view article
Figure 6
Reconstruction comparison with varying scan number N. (a1–a5) Recovered phase using the ESPINNet with N = 2, 3, 5, 10, 20; (b1–b5) Recovered phase using the UMPA with N = 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, while the window size used in UMPA is 10 for N = 2 and 1 for others; (c1) recovered phase using SPINNet with N = 1; (c2) recovered phase using UMPA with N = 1 and Nw = 15 [Nw is the analysis window size as described by De Marco et al. (2023View full citation)]; (d1–d3) recovered phase using the XSVT method with N = 5, 10, 20; (e) similarity of the recovered phase using different scan number N compared with scan number N = 20 for XSVT, UMPA, and ESPINNet. Data were acquired at the 1BM beamline of APS.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Volume 33| Part 2| March 2026| Pages 467-480
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577526000846
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS