research papers
Translocation and fate of nanospheres in pheochromocytoma cells following exposure to synchrotron-sourced terahertz radiation
aSchool of Science, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia, bSchool of Science, Computing and Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria 3122, Australia, cBiomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia, dTHz Beamline, Australian Synchrotron, 800 Blackburn Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia, eIR Microspectroscopy, Australian Synchrotron, 800 Blackburn Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia, fRMIT Microscopy and Microanalysis Facility, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia, and gSchool of Psychology, Illawara and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
*Correspondence e-mail: elena.ivanova@rmit.edu.au
The routes by which foreign objects enter cells is well studied; however, their fate following uptake has not been explored extensively. Following exposure to synchrotron-sourced (SS) terahertz (THz) radiation, reversible membrane permeability has been demonstrated in eukaryotic cells by the uptake of nanospheres; nonetheless, cellular localization of the nanospheres remained unclear. This study utilized silica core-shell gold nanospheres (AuSi NS) of diameter 50 ± 5 nm to investigate the fate of nanospheres inside pheochromocytoma (PC 12) cells following SS THz exposure. Fluorescence microscopy was used to confirm nanosphere internalization following 10 min of SS THz exposure in the range 0.5–20 THz.
followed by energy-dispersive spectroscopic (STEM-EDS) analysis was used to confirm the presence of AuSi NS in the cytoplasm or membrane, as single NS or in clusters (22% and 52%, respectively), with the remainder (26%) sequestered in vacuoles. Cellular uptake of NS in response to SS THz radiation could have suitable applications in a vast number of biomedical applications, regenerative medicine, vaccines, cancer therapy, gene and drug delivery.Keywords: fate of nanospheres; electromagnetic fields (EMFs); synchrotron-sourced THz radiation; PC 12 neuronal cells; membrane permeability.
1. Introduction
Terahertz technologies have gained attention in recent years given their prospects in a wide variety of applications ranging from telecommunications to material science (Gallerano & Biedron, 2004; Son et al., 2019; Sitnikov et al., 2018; Cocker et al., 2021; Todorova et al., 2016). The terahertz (THz) band lies between the microwave and infrared wavelengths on the electromagnetic spectrum (Todorova et al., 2016), from 0.1 mm to 1 mm (1 THz = 1012 Hz) (Todorova et al., 2016; Perera et al., 2019). THz radiation can also be described by: wavelength (λ = 30–3000 µm); wavenumber (k = 3.3–334 cm−1); period (0.1–10 ps); temperature (T = 4.8–478 K); photon energy (E = 0.4–41 meV) (Wiatrak et al., 2020). THz radiation differs from X-ray radiation as it is a non-ionizing radiation; THz frequencies do not carry enough energy to cause direct ionization effects on biological tissue (Wiatrak et al., 2020). Ionization results in the formation of highly reactive free radicals that can cause indirect or secondary damage to biomolecules (Wiatrak et al., 2020). Non-ionizing radiation, such as THz, does not generate free radicals but can cause thermal effects which cannot be distinguished from the biological effects that are caused by bulk heating (Wiatrak et al., 2020). This presents a huge advantage over current techniques like X-ray based techniques which cause biomolecules to break down (Son et al., 2019) thereby increasing its significance in potential clinical applications. Nanospheres (NS) of controlled geometry and surface chemical properties have proven to be of immense importance in theranostics. Their applications range from bioimaging of cells and tissues, immunoassays, clinical chemistry, targeted delivery of antigens, drugs and gene therapy (Gallerano & Biedron, 2004; Son et al., 2019; Sitnikov et al., 2018). New physico-chemical properties endowed by the nanoscale such as high surface-to-volume ratio is key to enabling (i) ease of functionalization, (ii) conjugation of biomolecules (Son et al., 2019) and (iii) high X-ray absorption co-efficient (Cocker et al., 2021). Gold (Au) NS have been rapidly adopted in diagnostic and therapeutic applications in recent years (Son et al., 2019). For example, Au NS have been utilized in photodynamic therapy (PDT) because of properties such as effective fluorescence quenching combined with surface plasmon resonance (Sitnikov et al., 2018). PDT is considered an effective treatment for oncological, skin and infectious diseases. Au NS have also been used as efficient sensors (Cocker et al., 2021) for the detection of various molecules and metal ions (Sitnikov et al., 2018).
The pheochromocytoma cell line PC 12 is routinely used in neuroscience research for studying neurotoxicity, neuroinflammation and neurosecretion (Wiatrak et al., 2020; Orlowska et al., 2017; Jhawar et al., 2022). In the presence of nerve growth factor, PC 12 cells can differentiate into sympathetic ganglion neurons on surfaces coated with various proteins for enhanced cellular attachment (Wiatrak et al., 2020; Orlowska et al., 2017; Jhawar et al., 2022). While investigating the bioeffects of synchrotron-sourced (SS) THz radiation on PC 12 cells, it was found that SS THz induced cell membrane permeabilization (Perera et al., 2019a,b), confirmed using fluorescence microscopy and (TEM) of internalized fluorescent silica (Si) NS (Perera et al., 2019a). Notably, upon exposure to SS THz radiation, the intra-cellular physiology of the PC 12 cells remained unaffected (Perera et al., 2019a). Cellular assays were conducted to assess cell viability, metabolic status, protein concentration and neuronal differentiation for a period of seven days, with no detrimental effects observed except for membrane blebbing in PC 12 cells which was not evident in the untreated control sample (Perera et al., 2019a).
Microwave irradiation at a fixed frequency of 18 GHz has also been studied in eukaryotes, red blood cells (Nguyen et al., 2017), model lipid membranes (Tharushi Perera et al., 2021) and prokaryotes (Nguyen et al., 2015; Shamis et al., 2012a,b). Reversible membrane permeability was reported in PC 12 cells (Perera et al., 2018), confirmed via the localization of Si core-shell Au NS (Tharushi Perera et al., 2022). It was found that the AuSi NS internalized as a result of 18 GHz high-frequency electromagnetic energy (HF EME) were localized within the cytoplasm, within vacuoles inside the cytoplasm or were membrane-associated (Tharushi Perera et al., 2022), whereas no internalization of NS was detected in the non-exposed PC 12 cells.
The aim of the current study was to investigate the cell permeabilization in response to SS THz radiation by locating the presence of AuSi NS. For this purpose we employed TEM, et al., 2019). Accordingly, exploring the SS THz induced internalization and localization of NS in mammalian cells may increase the possibility of non-ionizing radiation becoming a remarkable tool in cell permeabilization techniques due to the lack of detrimental intracellular effects following exposure.
energy-dispersive spectroscopic (STEM-EDS) and fluorescence microscopy. Transportation of foreign material across a biological barrier, as well as understanding of the mechanism of cellular uptake leading to the intracellular route, are of utmost importance in the field of nanomedicine, drug and gene therapy (Florczak2. Materials and methods
2.1. PC 12 cell culture and growth conditions
Pheochromocytoma cells are derived from the rat adrenal medulla (Tharushi Perera et al., 2022). The PC 12 cell line used in this study was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA) and cultured in a complete Gibco RPMI medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Australia) supplemented with 10% Gibco horse serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Australia, HS), 5% Gibco foetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Australia, FBS) and 1% Gibco penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Australia). Supplements were stored as aliquots at −20°C. Stock solutions of the PC 12 cells were prepared in a medium containing 90% FBS and 10% DMSO and stored in liquid nitrogen. The cells were maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a 95% humidified incubator. The medium was changed every two days and passaged accordingly when the confluence reached 90%.
2.2. SS THz exposure at the beam extraction port
PC 12 cells were exposed to 10 min of SS THz radiation using the beam extraction port (BEP), located at the Australian Synchrotron (Melbourne, Victoria, Australia). A monolayer of PC 12 cells was constructed at a concentration of 7.7 × 106 cells ml−1 using 30 µL in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) on a polyethylene (PE) film using an O-ring sealed using grease.
The present configuration of the Australian Synchrotron THz beam delivers energies approaching 0.058 mW over a 4.5 mm radius spot size giving a total intensity of ∼1.25 W m−2 (0.125 mW cm−2) at the BEP. After adjustments for the losses due to the sample holder, the intensity reduces to 1.0 W m−2. The Australian Synchrotron beam contains frequencies from 0.5 THz to above 20.0 THz with a variable intensity [Fig. 1(c)]. The spectrum of the intensity beam is centred on 4.0 THz with the half maximum points occurring at 2.0 THz and 8.0 THz. The temperature of the sample being exposed was recorded repeatedly using an IR gun (Fluke, Infrared thermometers, Everett, WA, USA) before and while the sample was being exposed. The temperature was recorded every minute for 10 min. After the exposure, the sample was collected from the PE film and analysed. Three repeats were carried out for post-exposure analysis. Furthermore, few independent technical replicates were performed over the course of time.
2.3. Internalization of silica nanospheres in PC 12 cells
Fluorescent silica nanospheres with a diameter of 23.5 ± 0.2 nm (FITC) (Corpuscular, Cold Spring, NY, USA) were used to study the permeability of PC 12 cells. The membrane phospholipids were stained using carbocyanine DIL (1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate) dye (ThermoFisher Scientific, Australia). Immediately following SS THz exposure, the nanospheres were added to the cell suspension at a concentration of 10 µg ml−1. After 5 min of incubation, the samples were washed twice using PBS and centrifuged at 1300 rpm for 5 min at 25°C. The procedure was repeated for the untreated controls, where the cell samples were mixed with 10 µL of FITC nanosphere solution. A 150 µL of the sample was visualized using a Flouview FV10i-W inverted microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Ten different fields of view were analysed per sample. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images were used in quantifying nanosphere uptake by counting the number of cells emitting the green fluorescence in parallel with the cells that are not permeabilized.
2.4. Localization of silica shelled gold nanospheres
Silica core-shell gold nanospheres with a diameter of 50 nm ± 5 nm (nanoComposix, San Diego, CA, USA) were used to study the uptake and localization of PC 12 cells. Immediately following SS THz exposure, the nanospheres were added to the cell suspension at a concentration of 10 µg ml−1. After 5 min of incubation, the samples were washed twice using PBS and centrifuged at 1300 rpm for 5 min at 25°C. The procedure was repeated for the untreated controls, where the cell samples were mixed with 10 µL of AuSi NS.
2.5. Sample preparation for TEM
After 5 min of incubation in the presence of nanospheres following SS THz exposure, cell suspensions were pelleted by centrifugation at 1300 rpm for 5 min at 25°C. The cells were then washed twice with PBS (10 mM, pH 7.4) to remove any unbound nanospheres. The cell pellet was conditioned with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). The cell pellet was then re-suspended in primary fixative of 4% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer overnight at 4°C and washed thrice in cacodylate buffer for 10 min each. The cells were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (OSO4) and 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide for 1 h followed by three washes in distilled water for 10 min each. The cells were dehydrated using a graded series of ice-cold ethanol (50%, 70% and 90%) for 15 min each. The cells were further dehydrated by passing through 100% ethanol twice followed by 100% acetone twice for 30 min each. The cells were further infiltrated with a 1:1 ratio of acetone:Spurr's resin mixture overnight. After that the cells were completely exchanged in 100% Spurr's resin twice for 3 h each time, under vacuum. The resin samples were polymerized at 70°C for 48 h. The final block was trimmed, then cut into ultrathin sections (90 nm thickness) using a Leica Ultracut Ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) with a diamond knife (Diatome, Pennsylvania, USA). Sections were placed onto 200 mesh copper grids and examined using a JEM 1010 instrument (Jeol). Approximately 40 TEM images were taken at 5000× and 10000× magnifications for sample analysis.
2.6. STEM-EDS
STEM-EDS was used in the elemental analysis and mapping of the AuNS in the ultrathin sections. STEM-EDS analysis was performed on samples prepared as described above using a Jeol JEM-F200 TEM (FEG, 200 kV). The instrument was equipped with a high-angle annular dark field detector (HAADF, scanning TEM mode, STEM) and an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS).
2.7. Cellular morphology
The scanning electron microscope FeSEM SUPRA 40VP (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with a primary beam energy of 3 kV was used. A 100 µL 2O (resistivity of 18.2 MW cm−1) and dried with 99.99% purity nitrogen gas. The PC 12 cells exposed to 10 min of SS THz radiation were fixed in a cocktail of 2.0% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 30 min. The cells were then dehydrated by passing through a graded ethanol series (20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100%) for 15 min. Before imaging, the fixed cells were subjected to gold sputtering (7 nm thick) using a NeoCoater MP-19020NCTR (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan). The same procedure was applied to non-treated PC 12 cells.
of cells in PBS were placed on a glass cover slip (ProSciTech, Kirwan, Australia) in duplicate. The glass cover slips were then washed with nanopure H2.8. Cell viability
The viability of PC 12 cells was determined using the LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer protocol. The viability of the SS THz irradiated cells and the controls was monitored immediately after the treatment and confirmed through three technical replicates. CLSM was used in assessing the number of viable cells; approximately ten fields of view were analysed per sample type and the number of cells per mm2 were expressed.
2.9. Statistical analysis
Statistical data processing was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS 24.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) among the various groups were calculated by independent groups t-test. The independent variable was the different treatment conditions (Control, SS THz). Results were gathered from three repeats and two technical repeats and averaged, where the average was used as a dependent variable.
3. Results and discussion
PC 12 cells were exposed to 10 min of SS THz radiation at the BEP as illustrated in Fig. 1. The average temperature in the presence of THz radiation was recorded to be 24.57 ± 0.12°C, which was considered to negligible given that the increase was insignificant, only in the range of 0.12°C. When exposing water-based samples, such as biological tissues, or water-based solutions containing samples, the of water (αw) needs to be considered, as this significantly alters both the intensity and the frequency profile at a given sample depth. αw increases from approximately 150 cm−2 at 0.5 THz to 3000 cm−2 (Segelstein, 1981). The consequence is that, for all practical purposes, all frequencies are absorbed within the first 100 µm, with the higher THz frequencies absorbed closer to the surface of the sample when compared with the lower frequencies. This results in significant differences in the exposure profile both in terms of sample depth and frequency. The changes in the THz radiation absorption pattern are presented in Fig. 1(d). In order to present a uniform THz radiation exposure profile to all cells, a monolayer of PC 12 cells was created on a thin polyethylene film using an O-ring of radius 2.5 mm (giving a surface area of approximately 17.2 mm2) and exposed to the beam. Since the PC 12 cells are approximately 10 µm in diameter, the cells would receive a reasonably uniform exposure profile equivalent to the sample depth of 5 µm. An exposure of 10 min with a 1.0 W m−2 incident beam over an area of 17.2 mm2 results in a total energy input of approximately 10.3 mJ.
Cell membrane permeability in PC 12 cells as a result of SS THz radiation was confirmed using fluorescence imaging and . Internalization of FITC NS was seen using confocal microscopy where the green signal was observed bound to the outer membrane (white insets) [Fig. 2(a)]; similar results were obtained before in response to SS THz radiation (Perera et al., 2019a) whereas the unexposed control sample did not indicate the presence of NS. The high-resolution TEM technique was used as an alternative technique, where ultrathin section of cells revealed the presence of NS in vacuoles [Fig. 2(b), black insets, red arrows] inside the cell cytoplasm. By contrast, the untreated control sample did not exhibit NS internalization.
as illustrated in Fig. 2Following confirmation of the Si NS cell–particle interactions, localization of the AuSi NS was further explored using STEM-EDS (Fig. 3). Vacuoles in PC 12 cells are visible in the STEM-EDS micrograph [Fig. 3(a), white insets, yellow arrows], and the line data spanning the entire vacuole reveal the presence of elemental Au [Fig. 3(b), black arrows] in the corresponding spectra. Quantification of the NS localization [Fig. 3(c)] revealed that most of the NS were membrane bound (52%) while 22% were in the cytoplasm and the rest were sequestered in vacuoles (26%); similarly, following exposure to HF EME of 18 GHz, AuSi NS were found to be mainly associated with the membrane after being vacuolized (Perera et al., 2018; Tharushi Perera et al., 2022).
In contrast, the non-exposed PC 12 cells [Fig. 3(d)] were analysed using line data spanning the vacuoles inside the cell, where the corresponding spectra [Fig. 3(e)] did not display any elemental peaks for Au; thus, confirming the absence of AuSi NS in the interior of the cells, which was also confirmed previously (Perera et al., 2019a). The exposure time causing this effect with 18 GHz was only 30 s (which was repeated thrice, with cooling periods of 2 min) whereas the THz exposure lasted for 10 min. This prolonged exposure may drive the endocytic process of the PC 12 cells and may have led to more NS coming into contact with the irradiated cells being vacuolized, which would explain why the SS THz exposed cells exhibited a higher number of NS vacuolizations in comparison with the 18 GHz exposed PC 12 cells. The current results suggest that the NS reside mainly in the cytoplasm where the membrane bounded endosomes have evolved into lysosomes (Chu et al., 2014). As reported previously in the literature, spherical NPs (as used in the current study) remain stable in endosomes following and evolve with the maturation of endosomes (Chu et al., 2014), and can be easily excreted following exocytosis (Yanes et al., 2013).
The viability of PC 12 cells has been previously shown in response to et al., 2019a); the viability of the cells following exposure to SS THz radiation was confirmed in the current study [Figs. 4(a) and 4(b)].
at a fixed frequency of 18 GHz (PereraFollowing exposure to SS THz radiation, viability of the PC 12 cells remained unaffected in comparison with the non-exposed cells; quantification [Fig. 4(b)] of the viable PC 12 cells revealed that the number of viable cells following exposure was reduced in number, but the findings were not statistically significant (p = 0.28). Another interesting finding, which is consistent with what has been shown previously (Perera et al., 2019a), is the blebbing of PC 12 cells as a result of SS THz exposure [Fig. 4(c); black insets and red arrows]. Examination of the blebs indicated that the diameter d of the protrusions of the exterior membrane ranges from 0.4 to 2.0 µm with an average diameter of 1.18 ± 0.48 µm.
The findings of the current study confirmed induced permeability in PC 12 cells following exposure to SS THz radiation without compromising cellular viability and morphology, which is in agreement with our previous reports using mammalian cells (Perera et al., 2018, 2019a) and prokaryotic cells (Nguyen et al., 2015, 2016; Shamis et al., 2011). Few other cell types and biological systems including in vivo models have been studied (Jhawar et al., 2022); one study demonstrated that exposure to 0.72 THz for 60 min resulted in changes of adhesion and axon structure in lymnaea stagnalis neurons (Perera et al., 2019a). In another study, human dermal fibroblasts exposed to continuous THz radiation from an optically pumped molecular gas THz laser source (2.52 THz, 227 mW cm−2) for up to 80 min were shown to be 90% viable (Perera et al., 2019b; Nguyen et al., 2017; Tharushi Perera et al., 2021). When exposed to the narrow-band THz radiation (2.3 THz, 1.4 W cm−2), human embryonic stem cells showed no structural chromosomal aberrations or difference in cell morphology when compared with the untreated control, and only some minor up-regulations of mitochondria-related genes were reported (Nguyen et al., 2015).
Poration of the cell membrane plays an important role in the intracellular delivery of molecules of various sizes (Fan et al., 2015), and has been used in breaching the cell membrane by alternative techniques including electroporation, sonoporation and mechanical stress (Fan et al., 2015; Bolhassani et al., 2014; Tomizawa, 2013). Electroporation works by applying short external pulsed electric fields to create pores in the membrane (Kotnik et al., 2015); sonoporation, on the other hand, uses sound waves instead of electric pulses (Tomizawa, 2013). SS THz radiation induces membrane permeability, not by creating pores in the membrane but rather because its non-ionizing radiation seems to have an effect on the fluidity of the cell membrane that leads to increased permeability, which is an independent mechanism (Tharushi Perera et al., 2022). Drawbacks of the current (alternative) techniques include having a negative effect on normal cellular functions and cell viability, and in the case of electroporation it can cause permanent permeabilization that leads to cell death and strong electrochemical reactions (Zu et al., 2014). THz and GHz radiation, on the other hand, facilitate foreign material into the cells without undermining cellular viability, intra-cellular physiology, morphology or neuronal differentiation [based on results using PC 12 cells (Perera et al., 2019a)]. Another disadvantage of using these techniques is that there is no control over the area which the technique is applied to (Zu et al., 2014; Towhidi et al., 2016), whereas non-ionizing EME including SS THz and GHz can be localized to a specific location, with the entire sample or the monolayer receiving an equal amount of radiation and thus uniform energy absorption. Thus, EME in the THz range has an immense potential in the field of drug delivery and targeted therapy as a safe and effective technique of membrane permeabilization.
The mechanism responsible for non-ionizing radiation-induced membrane permeability remains unclear due to the lack of the relevant data on non-ionizing studies. It may be speculated that cell blebbing or membrane protrusions can be used as an indication of how the membrane responds to HF EME as a result of a drop in intra-cellular pressure (Charras, 2008; Norman et al., 2010). Blebs or cellular protrusions may occur and disappear, and are the result of actomyosin contractions of the cortex which leads to transient detachment of the cell membrane from the actin cortex (Charras, 2008; Norman et al., 2010). In the growth of a bleb, will then flow into the bleb through its neck and the actin cortex is reconstituted (Charras, 2008; Norman et al., 2010).
HF EME has been shown to influence et al., 2016). Simulation studies have shown that high-strength electromagnetic radiation in the range >0.04 V nm−1 led to structural changes in (Todorova et al., 2016) given that upon absorption of EME a molecule undergoes three possible transitions: rotational, vibrational or electronic (Tuieng et al., 2021). EME will also be absorbed by water dipoles (Tuieng et al., 2021) and the increased vibration of the charged molecules may in turn have an effect on other cellular components that leads to changes in cell membrane fluidity (Shamis et al., 2012b; Tuieng et al., 2021). Phospholipids may also play a role in the process of (Bohdanowicz & Grinstein, 2013), yet the mechanism as to how EME induces cell membrane permeability is yet to be explored.
molecules' (Todorova4. Conclusions
The current findings revealed that the majority of AuSi NS were present in the cytoplasm of SS THz exposed cells as single NS or clusters, with the rest accumulated in vacuoles. Since the formation of vesicles containing NS is evident in the irradiated samples, it can be stated that SS THz induced translocation could trigger
leading to NS uptake and internalization in the form of membrane-bound vesicles which later evolve with the maturation of endosomes. Given the current study, SS THz radiation facilitates the delivery of NS in the range 20–50 nm making it a safe, effective technique for cell therapy and drug delivery.Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the facilities, and the scientific and technical assistance of the RMIT University's Microscopy and Microanalysis Facility, a linked laboratory of Microscopy Australia. Open access publishing facilitated by RMIT University, as part of the Wiley–RMIT University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.
Funding information
The authors would like to acknowledge financial support of the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research (Grant No. CRE1042464 and CRE1135076) and the funding received by Australian Radiation Protection and Safety Agency (ARPANSA) under the EME Research Framework.
References
Bohdanowicz, M. & Grinstein, S. (2013). Physiol. Rev. 93, 69–106. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bolhassani, A., Khavari, A. & Oraf, Z. (2014). Application of Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, ch. 11, edited by A. D. Sezer. InTech Open. Google Scholar
Charras, G. T. A. (2008). J. Microsc. 231, 466–478. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Chu, Z., Zhang, S., Zhang, B., Zhang, C., Fang, C. Y., Rehor, I., Cigler, P., Chang, H. C., Lin, G., Liu, R. & Li, Q. (2014). Sci. Rep. 4, 4495. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Cocker, T. L., Jelic, V., Hillenbrand, R. & Hegmann, F. A. (2021). Nat. Photon. 15, 558–569. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Fan, Q., Hu, W. & Ohta, A. T. (2015). Lab Chip, 15, 581–588. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Florczak, A. A., Mackiewicz, A. & Dams-Kozlowska, H. (2019). Int. J. Nanomed. 14, 6855–6865. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gallerano, G. P. & Biedron, S. (2004). Proceedings of the 26th International Free-Electron Laser Conference and the 11th FEL User-Workshop, 29 August–3 September 2004, Trieste, Italy, pp. 216–221. FRBIS02. Google Scholar
Jhawar, S., Arakawa, Y., Kumar, S., Varghese, D., Kim, Y. S., Roper, N., Elloumi, F., Pommier, Y., Pacak, K. & Del Rivero, J. (2022). Cancers, 14, 594. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kotnik, T., Frey, W., Sack, M., Haberl Meglič, S., Peterka, M. & Miklavčič, D. (2015). Trends Biotechnol. 33, 480–488. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. H., Shamis, Y., Croft, R. J., Wood, A., McIntosh, R. L., Crawford, R. J. & Ivanova, E. P. (2015). Sci. Rep. 5, 10980. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. H. P., Pham, V. T. H., Baulin, V., Croft, R. J., Crawford, R. J. & Ivanova, E. P. (2017). Sci. Rep. 7, 10798. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. H. P., Pham, V. T. H., Nguyen, S. H., Baulin, V., Croft, R. J., Phillips, B., Crawford, R. J. & Ivanova, E. P. (2016). PLoS One, 11, e0158135. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Norman, L. L., Brugués, J., Sengupta, K., Sens, P. & Aranda-Espinoza, H. (2010). Biophys. J. 99, 1726–1733. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Orlowska, A., Perera, P., Al Kobaisi, M., Dias, A., Nguyen, H., Ghanaati, S., Baulin, V., Crawford, R. & Ivanova, E. (2017). Materials, 11, 60. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Perera, P., Appadoo, D., Cheeseman, S., Wandiyanto, J., Linklater, D., Dekiwadia, C., Truong, V., Tobin, M., Vongsvivut, J., Bazaka, O., Bazaka, K., Croft, R., Crawford, R. & Ivanova, E. (2019a). Cancers, 11, 162. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Perera, P. G. T., Bazaka, O., Bazaka, K., Appadoo, D., Croft, R. J., Crawford, R. J. & Ivanova, E. P. (2019b). J. Neurol. Neuromed. 4, 35–40. Google Scholar
Perera, P. G. T., Nguyen, T. H. P., Dekiwadia, C., Wandiyanto, J. V., Sbarski, I., Bazaka, O., Bazaka, K., Crawford, R. J., Croft, R. J. & Ivanova, E. P. (2018). Int. J. Nanomed. 13, 8429–8442. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Segelstein, D. J. (1981). The Complex Refractive Index of Water. Thesis, University of Missouri-Kansas City, USA. Google Scholar
Shamis, Y., Croft, R., Taube, A., Crawford, R. J. & Ivanova, E. P. (2012a). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 96, 319–325. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shamis, Y., Taube, A., Mitik-Dineva, N., Croft, R., Crawford, R. J. & Ivanova, E. P. (2011). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 3017–3022. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shamis, Y., Taube, A., Croft, R., Crawford, R. J. & Ivanova, E. P. (2012b). J. Phys. Sci. Appl. 2, 143–151. Google Scholar
Sitnikov, D. S., Ilina, I. V., Pronkin, A. A., Ovchinnikov, A. V., Chefonov, O. V., Zurina, I. M., Gorkun, A. A. & Kosheleva, N. V. (2018). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1147, 012060. CrossRef Google Scholar
Son, J., Oh, S. J. & Cheon, H. (2019). J. Appl. Phys. 125, 190901. CrossRef Google Scholar
Tharushi Perera, P. G., Linklater, D. P., Kosyer, E., Croft, R. & Ivanova, E. P. (2022). R. Soc. Open Sci. 9, 220520. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Tharushi Perera, P. G., Todorova, N., Vilagosh, Z., Bazaka, O., Nguyen, T. H. P., Bazaka, K., Crawford, R. J., Croft, R. J., Yarovsky, I. & Ivanova, E. P. (2021). RSC Adv. 11, 31408–31420. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Todorova, N., Bentvelzen, A., English, N. J. & Yarovsky, I. (2016). J. Chem. Phys. 144, 085101. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Tomizawa, M. (2013). World J. of Methodol. 3, 39–44. CrossRef Google Scholar
Towhidi, L., Khodadadi, D., Maimari, N., Pedrigi, R. M., Ip, H., Kis, Z., Kwak, B. R., Petrova, T. W., Delorenzi, M. & Krams, R. (2016). Physiol. Rep. 4, e12673. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Tuieng, R. J., Cartmell, S. H., Kirwan, C. C. & Sherratt, M. J. (2021). Cells, 10, 3041. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Vilagosh, Z., Appadoo, D., Tharushi Perera, P. G., Hong Phong Nguyen, T., Linklater, D., Juodkazis, S., Croft, R. & Ivanova, E. (2022). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Science (ICIIBMS), 24–26 November 2022, Nara, Japan, pp. 367–369. Google Scholar
Wiatrak, B., Kubis-Kubiak, A., Piwowar, A. & Barg, E. (2020). Cells, 9, 958. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Yanes, R. E., Tarn, D., Hwang, A. A., Ferris, D. P., Sherman, S. P., Thomas, C. R., Lu, J., Pyle, A. D., Zink, J. I. & Tamanoi, F. (2013). Small, 9, 697–704. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zu, Y., Huang, S., Liao, W., Lu, Y. & Wang, S. (2014). J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 10, 982–992. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.