supplementary materials


Acta Cryst. (2009). E65, o500    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536809004152 ]

3-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-isochromene-1-thione

T. M. Babar, G. Qadeer, N. H. Rama, M. Khawar Rauf and W.-Y. Wong

Abstract top

In the molecule of the title compound, C16H11FOS, the benzene ring is oriented at a dihedral angle of 89.68 (3)° with respect to the planar [maximum deviation 0.009 (2) Å] isocoumarin ring system. An intramolecular C-H...S interaction results in the formation of a planar five-membered ring. In the crystal structure, intermolecular C-H...O hydrogen bonds link the molecules into chains parallel to the c axis. A [pi]-[pi] contact between the isocoumarin rings [centroid-centroid distance = 3.818 (3) Å] may further stabilize the structure.

Comment top

The isocoumarin nucleus is an abundant structural motif in natural products (Barry, 1964). Many constituents of the steadily growing class of known isocoumarins exhibit valuable biological properties such as antifungal (Sturtz et al., 2002), antitumor or cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic (Rossi et al., 2003) and enzyme inhibitory (Powers et al., 2002) activities. Naturally occurring halo-isocoumarins and their halogeno-3,4-dihydroiscoumarin derivatives are very rare. However, a few examples of naturally occurring chlorine containing isocoumarins are known (Thomas & Jens, 1999). In view of the importance of this class of compounds, the title compound, an isocoumarine derivative containing 4-fluorobenzyl substituent has been synthesized, and we report herein its crystal structure.

In the molecule of the title compound (Fig. 1), the bond lengths (Allen et al., 1987) and angles are within normal ranges, and comparable with the corresponding values in 3-(2-chlorobenzyl)isocoumarin (Abid et al., 2006). Rings A (C1-C6), B (O1/C5-C9) and C (C11-C16) are, of course, planar and the dihedral angles between them are A/B = 0.29 (3)°, A/C = 89.77 (4)° and B/C = 89.53 (3)°. The intramolecular C-H···S interaction (Table 1) results in the formation of a planar five-membered ring D (S1/C1/C6/C7/H1A).

In the crystal structure, intermolecular C-H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) link the molecules into chains parallel to the c-axis (Fig. 2), in which they may be effective in the stabilization of the structure. The π-π contact between the isocoumarine rings, Cg1—Cg2i [symmetry code: (i) -x, -y, 1 - z, where Cg1 and Cg2 are centroids of the rings A (C1-C6) and B (O1/C5-C9), respectively] may further stabilize the structure, with centroid-centroid distance of 3.818 (3) Å.

Related literature top

For general background, see: Barry (1964); Sturtz et al. (2002); Rossi et al. (2003); Powers et al. (2002); Thomas & Jens (1999). For a related structure, see: Abid et al. (2006). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987).

Experimental top

As shown in Scheme 2, the title compound was synthesized by refluxing 3-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1H-isochromen-1-one (0.5 g, 1.8 mmol) with Lawesson's reagent (0.89 g, 2.2 mmol) in dry toluene for 4 h. Pure thioisocoumarin was obtained by recrystalization in methanol (yield; 90%, m.p. 665-667 K).

Refinement top

H atoms were positioned geometrically, with C-H = 0.93 and 0.97 Å for aromatic and methylene H, respectively, and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title molecule, with the atom-numbering scheme.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A partial packing diagram of the title compound. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The formation of the title compound.
3-(4-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-isochromene-1-thione top
Crystal data top
C16H11FOSF(000) = 560
Mr = 270.31Dx = 1.361 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMelting point: 392(2) K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.7346 (6) ÅCell parameters from 1423 reflections
b = 17.9516 (11) Åθ = 4.2–25.4°
c = 8.4481 (5) ŵ = 0.25 mm1
β = 95.026 (1)°T = 294 K
V = 1319.57 (14) Å3Block, yellow
Z = 40.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
3188 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2655 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.016
φ and ω scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2001)
h = 1111
Tmin = 0.805, Tmax = 0.952k = 2322
7856 measured reflectionsl = 811
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.150H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0856P)2 + 0.2983P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3188 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
172 parametersΔρmax = 0.34 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.29 e Å3
Crystal data top
C16H11FOSV = 1319.57 (14) Å3
Mr = 270.31Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 8.7346 (6) ŵ = 0.25 mm1
b = 17.9516 (11) ÅT = 294 K
c = 8.4481 (5) Å0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
β = 95.026 (1)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
3188 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2001)
2655 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.805, Tmax = 0.952Rint = 0.016
7856 measured reflectionsθmax = 28.3°
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.150Δρmax = 0.34 e Å3
S = 1.03Δρmin = 0.29 e Å3
3188 reflectionsAbsolute structure: ?
172 parametersFlack parameter: ?
0 restraintsRogers parameter: ?
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.07012 (6)0.65948 (3)0.36335 (6)0.0646 (2)
O10.20272 (15)0.53300 (6)0.37410 (13)0.0506 (3)
F10.51024 (16)0.13358 (7)0.29180 (19)0.0845 (4)
C10.0938 (2)0.63191 (10)0.0010 (2)0.0563 (4)
H1A0.04720.67450.03500.068*
C20.1045 (3)0.62201 (12)0.1609 (2)0.0665 (5)
H2A0.06560.65810.23260.080*
C30.1727 (3)0.55866 (12)0.2156 (2)0.0706 (6)
H3A0.17850.55210.32410.085*
C40.2320 (3)0.50543 (11)0.1113 (2)0.0656 (5)
H4A0.27840.46330.14960.079*
C50.2234 (2)0.51390 (9)0.05279 (18)0.0483 (4)
C60.15271 (18)0.57814 (8)0.10781 (17)0.0439 (3)
C70.14344 (18)0.58791 (9)0.27669 (18)0.0446 (3)
C80.2707 (2)0.46929 (8)0.32005 (19)0.0482 (4)
C90.2829 (2)0.45929 (9)0.1661 (2)0.0523 (4)
H9A0.33040.41660.13130.063*
C100.3182 (3)0.41971 (10)0.4583 (2)0.0615 (5)
H10A0.23200.41410.52220.074*
H10B0.40060.44380.52370.074*
C110.3716 (2)0.34333 (9)0.4123 (2)0.0515 (4)
C120.5239 (3)0.32831 (12)0.3957 (3)0.0741 (6)
H12A0.59610.36620.41290.089*
C130.5718 (2)0.25794 (14)0.3540 (3)0.0799 (7)
H13A0.67480.24830.34210.096*
C140.4648 (2)0.20356 (10)0.3309 (2)0.0585 (4)
C150.3136 (2)0.21543 (11)0.3461 (3)0.0671 (5)
H15A0.24250.17710.32920.081*
C160.2677 (2)0.28622 (11)0.3875 (3)0.0644 (5)
H16A0.16440.29520.39870.077*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0761 (4)0.0604 (3)0.0583 (3)0.0200 (2)0.0112 (2)0.0054 (2)
O10.0702 (8)0.0431 (6)0.0390 (5)0.0077 (5)0.0071 (5)0.0006 (4)
F10.0826 (9)0.0557 (7)0.1132 (11)0.0188 (6)0.0030 (8)0.0146 (7)
C10.0629 (11)0.0529 (9)0.0526 (9)0.0022 (8)0.0028 (7)0.0071 (7)
C20.0840 (14)0.0661 (11)0.0485 (9)0.0040 (10)0.0003 (9)0.0157 (9)
C30.1044 (17)0.0684 (12)0.0396 (8)0.0116 (11)0.0106 (9)0.0040 (8)
C40.1026 (16)0.0520 (9)0.0441 (9)0.0023 (10)0.0173 (9)0.0040 (7)
C50.0635 (10)0.0415 (7)0.0408 (7)0.0063 (7)0.0093 (7)0.0009 (6)
C60.0473 (8)0.0431 (7)0.0412 (7)0.0052 (6)0.0042 (6)0.0012 (6)
C70.0462 (8)0.0438 (7)0.0437 (7)0.0001 (6)0.0043 (6)0.0000 (6)
C80.0623 (10)0.0364 (7)0.0460 (8)0.0016 (6)0.0053 (7)0.0004 (6)
C90.0713 (11)0.0383 (7)0.0484 (8)0.0032 (7)0.0110 (7)0.0020 (6)
C100.0910 (14)0.0465 (9)0.0466 (9)0.0090 (9)0.0037 (8)0.0035 (7)
C110.0653 (10)0.0424 (8)0.0464 (8)0.0041 (7)0.0019 (7)0.0069 (6)
C120.0598 (12)0.0560 (11)0.1061 (18)0.0107 (9)0.0047 (11)0.0067 (11)
C130.0506 (11)0.0685 (13)0.121 (2)0.0047 (9)0.0111 (12)0.0073 (13)
C140.0621 (11)0.0453 (8)0.0666 (11)0.0093 (7)0.0027 (8)0.0016 (8)
C150.0561 (11)0.0462 (9)0.0976 (15)0.0034 (8)0.0018 (10)0.0022 (9)
C160.0508 (10)0.0538 (10)0.0891 (14)0.0065 (8)0.0080 (9)0.0029 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
C1—C21.373 (3)C8—C101.498 (2)
C1—C61.400 (2)C9—H9A0.9300
C1—H1A0.9300C10—C111.510 (2)
C2—C31.382 (3)C10—H10A0.9700
C2—H2A0.9300C10—H10B0.9700
C3—C41.370 (3)C11—C161.373 (3)
C3—H3A0.9300C11—C121.376 (3)
C4—C51.403 (2)C12—C131.386 (3)
C4—H4A0.9300C12—H12A0.9300
C5—C61.406 (2)C13—C141.353 (3)
C5—C91.435 (2)C13—H13A0.9300
C6—C71.447 (2)C14—C151.355 (3)
C7—O11.3573 (19)C14—F11.367 (2)
C7—S11.6367 (16)C15—C161.387 (3)
C8—C91.327 (2)C15—H15A0.9300
C8—O11.3843 (18)C16—H16A0.9300
C2—C1—C6120.26 (18)C5—C9—H9A119.8
C2—C1—H1A119.9C8—C10—C11114.22 (15)
C6—C1—H1A119.9C8—C10—H10A108.7
C1—C2—C3120.26 (18)C11—C10—H10A108.7
C1—C2—H2A119.9C8—C10—H10B108.7
C3—C2—H2A119.9C11—C10—H10B108.7
C4—C3—C2120.55 (17)H10A—C10—H10B107.6
C4—C3—H3A119.7C16—C11—C12118.03 (17)
C2—C3—H3A119.7C16—C11—C10120.16 (18)
C3—C4—C5120.66 (18)C12—C11—C10121.81 (18)
C3—C4—H4A119.7C11—C12—C13121.35 (19)
C5—C4—H4A119.7C11—C12—H12A119.3
C4—C5—C6118.58 (15)C13—C12—H12A119.3
C4—C5—C9122.49 (16)C14—C13—C12118.3 (2)
C6—C5—C9118.92 (14)C14—C13—H13A120.8
C1—C6—C5119.68 (15)C12—C13—H13A120.8
C1—C6—C7121.00 (15)C13—C14—C15122.61 (18)
C5—C6—C7119.31 (14)C13—C14—F1119.12 (18)
O1—C7—C6117.29 (13)C15—C14—F1118.27 (18)
O1—C7—S1116.25 (11)C14—C15—C16118.29 (18)
C6—C7—S1126.45 (12)C14—C15—H15A120.9
C9—C8—O1120.60 (14)C16—C15—H15A120.9
C9—C8—C10130.03 (16)C11—C16—C15121.39 (18)
O1—C8—C10109.36 (13)C11—C16—H16A119.3
C8—C9—C5120.38 (15)C15—C16—H16A119.3
C8—C9—H9A119.8C7—O1—C8123.49 (12)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C1—H1A···S10.932.783.142 (2)105
C3—H3A···O1i0.932.603.529 (2)178
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z−1.
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C1—H1A···S10.932.783.142 (2)105
C3—H3A···O1i0.932.603.529 (2)178
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z−1.
Acknowledgements top

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Higher Education Commission, Islamabad, Pakistan.

references
References top

Abid, O., Rama, N. H., Qadeer, G., Khan, G. S. & Lu, X.-M. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o2895–o2896.

Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19.

Barry, R. D. (1964). Chem. Rev. 64, 239–241.

Bruker (2001). SMART and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Bruker (2002). SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.

Powers, J. C., Asgian, J. L., Ekici, D. & James, K. E. (2002). Chem. Rev. 102, 4639–4643.

Rossi, R., Carpita, A., Bellina, F., Stabile, P. & Mannina, L. (2003). Tetrahedron, 59, 2067–2081.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.

Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 7–13.

Sturtz, G., Meepagala, K. & Wedge, D. (2002). J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, 6979–6984.

Thomas, L. & Jens, B. J. (1999). Nat. Prod. 62, 1182–1187.