view article
Figure 2
Flux density comparison at 8.500 keV and z = 20 mm downstream of the grating. In the upper panel is shown a crosscut profile of the counts per pixel recorded for the four-reflection geometry for a counting time of 120 s. In the lower panel a crosscut profile is shown for the two-reflection geometry for a counting time of 6 s. These data show that the flux density in the four-reflection geometry is 5% of that for the two-reflection geometry.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Volume 31| Part 3| May 2024| Pages 508-516
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577524001425
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS