Synchrotron Radiation in Asia-Oceania Region
The role of carboxylate ligand orbitals in the breathing dynamics of a metal-organic framework by resonant X-ray emission spectroscopy
aDepartment of Advanced Materials Science, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8561, Japan, bInstitute for Solid State Physics (ISSP), The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8561, Japan, cInstitute for Advanced Synchrotron Light Source, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Sendai, Miyagi 980-8579, Japan, and dSynchrotron Radiation Collaborative Research Organization, The University of Tokyo, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: ugalino@issp.u-tokyo.ac.jp, harada@issp.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) exhibit structural flexibility induced by temperature and guest adsorption, as demonstrated in the structural breathing transition in certain MOFs between narrow-pore and large-pore phases. Soft modes were suggested to entropically drive such pore breathing through enhanced vibrational dynamics at high temperatures. In this work, oxygen K-edge resonant X-ray emission spectroscopy of the MIL-53(Al) MOF was performed to selectively probe the electronic perturbation accompanying pore breathing dynamics at the ligand carboxylate site for metal–ligand interaction. It was observed that the temperature-induced vibrational dynamics involves switching occupancy between antisymmetric and symmetric configurations of the carboxylate oxygen lone pair orbitals, through which electron density around carboxylate oxygen sites is redistributed and metal–ligand interactions are tuned. In turn, water adsorption involves an additional perturbation of π orbitals not observed in the structural change solely induced by temperature.
1. Introduction
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are soft porous crystals with dynamic crystalline frameworks (Horike et al., 2009; Coudert et al., 2013) exhibiting reversible structural transformations in response to external stimuli. A noteworthy example is the breathing transition observed in the MIL-53 family of MOFs, a structural (Loiseau et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2008) between large-pore and narrow-pore forms which can be induced by temperature and guest adsorption. The MIL-53 structure [Fig. 1(a)] consists of octahedral aluminium oxo metal nodes, bridged through terephthalate or benzenedicarboxylate (BDC) ligands, and assembled into a characteristic wine-rack framework topology (Loiseau et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2008). The carboxylate functionality, COO, is a defining feature of MOF structures, and its ability to bridge metal sites [Fig. 1(b)] enables a variety of framework topologies [Fig. 1(c)] and holds the MOF structure in place.
Free energy calculations (Walker et al., 2010; Wieme et al., 2018) suggested that the thermodynamic stability of narrow-pore and large-pore phases of a MIL-53 MOF depends on the interplay between long-range dispersion interactions and vibrational The narrow-pore phase [Fig. 1(c)], observed at low temperature, is stabilized by ππ stacking interactions between the ligand aromatic moieties that tend to favor pore collapse (Walker et al., 2010; Wieme et al., 2018; Grinnell & Samokhvalov, 2018). In turn, the large-pore phase [Fig. 1(c)], observed at high temperature, is stabilized by vibrational arising from enhanced ligand vibrational dynamics afforded with the larger pore volume (Walker et al., 2010; Wieme et al., 2018). Previous work (Liu et al., 2008; Salazar et al., 2015; Hoffman et al., 2018) showed that pore collapse at low temperatures was accompanied by a decrease in vibrational energy, or softening, of certain vibrational modes such as carboxylate asymmetric stretching (Salazar et al., 2015; Hoffman et al., 2018), benzene ring libration and linker twisting (Liu et al., 2008) modes. Enhancing the vibrational dynamics of these soft modes was proposed to drive pore breathing into large-pore phases at higher temperatures (Liu et al., 2008; Walker et al., 2010; Bersuker, 2013; Salazar et al., 2015; Wieme et al., 2018; Hoffman et al., 2018; Bersuker, 2021). The apparent universality of such mode softening, especially for the carboxylate stretching modes, was observed across carboxylate-based MOFs (Andreeva et al., 2020) as an indirect measure of the strength of MOF metal–ligand interaction. Moreover, it was also suggested how guest adsorption could stabilize the narrow-pore over the large-pore phase via the adsorption interaction (Coudert et al., 2008, 2014). However, there are aspects of structural transitions in MOFs that remain unresolved solely on thermodynamic grounds. These include the onset of ligand defect site formation in UiO-66 MOFs (Shearer et al., 2014), and of interpenetration in MOFs with very large ligands (Bara et al., 2019), which become favored, instead of pore collapse, at low temperatures. Within just the MIL-53 family of MOFs, despite sharing an identical framework topology, changing the metal center, say from Al to Fe or Ga (Volkringer et al., 2009), shifts the breathing transition temperature by large jumps which cannot be accounted for solely by ion size effects, and the role of metal–ligand orbital interaction appears to be significant. Understanding the interplay of temperature and guest adsorption for structural changes in MOFs, including the contribution of metal–ligand orbital interaction, is key to designing nanoporous materials with stimuli-responsive phase transitions exhibiting practical reversibility for real-time applications.
Resonant X-ray emission spectroscopy (RXES) is an emerging method for probing valence electronic states of small molecules (Tokushima et al., 2009; Horikawa et al., 2009; Meyer et al., 2014; Eckert et al., 2022) with element and symmetry selectivity. While nonresonant probes the entire manifold of occupied orbitals, resonant excitation under RXES imposes symmetry restrictions such that only a few selected occupied orbitals are observed in the spectra. In particular, the symmetry of the unoccupied orbital accessed during resonant excitation determines whether certain emission channels will be allowed or forbidden (Monson & McClain, 1970; Gel'mukhanov & Ågren, 1994; Meyer et al., 2014; Miyawaki et al., 2017; Eckert et al., 2022). In this work, oxygen K-edge RXES was undertaken for the MOF, MIL-53(Al), in order to selectively probe the carboxylate ligand orbitals participating in the metal–ligand interaction, both in the presence and absence of adsorbed water, and elucidate their role in modulating MOF vibrational dynamics responsible for pore breathing. RXES measurements were performed using the high-resolution soft X-ray emission spectrometer at the SPring-8 BL07LSU HORNET endstation (Harada et al., 2012; Yamamoto et al., 2014). Electronic structure calculations on the benzenedicarboxylate anion ligand were undertaken to adequately account for the spectral features which exhibited change with temperature and water adsorption.
2. Results and discussion
2.1. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS)
Oxygen K-edge of MIL-53(Al) MOF, in vacuum at 30°C, showed two pre-edge features (Fig. 2) at 532.0 and 534.4 eV. Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations on the benzendicarboxylate (BDC) anion ligand suggested that the 532.0 and 534.4 eV pre-edge peaks arise from the unoccupied orbitals and , respectively. While both are derived from the same delocalized carboxylate COO antibonding fragment orbital, they involve different benzene group orbitals which created the ∼2.4 eV energy gap (Hennies et al., 2007) between the and states. Moreover, it is noted that the 532.0 eV pre-edge peak includes contribution from the antibonding orbital for the localized carbonyl C=O group, as was observed in carboxylates and amino acids (Tokushima et al., 2009; Horikawa et al., 2009; Meyer et al., 2014; Eckert et al., 2022). Hence, RXES measurements were opted at 534.4 eV excitation, instead of at 532.0 eV, in order to probe the delocalized carboxylate COO units (Fig. 2) involved in bridging metal sites within the MOF structure. This minimizes the contribution of localized carbonyl C=O groups indicative of uncoordinated ligand sites in the subsequent RXES spectra.
2.2. Resonant X-ray emission spectroscopy (RXES)
RXES (Fig. 3) at the O 1s → excitation at 534.4 eV (Fig. 2) for the MIL-53(Al) MOF was measured in vacuum at 30°C (Fig. 3). RXES calculations (Roemelt et al., 2013), under restricted open with single excitations using DFT-derived orbitals (ROCIS-DFT) for the BDC anion ligand, suggested that the highest-lying emission features at 526.2 and 525.4 eV arise from the n(b1g) and n(ag) states (Fig. 3), respectively, derived from the carboxylate COO oxygen in-plane lone pair orbitals. The calculated ∼0.4 eV energy gap between these two states for the free BDC anion ligand was attributed to the difference in orbital overlap between the in-plane lone pair orbitals of the two oxygen atoms on the COO carboxylate group, in either an antisymmetric b1g or a symmetric ag configuration (Eckert et al., 2022). In n(b1g), the antibonding-like interaction between the lone pair orbitals creates a region of reduced electron density between the carboxylate oxygen sites, along with a diffuse region of electron density distributed away from the oxygen sites and directed separately into the flanking metal centers (Fig. 3). In turn, in n(ag), the bonding-like interaction between the lone pair orbitals concentrates electron density within the region between the carboxylate oxygens, favoring shared interaction with the neighboring metal centers (Fig. 3). The deep-lying weak emission feature at ∼521.4 eV was assigned to out-of-plane carboxylate π orbitals which delocalize into the neighboring benzene ring π system. The emission bands unaccounted for in the ligand RXES calculations are attributed to contributions from the oxide oxygens in the aluminium oxo centers (Ertan et al., 2017).
2.3. The role of temperature
The temperature dependence of the RXES spectra at 534.4 eV excitation (Fig. 4) for the MIL-53(Al) MOF showed modulation of emission intensities for the highest-lying valence states, with a reduced emission at 526.2 eV [n(b1g)] compensated by an enhanced emission at 525.4 eV [n(ag)] upon temperature increase. Such electronic perturbation appears to be involved in the structural change accompanying the onset of pore breathing at higher temperatures (Loiseau et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2008; Volkringer et al., 2009). This includes the slightly shorter carboxylate C—O bond inferred from the blue shift [Fig. S1 of the supporting information (SI)] for the stretching mode, and the modest increase in lattice constant (SI, Fig. S2) especially across the pore walls. The RXES spectra suggest that pore breathing, solely induced by temperature increase under vacuum, is accompanied by a modulation of orbital occupancy of n(b1g) and n(ag) states, as reflected in the change in their relative emission intensities.
Ligand vibrational dynamics in carboxylate MOFs is closely related to the strength of the metal–ligand (M−O) interaction (Andreeva et al., 2020), with `loose' M—O bond populations preferred over `tight' ones, and stabilized by at higher temperatures (Walker et al., 2010: Wieme et al., 2018). Tuning the orbital population for the n(b1g) and n(ag) states (Fig. 5) is one mechanism towards modulating the strength of metal–ligand interaction, and the accompanying ligand vibrational dynamics and entropic stabilization. In this mechanism, n(b1g) orbital occupation at low temperature appears to be a precedent for carboxylate C—O bond inequivalence, as observed in the narrow-pore phase, as regions of electron density are directed towards the flanking metal centers separately due to the nodal plane between the carboxylate oxygens. In turn, n(ag) orbital occupation at high temperature appears to be a precedent for carboxylate C—O bond equivalence, as observed in the large-pore phase, owing to the shared interaction of the overlapping electron density regions with the neighboring metal centers.
A pseudo-Jahn-Teller (PJT) description of the modulation of orbital occupancy (Bersuker, 2013, 2021) is applied for the n(b1g) and n(ag) orbital populations of the MOF carboxylate upon temperature change. In the PJT mechanism, orbital populations can change via orbital mixing mediated by coupling these electronic states, Γel(b1g) and Γel(ag), to a vibrational mode, Γvib(b1g), under the D2h symmetry of the BDC anion ligand, that satisfies the symmetry condition Γel(b1g) × Γel(ag) × Γvib(b1g) = Γ(Ag). In particular, the carboxylate asymmetric stretching mode of the BDC ligand of b1g symmetry (Fig. 5) is taken to participate in this mechanism, as it is sensitive (SI, Fig. S1) to structural changes in MOFs (Salazar et al., 2015; Hoffman et al., 2018). Also, being an in-plane vibrational mode, the carboxylate b1g asymmetric stretching mode has a large spatial overlap with the in-plane n(b1g) and n(ag) lone pair orbitals being mixed, enhancing the PJT effect as a result (Sato et al., 2006; Bersuker, 2013, 2021). Finally, it is remarked that while the microscopic mechanism of pore breathing in MIL-53 MOFs has been tackled on entropic and mechanical grounds (Walker et al., 2010; Triguero et al., 2011; Cockayne, 2017; Wieme et al., 2018), the modulation of orbital occupancy (Fig. 5) elaborated in this work involves an earlier stage and a smaller scale of the structural just at the onset of `loosening' or `tightening' the metal–ligand interaction that precedes the collective ligand motion needed for the drastic change in lattice structure during the breathing transition.
2.4. The role of water adsorption
The effect of water adsorption on the RXES spectra (Fig. 6) at 532.0 eV excitation (SI, Fig. S3) at 30°C showed that, upon MOF hydration, reduced emission at 525.4 eV is compensated by enhanced emission at 522.0 eV. These emission features at 525.4 and 522.0 eV derive from the carboxylate oxygen in-plane lone pair and out-of-plane π orbitals, respectively (Horikawa et al., 2009; Meyer et al., 2014; Eckert et al., 2022). Such orbital modulation suggests how water adsorption can perturb the out-of-plane electron density by accessing deep-lying π orbitals, which was not observed (SI, Fig. S4) for pore breathing in vacuum solely induced by temperature. While a similar RXES behavior at 534.4 eV excitation was anticipated, this already overlaps with the absorption pre-edge for the water molecule (Horikawa et al., 2009; Meyer et al., 2014; Eckert et al., 2022). Subtracting the contribution of adsorbed water would be difficult such that, ultimately, RXES at 532.0 eV excitation was opted for in this case. It is remarked how such a difference in orbital occupancy observed under vacuum and ambient conditions could provide alternative pathways for pore breathing, as exemplified in their distinct breathing kinetics, with a facile pore collapse under ambient conditions (Loiseau et al., 2004) compared with a severe hysteresis behavior under vacuum (Liu et al., 2008).
3. Conclusion
In summary, electronic perturbation at the ligand carboxylate accompanying pore breathing in the metal-organic framework MIL-53(Al) was observed by oxygen K-edge resonant X-ray emission spectroscopy. Pore breathing in vacuum, solely induced by temperature, involved modulation of orbital occupancy of carboxylate oxygen in-plane lone pair orbitals in either an antisymmetric or a symmetric configuration. In turn, water adsorption into the MOF involved additional perturbation of out-of-plane π orbitals. More than a mere counterion, the carboxylate ligand bears an electronic structure motif that is intrinsically functional for driving structural change in MOFs. Tailoring the symmetry of the ligand carboxylate electronic states appears to be a potential route towards the design of novel functional MOFs with controllable structural transitions.
4. Related literature
The following references, not cited in the main body of the paper, have been cited in the supporting information: Becke (1993); Chmela & Harding (2018); Drisdell et al. (2013); Kang et al. (2011); Momma & Izumi (2008); Neese (2012); Stephens et al. (1994); Weigend & Ahlrichs (2005).
Supporting information
Sections S1 and S2, including Figs. S1 to S5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577524000584/iy5002sup1.pdf
Acknowledgements
This work was in part carried out in SPring-8 BL07LSU (2018B7401, 2019A7401, 2019B7401) and in BL13XU (2023A1566, 2023A1774). We thank Professor Kunihisa Sugimoto (Kinki University) for his assistance in powder XRD measurements.
Funding information
This work was supported by Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Nos. JP19H05717 (Aquatic Functional Materials), JP22H05142 and JP22H05145 (Supraceramics), and JP19K20598.
References
Andreeva, A., Le, K., Chen, L., Kellman, M., Hendon, C. & Brozek, C. (2020). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 19291–19299. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bara, D., Wilson, C., Mörtel, M., Khusniyarov, M., Ling, S., Slater, B., Sproules, S. & Forgan, R. (2019). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 8346–8357. CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Becke, A. (1993). J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1372–1377. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bersuker, I. (2013). Chem. Rev. 113, 1351–1390. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bersuker, I. (2021). Chem. Rev. 121, 1463–1512. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chmela, J. & Harding, M. (2018). Mol. Phys. 116, 1523–1538. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Cockayne, E. (2017). J. Phys. Chem. C, 121, 4312–4317. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Coudert, F., Boutin, A., Fuchs, A. & Neimark, A. (2013). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 3198–3205. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Coudert, F., Jeffroy, M., Fuchs, A., Boutin, A. & Mellot-Draznieks, C. (2008). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 14294–14302. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Coudert, F., Ortiz, A., Haigis, V., Bousquet, D., Fuchs, A., Ballandras, A., Weber, G., Bezverkhyy, I., Geoffroy, N., Bellat, J., Ortiz, G., Chaplais, G., Patarin, J. & Boutin, A. (2014). J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 5397–5405. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Drisdell, W., Poloni, R., McDonald, T., Long, J., Smit, B., Neaton, J., Prendergast, D. & Kortright, J. (2013). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 18183–18190. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Eckert, S., Mascarenhas, E., Mitzner, R., Jay, R., Pietzsch, A., Fondell, M., Vaz da Cruz, V. & Föhlisch, A. (2022). Inorg. Chem. 61, 10321–10328. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ertan, E., Kimberg, V., Gel'mukhanov, F., Hennies, F., Rubensson, J., Schmitt, T., Strocov, V., Zhou, K., Iannuzzi, M., Föhlisch, A., Odelius, M. & Pietzsch, A. (2017). Phys. Rev. B, 95, 144301. CrossRef Google Scholar
Gel'mukhanov, F. & Ågren, H. (1994). Phys. Rev. A, 49, 4378–4389. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Grinnell, C. & Samokhvalov, A. (2018). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 26947–26956. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Harada, Y., Kobayashi, M., Niwa, H., Senba, Y., Ohashi, H., Tokushima, T., Horikawa, Y., Shin, S. & Oshima, M. (2012). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 013116. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Hennies, F., Polyutov, S., Minkov, I., Pietzsch, A., Nagasono, M., Ågren, H., Triguero, L., Piancastelli, M., Wurth, W., Gel'mukhanov, F. & Föhlisch, A. (2007). Phys. Rev. A, 76, 032505. CrossRef Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. E. J., Vanduyfhuys, L., Nevjestić, I., Wieme, J., Rogge, S., Depauw, H., Van Der Voort, P., Vrielinck, H. & Van Speybroeck, V. (2018). J. Phys. Chem. C, 122, 2734–2746. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Horikawa, Y., Tokushima, T., Harada, Y., Takahashi, O., Chainani, A., Senba, Y., Ohashi, H., Hiraya, A. & Shin, S. (2009). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 8676–8679. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Horike, S., Shimomura, S. & Kitagawa, S. (2009). Nat. Chem. 1, 695–704. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kang, I., Khan, N., Haque, E. & Jhung, S. (2011). Chem. A Eur. J. 17, 6437–6442. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Her, J., Dailly, A., Ramirez-Cuesta, A., Neumann, D. & Brown, C. (2008). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 11813–11818. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Loiseau, T., Serre, C., Huguenard, C., Fink, G., Taulelle, F., Henry, M., Bataille, T. & Férey, G. (2004). Chem. A Eur. J. 10, 1373–1382. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Meyer, F., Blum, M., Benkert, A., Hauschild, D., Nagarajan, S., Wilks, R., Andersson, J., Yang, W., Zharnikov, M., Bär, M., Heske, C., Reinert, F. & Weinhardt, L. (2014). J. Phys. Chem. B, 118, 13142–13150. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Miyawaki, J., Suga, S., Fujiwara, H., Urasaki, M., Ikeno, H., Niwa, H., Kiuchi, H. & Harada, Y. (2017). Phys. Rev. B, 96, 214420. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Momma, K. & Izumi, F. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 653–658. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Monson, P. & McClain, W. (1970). J. Chem. Phys. 53, 29–37. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Neese, F. (2012). WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2, 73–78. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Roemelt, M., Maganas, D., DeBeer, S. & Neese, F. (2013). J. Chem. Phys. 138, 204101. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Salazar, J., Weber, G., Simon, J., Bezverkhyy, I. & Bellat, J. (2015). J. Chem. Phys. 142, 124702. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Sato, T., Tokunaga, K. & Tanaka, K. (2006). J. Chem. Phys. 124, 024314. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Shearer, G., Chavan, S., Ethiraj, J., Vitillo, J., Svelle, S., Olsbye, U., Lamberti, C., Bordiga, S. & Lillerud, K. (2014). Chem. Mater. 26, 4068–4071. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Stephens, J., Devlin, F., Chabalowski, C. F. & Frisch, M. (1994). J. Phys. Chem. 98, 11623–11627. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Tokushima, T., Horikawa, Y., Harada, Y., Takahashi, O., Hiraya, A. & Shin, S. (2009). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 1679–1682. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Triguero, C., Coudert, F., Boutin, A., Fuchs, A. & Neimark, A. (2011). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 2033–2037. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Volkringer, C., Loiseau, T., Guillou, N., Férey, G., Elkaïm, E. & Vimont, A. (2009). Dalton Trans. pp. 2241. Google Scholar
Walker, A., Civalleri, B., Slater, B., Mellot–Draznieks, C., Corà, C., Zicovich–Wilson, C. M., Román–Pérez, G., Soler, J. & Gale, J. (2010). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 7501–7503. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Weigend, F. & Ahlrichs, R. (2005). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 3297–3305. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Wieme, J., Lejaeghere, K., Kresse, G. & Van Speybroeck, V. (2018). Nat. Commun. 9, 4899. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Yamamoto, S., Senba, Y., Tanaka, T., Ohashi, H., Hirono, T., Kimura, H., Fujisawa, M., Miyawaki, J., Harasawa, A., Seike, T., Takahashi, S., Nariyama, N., Matsushita, T., Takeuchi, M., Ohata, T., Furukawa, Y., Takeshita, K., Goto, S., Harada, Y., Shin, S., Kitamura, H., Kakizaki, A., Oshima, M. & Matsuda, I. (2014). J. Synchrotron Rad. 21, 352–365. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.