy X-ray beam. In addition, sulfonic acid buffers – the matrices in which these measurements were collected – are known to enhance or facilitate redox activity (Cuculić et al., 1998), yet it should be noted that reductive decomposition of Pu and Bk was also observed in other buffers (i.e. TRIS buffer). Similar reductive decomposition was also recently observed in lanthanide systems with Ce(IV)-343-HOPO reduction to Ce(III)-343-HOPO (Bailey et al., 2021). due to the X-ray beam has also been reported for transition metals (van Schooneveld & DeBeer, 2015), such as iron +III/+II, ruthenium +IV/+III and manganese +III/+II transformations (Gonçalves Ferreira et al., 2013; Mo et al., 2000; Risch et al., 2017). Taking into account these examples of reductive beam effects on transition metal, lanthanide and now transuranic systems, caution is advised when conducting oxidation-state studies at the LIII-edge for Pu and Bk samples. Recently, efforts to capture and characterize in situ Pu(IV) and Bk(IV) reductions were attempted at SSRL wherein beam energies were kept stationary at the relative LIII-edge energies of Pu(IV) and Bk(IV) (∼18067 and ∼19444 eV, respectively) and the change in energy as a function of time was monitored. It was hypothesized that a shift to lower energy would be observed, consistent with reduction of the actinide metal ion from the +IV to the +III and similar to the reduction of Ce(IV)-343-HOPO to Ce(III)-343-HOPO identified in previous studies (Bailey et al., 2021). However, no substantial change in the LIII-edge energy intensities was detected as a function of time (t = 10 min; data points collected every 1 s). Subsequent XANES scans indicated absorption edges consistent with +III species, and therefore we postulate that the reduction occurred faster than the timescale of the initial data point.
Fortuitously, in situ production of Pu(III) and Bk(III) allowed for detailed solution-state electronic and structural information to be obtained on transuranic species. Moreover, Pu(III)-343-HOPO and Bk(III)-343-HOPO fit into an extended series of An(III)-343-HOPO complexes that have been reported by our group. Additions of Pu(III) and Bk(III) to this series result in an exceptional and uncommon dataset: coordination complexes of the trivalent actinides spanning Pu to Es (Kelley et al., 2018; Carter, Shield et al., 2021). Put into a larger picture, these data inform of periodicity across the 5f series, exhibiting a general shortening of the An—OHOPO bonding interaction that is consistent with the actinide contraction. More broadly, additions of experimental data points to the An(III)-343-HOPO series can provide insight into an increase in covalency and heterogeneity as one moves farther along in the actinide series (Fig. 4), and is the subject of ongoing investigations.
5. Conclusions and outlook
In summary, in situ reductive decomposition of Pu(IV) and Bk(IV) was observed during measurements, which yielded Pu(III) and Bk(III) coordination complexes with the octadentate chelator 343-HOPO. XANES and spectroscopies on Pu- and Bk-343-HOPO samples confirmed metal ion reduction and providing rare insight into the coordination chemistry behavior of both trivalent species. Limited studies with Pu(III) have focused on aqueous inorganic, organic, or environmentally relevant ligand systems (Allen et al., 1997, 2000; Ankudinov et al., 1998; Arab-Chapelet et al., 2016; Popa et al., 2015; Vitova et al., 2018; Brendebach et al., 2009; Kirsch et al., 2011; Schmeide et al., 2006; Marquardt et al., 2004) and only two experiments have been conducted on Bk previously (Antonio et al., 2002; Deblonde, Kelley et al., 2018). As such, results included herein provide necessary metrical parameters to better assess future Pu(III) and Bk(III) coordination complexes in condensed aqueous phases. Pu(III)-343-HOPO and Bk(III)-343-HOPO bond distances were found to agree with previous DFT calculations for +III complexes and were compared with the results of Am(III), Cm(III), Cf(III), and Es(III) in the presence of 343-HOPO. Consequently, insights into actinide periodicity were demonstrated that can inform the extent to which 5f covalency and heterogeneity increase across the actinide series. Overall, these results highlight the ability to use to assess microgram quantities of actinide complexes, even in less-common oxidation states, which has greatly expanded our understanding of the 5f block, and which we will continue to build on in future studies focused on actinide with bio-inspired ligands.
6. Related literature
The following references, not cited in the main body of the paper, have been cited in the supporting information: Ankudinov et al. (1998); Booth & Bridges (2021); Booth & Hu (2009); Li et al. (1995).
Supporting information
Supporting figures and tables. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577522000200/ok5066sup1.pdf
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Wayne Lukens for preparing the 242Pu starting stock solution.
Funding information
249Bk and 242Pu used in this research were supplied by the US Department of Energy (DOE) Isotope Program, managed by the Office of Isotope R&D and Production. This work was supported by the US DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Heavy Element Chemistry Program at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 awarded to RA). Use of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is supported by the US DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515).
References
Abergel, R. J. (2017). Metal Chelation in Medicine, edited by R. Crichton, R. J. Ward & R. C. Hider, pp. 183–212. The Royal Society of Chemistry. Google Scholar
Abergel, R. J., D'Aléo, A., Ng Pak Leung, C., Shuh, D. K. & Raymond, K. N. (2009). Inorg. Chem. 48, 10868–10870. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Abergel, R. J., Durbin, P. W., Kullgren, B., Ebbe, S. N., Xu, J., Chang, P. Y., Bunin, D. I., Blakely, E. A., Bjornstad, K. A., Rosen, C. J., Shuh, D. K. & Raymond, K. N. (2010). Health Phys. 99, 401–407. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Allen, P. G., Bucher, J. J., Shuh, D. K., Edelstein, N. M. & Craig, I. (2000). Inorg. Chem. 39, 595–601. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Allen, P. G., Bucher, J. J., Shuh, D. K., Edelstein, N. M. & Reich, T. (1997). Inorg. Chem. 36, 4676–4683. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Allred, B. E., Rupert, P. B., Gauny, S. S., An, D. D., Ralston, C. Y., Sturzbecher-Hoehne, M., Strong, R. K. & Abergel, R. J. (2015). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 10342–10347. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ankudinov, A. L., Conradson, S. D., Mustre de Leon, J. & Rehr, J. J. (1998). Phys. Rev. B, 57, 7518–7525. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ankudinov, A. L., Ravel, B., Rehr, J. J. & Conradson, S. D. (1998). Phys. Rev. B, 58, 7565–7576. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Antonio, M. R., Williams, C. W. & Soderholm, L. (2002). Radiochim. Acta, 90, 851–856. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Arab-Chapelet, B., Martin, P. M., Costenoble, S., Delahaye, T., Scheinost, A. C., Grandjean, S. & Abraham, F. (2016). Dalton Trans. 45, 6909–6919. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Arnedo-Sanchez, L., Smith, K. F., Deblonde, G. J.-P., Carter, K. P., Moreau, L. M., Rees, J. A., Tratnjek, T., Booth, C. H. & Abergel, R. J. (2021). ChemPlusChem, 86, 483–491. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Audras, M., Berthon, L., Berthon, C., Guillaumont, D., Dumas, T., Illy, M.-C., Martin, N., Zilbermann, I., Moiseev, Y., Ben-Eliyahu, Y., Bettelheim, A., Cammelli, S., Hennig, C. & Moisy, P. (2017). Inorg. Chem. 56, 12248–12259. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aupiais, J., Younes, A., Moisy, P., Hennig, C., Rossberg, A., Brunel, B., Kerbaa, M., Vidaud, C. & Den Auwer, C. (2017). New J. Chem. 41, 11291–11298. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bailey, T. A., Mocko, V., Shield, K. M., An, D. D., Akin, A. C., Birnbaum, E. R., Brugh, M., Cooley, J. C., Engle, J. W., Fassbender, M. E., Gauny, S. S., Lakes, A. L., Nortier, F. M., O'Brien, E. M., Thiemann, S. L., White, F. D., Vermeulen, C., Kozimor, S. A. & Abergel, R. J. (2021). Nat. Chem. 13, 284–289. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bessen, N. P., Popov, I. A., Heathman, C. R., Grimes, T. S., Zalupski, P. R., Moreau, L. M., Smith, K. F., Booth, C. H., Abergel, R. J., Batista, E. R., Yang, P. & Shafer, J. C. (2021). Inorg. Chem. 60, 6125–6134. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Booth, C. H. & Bridges, F. (2021). International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. I, doi:10.1107/S1574870720003444. Google Scholar
Booth, C. H. & Hu, Y.-J. (2009). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 190, 012028. CrossRef Google Scholar
Boukhalfa, H., Reilly, S. D. & Neu, M. P. (2007). Inorg. Chem. 46, 1018–1026. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Brendebach, B., Banik, N. L., Marquardt, C. M., Rothe, J., Denecke, M. & Geckeis, H. (2009). Radiochim. Acta, 97, 701–708. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Captain, I., Deblonde, G. J. P., Rupert, P. B., An, D. D., Illy, M.-C., Rostan, E., Ralston, C. Y., Strong, R. K. & Abergel, R. J. (2016). Inorg. Chem. 55, 11930–11936. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Carter, K. P., Deblonde, G. J. P., Lohrey, T. D., Bailey, T. A., An, D. D., Shield, K. M., Lukens, W. W. & Abergel, R. J. (2020). Commun. Chem. 3, 61. CrossRef Google Scholar
Carter, K. P., Jian, J., Pyrch, M. M., Forbes, T. Z., Eaton, T. M., Abergel, R. J., de Jong, W. A. & Gibson, J. K. (2018). Chem. Commun. 54, 10698–10701. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Carter, K. P., Pallares, R. M. & Abergel, R. J. (2020). Commun. Chem. 3, 103. CrossRef Google Scholar
Carter, K. P., Shield, K. M., Smith, K. F., Jones, Z. R., Wacker, J. N., Arnedo-Sanchez, L., Mattox, T. M., Moreau, L. M., Knope, K. E., Kozimor, S. A., Booth, C. H. & Abergel, R. J. (2021). Nature, 590, 85–88. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Carter, K. P., Smith, K. F., Tratnjek, T., Deblonde, G. J. P., Moreau, L. M., Rees, J. A., Booth, C. H. & Abergel, R. J. (2021). Inorg. Chem. 60, 973–981. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Carter, K. P., Smith, K. F., Tratnjek, T., Shield, K. M., Moreau, L. M., Rees, J. A., Booth, C. H. & Abergel, R. J. (2020). Chem. Eur. J. 26, 2354–2359. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cary, S. K., Vasiliu, M., Baumbach, R. E., Stritzinger, J. T., Green, T. D., Diefenbach, K., Cross, J. N., Knappenberger, K. L., Liu, G., Silver, M. A., DePrince, A. E., Polinski, M. J., Van Cleve, S. M., House, J. H., Kikugawa, N., Gallagher, A., Arico, A. A., Dixon, D. A. & Albrecht-Schmitt, T. E. (2015). Nat. Commun. 6, 6827. Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD PubMed Google Scholar
Conradson, S. D., Abney, K. D., Begg, B. D., Brady, E. D., Clark, D. L., den Auwer, C., Ding, M., Dorhout, P. K., Espinosa-Faller, F. J., Gordon, P. L., Haire, R. G., Hess, N. J., Hess, R. F., Keogh, D. W., Lander, G. H., Lupinetti, A. J., Morales, L. A., Neu, M. P., Palmer, P. D., Paviet-Hartmann, P., Reilly, S. D., Runde, W. H., Tait, C. D., Veirs, D. K. & Wastin, F. (2004). Inorg. Chem. 43, 116–131. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Cross, J. N., Su, J., Batista, E. R., Cary, S. K., Evans, W. J., Kozimor, S. A., Mocko, V., Scott, B. L., Stein, B. W., Windorff, C. J. & Yang, P. (2017). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8667–8677. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cuculić, V., Mlakar, M. & Branica, M. (1998). Electroanalysis, 10, 852–856. Google Scholar
Dardenne, K., Seibert, A., Denecke, M. A. & Marquardt, C. M. (2009). Radiochim. Acta, 97, 91–97. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Deblonde, G. J. P., Kelley, M. P., Su, J., Batista, E. R., Yang, P., Booth, C. H. & Abergel, R. J. (2018). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 4521–4526. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Deblonde, G. J. P., Lohrey, T. D., An, D. D. & Abergel, R. J. (2018). New J. Chem. 42, 7649–7658. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Deblonde, G. J. P., Ricano, A. & Abergel, R. J. (2019). Nat. Commun. 10, 2438. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Deblonde, G. J. P., Sturzbecher-Hoehne, M. & Abergel, R. J. (2013). Inorg. Chem. 52, 8805–8811. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Deblonde, G. J. P., Sturzbecher-Hoehne, M., Rupert, P. B., An, D. D., Illy, M.-C., Ralston, C. Y., Brabec, J., de Jong, W. A., Strong, R. K. & Abergel, R. J. (2017). Nat. Chem. 9, 843–849. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ferrier, M. G., Stein, B. W., Batista, E. R., Berg, J. M., Birnbaum, E. R., Engle, J. W., John, K. D., Kozimor, S. A., Lezama Pacheco, J. S. & Redman, L. N. (2017). ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 176–185. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Galbis, E., Hernández-Cobos, J., den Auwer, C., Le Naour, C., Guillaumont, D., Simoni, E., Pappalardo, R. & Sánchez Marcos, E. (2010). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 3811–3815. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gonçalves Ferreira, P., de Ligny, D., Lazzari, O., Jean, A., Cintora Gonzalez, O. & Neuville, D. R. (2013). Chem. Geol. 346, 106–112. Google Scholar
Gorden, A. E., Shuh, D. K., Tiedemann, B. E., Wilson, R. E., Xu, J. & Raymond, K. N. (2007). Chem. Eur. J. 13, 378–379. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gorden, A. E. V., Xu, J., Raymond, K. N. & Durbin, P. (2003). Chem. Rev. 103, 4207–4282. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Jones, Z. R., Livshits, M. Y., White, F. D., Dalodière, E., Ferrier, M. G., Lilley, L. M., Knope, K. E., Kozimor, S. A., Mocko, V., Scott, B. L., Stein, B. W., Wacker, J. N. & Woen, D. H. (2021). Chem. Sci. 12, 5638–5654. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kelley, M. P., Deblonde, G. J. P., Su, J., Booth, C. H., Abergel, R. J., Batista, E. R. & Yang, P. (2018). Inorg. Chem. 57, 5352–5363. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kelley, M. P., Su, J., Urban, M., Luckey, M., Batista, E. R., Yang, P. & Shafer, J. C. (2017). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 9901–9908. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kirsch, R., Fellhauer, D., Altmaier, M., Neck, V., Rossberg, A., Fanghänel, T., Charlet, L. & Scheinost, A. C. (2011). Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 7267–7274. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kraft, S., Stümpel, J., Becker, P. & Kuetgens, U. (1996). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67, 681–687. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Kullgren, B., Jarvis, E. E., An, D. D. & Abergel, R. J. (2013). Toxicol. Mech. Methods, 23, 18–26. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, G. G., Bridges, F. & Booth, C. H. (1995). Phys. Rev. B, 52, 6332–6348. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Lundberg, D. & Persson, I. (2016). Coord. Chem. Rev. 318, 131–134. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Marquardt, C. M., Seibert, A., Artinger, R., Denecke, M. A., Kuczewski, B., Schild, D. & Fanghänel, T. (2004). Radiochim. Acta, 92, 617–623. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mo, Y., Antonio, M. R. & Scherson, D. A. (2000). J. Phys. Chem. B, 104, 9777–9779. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Müller, A., Deblonde, G. J. P., Ercius, P., Zeltmann, S. E., Abergel, R. J. & Minor, A. M. (2021). Nat. Commun. 12, 948. PubMed Google Scholar
Pallares, R. M., An, D. D., Deblonde, G. J. P., Kullgren, B., Gauny, S. S., Jarvis, E. E. & Abergel, R. J. (2021). Chem. Sci. 12, 5295–5301. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Popa, K., Raison, P. E., Martel, L., Martin, P. M., Prieur, D., Solari, P. L., Bouëxière, D., Konings, R. J. M. & Somers, J. (2015). J. Solid State Chem. 230, 169–174. Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Pugmire, A. L., Olive, D. T. & Booth, C. H. (2019). Plutonium Handbook, 2nd ed., edited by D. L. Clark, D. A. Geeson & R. J. Hanrahan, Jr, Vol. 6, ch. 42.5, pp. 2968–2982. La Grange Park, IL: American Nuclear Society. Google Scholar
Ricano, A., Captain, I., Carter, K. P., Nell, B. P., Deblonde, G. J. P. & Abergel, R. J. (2019). Chem. Sci. 10, 6834–6843. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Risch, M., Stoerzinger, K. A., Han, B., Regier, T. Z., Peak, D., Sayed, S. Y., Wei, C., Xu, Z. & Shao-Horn, Y. (2017). J. Phys. Chem. C, 121, 17682–17692. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Schmeide, K., Reich, T., Sachs, S. & Bernhard, G. (2006). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 359, 237–242. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Schooneveld, M. M. van & DeBeer, S. (2015). J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 198, 31–56. Google Scholar
Silver, M. A., Cary, S. K., Johnson, J. A., Baumbach, R. E., Arico, A. A., Luckey, M., Urban, M., Wang, J. C., Polinski, M. J., Chemey, A., Liu, G., Chen, K., Van Cleve, S. M., Marsh, M. L., Eaton, T. M., van de Burgt, L. J., Gray, A. L., Hobart, D. E., Hanson, K., Maron, L., Gendron, F., Autschbach, J., Speldrich, M., Kögerler, P., Yang, P., Braley, J. & Albrecht-Schmitt, T. E. (2016). Science, 353, aaf3762. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Stein, B. W., Morgenstern, A., Batista, E. R., Birnbaum, E. R., Bone, S. E., Cary, S. K., Ferrier, M. G., John, K. D., Pacheco, J. L., Kozimor, S. A., Mocko, V., Scott, B. L. & Yang, P. (2019). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 19404–19414. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sturzbecher-Hoehne, M., Choi, T. A. & Abergel, R. J. (2015). Inorg. Chem. 54, 3462–3468. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sturzbecher-Hoehne, M., Ng Pak Leung, C., D'Aléo, A., Kullgren, B., Prigent, A.-L., Shuh, D. K., Raymond, K. N. & Abergel, R. J. (2011). Dalton Trans. 40, 8340–8346. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Su, J., Batista, E. R., Boland, K. S., Bone, S. E., Bradley, J. A., Cary, S. K., Clark, D. L., Conradson, S. D., Ditter, A. S., Kaltsoyannis, N., Keith, J. M., Kerridge, A., Kozimor, S. A., Löble, M. W., Martin, R. L., Minasian, S. G., Mocko, V., La Pierre, H. S., Seidler, G. T., Shuh, D. K., Wilkerson, M. P., Wolfsberg, L. E. & Yang, P. (2018). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 17977–17984. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vitova, T., Pidchenko, I., Fellhauer, D., Pruessmann, T., Bahl, S., Dardenne, K., Yokosawa, T., Schimmelpfennig, B., Altmaier, M., Denecke, M., Rothe, J. & Geckeis, H. (2018). Chem. Commun. 54, 12824–12827. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wilson, R. E., Carter, T. J., Autillo, M. & Stegman, S. (2020). Chem. Commun. 56, 2622–2625. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Xu, J., Radkov, E., Ziegler, M. & Raymond, K. N. (2000). Inorg. Chem. 39, 4156–4164. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.