research papers
VUV absorption spectra of water and nitrous oxide by a double-duty differentially pumped gas filter
aPaul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
*Correspondence e-mail: andras.boedi@psi.ch, andre.al-haddad@psi.ch
The differentially pumped rare-gas filter at the end of the VUV beamline of the Swiss Light Source has been adapted to house a windowless absorption cell for gases. Absorption spectra can be recorded from 7 eV to up to 21 eV photon energies routinely, as shown by a new water and nitrous oxide 2O exhibits a small shift in the band and tentative fine structures that have not yet been fully described. This setup will facilitate the measurement of absorption spectra in the VUV above the of LiF and MgF2 windows. It will also allow us to carry out condensed-phase measurements on thin liquid sheets and solid films. Further development options are discussed, including the recording of temperature-dependent absorption spectra, a stationary gas cell for calibration measurements, and the improvement of the photon energy resolution.
By and large, the spectra agree with previously published ones both in terms of resonance energies and absorption cross sections, but that of N1. Introduction
Photoabsorption, in which condensed matter or isolated species absorb photons and transition to higher-energy states, underpins a multitude of natural and synthetic systems, most notably vision, photosynthesis and photovoltaics. While these rely on the spectral range with the maximum intensity of i.e. on visible light, absorption spectroscopy spans the entire electromagnetic spectrum from microwaves to X-rays. Microwave spectroscopy reveals molecular rotation and, thus, geometries. Room-temperature black-body radiation peaks in the infrared, which is why infrared absorption drives the greenhouse effect. Infrared spectroscopy is a structural analytical tool in the energy range of vibrational excitation. Visible (vis), ultraviolet (UV) and vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) photons have energies that allow for electronic excitation of valence states, potentially leading to ionization above hν > 5 eV photon energy (λ < 250 nm). The UV-vis as well as VUV absorption spectra of gaseous molecules of atmospheric interest have been compiled in the eminently useful MPI-Mainz UV/VIS Spectral Atlas (Keller-Rudek et al., 2013). X-ray absorption involves core-excitation states. Thanks to synchrotron and free-electron laser facilities, tender and hard X-ray experiments have provided a wealth of structural information on condensed-state samples (Willmott, 2019).
VUV absorption spectra of gaseous samples give insights into electronic excitations to high-lying valence states, allow the identification of Rydberg states and their progressions, and VUV absorption may lead to et al., 2009) and the breakdown diagram of the water cation (Bodi et al., 2014) show that the threshold jumps fourfold at the H-loss onset. With no comparable jump discernible in the photoabsorption oscillator strengths (Gürtler et al., 1977), this implies that the to threshold changes suddenly as the channel opens up. This identifies a process beyond the sudden approximation (Melania Oana & Krylov, 2007; Bodi et al., 2017), which is an important aspect regarding calculations. VUV absorption spectra are also connected to resonance-enhanced experiments, in which the neutral states seen in the act as intermediate states, resonantly excited in (Ashfold et al., 1984; Yang et al., 2010). Beyond fundamental insights into electronic and vibronic structure as well as transitions, VUV absorption also plays a direct role in environments with a strong VUV radiation field. For instance, black-body radiation peaks in the VUV range at temperatures around 20000 K. Therefore, VUV absorption plays an important role in plasma physics and in the radiation field of blue stars (Cruz-Diaz et al., 2014). Furthermore, VUV-induced chemistry may also play a role at the edge of the atmosphere (Gao, 2021). In fact, relatively recent data on water vapor in the 6.23–6.85 eV energy range, recorded using a hydrogen discharge lamp, continue to influence terrestrial and extraterrestrial atmospheric models (Parkinson & Yoshino, 2003). Generally, the weak absorption of by water vapor in the near-UV range between 3.1 and 6.2 eV at characteristic cross sections of 10−24 cm2 is a poorly understood and neglected aspect in atmospheric radiation models leading to errors in the range 0.2–0.8 W m−2 (Makogon et al., 2013; Pei et al., 2019).
above the In small molecules, vibrational progressions can often be resolved and assigned. Above the the ratio of the and the photoabsorption cross sections yields the which reveals fundamental mechanistic details. For instance, the water threshold photoelectron spectrum (TruongIn hydrocarbons and oxygenates, VUV absorption is associated with the excitation of σ and n electrons into σ* and Rydberg orbitals. As σ orbitals are sensitive to the molecular structure, VUV absorption spectra can contribute to the identification of polyatomic molecules relevant in low-temperature combustion and atmospheric chemistry (Doner et al., 2022). Electronic structure theory can be applied to compute these transitions, e.g. for oxygenates (Bralick et al., 2023), whereas Franck–Condon modeling and on-the-fly ab initio semiclassical approaches can be used to simulate the vibrational structure of the spectrum (Patoz et al., 2018).
Measuring VUV absorption spectra in the gas phase can be challenging. There are few laboratory-based light sources that deliver sufficient ), for instance to record the of nitrous oxide (N2O) in the 12.4–20.7 eV range (Cook et al., 1968). Deuterium lamps can be used in the 5–10 eV range to enable quantitative isomer-resolved speciation measurements of functionalized hydrocarbons in combustion chemistry (Christianson et al., 2021). Machine learning models were also proposed for binary molecular classification using VUV absorption spectra obtained in the laboratory (Doner et al., 2023). Nevertheless, broadband VUV absorption studies have primarily been carried out at synchrotron light sources. These deliver plenty of VUV but have stringent vacuum requirements to protect the accelerator. A differential pumping scheme was used together with a 100 nm zapon (cellulose nitrate) film to record the absorption cross sections of rare gases at the Synchrotron Radiation Source (SRS) at Daresbury Laboratory (West & Marr, 1976). Later, a capillary beam guide was utilized for differential pumping when recording the nitrous oxide in the 12.9–25.6 eV range at the SRS (Shaw et al., 1992). Further windowless differentially pumped absorption cells were used to record VUV photoabsorption spectra, for example for water vapor in the 12.4–20.7 eV range at DESY (Gürtler et al., 1977) and for nitrous oxide in the 5.9–12.4 eV range at the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC) at Hsinchu (Nee et al., 1999). Fillion et al. reported a high-resolution water vapor between 10.9 and 12.0 eV at the LURE-Super-ACO synchrotron (Fillion et al., 2004). Nonetheless, these sources have either been decommissioned or are nearing their end of life, which means that experimental stations where broadband VUV absorption spectra can be recorded above 11 eV (λ < 113 nm) are virtually nonexistent. A notable exception is the state-of-the-art at the DESIRS beamline of SOLEIL, which allows for the measurement of absorption cross sections in a molecular beam and at room temperature in the 4–30 eV photon energy range with a limiting resolution of 0.01 meV (10−4 nm at 10 eV) (de Oliveira et al., 2016). This setup has been employed to record the high-resolution of room-temperature and jet-cooled ammonia between 7.32 and 11.53 eV (Pratt et al., 2023) and that of two dihydrofuran isomers in the 5.5–9.4 eV photon energy range (Röder et al., 2020).
in the VUV. Historically, Hopfield-continuum light sources were used (Cook & Metzger, 1964Windowed absorption cells can only reach energies up to 11.3 eV (λ > 110 nm) in the VUV because of the of the window material, typically LiF or MgF2. They are more broadly available and have been used to record a multitude of VUV absorption spectra. Also at the Daresbury light source, a windowed setup was used to measure the VUV of ozone (Mason et al., 1996). Duflot et al. reviewed synchrotron-based VUV photoabsorption studies of gaseous samples (Duflot et al., 2019), focusing on work done at the ASTRID synchrotron at Aarhus, Denmark, using a windowed absorption cell (Eden et al., 2006). Mota et al. recorded the absorption of water at a resolution of ∼4 meV in the 6–11 eV photon energy range there (Mota et al., 2005). More recently, the VUV of ammonia was recorded in the 5.4–10.8 eV range by Limão-Vieira et al. (2019), and Ovad et al. recorded the VUV of C4F7N, a dielectric gas and SF6 replacement candidate, at the updated ASTRID-2 storage ring also in a windowed cell (Ovad et al., 2023). Finally, VUV absorption spectra have been recorded at the AMO beamline of the INDUS(-2) synchrotron with 4 meV resolution and the Rydberg progressions assigned, for example, for N,N-dimethylformamide in the 5.6–9.9 eV energy range (Shastri et al., 2017) and for nitromethane in the 5.4–11.8 eV range (Shastri et al., 2021). The latter study has since been followed up by further absorption work from ASTRID-2 (Dalagnol et al., 2023).
Alternatively to photoabsorption, electron energy-loss dipole (e,e) spectroscopy can be used to measure oscillator strengths that relate to the absorption et al., 1978). Later, (e,e) spectroscopy yielded water cross sections in the 6–200 eV energy range using 8 keV electrons (Chan et al., 1993). Notwithstanding the broad energy range, the 1 eV resolution means that nearby bands overlap, and the vibrational fine structure of the spectrum remains out of reach. Thus, (e,e) spectroscopy is a worthwhile complementary tool, but it rarely reveals the full richness of the VUV For that, direct photoabsorption measurements remain indispensable.
directly. The main benefit of (e,e) spectroscopy is its easy implementation. However, it suffers from constraints in spectral resolution, and the accuracy of the data obtained is contingent on the validity of the dipole approximation, which may not always hold. Electron impact coincidence simulation techniques were applied to study absorption, ionization and fragmentation of water in the 10–60 eV energy range using 3.5 keV electrons (TanThe VUV beamline at the Swiss Light Source (SLS) has a bending magnet source, which requires a large horizontal acceptance and results in a relatively large divergence of the beam at 8 mrad (h) × 4 mrad (v). To provide high-harmonic-free VUV radiation, VUV beamlines often rely on thin films, as recently implemented at FinEstBeAMS at MAX IV (Chernenko et al., 2021). However, particularly in the 10–21 eV range, rare-gas filters are used, which are almost fully transparent below the of the rare gas and let virtually no light pass above it. The divergent bending magnet radiation means that the light beam cannot be led through a capillary, as is often done at undulator light sources, such as at the Chemical Dynamics beamline at the ALS and DESIRS at SOLEIL (Suits et al., 1995; Mercier et al., 2000). Furthermore, in the absence of re-focusing optics to minimize the number of optical elements and maximize the usable the gas filter had to be placed near the experimental station at the end of the beamline. Satisfying these requirements, a differentially pumped filter was developed with eight chambers. Its absorption chamber, with an optical length of 10 cm, can accept ∼30 mbar of rare gas without compromising the 10−7 mbar pressure in the transfer line. At a rare-gas pressure of 10 mbar, the suppression factor for the high-harmonic radiation of the grating was measured to be ∼106 (Johnson et al., 2009). The gas filter is, thus, effectively a differentially pumped, windowless absorption cell, which has motivated us to evaluate it in VUV absorption measurements above the MgF2 edge. We chose two atmospherically relevant and well characterized gaseous samples – water and nitrous oxide – and will compare the spectra with the literature results. In addition, we have constructed the absorption cell to allow for condensed phases, such as a thin film or free-flowing liquid sheet targets (Koralek et al., 2018).
2. Experimental
The bending magnet synchrotron radiation of the VUV beamline at the SLS was collimated, dispersed using a 150 lines mm−1 laminar grating, and focused ∼22 m from the source point of the bending magnet (Bodi et al., 2012). Normally, the focus is at the variable exit slit in a cell downstream from the gas inlet chamber in the rare-gas filter, after which the gas filter is interfaced to a photoelectron photoion coincidence endstation by two further differential pumping stages (Sztáray et al., 2017; Johnson et al., 2009). In the VUV absorption experiments, we removed the last three differentially pumped chambers of the rare-gas filter towards the endstation port to have optical access and flexibility in terms of the absorbing medium. The chamber with the focus, originally housing the exit slit, has been replaced by the absorption chamber as seen in Fig. 1. Thus, with respect to the original setup, the last remaining gas filter chamber is the rare-gas inlet, which was filled with an Ne–Ar–Kr mixture or pure Ne, depending on the photon energy range of interest, to provide high-harmonic-free radiation in the absorption chamber. The absorption chamber is connected by a 1 mm channel through a precision-made copper plate, as seen in Fig. 1(b), with the rare-gas inlet chamber. This channel also acted as the exit slit. Setting up the beamline for absorption experiments requires ∼3 h of time. We used the Ar in the first and second order as well as the Kr in the first order to calibrate the photon energy scale and determine the photon energy resolution. The latter was found to be 10 meV at 7 eV and 20–30 meV in the 14–16 eV range, based on the full width at half-maximum of the derivative of the Ar and Kr absorption edges. The could be further increased about fivefold at the cost of by installing a 200 µm exit slit in the center of the absorption chamber at the focus of the beamline.
Equilibrium vacuum conditions are quickly reached when the pressure is highest in the rare-gas chamber. The gas filter can work at filter gas pressures up to 30 mbar, which means the maximum pressure in the absorption cell can be 25 mbar without risking sample diffusion into the filter cell. In the current measurements, the filter gas pressure was measured at 9.9 mbar using a capacitance gauge, so that there is filter gas flow towards the absorption chamber. The absorption chamber was pumped using an ACP 120G Roots pump through a 40 mm VAT diaphragm valve to reduce pumping speed. The pressure in the absorption chamber was set using a needle valve for the sample inlet and the diaphragm valve to control pumping. The background pressure with the gas filter on was measured by a Pirani gauge connected close to the chamber at the pumping line to be ∼0.2 mbar, whereas sample absorption measurements were taken at pressure readings of 0.6–1.1 mbar for H2O and 0.36–0.42 mbar for N2O. Because of the limited accuracy of the Pirani pressure readings as well as the difficult-to-characterize contributions of the rare-gas diffusion into the absorption chamber, the column density of the sample is unknown, and overlapping scans and low-energy cross sections reported in the literature were used to anchor the measured to absolute absorption cross sections.
The light was detected using an SXUV100 photodiode as seen in Fig. 1(b), and the resulting photocurrent was measured using a Keithley 6485 picoammeter. In each scan, the photocurrent was averaged for 1–2 s at each photon energy, which was scanned in a 5–50 meV step size. The beamline transmission was measured with a running gas filter but without sample in between scans using comparable settings. The curve of the beamline was found to drift only slightly during the measurement campaign. Reference scans before and after absorption scans were used to obtain the extinction. The sample pressure was set so that the extinction did not exceed 90% and averaged around 50% across the spectral range, to ensure the linearity of the photocurrent with respect to the photon flux.
3. Results and discussion
Absorption spectra were recorded in the 8–18 eV and 7.5–19 eV range for water and nitrous oxide and are shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively, together with previous measurements as compiled in the MPI-Mainz UV/VIS Spectral Atlas, with the cross sections occasionally converted from the originally published absorption coefficients by the Atlas (Keller-Rudek et al., 2013). The newly recorded absorption spectra are also available in the supporting information.
The water −17 cm2, i.e. 10 Mb, as shown in Fig. 2 together with previous absorption measurements and the relevant part of the (e,e) spectrum of water, recorded between 6 and 200 eV by Chan et al. (1993). The ∼1 eV resolution of the water (e,e) spectrum only depicts changes in the average absorption and does not reveal the rich structure of the spectrum.
has been studied quite extensively. As determined by the working range of the differentially pumped gas filter, our energy range starts at ∼7 eV and reaches up to 20 eV, where characteristic cross sections are of the order of 10This is best seen in the synchrotron-based measurement of Gürtler et al. (1977), who recorded cross sections in the 10–60 eV range. The structure seen between 10 and 12.6 eV can be assigned to 3–5p and 3–6d Rydberg states as well as their vibrational fine structure, converging to the ionization threshold to the ground 2B1 cation state at 12.617 eV (Ruscic, 2023). The onset of the first excited 2A1 cation state was reported at 13.748 eV by Truong et al. (2009), but the corresponding energy is 14.8 eV. This is also where the ns and np Rydberg progressions, giving rise to the vibrational fine structure in the 13–16 eV energy range in the were assumed to converge to by Gürtler et al. The next, 2B2 band in the photoelectron spectrum appears at 17.203 eV (Truong et al., 2009), exhibits a energy of ∼18.5 eV, and contains the onset at 18.118 eV (Bodi et al., 2014) with a corresponding ∼fourfold jump in the threshold ionization at unchanging absorption cross sections, i.e. corresponding to a jump in the threshold ionization at this energy (Truong et al., 2009; Bodi et al., 2014). The vibrational fine structure in the above 16 eV is due to the Rydberg progression towards the state.
Turning attention towards lower energies, we highlight three prior results. Watanabe & Zelikoff used a hydrogen discharge tube and reported the absorption of water vapor in the 6.7–10.2 eV photon energy range in their seminal paper (Watanabe & Zelikoff, 1953). More recently, Mota et al. (2005) measured light water, whereas Cheng et al. (2004) measured light and absorption using synchrotron radiation in the 6.4–10.8 eV and 8.55–9.92 eV energy ranges, respectively. Mota et al.'s spectrum shows significant overlap with that of Gürtler et al., and all three lower-energy scans can be used to anchor our spectrum to obtain absolute absorption cross sections across the complete energy range studied herein. The band centered around 7.5 eV is the band of the water spectrum and corresponds to a 3s ← b1 excitation belonging to the Rydberg states converging to the cation ground state, whereas excitation of an a1 electron to the same 3s orbital results in the second band of the water VUV spectrum, centered at 9.7 eV and belonging to the progression converging to the excited 2A1 cation state.
The evident fine structure of the band sitting on top of an intense and broad baseline has fascinated researchers for a long time (van Harrevelt et al., 2001). While the assignment of the normal modes giving rise to this structure is straightforward (Mota et al., 2005), it falls short of capturing the double nature of this band as well as the subtle effects of the different wells as the energy rises above the HOH ↔ HHO barrier (Cheng et al., 2004). Isotopologue measurements and Monte Carlo quantum chemical calculations have conclusively established the role of resonances responsible for the fine structure as being due to the HOH well and are well described by bending and stretching vibrations below 9 eV, and to the HOH well coupled by quantum tunneling to the HHO well slightly above 9 eV, and again simply described well above 9 eV. Furthermore, in contrast to the resonances, the broad background is due to fast coupling to and dissociation on the ground state, as also illustrated by the different electronic states of the OH radicals produced (Zhou et al., 2015).
The newly recorded et al. are sharper, thanks to the higher energy resolution of their light source, but this could be reproduced in our experiment, as well, with the help of a well positioned exit slit. The only notable but minor difference is seen above 14 eV, where our cross sections are, on average, ∼13% larger than those reported by Gürtler et al. (1977) and agree slightly better with the (e,e) data of Chan et al. (1993).
fitted to the literature values around 9 eV to obtain absolute cross sections, generally agrees with the previously measured ones across the studied energy range in terms of cross sections and resonance energies. The resonances reported by GürtlerThe valence cation states of nitrous oxide have been studied using He I ) and (Berkowitz & Eland, 1977). Employing ion internal energy selection, Guyon et al. studied interactions between neutral dissociation and ionization continua after valence (Guyon et al., 1983). They also estimated the at 15.5 eV to be constant at ∼0.5, which was later shown to oscillate quite strongly around 0.7 in this energy range (Shaw et al., 1992). Ionization from the 2π, 7σ and 1π HOMO, HOMO-1 and HOMO-2 orbitals of N2O is known to result in the first three 2Π, 2Σ+ and 2Π cation electronic states at ionization energies of 12.886, 16.388 and 17.65 eV, respectively. These ionization limits must be considered when interpreting the nitrous oxide shown together with literature results in Fig. 3.
(Brundle & Turner, 1969Cook et al. used a Hopfield-continuum light source and recorded the spectrum in the 12.4–20.7 eV energy range (Cook et al., 1968), to be complemented by Nee et al. between 5.6 and 12.4 eV (Nee et al., 1999) using a synchrotron light source and a LiF windowed cell to obtain well defined column densities and absolute cross sections in the lower energy range. We relied on these to normalize our to obtain absolute cross sections, as well. As previously mentioned, Shaw et al.'s ultimate goal was to report efficiencies, for which they recorded absolute absorption cross sections upwards from the ionization onset in the 12.9–25.6 eV energy range at the SRS in Daresbury (Shaw et al., 1992). Furthermore, high-resolution absorption spectra were reported by Cossart-Magos et al. in the 9.3–12.9 eV energy range (Cossart-Magos et al., 2001), while Duflot et al. and Jones reported and compared a high-resolution N2O (e,e) spectrum and an (Duflot et al., 2019; Jones, 2000).
The dipole forbidden 1Δ band of N2O is broad, weak with a maximum of 1.4 × 10−19 cm2, centered at 6.85 eV, below our region of interest. It is followed by the dissociative 1Π band (Yuan et al., 2018), exhibiting vibrational fine structure of ∼1000 cm−1 around 8.5 eV. The 1Σ+ band, centered at 9.5 eV or slightly higher, was previously described as featureless (Nee et al., 1999), although some fine structure is evident in Fig. 3. Zelikoff et al. reported a number of diffuse bands in the 9.3–9.6 eV energy range, which are tentatively visible in our data, as well (Zelikoff et al., 1953). However, they have not observed fine structure on the blue side of the band, where it appears to be more apparent in our spectrum. The 1Σ+ band is also dissociative, the mechanism of which, including the participation of the nearby 3Πv state, was discussed by Lambert et al. (2005). The next sharp and strong feature in the spectrum, observed at 10.521 eV, was previously assigned to the 2π35π 1Σ+ state (Hopper, 1984), later revised as a vibrationally excited 3pσ 1Π Rydberg state (Szarka & Wallace, 1991), then as a vibrationally ground state of the same configuration (Cossart-Magos et al., 2001). Although they have not reported absorption cross sections, Cossart-Magos et al. have thoroughly assigned the peaks below 12.9 eV to various Rydberg progressions converging to the , and cation states (Cossart-Magos et al., 2001). It is also in this energy range, between 12.5 and 13.0 eV, that the absorption cross sections of Cook et al. deviate the most from our results (Cook et al., 1968). The results of Cossart-Magos et al. and Jones agree with our band profile in this energy region, and, based on the discussion of the former, it is possible that a nitrogen impurity led to the skewed band profile in the spectrum of Cook et al. (1968) just below 13 eV (Duflot et al., 2019; Jones, 2000; Cossart-Magos et al., 2001).
At 12.886 eV, we reach the 2Π state, which coincides with the onset of a continuum-like absorption region with monotonously rising cross sections up to 13.9 eV. While neither Shaw et al. nor Cook et al. reported a fine structure in this energy region, the photoabsorption data shown by Duflot et al. exhibit some peaks. Our data, confirmed by the raw photocurrent profile over three scans in this energy range, is suggestive of a stepwise increase of the cross sections, indicative of a vibrational structure and a coupled continuum state responsible for the rising baseline. There are no cation final states in this energy region, and the is monotonously dropping (Shaw et al., 1992). Thus, it is likely that neutral final states are responsible for the rise in the photoabsorption This band comes to an end with four to five peaks in the 13.89–14.22 eV range, assigned to vibrationally ground and excited 3pσ and 3pπ Rydberg states converging to the 2Σ+ and 2Π cation states, respectively. Thereafter, the spectrum is dominated by excitation into npσ, nsσ, ndπ and ndσ states up to the 2Σ+ at 16.39 eV. According to Shaw et al. (1992), the anticorrelates with the photoabsorption in this energy range, indicative of neutral decay channels. The fine structure at 16.5–17.8 eV, in part overlapping with the 17.65 eV onset of the broad and resolved 2Π cation state band in the photoelectron spectrum (Brundle & Turner, 1969), has also been observed by a more recent measurement on N2O photodissociation by Shaw & Holland (2008) and is somewhat better resolved by the current measurement. It is likely due to Rydberg progressions to this cation state. The sharp peaks at 18.23 and 18.56 eV, also reported by Shaw et al. (1992), must be due to Rydberg states belonging to the manifold converging to the 2Σ+ cation state at 20.11 eV.
to theOverall, the newly recorded spectrum agrees well with the literature data, although we report the maximum of the band at a slightly higher energy with a hint of a superimposed fine structure beyond the literature results. Based also on more recent measurements, we also propose that the band shape below 13 eV, as recorded by Cook et al., was likely affected by impurities. Furthermore, oscillations in the spectrum slightly above 13 eV are newly and around 17 eV somewhat more clearly resolved by the current measurements compared with the literature.
4. Conclusions
Based on a differentially pumped rare-gas filter, we constructed an absorption cell to be used in the 7–21 eV energy range to measure the absorption cross sections of gaseous samples. The −1) in one go. The spectra were calibrated using literature measurements with known column densities to obtain absolute photoabsorption cross sections, which generally agreed with literature results very well, while also revealing new details in the of N2O.
of water and nitrous oxide were recorded in commissioning experiments in less than 12 h. Both spectra span most of the VUV valence excitation and ionization region of the samples and represent a novel avenue to cover such a broad energy range (7–21 eV, 170–59 nm or 56000–170000 cmThese commissioning experiments have also highlighted four avenues, along which the experiment could be developed further. First, more than half of the measurement time was spent waiting for the monochromator to change energy and come to a stop. In light of the short photocurrent averaging times, data acquisition could therefore be speeded up considerably by implementing continuous, on-the-fly scanning instead of the point-to-point stop-and-go approach employed currently at the beamline (Lin et al., 2013). Second, by building an MgF2- or LiF-windowed gas cell, we could carry out the calibration experiments to determine absolute cross sections to which the differentially pumped setup can be calibrated to. Third, by installing an exit slit or exit skimmer at the focus of the chamber, we could reach the nominal resolution of the beamline, i.e. E/ΔE of up to 1000–10000, depending on the grating and the photon energy. Fourth, some of the newly, tentatively observed structure in the N2O spectrum could likely be made more evident by cooling down the sample, thereby sharpening the rotational envelope.
In summary, this setup will allow for VUV absorption measurements of gaseous samples above the 2 and LiF. Our absorption experiment will fill a gap in this regard, as most light sources and experiments capable of such measurements have been decommissioned in recent years. The chamber is also designed to allow for condensed phase absorption measurements in this energy range, such as liquid or solid thin films. This also opens up the possibility to determine the absorbance of condensed-phase samples in the VUV.
of MgFSupporting information
Absorption spectra in Excel format. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577524005423/rv5179sup1.xlsx
Acknowledgements
The measurements were carried out at the VUV beamline of the Swiss Light Source, located at Paul Scherrer Institute in Villigen, Switzerland.
References
Ashfold, M. N. R., Bayley, J. M. & Dixon, R. N. (1984). Chem. Phys. 84, 35–50. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Berkowitz, J. & Eland, J. H. D. (1977). J. Chem. Phys. 67, 2740–2752. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bodi, A., Csontos, J., Kállay, M., Borkar, S. & Sztáray, B. (2014). Chem. Sci. 5, 3057–3063. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bodi, A., Hemberger, P., Gerber, T. & Sztáray, B. (2012). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 083105. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Bodi, A., Hemberger, P. & Tuckett, R. P. (2017). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 30173–30180. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bralick, A. K., Mitchell, E. C., Doner, A. C., Webb, A. R., Christianson, M. G., Turney, J. M., Rotavera, B. & Schaefer, H. F. (2023). J. Phys. Chem. A, 127, 3743–3756. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brundle, C. R. & Turner, D. W. (1969). Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 2, 195–220. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Chan, W. F., Cooper, G. & Brion, C. E. (1993). Chem. Phys. 178, 387–400. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Cheng, B. M., Chung, C. Y., Bahou, M., Lee, Y. P., Lee, L. C., van Harrevelt, R. & van Hemert, M. C. (2004). J. Chem. Phys. 120, 224–229. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Chernenko, K., Kivimäki, A., Pärna, R., Wang, W., Sankari, R., Leandersson, M., Tarawneh, H., Pankratov, V., Kook, M., Kukk, E., Reisberg, L., Urpelainen, S., Käämbre, T., Siewert, F., Gwalt, G., Sokolov, A., Lemke, S., Alimov, S., Knedel, J., Kutz, O., Seliger, T., Valden, M., Hirsimäki, M., Kirm, M. & Huttula, M. (2021). J. Synchrotron Rad. 28, 1620–1630. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Christianson, M. G., Doner, A. C., Koritzke, A. L., Frandsen, K. & Rotavera, B. (2021). J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 258, 107274. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Cook, G. R. & Metzger, P. H. (1964). J. Chem. Phys. 41, 321–336. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Cook, G. R., Metzger, P. H. & Ogawa, M. (1968). J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 129. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Cossart-Magos, C., Jungen, M. & Launay, F. (2001). J. Chem. Phys. 114, 7368–7378. CAS Google Scholar
Cruz-Diaz, G. A., Muñoz Caro, G. M., Chen, Y. & Yih, T. (2014). AA, 562, A119. Google Scholar
Dalagnol, L. V. S., Bettega, M. H. F., Jones, N. C., Hoffmann, S. V., Souza Barbosa, A. & Limão-Vieira, P. (2023). J. Phys. Chem. A, 127, 1445–1457. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Doner, A. C., Moran, H. A., Webb, A. R., Christianson, M. G., Koritzke, A. L., Dewey, N. S., Hartness, S. W. & Rotavera, B. (2023). J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 297, 108438. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Doner, A. C., Webb, A. R., Dewey, N. S., Hartness, S. W., Christianson, M. G., Koritzke, A. L., Larsson, A., Frandsen, K. M. & Rotavera, B. (2022). J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 292, 108346. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Duflot, D., Hoffmann, S. V., Jones, N. C. & Limão-Vieira, P. (2019). Radiation in Bioanalysis: Spectroscopic Techniques and Theoretical Methods, edited by A. S. Pereira, P. Tavares & P. Limão-Vieira, pp. 43–81. Springer: Cham. Google Scholar
Eden, S., Limão-Vieira, P., Hoffmann, S. V. & Mason, N. J. (2006). Chem. Phys. 323, 313–333. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Fillion, J. H., Ruiz, J., Yang, X. F., Castillejo, M., Rostas, F. & Lemaire, J. L. (2004). J. Chem. Phys. 120, 6531–6541. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Gao, H. (2021). Mol. Phys. 119, e1861354. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Gürtler, P., Saile, V. & Koch, E. E. (1977). Chem. Phys. Lett. 51, 386–391. Google Scholar
Guyon, P. M., Baer, T. & Nenner, I. (1983). J. Chem. Phys. 78, 3665–3672. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Harrevelt, R. van, van Hemert, M. C. & Schatz, G. C. (2001). J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 11480–11487. Google Scholar
Hopper, D. G. (1984). J. Chem. Phys. 80, 4290–4316. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Johnson, M., Bodi, A., Schulz, L. & Gerber, T. (2009). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 610, 597–603. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Jones, N. C. (2000). Thesis, University College London, UK. Google Scholar
Keller-Rudek, H., Moortgat, G. K., Sander, R. & Sörensen, R. (2013). Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 365–373. Google Scholar
Koralek, J. D., Kim, J. B., Brůža, P., Curry, C. B., Chen, Z., Bechtel, H. A., Cordones, A. A., Sperling, P., Toleikis, S., Kern, J. F., Moeller, S. P., Glenzer, S. H. & DePonte, D. P. (2018). Nat. Commun. 9, 1353. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Lambert, H. M., Davis, E. W., Tokel, O., Dixit, A. A. & Houston, P. L. (2005). J. Chem. Phys. 122, 174304. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Limão-Vieira, P., Jones, N. C., Hoffmann, S. V., Duflot, D., Mendes, M., Lozano, A. I., Ferreira da Silva, F., García, G., Hoshino, M. & Tanaka, H. (2019). J. Chem. Phys. 151, 184302. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Lin, S.-W., Chang, C.-F., Lee, R., Huang, C.-Y., Ma, C.-I., Fan, L.-J. & Fung, H.-S. (2013). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 425, 122002. CrossRef Google Scholar
Makogon, M. M., Ponomarev, Y. N. & Tikhomirov, B. A. (2013). Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 26, 45–49. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mason, N. J., Gingell, J. M., Davies, J. A., Zhao, H., Walker, I. C. & Siggel, M. R. F. (1996). J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 29, 3075–3089. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Melania Oana, C. & Krylov, A. I. (2007). J. Chem. Phys. 127, 234106. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Mercier, B., Compin, M., Prevost, C., Bellec, G., Thissen, R., Dutuit, O. & Nahon, L. (2000). J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 18, 2533–2541. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mota, R., Parafita, R., Giuliani, A., Hubin-Franskin, M. J., Lourenço, J. M. C., Garcia, G., Hoffmann, S. V., Mason, N. J., Ribeiro, P. A., Raposo, M. & Limão-Vieira, P. (2005). Chem. Phys. Lett. 416, 152–159. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Nee, J. B., Yang, J. C., Lee, P. C., Wang, X. Y. & Kuo, C. T. (1999). Chin. J. Phys. 37, 172–180. CAS Google Scholar
Oliveira, N. de, Joyeux, D., Roudjane, M., Gil, J.-F., Pilette, B., Archer, L., Ito, K. & Nahon, L. (2016). J. Synchrotron Rad. 23, 887–900. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ovad, T., Sapunar, M., Sršeň, S., Slavíček, P., Mašín, Z., Jones, N. C., Hoffmann, S. V., Ranković, M. & Fedor, J. (2023). J. Chem. Phys. 158, 014303. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Parkinson, W. H. & Yoshino, K. (2003). Chem. Phys. 294, 31–35. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Patoz, A., Begušić, T. & Vaníček, J. (2018). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 2367–2372. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pei, L., Min, Q., Du, Y., Wang, Z., Yin, B., Yang, K., Disterhoft, P., Pongetti, T. & Zhu, L. (2019). JGR Atmospheres, 124, 14310–14324. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Pratt, S. T., Jacovella, U., Boyé-Péronne, S., Ashfold, M. N. R., Joyeux, D., De Oliveira, N. & Holland, D. M. P. (2023). J. Mol. Spectrosc. 396, 111810. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Röder, A., de Oliveira, N., Grollau, F., Mestdagh, J. M., Gallician, G., Gaveau, M. A., Nahon, L. & Briant, M. (2020). J. Chem. Phys. 153, 134303. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Ruscic, B. (2023). Active Thermochemical Tables, https://ATcT.anl.gov. Google Scholar
Shastri, A., Das, A. K., Krishnakumar, S., Singh, P. J. & Raja Sekhar, B. N. (2017). J. Chem. Phys. 147, 224305. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Shastri, A., Das, A. K., Sunanda, K. & Rajasekhar, B. N. (2021). J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 276, 107933. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Shaw, D. A. & Holland, D. M. P. (2008). J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41, 145103. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Shaw, D. A., Holland, D. M. P., MacDonald, M. A., Hopkirk, A., Hayes, M. A. & McSweeney, S. M. (1992). Chem. Phys. 163, 387–404. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Suits, A. G., Heimann, P., Yang, X., Evans, M., Hsu, C.-W., Lu, K., Lee, Y. T. & Kung, A. H. (1995). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 4841–4844. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Szarka, M. G. & Wallace, S. C. (1991). J. Chem. Phys. 95, 2336–2351. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sztáray, B., Voronova, K., Torma, K. G., Covert, K. J., Bodi, A., Hemberger, P., Gerber, T. & Osborn, D. L. (2017). J. Chem. Phys. 147, 013944. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Tan, K. H., Brion, C. E., Van der Leeuw, P. E. & van der Wiel, M. J. (1978). Chem. Phys. 29, 299–309. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Truong, S. Y., Yencha, A. J., Juarez, A. M., Cavanagh, S. J., Bolognesi, P. & King, G. C. (2009). Chem. Phys. 355, 183–193. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Watanabe, K. & Zelikoff, M. (1953). J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, 756–759. Google Scholar
West, J. B. & Marr, G. V. (1976). Proc. R. Soc. London A, 349, 397–421. CAS Google Scholar
Willmott, P. (2019). An Introduction to Synchrotron Radiation, 2nd ed. Wiley. Google Scholar
Yang, C. H., Sarma, G., Ter Meulen, J. J., Parker, D. H. & Western, C. M. (2010). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 13983–13991. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yuan, D., Yu, S., Xie, T., Chen, W., Wang, S., Tan, Y., Wang, T., Yuan, K., Yang, X. & Wang, X. (2018). J. Phys. Chem. A, 122, 2663–2669. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zelikoff, M., Watanabe, K. & Inn, E. C. Y. (1953). J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1643–1647. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Zhou, L., Xie, D. & Guo, H. (2015). J. Chem. Phys. 142, 124317. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.