research papers
Ultrashort large-bandwidth X-ray free-electron laser generation with a dielectric-lined waveguide
aSchool of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China, bShanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China, cShanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201210, China, dInstitute of Advanced Science Facilities, Shenzhen 518107, China, and eUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*Correspondence e-mail: wangz@sari.ac.cn, fengc@sari.ac.cn
Large-bandwidth pulses produced by cutting-edge X-ray free-electron lasers (FELs) are of great importance in research fields like material science and biology. In this paper, a new method to generate high-power ultrashort FEL pulses with tunable spectral bandwidth with spectral coherence using a dielectric-lined waveguide without interfering operation of linacs is proposed. By exploiting the passive and dephasingless wakefield at terahertz frequency excited by the beam, stable energy modulation can be achieved in the electron beam and large-bandwidth high-intensity soft X-ray radiation can be generated. Three-dimensional start-to-end simulations have been carried out and the results show that coherent radiation pulses with duration of a few femtoseconds and bandwidths ranging from 1.01% to 2.16% can be achieved by changing the undulator taper profile.
1. Introduction
High-intensity coherent X-ray free-electron lasers (FELs) have promoted unprecedented advancements in research fields like ultrafast science, sub-nanometre structure characterization and atomic inner-shell electron spectroscopy (Bostedt et al., 2016; Rossbach et al., 2019; Li et al., 2022). Unlike conventional optical lasers, FELs utilize the high-quality electron bunches as gain media to achieve flexible coherent amplification of radiation with spectral coverage down to atomic level withstanding the destruction of strong pulses. In most existing FEL facilities, the accelerated bunches directly pass through the undulator arrays to conduct the high-gain process with the self-amplified (SASE) principle (Emma et al., 2010; Ackermann et al., 2007; Ishikawa et al., 2012). The relative bandwidth of the SASE-FEL pulses is of the order of the dimensionless Pierce parameter ρ (Bonifacio et al., 1984), typically ranging from 10−4 to 10−3.
However, there is strong interest in generating ultrashort and large-bandwidth (10−2) FEL pulses, which have potential applications in femtosecond crystallography (Chapman et al., 2011; Schlichting, 2015; Nass et al., 2021), X-ray absorption fine-structure spectroscopy (Popmintchev et al., 2018) and multi-wavelength anomalous diffraction (Favre-Nicolin et al., 2012; Son et al., 2011). In order to broaden the bandwidth of the radiation, various methods have been developed in the last decade. According to the resonance condition of undulators,
where λr is the radiation wavelength, λu the undulator period, γ the Lorentz factor of electrons and K the undulator parameter, there are basically two paths to generate large-bandwidth radiation with currently available undulators of fixed period. A possible method is to introduce a transverse tilt in the electron bunch passing through downstream undulators with considerable transverse variation of the undulator parameter like transverse gradient undulators (Prat et al., 2016) or natural gradient of planar undulators (Song et al., 2018). This kind of transversely tilted bunches can be achieved by radiofrequency (RF) deflecting cavity or corrugated structure. However, these methods suffer from complicated electron dynamics, dedicated large equipment and enormous cost. A more general method is to increase the energy chirp of the electron beam. Large chirped electron beam can be produced by operating the linac off-crest, and opportunely tuning the bunch compression process in the accelerator. The bandwidth of the radiation is proportional to the energy chirp (Hernandez et al., 2016; Yan & Deng, 2019; Prat et al., 2020). With the energy-chirped electron bunches, the bandwidth can be further increased through the longitudinal space charge (LSC) effect resulting from the extremely compressed electron bunch (Serkez et al., 2013). However, increasing the energy chirp exploiting the RF is inefficient, since in this case we have a limitation of the RF amplitude and frequency. Furthermore, this would have an impact also on other beamlines in FEL complexes that do not have dedicated linacs to separately tune the beam energy.
On the contrary, the wavelengths of optical lasers are much shorter than that of RF waves, which are usually used to introduce the energy chirp for more efficient electron beam manipulation. It has been proposed that 13 m-long corrugated structure sections can be used to broaden the SASE bandwidth by up to 3% at the European XFEL (Zagorodnov et al., 2016). Recently a new method based on plasma wakefield acceleration to generate large-bandwidth XFEL radiation has been proposed (Peng et al., 2023). However, for these approaches a reliable implementation is still a critical aspect, due to the large cost and the synchronization. Thus, passive and dephasingless terahertz wakefield components, dielectric-lined waveguides (DLWs), are employed to efficiently and stably manipulate the bunch with a Cherenkov-style self-wakefield. When the beam passes through the DLWs, the THz longitudinal electromagnetic field can be excited with a gradient order of GW m−1 for nC bunches (O'Shea et al., 2014, 2016). Besides, the wakefield elements find their applications in phase space linearization (Craievich, 2010), dechirping operation (Antipov et al., 2014; Emma et al., 2014), two-color FEL schemes (Bettoni et al., 2016a, 2021), terahertz sources (Cook et al., 2009; O'Shea et al., 2019; Floettmann et al., 2021), current shaping (Andonian et al., 2017), beam temporal profile measurement (Bettoni et al., 2016b) and efficient particle acceleration (Jiang et al., 2012).
In this paper, a simple and cost-effective method is proposed to generate a spectral-coherent large-bandwidth X-ray FEL with cylindrical DLW structures. In the proposed method, a DLW structure is employed to generate stable energy chirp in the electron beam taking advantage of the passive, dephasingless and efficient wakefields. The large energy chirp will result in large-bandwidth radiation in the downstream undulators. Three-dimensional start-to-end simulations with the parameters of the Shanghai Soft X-ray FEL facility (Zhao et al., 2017) have been carried out and the results show that tunable large-bandwidth radiation can be achieved with a bandwidth ranging from 1.01% to 2.16% full width at half-maximum (FWHM) by changing the taper profile of the undulator section.
2. Layout and analytic method
In this method, all the phase space manipulations of the bunch are carried out downstream of the switchyard, to avoid the deteriorative impact on other beamlines. A schematic layout of the proposed method is shown in Fig. 1, where a cylindrical dielectric-lined metal waveguide has been employed after the linac to induce large energy chirp in the electron beam. Compared with a corrugated structure, the quadrupole field of the DLW is relatively weak while exciting strong longitudinal wakefield. The high-quality flat-top electron bunch generated in the upstream linac is transferred through the 100 mm-long DLW tube made of fused silica (ɛr = 3.75 as an example) along the axis. Due to the induced resonant Cherenkov-style wakefield excited by the bunch itself, energy modulation is imprinted mainly by the longitudinal electric field. The resonant frequency can be well tuned with different dielectric plating parameters. Wakefield excited can be enhanced as the bunch size decreases in both transverse and longitudinal direction, allowing for adoption of thinner waveguides and therefore shorter modulation wavelengths and stronger amplitudes. From the cosine essence of the point-charge wakefield, the chirp of the bunch head is negative, which means the particle energy of the front slices is higher than that of the back slices. Positive energy chirp can be generated by decreasing the diameter of the waveguide to shorten the wavelength of the wakefield excited, generally. With a following chicane, the positively chirped bunch can be compressed to tune the duration. And an isolated current spike can be obtained with a of several kA and of the few femtoseconds level after extreme compression in the downstream chicane. An ultrashort radiation pulse with tunable large-bandwidth can be therefore expected in the following undulator sections.
The wakefield is excited following charged particles passing by dielectric materials. To further collect and enhance this radiation, cylindrical dielectric-lined waveguide structures are utilized. The particles are meanwhile modulated by the field. In order to calculate the wakefield, the steady-state wakefield solution of Maxwell's equations is used to numerically calculate the bunch evolution in the waveguide. This method is verified efficient when the length of the DLW is much larger than the wavelength of the waveguide's fundamental wavelength in the following content. The general solution for the longitudinal wakefield potential of the monopole resonant mode along the axis of the dielectric tube is shown as (Ng, 1990; Rosing & Gai, 1990)
where z is the axial coordinate along the tube, v is the velocity of the particle, ω0n is the nth resonant angular frequency, H(vt − z) is the Heaviside function, and L is the length of the DLW. The amplitude function of the vacuum area can be numerically calculated by solving the boundary problem of Maxwell's equation in the case of cylindrical coordinates. The energy modulation ΔE(s) introduced within a bunch can be obtained through a convolution of the longitudinal electric field (point charge wake) with the longitudinal bunch distribution.
3. Simulation setups
In order to demonstrate the performance of the proposed scheme, the wakefield simulation code ECHO2D (Zagorodnov & Weiland, 2005) and 3D tracking code GENESIS (Reiche, 1999) are used to verify the bunch dynamics in DLW and simulate the radiation process in the undulators with the typical parameters of the Shanghai Soft X-ray FEL facility (Liu et al., 2021), as listed in Table 1. The coherent synchrotron radiation (CSR) effect during compression, the resistive wall wakefield and the LSC effect after compression are also evaluated. The longitudinal phase space and current profile of the electron bunch at the entrance of the DLW are given in Fig. 2.
|
4. Wakefield and beam dynamics
The high-quality electron beam generated in the upstream linac is transported through the 100 mm-long DLW structure on-axis. The theoretical analysis of the steady-state solution with equation (2) and evolutionary simulation results using ECHO2D of longitudinal wakefields of the first four modes are summarized in Fig. 3, from which one can find that the theoretical results agree very well with the simulation case. It is reasonable to simulate the field evolution analytically without considering the transient effect at the entrance and exit. Furthermore, it is evident that the longitudinal wakefield potential of the monopole significantly influences the bunch compared with the higher-order modes.
The first four resonant frequencies of the monopole field, also known as the transverse magnetic (TM) mode, are analyzed to be 0.64, 2.09, 3.78 and 5.53 THz. With the phase velocity of the resonant frequencies equal to that of ultra-relativistic electrons, the fundamental-mode wavelength of the wakefield is estimated to be 0.46 mm, assuring sub-cycle modulation along the electron bunch. According to the results shown in Fig. 3(a), an ∼100 GV m−1 quasi-linear energy chirp can be introduced by the DLW structure to the last third of the bunch.
In the modulation process, the time-dependent dipole and quadrupole field arising from off-axis particles would significantly degrade the quality of the electron bunch. To suppress the impact of a transverse wakefield, the electron bunch should pass through the DLW structure along the axis with a nearly round βx = βy = 2 m and αx = αy = 1, namely about 30 µm transverse beam size to diminish the time-dependent transverse phase space rotation. The longitudinal phase space after modulation is shown in Fig. 4(a). The monopole dominates the longitudinal phase space with such small bunch size. The energy chirp in the last third is estimated to be 103 GV m−1. Suffering from the transverse wakefield, the trajectory offset and phase space rotation lead to significant projected emittance growth in the x direction from 0.46 µm mrad to 0.62 µm mrad, as shown in Fig. 4(b). However, the quality of the core part with positive energy chirp is preserved relatively better.
as slim as possible. More precisely, even under this circumstance of conceivable alignment of the whole bunch, the off-axis particles and fluctuations of the slice centroid still make a difference to some degree. However, the fluctuation tends to be suppressed with smaller transverse size. Thus, the Twiss parameters at the entrance of the DLW structure are taken to beIn the modulation process, about 0.33% particle loss events take place at the entrance of the waveguide. Those particles with large betatron oscillation amplitude can be intercepted by collimators upstream. In addition, almost no particle hits the dielectric layer in the modulation process, thus avoiding issues like charging and particle shower. As shown in Fig. 3(a), the wakefield is about 60 MV m−1, which is far below that of the breakdown threshold (Thompson et al., 2008). The total energy variation of the bunch before and after the DLW is 58.61 nJ, well within the capabilities of cryocoolers.
5. Spectral-coherent large-bandwidth lasing
Large-bandwidth lasing can be obtained when directly guiding the modulated chirped bunch to the downstream undulator sections, as for from the resonance condition. From the differentiation of equation (1), a chirped bunch with uniform current profile would generate radiation with a relative bandwidth twice the value of the relative energy spread. For a chirped bunch with a relative energy spread of 0.65% (FWHM), it is estimated that radiation pulses with a relative bandwidth of about 1.3% can be produced in the undulator section. However, the spectra of such pulses directly generated are incoherent with many longitudinal modes, for there is no external seed laser nor phase coupling between different longitudinal modes.
To further optimize the phase relation between different frequencies, ultrashort pulses with mode number even down to 1 is expected. The positively chirped part of the bunch is compressed to convert the energy modulation to density modulation in the downstream magnetic chicane with chicane matrix element R56 of 14.82 mm and total length of 11.8 m so as to promote spectral coherence. This dispersion section is conventional in FEL facilities with external seeding schemes. As a consequence, an isolated current spike with of about 8.5 kA can be generated, which may have a strong influence on the quality of the bunch due to CSR. The code CSRtrack (Dohlus & Limberg, 2007) is adopted to assess the CSR effect in the compression process. By reducing the transverse bunch size in the last dipole, the emittance growth of the current spike can be limited to a certain range (Stulle et al., 2007). The longitudinal phase space and the horizontal slice geometrical emittance of the current spike at the exit of the chicane are presented in Fig. 5(a). The horizontal slice emittance of the compressed electron beam increases from 0.53 µm mrad to 0.73 µm mrad after passing through the chicane. Besides, the of the compressed bunch reaches up to 8.41 kA while the spike FWHM duration shortened to 5.84 µm, which is already on the scale of the coherence length of 4 nm free-electron lasing, as displayed in Fig. 5(b).
The compressed electron bunch is transported into the downstream undulator sections after alignment to further study the radiation property after an 8.8 m-long matching section. For such an ultrashort current spike with high current, the bunch will continuously undergo space charge effects from the bunch itself and resistive wall wakefield excitation while passing by aluminium round beam pipes even in the drift section. The longitudinal field comprising the LSC (Ding et al., 2009) and resistive wall wakefield is calculated and shown in Fig. 5(b). The total longitudinal field can reach up to 0.8 MV m−1. Even in the worst case of applying all the longitudinal modulation at the entrance of the 58.5 m-long undulator sections, this would result in longitudinal particle slippage of no more than 0.59 µm with respect to the initial current peak, about an order of magnitude smaller than the current spike width. Thus, it is reasonable in simulation to freeze the longitudinal field and in this study regarding the numerical noise. The simulation process including these longitudinal effects is carried out using GENESIS. To preserve the resonant condition for the target lasing slice with the increasing chirp proportional to undulator distance, the undulator parameter profile should be tuned according to the varying central energy met by the chosen radiation slice along the electron beam, as displayed in Fig. 6(a). In Fig. 6(b), the resonant wavelength distribution for different slices at different undulator distance is shown, with the magenta solid line representing the trajectory of the chosen radiation slice. The radiation peak finally coincidences with the slice. As a result of the increasing chirp generated by the longitudinal field, the decreases quickly.
The FEL performance has been summarized in Fig. 7. As a result of the large energy chirp induced by the longitudinal field and the matching undulator taper profile, it can be found in Fig. 7(a) that isolated X-ray pulses without sidebands are stably produced with different initial shot noises. The average pulse energy is about 131 µJ. The Wigner distribution of a typical shot is shown in Fig. 7(b), in which the bandwidth of the spectral intensity is about 0.77%. The positive chirp can be attributed to the chirp of the resonant wavelength around z = 40 m in Fig. 6(b). The statistical FEL evolution process for 260 shots is summarized in Fig. 7(c) where one can find that the average FWHM decreases from 19 fs to about 1.41 fs along the 15 undulator segments resulting from increasingly enhanced energy chirp, and the peak power finally increases to 71 GW. As depicted in Fig. 7(d), the average central wavelength for 260 shots is around 4.08 nm with a relative bandwidth of 1.02% (FWHM). It should be pointed out that only the current spike of the beam is taken into account in the FEL simulations, because the gain process of the head part is eroded compared with the target region due to the low current, transverse mismatch and off-resonant undulator parameters. The power of the head part is lower by a factor of 100000 than the peak power in further simulations. In addition, the betatron oscillation due to mismatch is limited to 0.5 mm. Therefore the particle loss in the undulator sections is controllable.
In the foregoing simulation, the undulator taper profile is chosen to preserve the resonant wavelength as the target slice slipping ahead, namely the `chirp-taper' technique (Saldin et al., 2006; Giannessi et al., 2011). Taking advantage of the high current spike, the bandwidth can be further broadened by disturbing the resonance condition. Fig. 8(a) displays the radiation property at the exit of 15 undulator sections of different scaling factor. The scaling factor is defined as the taper strength with respect to the optimized one shown in Fig. 6(a), characterized as Kn = n(Kn=1 − K0) + K0, where Kn is the undulator profile for scaling factor n, K0 is the initial undulator parameter, and Kn=1 is the resonant undulator profile as demonstrated in Fig. 6(b). In this manner, the bandwidth can be tuned from 1.01% to 2.16% (FWHM) by adjusting the scaling factor from 0.5 to 1.3 as summarized in Fig. 8(b). Meanwhile, the total pulse energy decreases by a factor of three from 134 µJ to 46 µJ when the bandwidth is extended by a factor of near two. Further enhancing the taper scaling factor, the final radiation property degrades sharply as a consequence of the short growth length preserving the resonance condition.
6. Conclusion
In this paper, a novel method is proposed using DLW to induce a large positive energy chirp in the electron beam without interfering with the running of the linac and other beamlines in a FEL complex. By use of a 100 mm-long DLW tube, stable sub-cycle energy modulation can be achieved taking advantage of the passiveness and dephasingless wakefield of the DLW structures. Three-dimensional simulations have been carried out and the results show that the isolated ultrashort X-ray radiation pulse can be achieved with a FWHM bandwidth of 1.02% and peak power of 71.14 GW. By rescaling the taper strength of the undulator segment the bandwidth can be further tuned from 1.01% to 2.16% (FWHM). The longitudinal space charge effect, the coherent synchrotron radiation effect and the longitudinal resistive wall wakefield are taken into account. The isolated large-bandwidth X-ray radiation pulses will have great potential applications on spectroscopy science studies.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dao Xiang and Yujie Lu for helpful discussions and useful comments.
Funding information
The following funding is acknowledged: National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant Nos. 12122514, 11975300, 12105347, 12275340).
References
Ackermann, W., Asova, G., Ayvazyan, V., Azima, A., Baboi, N., Bähr, J., Balandin, V., Beutner, B., Brandt, A., Bolzmann, A., Brinkmann, R., Brovko, O. I., Castellano, M., Castro, P., Catani, L., Chiadroni, E., Choroba, S., Cianchi, A., Costello, J. T., Cubaynes, D., Dardis, J., Decking, W., Delsim-Hashemi, H., Delserieys, A., Di Pirro, G., Dohlus, M., Düsterer, S., Eckhardt, A., Edwards, H. T., Faatz, B., Feldhaus, J., Flöttmann, K., Frisch, J., Fröhlich, L., Garvey, T., Gensch, U., Gerth, Ch., Görler, M., Golubeva, N., Grabosch, H., Grecki, M., Grimm, O., Hacker, K., Hahn, U., Han, J. H., Honkavaara, K., Hott, T., Hüning, M., Ivanisenko, Y., Jaeschke, E., Jalmuzna, W., Jezynski, T., Kammering, R., Katalev, V., Kavanagh, K., Kennedy, E. T., Khodyachykh, S., Klose, K., Kocharyan, V., Körfer, M., Kollewe, M., Koprek, W., Korepanov, S., Kostin, D., Krassilnikov, M., Kube, G., Kuhlmann, M., Lewis, C. L. S., Lilje, L., Limberg, T., Lipka, D., Löhl, F., Luna, H., Luong, M., Martins, M., Meyer, M., Michelato, P., Miltchev, V., Möller, W. D., Monaco, L., Müller, W. F. O., Napieralski, O., Napoly, O., Nicolosi, P., Nölle, D., Nuñez, T., Oppelt, A., Pagani, C., Paparella, R., Pchalek, N., Pedregosa-Gutierrez, J., Petersen, B., Petrosyan, B., Petrosyan, G., Petrosyan, L., Pflüger, J., Plönjes, E., Poletto, L., Pozniak, K., Prat, E., Proch, D., Pucyk, P., Radcliffe, P., Redlin, H., Rehlich, K., Richter, M., Roehrs, M., Roensch, J., Romaniuk, R., Ross, M., Rossbach, J., Rybnikov, V., Sachwitz, M., Saldin, E. L., Sandner, W., Schlarb, H., Schmidt, B., Schmitz, M., Schmüser, P., Schneider, J. R., Schneidmiller, E. A., Schnepp, S., Schreiber, S., Seidel, M., Sertore, D., Shabunov, A. V., Simon, C., Simrock, S., Sombrowski, E., Sorokin, A. A., Spanknebel, P., Spesyvtsev, R., Staykov, L., Steffen, B., Stephan, F., Stulle, F., Thom, H., Tiedtke, K., Tischer, M., Toleikis, S., Treusch, R., Trines, D., Tsakov, I., Vogel, E., Weiland, T., Weise, H., Wellhöfer, M., Wendt, M., Will, I., Winter, A., Wittenburg, K., Wurth, W., Yeates, P., Yurkov, M. V., Zagorodnov, I. & Zapfe, K. (2007). Nat. Photon. 1, 336–342. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Andonian, G., Barber, S., O'Shea, F., Fedurin, M., Kusche, K., Swinson, C. & Rosenzweig, J. (2017). Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 054802. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Antipov, S., Baturin, S., Jing, C., Fedurin, M., Kanareykin, A., Swinson, C., Schoessow, P., Gai, W. & Zholents, A. (2014). Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 114801. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Bettoni, S., Craievich, P., Dax, A., Ganter, R., Guetg, M., Huppert, M., Marcellini, F., Neto Pestana, R., Reiche, S., Prat, E., Trisorio, A., Vicario, C. & Lutman, A. (2021). Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 24, 082801. CrossRef Google Scholar
Bettoni, S., Craievich, P., Lutman, A. & Pedrozzi, M. (2016b). Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 19, 021304. CrossRef Google Scholar
Bettoni, S., Prat, E. & Reiche, S. (2016a). Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 19, 050702. CrossRef Google Scholar
Bonifacio, R., Pellegrini, C. & Narducci, L. (1984). Opt. Commun. 50, 373–378. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bostedt, C., Boutet, S., Fritz, D. M., Huang, Z., Lee, H. J., Lemke, H. T., Robert, A., Schlotter, W. F., Turner, J. J. & Williams, G. J. (2016). Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015007. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Chapman, H. N., Fromme, P., Barty, A., White, T. A., Kirian, R. A., Aquila, A., Hunter, M. S., Schulz, J., DePonte, D. P., Weierstall, U., Doak, R. B., Maia, F. R. N. C., Martin, A. V., Schlichting, I., Lomb, L., Coppola, N., Shoeman, R. L., Epp, S. W., Hartmann, R., Rolles, D., Rudenko, A., Foucar, L., Kimmel, N., Weidenspointner, G., Holl, P., Liang, M., Barthelmess, M., Caleman, C., Boutet, S., Bogan, M. J., Krzywinski, J., Bostedt, C., Bajt, S., Gumprecht, L., Rudek, B., Erk, B., Schmidt, C., Hömke, A., Reich, C., Pietschner, D., Strüder, L., Hauser, G., Gorke, H., Ullrich, J., Herrmann, S., Schaller, G., Schopper, F., Soltau, H., Kühnel, K., Messerschmidt, M., Bozek, J. D., Hau-Riege, S. P., Frank, M., Hampton, C. Y., Sierra, R. G., Starodub, D., Williams, G. J., Hajdu, J., Timneanu, N., Seibert, M. M., Andreasson, J., Rocker, A., Jönsson, O., Svenda, M., Stern, S., Nass, K., Andritschke, R., Schröter, C., Krasniqi, F., Bott, M., Schmidt, K. E., Wang, X., Grotjohann, I., Holton, J. M., Barends, T. R. M., Neutze, R., Marchesini, S., Fromme, R., Schorb, S., Rupp, D., Adolph, M., Gorkhover, T., Andersson, I., Hirsemann, H., Potdevin, G., Graafsma, H., Nilsson, B. & Spence, J. C. H. (2011). Nature, 470, 73–77. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cook, A., Tikhoplav, R., Tochitsky, S., Travish, G., Williams, O. & Rosenzweig, J. (2009). Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 095003. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Craievich, P. (2010). Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 13, 034401. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Ding, Y., Huang, Z., Ratner, D., Bucksbaum, P. & Merdji, H. (2009). Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 12, 060703. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Dohlus, M. & Limberg, T. (2007). CSRTRACK, Version 1.2. DESY, Hamburg, Germany. Google Scholar
Emma, P., Akre, R., Arthur, J., Bionta, R., Bostedt, C., Bozek, J., Brachmann, A., Bucksbaum, P., Coffee, R., Decker, F.-J., Ding, Y., Dowell, D., Edstrom, S., Fisher, A., Frisch, J., Gilevich, S., Hastings, J., Hays, G., Hering, P., Huang, Z., Iverson, R., Loos, H., Messerschmidt, M., Miahnahri, A., Moeller, S., Nuhn, H., Pile, G., Ratner, D., Rzepiela, J., Schultz, D., Smith, T., Stefan, P., Tompkins, H., Turner, J., Welch, J., White, W., Wu, J., Yocky, G. & Galayda, J. (2010). Nat. Photon. 4, 641–647. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Emma, P., Venturini, M., Bane, K., Stupakov, G., Kang, H.-S., Chae, M., Hong, J., Min, C.-K., Yang, H., Ha, T., Lee, W. W., Park, C. D., Park, S. J. & Ko, I. S. (2014). Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 034801. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Favre-Nicolin, V., Proietti, M., Leclere, C., Katcho, N., Richard, M. I. & Renevier, H. (2012). Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 208, 189–216. CAS Google Scholar
Floettmann, K., Lemery, F., Dohlus, M., Marx, M., Tsakanov, V. & Ivanyan, M. (2021). J. Synchrotron Rad. 28, 18–27. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Giannessi, L., Bacci, A., Bellaveglia, M., Briquez, F., Castellano, M., Chiadroni, E., Cianchi, A., Ciocci, F., Couprie, M., Cultrera, L., Dattoli, G., Filippetto, D., Del Franco, M., Di Pirro, G., Ferrario, M., Ficcadenti, L., Frassetto, F., Gallo, A., Gatti, G., Labat, M., Marcus, G., Moreno, M., Mostacci, A., Pace, E., Petralia, A., Petrillo, V., Poletto, L., Quattromini, M., Rau, J. V., Ronsivalle, C., Rosenzweig, J., Rossi, A. R., Rossi Albertini, V., Sabia, E., Serluca, M., Spampinati, S., Spassovsky, I., Spataro, B., Surrenti, V., Vaccarezza, C. & Vicario, C. (2011). Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 144801. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Ishikawa, T., Aoyagi, H., Asaka, T., Asano, Y., Azumi, N., Bizen, T., Ego, H., Fukami, K., Fukui, T., Furukawa, Y., Goto, S., Hanaki, H., Hara, T., Hasegawa, T., Hatsui, T., Higashiya, A., Hirono, T., Hosoda, N., Ishii, M., Inagaki, T., Inubushi, Y., Itoga, T., Joti, Y., Kago, M., Kameshima, T., Kimura, H., Kirihara, Y., Kiyomichi, A., Kobayashi, T., Kondo, C., Kudo, T., Maesaka, H., Maréchal, X. M., Masuda, T., Matsubara, S., Matsumoto, T., Matsushita, T., Matsui, S., Nagasono, M., Nariyama, N., Ohashi, H., Ohata, T., Ohshima, T., Ono, S., Otake, Y., Saji, C., Sakurai, T., Sato, T., Sawada, K., Seike, T., Shirasawa, K., Sugimoto, T., Suzuki, S., Takahashi, S., Takebe, H., Takeshita, K., Tamasaku, K., Tanaka, H., Tanaka, R., Tanaka, T., Togashi, T., Togawa, K., Tokuhisa, A., Tomizawa, H., Tono, K., Wu, S., Yabashi, M., Yamaga, M., Yamashita, A., Yanagida, K., Zhang, C., Shintake, T., Kitamura, H. & Kumagai, N. (2012). Nat. Photon. 6, 540–544. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Jiang, B., Jing, C., Schoessow, P., Power, J. & Gai, W. (2012). Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 15, 011301. CrossRef Google Scholar
Li, S., Driver, T., Rosenberger, P., Champenois, E. G., Duris, J., Al-Haddad, A., Averbukh, V., Barnard, J. C., Berrah, N., Bostedt, C., Bucksbaum, P. H., Coffee, R. N., DiMauro, L. F., Fang, L., Garratt, D., Gatton, A., Guo, Z., Hartmann, G., Haxton, D., Helml, W., Huang, Z., LaForge, A. C., Kamalov, A., Knurr, J., Lin, M., Lutman, A. A., MacArthur, J. P., Marangos, J. P., Nantel, M., Natan, A., Obaid, R., O'Neal, J. T., Shivaram, N. H., Schori, A., Walter, P., Wang, A. L., Wolf, T. J. A., Zhang, Z., Kling, M. F., Marinelli, A. & Cryan, J. P. (2022). Science, 375, 285–290. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, B., Feng, C., Gu, D., Gao, F., Deng, H., Zhang, M., Sun, S., Chen, S., Zhang, W., Fang, W., Wang, Z., Zhou, Q., Leng, Y., Gu, M., Yin, L., Gu, Q., Fang, G., Wang, D. & Zhao, Z. (2021). Appl. Sci. 12, 176. CrossRef Google Scholar
Nass, K., Bacellar, C., Cirelli, C., Dworkowski, F., Gevorkov, Y., James, D., Johnson, P. J. M., Kekilli, D., Knopp, G., Martiel, I., Ozerov, D., Tolstikova, A., Vera, L., Weinert, T., Yefanov, O., Standfuss, J., Reiche, S. & Milne, C. J. (2021). IUCrJ, 8, 905–920. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ng, K.-Y. (1990). Phys. Rev. D, 42, 1819–1828. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
O'Shea, B., Andonian, G., Barber, S., Fitzmorris, K., Hakimi, S., Harrison, J., Hoang, P., Hogan, M., Naranjo, B., Williams, O., Yakimenko, V. & Rosenzweig, J. B. (2016). Nat. Commun. 7, 12763. PubMed Google Scholar
O'Shea, B., Williams, O., Andonian, G., Harrison, J., Fitzmorris, K. & Rosenzweig, J. (2014). Proceedings of the 5th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC2014), 15–20 June 2014, Dresden, Germany, pp. 965–967. TUOBB02. Google Scholar
O'Shea, B. D., Andonian, G., Barber, S. K., Clarke, C. I., Hoang, P. D., Hogan, M. J., Naranjo, B., Williams, O. B., Yakimenko, V. & Rosenzweig, J. B. (2019). Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 134801. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Peng, B., Feng, C., Wang, Z., Hua, J., Wu, Y., Deng, H., Li, F., Lu, W. & Zhao, Z. (2023). Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 054066. CrossRef Google Scholar
Popmintchev, D., Galloway, B. R., Chen, M.-C., Dollar, F., Mancuso, C. A., Hankla, A., Miaja-Avila, L., O'Neil, G., Shaw, J. M., Fan, G., Ališauskas, S., Andriukaitis, G., Balčiunas, T., Mücke, O. D., Pugzlys, A., Baltuška, A., Kapteyn, H. C., Popmintchev, T. & Murnane, M. M. (2018). Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 093002. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Prat, E., Calvi, M. & Reiche, S. (2016). J. Synchrotron Rad. 23, 874–879. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Prat, E., Dijkstal, P., Ferrari, E. & Reiche, S. (2020). Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 074801. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Reiche, S. (1999). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 429, 243–248. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rosing, M. & Gai, W. (1990). Phys. Rev. D, 42, 1829–1834. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rossbach, J., Schneider, J. R. & Wurth, W. (2019). Phys. Rep. 808, 1–74. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Saa Hernandez, A., Prat, E., Bettoni, S., Beutner, B. & Reiche, S. (2016). Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 19, 090702. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Saldin, E. L., Schneidmiller, E. A. & Yurkov, M. V. (2006). Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 9, 050702. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Schlichting, I. (2015). IUCrJ, 2, 246–255. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Serkez, S., Kocharyan, V., Saldin, E., Zagorodnov, I., Geloni, G. & Yefanov, O. (2013). arXiv: 1306.4830. Google Scholar
Son, S.-K., Chapman, H. N. & Santra, R. (2011). Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 218102. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Song, M., Yan, J., Li, K., Feng, C. & Deng, H. (2018). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 884, 11–17. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Stulle, F., Adelmann, A. & Pedrozzi, M. (2007). Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 10, 031001. CrossRef Google Scholar
Thompson, M., Badakov, H., Cook, A., Rosenzweig, J., Tikhoplav, R., Travish, G., Blumenfeld, I., Hogan, M., Ischebeck, R., Kirby, N., Siemann, R., Walz, D., Muggli, P., Scott, A. & Yoder, R. B. (2008). Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 214801. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Yan, J. & Deng, H. (2019). Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 22, 020703. CrossRef Google Scholar
Zagorodnov, I., Feng, G. & Limberg, T. (2016). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 837, 69–79. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zagorodnov, I. & Weiland, T. (2005). Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, 8, 042001. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhao, Z., Wang, D., Gu, Q., Yin, L., Fang, G., Gu, M., Leng, Y., Zhou, Q., Liu, B., Tang, C., Huang, W., Liu, Z. & Jiang, H. (2017). Synchrotron Radiat. News, 30(6), 29–33. CrossRef Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.