view article

Figure 4
(a) Distortion of the sample surface due to the exciting optical pump beam. The simulation is taken from Navirian et al. (2012BB17). (b) Scattering geometry of the unexcited sample. The scattering vector [{\bf{q}}_{\rm{sc}}] is parallel to the Qz-axis. (c) The rising slope of the near-surface distortion of the sample leads to a decrease of αi. The scattering vector [{\bf{q}}_{\rm{sc}}] is now composed of a positive qz- and a negative qx-component. (d) In the center of the excitation spot the sample is almost homogeneously excited in the lateral direction. The center of the CTR is shifted to smaller Qz-values due to thermal expansion of the lattice. The scattering vector [{\bf{q}}_{\rm{sc}}] is again parallel to the Qz-axis, i.e. qx = 0. (e) Similar to (c); however, the falling slope leads to an increased diffraction angle αi. The scattering vector is now composed of a positive qz and a positive qx-component. The decomposition of the scattering vector [{\bf{q}}_{\rm{sc}}] into a qz- and a qx-component is shown.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds