supplementary materials


hb2728 scheme

Acta Cryst. (2008). E64, o987    [ doi:10.1107/S160053680801266X ]

2-Chloro-N-phenylacetamide

B. T. Gowda, J. Kozísek, M. Tokarcík and H. Fuess

Abstract top

In the title compound, C8H8ClNO, the conformations of the N-H and C=O bonds are anti to each other, but the C-Cl and C=O bonds in the side chain are syn. The molecules are linked by N-H...O hydrogen bonds into infinite chains running in the [101] direction.

Comment top

In the present work, the structure of the title compoud, (I), 2-chloro-N-(phenyl)-acetamide (NPCA) has been determined, as part of a study of the effect of ring and side chain substitutions on the solid state geometry of aromatic amides (Gowda et al., 2007; 2008). The conformations of the N—H and C=O bonds are anti to each other, but the C—Cl and C=O bonds in the side chain are syn to each other (Fig. 1), similar to that observed in 2-chloro-N-(2-chlorophenyl)-acetamide (Gowda et al., 2007)and 2-chloro-N-(3-methylphenyl)-acetamide (Gowda et al., 2008) with similar bond parameters. Further, the amide group –NHCO– in (I) makes a dihedral angle of 16.0 (8)° with the phenyl ring.

Part of the packing for (I) viewed down the b axis is shown in Fig. 2. Infinite chains running along the base vector [101] are formed by N-H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1).

Related literature top

For the synthesis, see: Gowda et al. (2003). For related structures, see: Gowda et al. (2007, 2008).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared according to the literature method (Gowda et al., 2003) and colourless prisms of (I) were recrystallised from an ethanol solution.

Refinement top

The H atoms were placed in calculated positions (C-H = 0.93Å, N-H = 0.86Å) and refined as riding with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C,N).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2002); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), PLATON (Spek, 2003) and WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of (I) with displacement ellipsoids for the non-hydrogen atoms drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Part of the packing for (I) viewed down the b axis showing the chains arising from N-H···O hydrogen bonds Symmetry code (i): x - 1/2,-y + 1/2,z - 1/2.
2-Chloro-N-phenylacetamide top
Crystal data top
C8H8ClNOF000 = 352
Mr = 169.6Dx = 1.36 Mg m3
Monoclinic, CcMo Kα radiation
λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: C -2ycCell parameters from 159 reflections
a = 5.0623 (15) Åθ = 4.9–25.1º
b = 18.361 (6) ŵ = 0.40 mm1
c = 9.115 (2) ÅT = 297 (2) K
β = 102.13 (3)ºPrism, colorless
V = 828.3 (4) Å30.41 × 0.24 × 0.17 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur System
diffractometer
1067 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source385 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.046
Detector resolution: 10.4340 pixels mm-1θmax = 26º
T = 297(2) Kθmin = 4.3º
ω scansh = 6→6
Absorption correction: analytical
[CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006), using a multifaceted crystal model based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995)]
k = 22→22
Tmin = 0.905, Tmax = 0.938l = 9→11
2388 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036  [exp(3.70(sinθ/λ)2)]/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.035P)2]
where P = 0.33333Fo2 + 0.66667Fc2
wR(F2) = 0.086(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 0.96Δρmax = 0.1 e Å3
1067 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.11 e Å3
106 parametersExtinction correction: none
2 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 254 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: 0.04 (11)
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Crystal data top
C8H8ClNOV = 828.3 (4) Å3
Mr = 169.6Z = 4
Monoclinic, CcMo Kα
a = 5.0623 (15) ŵ = 0.40 mm1
b = 18.361 (6) ÅT = 297 (2) K
c = 9.115 (2) Å0.41 × 0.24 × 0.17 mm
β = 102.13 (3)º
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur System
diffractometer
1067 independent reflections
Absorption correction: analytical
[CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006), using a multifaceted crystal model based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995)]
385 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.905, Tmax = 0.938Rint = 0.046
2388 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.086Δρmax = 0.1 e Å3
S = 0.96Δρmin = 0.11 e Å3
1067 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 254 Friedel pairs
106 parametersFlack parameter: 0.04 (11)
2 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl11.3492 (4)0.15000 (9)0.9151 (2)0.1082 (7)
C11.0871 (11)0.1998 (3)0.8076 (6)0.0824 (18)
H1A1.14880.22150.72370.099*
H1B0.9390.16710.76720.099*
C20.9849 (11)0.2595 (3)0.8961 (6)0.0629 (17)
N10.7939 (8)0.3008 (2)0.8086 (4)0.0642 (13)
H1N0.75650.28970.71490.077*
O11.0653 (7)0.26846 (19)1.0314 (3)0.0833 (13)
C30.6481 (10)0.3597 (3)0.8507 (6)0.0517 (13)
C40.7302 (11)0.3975 (3)0.9862 (6)0.0670 (17)
H40.8880.38451.05360.08*
C50.5727 (15)0.4542 (3)1.0177 (7)0.082 (2)
H50.62220.4781.10940.099*
C60.3490 (16)0.4762 (3)0.9197 (10)0.0824 (18)
H60.25130.5160.94280.099*
C70.2640 (13)0.4399 (4)0.7850 (7)0.082 (2)
H70.10680.45380.71830.099*
C80.4153 (10)0.3835 (4)0.7525 (6)0.0676 (16)
H80.36140.35980.66090.081*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.1120 (13)0.1207 (13)0.0829 (10)0.0402 (13)0.0004 (9)0.0083 (13)
C10.079 (4)0.091 (4)0.067 (4)0.022 (4)0.006 (3)0.006 (4)
C20.070 (4)0.071 (4)0.045 (3)0.003 (3)0.005 (3)0.004 (4)
N10.066 (3)0.084 (3)0.035 (3)0.012 (3)0.006 (2)0.003 (3)
O10.102 (3)0.097 (3)0.039 (2)0.010 (2)0.013 (2)0.005 (2)
C30.051 (4)0.062 (4)0.041 (3)0.001 (3)0.008 (3)0.002 (3)
C40.055 (4)0.084 (4)0.059 (4)0.005 (4)0.007 (3)0.004 (3)
C50.083 (5)0.097 (5)0.073 (5)0.005 (5)0.029 (4)0.014 (4)
C60.078 (5)0.071 (4)0.101 (5)0.002 (5)0.027 (4)0.005 (5)
C70.066 (5)0.094 (5)0.081 (5)0.019 (5)0.005 (4)0.020 (5)
C80.053 (4)0.090 (5)0.058 (4)0.003 (3)0.006 (3)0.014 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
Cl1—C11.735 (5)C4—C51.378 (7)
C1—C21.515 (6)C4—H40.93
C1—H1A0.97C5—C61.349 (8)
C1—H1B0.97C5—H50.93
C2—O11.226 (6)C6—C71.384 (9)
C2—N11.350 (6)C6—H60.93
N1—C31.407 (6)C7—C81.357 (7)
N1—H1N0.86C7—H70.93
C3—C81.392 (6)C8—H80.93
C3—C41.401 (7)
C2—C1—Cl1112.8 (4)C5—C4—C3118.7 (6)
C2—C1—H1A109C5—C4—H4120.7
Cl1—C1—H1A109C3—C4—H4120.7
C2—C1—H1B109C6—C5—C4122.0 (6)
Cl1—C1—H1B109C6—C5—H5119
H1A—C1—H1B107.8C4—C5—H5119
O1—C2—N1124.3 (6)C5—C6—C7120.3 (6)
O1—C2—C1123.7 (6)C5—C6—H6119.8
N1—C2—C1112.0 (5)C7—C6—H6119.8
C2—N1—C3128.5 (5)C8—C7—C6118.5 (6)
C2—N1—H1N115.7C8—C7—H7120.8
C3—N1—H1N115.7C6—C7—H7120.8
C8—C3—C4117.8 (5)C7—C8—C3122.6 (6)
C8—C3—N1119.2 (5)C7—C8—H8118.7
C4—C3—N1123.0 (5)C3—C8—H8118.7
Cl1—C1—C2—O14.8 (7)N1—C3—C4—C5179.6 (5)
Cl1—C1—C2—N1175.8 (4)C3—C4—C5—C62.8 (9)
O1—C2—N1—C31.1 (9)C4—C5—C6—C72.7 (9)
C1—C2—N1—C3178.3 (5)C5—C6—C7—C82.0 (9)
C2—N1—C3—C8164.2 (5)C6—C7—C8—C31.7 (8)
C2—N1—C3—C417.8 (8)C4—C3—C8—C71.8 (8)
C8—C3—C4—C52.3 (8)N1—C3—C8—C7180.0 (5)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···O1i0.862.052.848 (5)155
Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2.
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···O1i0.862.052.848 (5)155
Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1/2.
Acknowledgements top

BTG thanks the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Bonn, Germany, for resumptions of his research fellowship. JK and MT thank the Grant Agency of the Slovak Republic (grant No. VEGA 1/0817/08) and the Structural Funds, Interreg IIIA, for financial support for the purchase of the diffractometer.

references
References top

Brandenburg, K. (2002). DIAMOND. Bonn, Germany.

Clark, R. C. & Reid, J. S. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 887–897.

Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.

Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.

Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.

Gowda, B. T., Foro, S. & Fuess, H. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o4611.

Gowda, B. T., Svoboda, I., Foro, S., Dou, S. & Fuess, H. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o208.

Gowda, B. T., Usha, K. M. & Jayalakshmi, K. L. (2003). Z. Naturforsch. Teil A, 58, 801–806.

Oxford Diffraction (2006). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.

Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 7–13.