supplementary materials


Acta Cryst. (2012). E68, i86-i87    [ doi:10.1107/S160053681204384X ]

Redetermination of durangite, NaAl(AsO4)F

G. W. Downs, B. N. Yang, R. M. Thompson, M. D. Wenz and M. B. Andrade

Abstract top

The crystal structure of durangite, ideally NaAl(AsO4)F (chemical name sodium aluminium arsenate fluoride), has been determined previously [Kokkoros (1938). Z. Kristallogr. 99, 38-49] using Weissenberg film data without reporting displacement parameters of atoms or a reliability factor. This study reports the redetermination of the structure of durangite using single-crystal X-ray diffraction data from a natural sample with composition (Na0.95Li0.05)(Al0.91Fe3+0.07Mn3+0.02)(AsO4)(F0.73(OH)0.27) from the type locality, the Barranca mine, Coneto de Comonfort, Durango, Mexico. Durangite is isostructural with minerals of the titanite group in the space group C2/c. Its structure is characterized by kinked chains of corner-sharing AlO4F2 octahedra parallel to the c axis. These chains are cross-linked by isolated AsO4 tetrahedra, forming a three-dimensional framework. The Na+ cation (site symmetry 2) occupies the interstitial sites and is coordinated by one F- and six O2- anions. The AlO4F2 octahedron has symmetry -1; it is flattened, with the Al-F bond length [1.8457 (4) Å] shorter than the Al-O bond lengths [1.8913 (8) and 1.9002 (9) Å]. Examination of the Raman spectra for arsenate minerals in the titanite group reveals that the position of the band originating from the As-O symmetric stretching vibrations shifts to lower wavenumbers from durangite, maxwellite [ideally NaFe(AsO4)F], to tilasite [CaMg(AsO4)F].

Comment top

Durangite, NaAl(AsO4)F, is a member of the titanite mineral group crystallizing in space group C2/c, which includes a number of silicate, arsenate, phosphate, and sulfate minerals, as well as synthetic compounds with a wide range of chemical components (Hawthorne, 1990; Groat et al., 1990; Sebastian et al., 2002). Durangite was first described by Brush (1869) from tin placers in Durango, Mexico, and its crystallographic and optical data were measured by Des Cloizeaux (1875). Using Weissenberg photographs, Kokkoros (1938) determined its structure without reporting displacement parameters of atoms or a reliability factor. The synthesis of durangite was made by Machatschki (1941) and its infrared spectroscopic data were measured by Sumin de Portilla (1974). Foord et al. (1985) conducted a comprehensive mineralogical study on durangite from three different localities, including Black Range (New Mexico), Durango (Mexico), and Cornwall (England). Nevertheless, since the work by Kokkoros (1938), no further detailed crystallographic investigation has been reported for this mineral. As a part of our efforts to understand the crystal-chemical behavior of F versus OH in minerals, we concluded that the structural data for durangite need to be improved. This study reports a structure redetermination of durangite from the type locality by means of single-crystal X-ray diffraction.

Durangite is isostructural with minerals of the C2/c titanite group (e.g., Hawthorne et al., 1991; Oberti et al., 1991; Troitzsch et al., 1999) and topologically similar to the minerals of the C1 amblygonite (LiAlPO4F)-montebrasite (LiAlPO4OH) group (Groat et al., 1990). Its structure is characterized by kinked chains of corner-sharing AlO4F2 octahedra (symmetry 1) running parallel to the c axis. These chains are cross-linked by isolated AsO4 tetrahedra, forming a three-dimensional framework. The Na+ cation (site symmetry 2) occupies the interstitial sites and is coordinated by one F and six O anions (Fig. 1). The AlO4F2 octahedron is flattened, with the Al—F bond lengths (1.8457 (4) Å) shorter than the Al—O bond lengths (1.8913 (9) and 1.9002 (9) Å). The average As—O, Al—(O,F), and Na—(O,F) bond lengths are 1.681, 1.879, and 2.420 Å, respectively.

In addition to durangite, two other arsenate minerals, namely maxwellite (ideally NaFe3+(AsO4)F) and tilasite (CaMg(AsO4)F), also belong to the C2/c titanite group. An examination of these arsenate mineral structures shows that the AsO4 tetrahedron appears to become increasingly distorted from durangite to maxwellite to tilasite, as measured by the tetrahedral angle variance (TAV) and quadratic elongation (TQE) indexes (Robinson et al., 1971). The TAV and TQE values are 7.00 and 1.0018, respectively, for durangite, 9.80 and 1.0026 for maxwellite (Cooper & Hawthorne, 1995), and 15.45 and 1.0041 for tilasite (Bermanec, 1994). This observation may be correlated with the Ca content in these minerals, since our durangite sample shows no Ca, whereas the maxwellite sample examined by Cooper & Hawthorne (1995) contains 37% Ca substituting for Na.

Plotted in Figure 2 is the Raman spectrum for durangite, along with the Raman spectra for maxwellite and tilasite from the RRUFF Project (with RRUFF deposition numbers R060955 and R060618, respectively) for comparison. Note that our maxwellite sample is from the same locality as that studied by Cooper & Hawthorne (1995). Evidently, there are some resemblances among these Raman spectra. There have been numerous Raman spectroscopic studies on a variety of arsenate minerals and compounds (e.g., Yang et al., 2011a,b; Frost & Xi, 2012; Frost et al., 2012, and references therein). In general, these spectra can be divided into three regions. Region 1, between 700 and 1000 cm-1, contains bands attributable to the As—O symmetric (the most intense band in each spectrum) and anti-symmetric stretching vibrations (ν1 and ν3 modes, respectively) within the AsO4 tetrahedra. Region 2, between 300 and 560 cm-1, includes bands originating from the O—As—O symmetric and anti-symmetric bending vibrations (ν2 and ν4 modes) within the AsO4 tetrahedron, overlapped with those from the M-(O,F) (M = octahedrally coordinated cations) stretching vibrations. The bands in Region 3, below 300 cm-1, are associated with the rotational and translational modes of AsO4 tetrahedra, as well as the O—M—O bending vibrations, Na-(O,F) interactions, and lattice vibrational modes.

One of the noticeable features in Figure 2 is that the position of the strongest band due to the As—O symmetric stretching vibrations is shifted to the lower wavenumbers from durangite (913 cm-1), maxwellite (870 cm-1), to tilasite (852 cm-1). This shift appears to be in line with the augmented distortion of the AsO4 tetrahedra from durangite, maxwellite, to tilasite, which, in turn, corresponds to the increased tilasite component in these minerals. Another visible feature in Figure 2 is the marked broadening of Raman bands for maxwellite relative to the corresponding ones for durangite and tilasite, indicating the strong short-range order of the maxwellite structure, resulting likely from its complex chemistry, i.e. (Na0.56Ca0.41–0.03)Σ=1(Fe3+0.24Al0.24Fe2+0.23Mg0.19Ti0.06Mn0.03)Σ=1(As0.99P0.01)Σ=1O4)F1.00.

From chemical microprobe analysis, we estimated about 0.27 OH atoms per formula unit substituting for F in the structure. Unfortunately, we could not detect any obvious band attributable to the O—H stretching vibrations in the Raman spectra measurements. The possible hydrogen bond appears to be between F and O1, which are separated by a distance of 3.215 (1) Å.

Related literature top

For previous work on durangite, see: Brush (1869); Des Cloizeaux (1875); Kokkoros (1938); Machatschki (1941); Sumin de Portilla (1974); Foord et al. (1985). For minerals isostructural with or similar to durangite, see: Hawthorne (1990); Groat et al. (1990); Hawthorne et al. (1991); Oberti et al. (1991); Bermanec (1994); Cooper & Hawthorne (1995); Troitzsch et al. (1999); Sebastian et al. (2002). For Raman spectroscopic measurements on arsenate minerals and compounds, see: Yang et al. (2011a,b); Frost & Xi (2012); Frost et al. (2012). For the definition of polyhedral distortion, see: Robinson et al. (1971).

Experimental top

The durangite crystal used in this study is from the type locality, the Barranca mine, Coneto de Comonfort, Durango, Mexico and is in the collection of the RRUFF project (http://rruff.info/R120118). Its chemical composition was measured with a CAMECA SX100 electron microprobe (9 analysis points), yielding the empirical chemical formula, calculated on the basis of 5 O atoms, (Li and OH were estimated by charge balance and difference).

The Raman spectra were collected from randomly oriented crystals at 100% power on a Thermo Almega microRaman system, using a solid-state laser with a wavenumber of 532 nm, and a thermoelectrically cooled CCD detector. The laser is partially polarized with 4 cm-1 resolution and a spot size of 1 µm.

Refinement top

Due to similar its X-ray scattering power, the small amount of Mn was treated as Fe during the refinement. Na and Li, Al and Fe, and F and the O atom of the OH group, respectively, were refined on the same sites and with the same displacement factors. All atomic sites were assumed to be fully occupied, yielding the structure formula (Na0.95Li0.05)(Al0.91Fe3+0.09)(As1.00O4)[F0.73(OH)0.27]. The highest residual peak in the difference Fourier maps was located at (0.0933, 0.3242, 0.3620), 0.77 Å from As, and the deepest hole at (0.0012, 0.3233, 0.3559), 0.74 Å from As.

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: XtalDraw (Downs & Hall-Wallace, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The crystal structure of durangite, NaAl(AsO4)F. The octahedra and tetrahedra represent the AlO4F2 and AsO4 groups, respectively.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The Raman spectra of durangite, maxwellite, and tilasite. The spectra are shown with vertical offset for clarity.
Sodium aluminium arsenate fluoride top
Crystal data top
(Na0.95Li0.05)(Al0.91Fe0.09)(AsO4)(F0.73OH0.27)F(000) = 395
Mr = 208.88Dx = 3.915 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 2164 reflections
a = 6.5789 (5) Åθ = 4.2–32.7°
b = 8.5071 (6) ŵ = 10.18 mm1
c = 7.0212 (5) ÅT = 293 K
β = 115.447 (4)°Cuboid, red
V = 354.83 (4) Å30.10 × 0.10 × 0.09 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
645 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube641 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.019
φ and ω scanθmax = 32.6°, θmin = 4.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2005)
h = 99
Tmin = 0.429, Tmax = 0.461k = 1212
2509 measured reflectionsl = 1010
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters not refined
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.013 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0158P)2 + 0.3997P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.033(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.10Δρmax = 0.65 e Å3
645 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.47 e Å3
44 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
3 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.0311 (12)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Crystal data top
(Na0.95Li0.05)(Al0.91Fe0.09)(AsO4)(F0.73OH0.27)V = 354.83 (4) Å3
Mr = 208.88Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 6.5789 (5) ŵ = 10.18 mm1
b = 8.5071 (6) ÅT = 293 K
c = 7.0212 (5) Å0.10 × 0.10 × 0.09 mm
β = 115.447 (4)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
645 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2005)
641 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.429, Tmax = 0.461Rint = 0.019
2509 measured reflectionsθmax = 32.6°
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.013H-atom parameters not refined
wR(F2) = 0.033Δρmax = 0.65 e Å3
S = 1.10Δρmin = 0.47 e Å3
645 reflectionsAbsolute structure: ?
44 parametersFlack parameter: ?
3 restraintsRogers parameter: ?
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Na0.50000.17173 (9)0.25000.01324 (16)0.9500 (1)
Li0.50000.17173 (9)0.25000.01324 (16)0.0500 (1)
Al0.00000.00000.00000.00554 (10)0.9100 (1)
Fe0.00000.00000.00000.00554 (10)0.0900 (1)
As0.00000.314545 (18)0.25000.00504 (7)
O10.19850 (14)0.43542 (11)0.41553 (14)0.00955 (16)
O20.10283 (15)0.20307 (10)0.11309 (15)0.00838 (15)
F0.00000.06705 (13)0.25000.00719 (18)0.7300 (1)
OH0.00000.06705 (13)0.25000.00719 (18)0.2700 (1)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Na0.0098 (3)0.0063 (3)0.0208 (4)0.0000.0039 (3)0.000
Li0.0098 (3)0.0063 (3)0.0208 (4)0.0000.0039 (3)0.000
Al0.00567 (19)0.0052 (2)0.00565 (19)0.00045 (13)0.00233 (15)0.00008 (14)
Fe0.00567 (19)0.0052 (2)0.00565 (19)0.00045 (13)0.00233 (15)0.00008 (14)
As0.00470 (9)0.00455 (9)0.00563 (9)0.0000.00199 (6)0.000
O10.0072 (3)0.0093 (4)0.0103 (4)0.0026 (3)0.0020 (3)0.0032 (3)
O20.0097 (3)0.0071 (3)0.0103 (4)0.0003 (3)0.0061 (3)0.0020 (3)
F0.0096 (4)0.0067 (4)0.0056 (4)0.0000.0036 (3)0.000
OH0.0096 (4)0.0067 (4)0.0056 (4)0.0000.0036 (3)0.000
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Na—Fi2.2222 (14)Al—O1vii1.8913 (8)
Na—O2ii2.3799 (9)Al—O1iii1.8913 (8)
Na—O22.3799 (9)Al—O2vi1.9002 (9)
Na—O1iii2.4069 (11)Al—O21.9002 (9)
Na—O1iv2.4069 (11)As—O11.6761 (8)
Na—O2v2.5708 (10)As—O1viii1.6761 (8)
Na—O2i2.5708 (10)As—O2viii1.6852 (9)
Al—Fvi1.8457 (4)As—O21.6852 (9)
Al—F1.8457 (4)
Fvi—Al—F180.00 (6)F—Al—O288.34 (4)
Fvi—Al—O1vii87.68 (3)O1vii—Al—O290.23 (4)
F—Al—O1vii92.32 (3)O1iii—Al—O289.77 (4)
Fvi—Al—O1iii92.32 (3)O2vi—Al—O2180.00 (7)
F—Al—O1iii87.68 (3)O1—As—O1viii104.31 (6)
O1vii—Al—O1iii180.00 (8)O1—As—O2viii109.50 (5)
Fvi—Al—O2vi88.34 (4)O1viii—As—O2viii110.89 (4)
F—Al—O2vi91.66 (4)O1—As—O2110.89 (4)
O1vii—Al—O2vi89.77 (4)O1viii—As—O2109.50 (4)
O1iii—Al—O2vi90.23 (4)O2viii—As—O2111.51 (6)
Fvi—Al—O291.66 (4)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y+1/2, z; (ii) x+1, y, z+1/2; (iii) x+1/2, y1/2, z+1/2; (iv) x+1/2, y1/2, z; (v) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (vi) x, y, z; (vii) x1/2, y+1/2, z1/2; (viii) x, y, z+1/2.
Acknowledgements top

Support of this study was provided by the Arizona Science Foundation, CNPq 202469/2011–5 from the Brazilian government for MBA, and Bruker AXS for a summer work study by GWD and BNY. The durangite sample used in this study was kindly donated to the RRUFF Project by Michael Shannon.

references
References top

Bermanec, V. (1994). Neues Jahrb. Miner. Mh. 1994, 289–294.

Bruker (2004). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Brush, G. J. (1869). Am. J. Sci. Arts, 98, 179–182.

Cooper, M. A. & Hawthorne, F. C. (1995). Neues Jahrb. Miner. Mh. 1995, 97–104.

Des Cloizeaux, M. (1875). Ann. Chim. Phys. 4, 401–406.

Downs, R. T. & Hall-Wallace, M. (2003). Am. Mineral. 88, 247–250.

Foord, E. E., Oakman, M. R. & Maxwell, C. H. (1985). Can. Mineral. 23, 241–246.

Frost, R. L. & Xi, Y. (2012). Spectrochim. Acta Part A, 86, 224–230.

Frost, R. L., Xi, Y., Tan, K., Millar, G. J. & Palmer, S. J. (2012). Spectrochim. Acta Part A, 85, 173–178.

Groat, L. A., Raudsepp, M., Hawthorne, F. C., Ercit, T. S., Sherriff, B. L. & Hartman, J. S. (1990). Am. Mineral. 75, 992–1008.

Hawthorne, F. C. (1990). Z. Kristallogr. 192, 1–52.

Hawthorne, F. C., Groat, L. A., Raudsepp, M., Ball, N. A., Kimata, M., Spike, F. D., Gaba, R., Halden, N. M., Lumpkin, G. R., Ewing, R. C., Greegor, R. B., Lytle, F. W., Ercit, T. S., Rossman, G. R., Wicks, F. J., Ramik, R. A., Sherriff, B. L., Fleet, M. E. & McCammon, C. A. (1991). Am. Mineral. 76, 370–396.

Kokkoros, P. (1938). Z. Kristallogr. 99, 38–49.

Machatschki, F. (1941). Z. Kristallogr. 103, 221–227.

Oberti, R., Smith, D. C., Rossi, G. & Caucia, F. (1991). Eur. J. Mineral. 3, 777–792.

Robinson, K., Gibbs, G. V. & Ribbe, P. H. (1971). Science, 172, 567–570.

Sebastian, L., Gopalakrishnan, J. & Piffard, Y. (2002). J. Mater. Chem. 12, 374–377.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2005). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.

Sumin de Portilla, V. I. (1974). Can. Mineral. 12, 262–268.

Troitzsch, U., Ellis, D. J., Thompson, J. & Fitz-Gerald, J. (1999). Eur. J. Mineral. 11, 955–965.

Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Yang, H., Evans, S. H., Downs, R. T. & Jenkins, R. A. (2011a). Can. Mineral. 49, 687–696.

Yang, Y. W., Stevenson, R. A., Siegel, A. M. & Downs, G. W. (2011b). Acta Cryst. E67, i68.