organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

An ortho­rhom­bic polymorph of pyrazino­[2,3-f][1,10]phenanthroline-2,3-dicarbo­nitrile

aDepartment of Chemistry, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, People's Republic of China, bResearch Center for Import–Export Chemicals Safety of the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China (AQSIQ), Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine, Beijing 100123, People's Republic of China, and cKey Laboratory of Terahertz Optoelectronics, Ministry of Education, Department of Physics, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: jinqh204@163.com

(Received 5 October 2011; accepted 7 November 2011; online 9 November 2011)

The title compound, C16H6N6, is a polymorph of the previously reported structure [Kozlov & Goldberg (2008[Kozlov, L. & Goldberg, I. (2008). Acta Cryst. C64, o498-o501.]). Acta Cryst. C64, o498–o501]. Unlike the previously reported monoclinic polymorph (space group P21/c, Z = 8), the title compound reveals ortho­rhom­bic symmetry (space group Pnma, Z = 4). The mol­ecule shows crystallographic mirror symmetry, while the previously reported structure exhibits two independent mol­ecules per asymmetric unit. In the title compound, adjacent mol­ecules are essentially parallel along the c axis and tend to be vertical along the b axis with dihedral angles of 72.02 (6)°. However, in the reported polymorph, the entire crystal structure shows an anti­parallel arrangement of adjacent columns related by inversion centers and the two independent mol­ecules are nearly parallel with a dihedral angle of 2.48 (6)°.

Related literature

For ligands based on 1,10-phenanthroline in coordination chemistry, see: Rabaca et al. (2008[Rabaca, S., Duarte, M. C., Santos, I. C., Pereira, L. C. J., Fourmigue, M., Henriques, R. T. & Almeida, M. (2008). Polyhedron, 27, 1999-2006.]); Stephenson et al. (2008[Stephenson, M. D., Prior, T. J. & Hardie, M. J. (2008). Cryst. Growth Des. 8, 643-653.]). For reports of the title compound in coordination chemistry, see: Kulkarni et al. (2004[Kulkarni, M. S., Rao, B. S. M., Sastri, C. V., Maiya, B. G., Mohan, H. & Mittal, J. P. (2004). J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 167, 101-109.]); Stephenson & Hardie (2006[Stephenson, M. D. & Hardie, M. J. (2006). Cryst. Growth Des. 6(2), 423-432.]); Xiao et al. (2011[Xiao, Y. L., Jin, Q. H., Deng, Y. H., Li, Z. F., Yang, W., Wu, M. H. & Zhang, C. L. (2011). Inorg. Chem. Commun. Accepted, doi:10.1016/j.inoche.2011.10.011.]); Xu et al. (2002[Xu, Z. D., Liu, H., Wang, M., Xiao, S. L., Yang, M. & Bu, X. H. (2002). J. Inorg. Biochem. 92, 149-155.]). For examples of polymorphism, see: Demirtaş et al. (2011[Demirtaş, G., Dege, N. & Büyükgüngör, O. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o1509-o1510.]); Jiang et al. (2000[Jiang, R.-W., Ming, D.-S., But, P. P. H. & Mak, T. C. W. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 594-595.]); Okabe et al. (2001[Okabe, N., Kyoyama, H. & Suzuki, M. (2001). Acta Cryst. E57, o764-o766.]); Pan & Chen (2009[Pan, J. X. & Chen, Q. W. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o652.]); Ramos Silva et al. (2011[Ramos Silva, M., Pereira Silva, P. S., Yuste, C. & Paixão, J. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o340.]); Thallapally et al. (2004[Thallapally, P. K., Jetti, R. K. R., Katz, A. K., Carrell, H. L., Singh, K., Lahiri, K., Kotha, S., Boese, R. & Desiraju, G. R. (2004). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 1149-1155.]). For the previously reported polymorph, see: Kozlov & Goldberg (2008[Kozlov, L. & Goldberg, I. (2008). Acta Cryst. C64, o498-o501.]). For related structures, see: Kozlov et al. (2008[Kozlov, L., Rubin-Preminger, J. M. & Goldberg, I. (2008). Acta Cryst. C64, o1-o3.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C16H6N6

  • Mr = 282.27

  • Orthorhombic, P n m a

  • a = 14.1055 (13) Å

  • b = 16.3331 (14) Å

  • c = 5.2694 (4) Å

  • V = 1214.00 (18) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.10 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.45 × 0.30 × 0.26 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007[Bruker (2007). SMART, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.956, Tmax = 0.974

  • 4543 measured reflections

  • 1113 independent reflections

  • 759 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.046

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041

  • wR(F2) = 0.119

  • S = 1.06

  • 1113 reflections

  • 100 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007[Bruker (2007). SMART, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007[Bruker (2007). SMART, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]) and ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996[Burnett, M. N. & Johnson, C. K. (1996). ORTEPIII. Report ORNL-6895. OakRidge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information


Comment top

Ligands based on 1,10-phenanthroline are attractive building blocks for the formation of metal-organic complexes bearing diverse dimensionalities (Rabaca et al., 2008; Stephenson et al., 2008). Among 1,10-phenanthroline derivatives, the DICNQ (DICNQ = pyrazino[2,3-f][1,10]phenanthroline-2,3-dicarbonitrile) (Xu et al., 2002; Kulkarni et al., 2004) has a big conjugated system and multiple coordination including strong chelating phenanthroline ring, bridging pyrazine ring and cyanite groups, so it is good in synthesizing luminescent complexes containing multifunctional ligands. Up to date only a few complexes of DICNQ are reported, such as [Co(dicnq)2Br2] and [Cu(dicnq)2Br2][Cu(dicnq)2Br]Br.(CH3CN).2(H2O) (Stephenson & Hardie, 2006). Very recently, we synthesized five Cu(I) complexes [Cu(PPh3)(C16H6N6)X] (C16H6N6 = pyrazino[2,3-f][1,10]phenanthroline-2,3-dicarbonitrile; X = Cl, Br, I, CN, SCN) (Xiao et al., 2011). During our attempts to synthesize Cu(II) complexes of DICNQ and 4,4'-bipyridine, we obtained crystals of a new orthorhombic polymorph of the solvent-free DICNQ.

Polymorphism can potentially be found in any crystalline material including polymers, minerals, and metals, and is related to allotropy, which refers to elemental solids. When polymorphism exists as a result of difference in crystal packing, it is called packing polymorphism. The different crystal types probably are the result of hydration, solvation or the effect of synthesis methods. There are recently reported examples of organic polymorphs: 2-(pyrimidin-2-ylsulfanyl) acetic acid, which is able to form monoclinic and orthorhombic crystals (Ramos Silva et al., 2011; Pan & Chen, 2009). 3,4,5-Trihydroxybenzoic acid monohydrate is found to form three polymorphs (Demirtaş et al., 2011; Jiang et al., 2000; Okabe et al., 2001). We herein report a new orthorhombic polymorph of DICNQ (1).

ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996) representation of the title compound (1) is shown in Fig. 1. The title compound belongs to orthorhombic system, space group Pnma, consisting of one symmetric unit of single molecule, unlike the reported monoclinic polymorph (space group P21/c), (2), (Kozlov & Goldberg, 2008), which consists of two crystallographically independent molecules.

The phenanthroline fragment of both polymorphs is nearly planar, and a similar bending of the cyano groups from the plane of the phenanthroline residues can be observed. The deviating distance of the cyano groups from the plane in (1) (0.182 (7) Å) is obviously bigger than the corresponding deviating distances in (2) (0.0345 Å and 0.0374 Å).

The packing pattern differs from the reported polymorph. In the title compound, there are two packing arrangements (Fig. 2), adjacent molecules are essentially parallel along the c axis and tend to be vertical along the b axis with dihedral angles of 72.02 (6)°. Howerver, in the reported polymorph the entire crystal structure shows an antiparallel arrangement of the adjacent columns related by inversion centers, and the two independent molecules are nearly parallel with a dihedral angle of 2.48 (6)°.

In addition, the intermolecular assembly of (1) is dominated by π-π stacking of overlaps among phenanthroline fragments and π-π stacking between phenanthroline fragment and cyano group of adjacent molecules (Fig. 2), with an interplanar distance between the parallel phenanthroline rings in the two adjacent molecules of 3.030 (1) Å. In contrast, in (2) and the ethanol solvate of DICNQ (C16H6N6).(C2H6O) (3) (Kozlov et al., 2008), adjacent molecules overlap only through their phenanthroline fragments with the shortest interplanar distance of 3.380 (3) Å for (2), 3.27 Å and 3.40 Å for (3).

Various methods and conditions of the crystallization process are the main reason responsible for the formation of different polymorphic forms (Thallapally et al., 2004). The two polymorphs (1) and (2) are prepared under different catalysts. (1) was prepared under the catalysis of CuCl2.2H2O and 4,4'-bipy, while (2) was prepared under the catalysis of [Pd(PPh3)Cl2].

Related literature top

For ligands based on 1,10-phenanthroline in coordination chemistry, see: Rabaca et al. (2008); Stephenson et al. (2008). For reports of the title compound in coordination chemistry, see: Kulkarni et al. (2004); Stephenson & Hardie (2006); Xiao et al. (2011); Xu et al. (2002). For examples of polymorphism, see: Demirtaş et al. (2011); Jiang et al. (2000); Okabe et al. (2001); Pan & Chen (2009); Ramos Silva et al. (2011); Thallapally et al. (2004). For the previously reported polymorph, see: Kozlov & Goldberg (2008). For related structures, see: Kozlov et al. (2008).

Experimental top

A mixture of CuCl2.2H2O (0.0178 g, 0.1 mmol) in 5 ml CH2Cl2 and DICNQ (0.0290 g, 0.1 mmol) in 3 ml CH3CN was stirred for 30 min, then a solution of 4,4'-bipyridine (0.0202 g, 0.1 mmol) in 2 ml CH3CN was added under continuous stirring. The resulting solution was refluxed for 5 h and filtered. The filtrate was allowed to evaporate slowly at room temperature to yield yellow block crystals of the title complex. Crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction were selected directly from the sample as prepared.

IR (KBr, disc: v/cm-1): 3466.82 s, 1587.57m, 1571.17m, 1505.59m, 1459.84m, 1444.23m, 1384.77m, 1372.26m, 1331.97w, 1264.07w, 1219.29m, 1141.93m, 1123.84w, 1073.56w, 1028.64w, 975.09w, 817.56m, 743.23m, 688.54w, 618.37w, 527.98w, 441.00w, 420.02w, 409.42w.

Refinement top

H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model with C—H = 0.93 Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Structure description top

Ligands based on 1,10-phenanthroline are attractive building blocks for the formation of metal-organic complexes bearing diverse dimensionalities (Rabaca et al., 2008; Stephenson et al., 2008). Among 1,10-phenanthroline derivatives, the DICNQ (DICNQ = pyrazino[2,3-f][1,10]phenanthroline-2,3-dicarbonitrile) (Xu et al., 2002; Kulkarni et al., 2004) has a big conjugated system and multiple coordination including strong chelating phenanthroline ring, bridging pyrazine ring and cyanite groups, so it is good in synthesizing luminescent complexes containing multifunctional ligands. Up to date only a few complexes of DICNQ are reported, such as [Co(dicnq)2Br2] and [Cu(dicnq)2Br2][Cu(dicnq)2Br]Br.(CH3CN).2(H2O) (Stephenson & Hardie, 2006). Very recently, we synthesized five Cu(I) complexes [Cu(PPh3)(C16H6N6)X] (C16H6N6 = pyrazino[2,3-f][1,10]phenanthroline-2,3-dicarbonitrile; X = Cl, Br, I, CN, SCN) (Xiao et al., 2011). During our attempts to synthesize Cu(II) complexes of DICNQ and 4,4'-bipyridine, we obtained crystals of a new orthorhombic polymorph of the solvent-free DICNQ.

Polymorphism can potentially be found in any crystalline material including polymers, minerals, and metals, and is related to allotropy, which refers to elemental solids. When polymorphism exists as a result of difference in crystal packing, it is called packing polymorphism. The different crystal types probably are the result of hydration, solvation or the effect of synthesis methods. There are recently reported examples of organic polymorphs: 2-(pyrimidin-2-ylsulfanyl) acetic acid, which is able to form monoclinic and orthorhombic crystals (Ramos Silva et al., 2011; Pan & Chen, 2009). 3,4,5-Trihydroxybenzoic acid monohydrate is found to form three polymorphs (Demirtaş et al., 2011; Jiang et al., 2000; Okabe et al., 2001). We herein report a new orthorhombic polymorph of DICNQ (1).

ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996) representation of the title compound (1) is shown in Fig. 1. The title compound belongs to orthorhombic system, space group Pnma, consisting of one symmetric unit of single molecule, unlike the reported monoclinic polymorph (space group P21/c), (2), (Kozlov & Goldberg, 2008), which consists of two crystallographically independent molecules.

The phenanthroline fragment of both polymorphs is nearly planar, and a similar bending of the cyano groups from the plane of the phenanthroline residues can be observed. The deviating distance of the cyano groups from the plane in (1) (0.182 (7) Å) is obviously bigger than the corresponding deviating distances in (2) (0.0345 Å and 0.0374 Å).

The packing pattern differs from the reported polymorph. In the title compound, there are two packing arrangements (Fig. 2), adjacent molecules are essentially parallel along the c axis and tend to be vertical along the b axis with dihedral angles of 72.02 (6)°. Howerver, in the reported polymorph the entire crystal structure shows an antiparallel arrangement of the adjacent columns related by inversion centers, and the two independent molecules are nearly parallel with a dihedral angle of 2.48 (6)°.

In addition, the intermolecular assembly of (1) is dominated by π-π stacking of overlaps among phenanthroline fragments and π-π stacking between phenanthroline fragment and cyano group of adjacent molecules (Fig. 2), with an interplanar distance between the parallel phenanthroline rings in the two adjacent molecules of 3.030 (1) Å. In contrast, in (2) and the ethanol solvate of DICNQ (C16H6N6).(C2H6O) (3) (Kozlov et al., 2008), adjacent molecules overlap only through their phenanthroline fragments with the shortest interplanar distance of 3.380 (3) Å for (2), 3.27 Å and 3.40 Å for (3).

Various methods and conditions of the crystallization process are the main reason responsible for the formation of different polymorphic forms (Thallapally et al., 2004). The two polymorphs (1) and (2) are prepared under different catalysts. (1) was prepared under the catalysis of CuCl2.2H2O and 4,4'-bipy, while (2) was prepared under the catalysis of [Pd(PPh3)Cl2].

For ligands based on 1,10-phenanthroline in coordination chemistry, see: Rabaca et al. (2008); Stephenson et al. (2008). For reports of the title compound in coordination chemistry, see: Kulkarni et al. (2004); Stephenson & Hardie (2006); Xiao et al. (2011); Xu et al. (2002). For examples of polymorphism, see: Demirtaş et al. (2011); Jiang et al. (2000); Okabe et al. (2001); Pan & Chen (2009); Ramos Silva et al. (2011); Thallapally et al. (2004). For the previously reported polymorph, see: Kozlov & Goldberg (2008). For related structures, see: Kozlov et al. (2008).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Perspective view of a basic unit of the title complex. Atoms are displayed as elliposoids at the 50% probability level at ca 293 K.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The crystal packing of the title complex.
pyrazino[2,3-f][1,10]phenanthroline-2,3-dicarbonitrile top
Crystal data top
C16H6N6F(000) = 576
Mr = 282.27Dx = 1.544 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PnmaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2nCell parameters from 1184 reflections
a = 14.1055 (13) Åθ = 2.9–27.5°
b = 16.3331 (14) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 5.2694 (4) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1214.00 (18) Å3Block, yellow
Z = 40.45 × 0.30 × 0.26 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1113 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube759 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.046
phi and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2007)
h = 1616
Tmin = 0.956, Tmax = 0.974k = 197
4543 measured reflectionsl = 66
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.119H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0556P)2 + 0.3018P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1113 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
100 parametersΔρmax = 0.20 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
Crystal data top
C16H6N6V = 1214.00 (18) Å3
Mr = 282.27Z = 4
Orthorhombic, PnmaMo Kα radiation
a = 14.1055 (13) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 16.3331 (14) ÅT = 293 K
c = 5.2694 (4) Å0.45 × 0.30 × 0.26 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1113 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2007)
759 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.956, Tmax = 0.974Rint = 0.046
4543 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0410 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.119H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.20 e Å3
1113 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
100 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.56932 (11)0.33317 (10)0.1078 (3)0.0347 (5)
N20.77953 (11)0.33585 (9)0.6140 (3)0.0322 (4)
N30.92249 (13)0.37680 (13)1.1146 (4)0.0539 (6)
C10.61818 (12)0.29508 (11)0.0786 (3)0.0279 (5)
C20.67134 (12)0.33802 (11)0.2603 (3)0.0281 (5)
C30.67273 (13)0.42373 (12)0.2476 (4)0.0349 (5)
H30.70600.45420.36730.042*
C40.62440 (14)0.46176 (13)0.0564 (4)0.0381 (6)
H40.62490.51850.04220.046*
C50.57451 (13)0.41428 (12)0.1161 (4)0.0369 (5)
H50.54260.44100.24630.044*
C60.72648 (12)0.29328 (11)0.4470 (3)0.0285 (5)
C70.83106 (12)0.29288 (12)0.7773 (4)0.0317 (5)
C80.88437 (14)0.33918 (13)0.9640 (4)0.0372 (5)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0333 (9)0.0368 (10)0.0339 (10)0.0021 (7)0.0025 (8)0.0040 (8)
N20.0305 (9)0.0357 (9)0.0303 (9)0.0020 (7)0.0014 (8)0.0007 (8)
N30.0476 (11)0.0703 (14)0.0437 (12)0.0084 (10)0.0041 (10)0.0142 (11)
C10.0249 (9)0.0318 (10)0.0271 (11)0.0011 (8)0.0041 (8)0.0010 (9)
C20.0255 (9)0.0291 (10)0.0296 (11)0.0002 (8)0.0036 (8)0.0018 (9)
C30.0335 (11)0.0312 (10)0.0401 (13)0.0031 (9)0.0007 (10)0.0031 (10)
C40.0353 (11)0.0302 (10)0.0488 (14)0.0018 (9)0.0026 (11)0.0059 (10)
C50.0354 (11)0.0370 (12)0.0382 (12)0.0052 (9)0.0005 (10)0.0082 (10)
C60.0253 (9)0.0319 (9)0.0283 (10)0.0016 (8)0.0028 (8)0.0029 (8)
C70.0264 (10)0.0428 (11)0.0261 (11)0.0027 (8)0.0008 (9)0.0014 (9)
C80.0314 (11)0.0480 (13)0.0321 (12)0.0018 (9)0.0013 (10)0.0013 (11)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C51.327 (3)C3—C41.366 (3)
N1—C11.352 (2)C3—H30.9300
N2—C71.327 (2)C4—C51.387 (3)
N2—C61.348 (2)C4—H40.9300
N3—C81.138 (3)C5—H50.9300
C1—C21.404 (2)C6—C6i1.414 (4)
C1—C1i1.473 (4)C7—C7i1.401 (4)
C2—C31.402 (3)C7—C81.451 (3)
C2—C61.451 (2)
C5—N1—C1117.07 (17)C3—C4—H4120.6
C7—N2—C6117.02 (16)C5—C4—H4120.6
N1—C1—C2122.55 (17)N1—C5—C4124.37 (19)
N1—C1—C1i117.41 (10)N1—C5—H5117.8
C2—C1—C1i119.97 (11)C4—C5—H5117.8
C3—C2—C1118.29 (17)N2—C6—C6i121.05 (10)
C3—C2—C6121.85 (17)N2—C6—C2118.69 (16)
C1—C2—C6119.80 (17)C6i—C6—C2120.23 (10)
C4—C3—C2118.85 (18)N2—C7—C7i121.93 (10)
C4—C3—H3120.6N2—C7—C8116.61 (17)
C2—C3—H3120.6C7i—C7—C8121.41 (11)
C3—C4—C5118.85 (18)N3—C8—C7177.0 (2)
C5—N1—C1—C21.0 (3)C3—C4—C5—N10.7 (3)
C5—N1—C1—C1i175.87 (13)C7—N2—C6—C6i0.18 (19)
N1—C1—C2—C30.5 (3)C7—N2—C6—C2178.16 (15)
C1i—C1—C2—C3177.37 (12)C3—C2—C6—N20.7 (3)
N1—C1—C2—C6176.57 (15)C1—C2—C6—N2177.73 (15)
C1i—C1—C2—C60.26 (19)C3—C2—C6—C6i177.26 (13)
C1—C2—C3—C41.5 (3)C1—C2—C6—C6i0.26 (19)
C6—C2—C3—C4175.52 (17)C6—N2—C7—C7i0.18 (19)
C2—C3—C4—C51.0 (3)C6—N2—C7—C8177.14 (15)
C1—N1—C5—C41.7 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1/2, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC16H6N6
Mr282.27
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pnma
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)14.1055 (13), 16.3331 (14), 5.2694 (4)
V3)1214.00 (18)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.10
Crystal size (mm)0.45 × 0.30 × 0.26
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2007)
Tmin, Tmax0.956, 0.974
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
4543, 1113, 759
Rint0.046
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.595
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.041, 0.119, 1.06
No. of reflections1113
No. of parameters100
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.20, 0.24

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2007), SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

 

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21171119). It was granted by the research project of recycling PET of food contact materials (No. 2010 J K022) from the Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine, National Keystone Basic Research Program (973 Program) under grant Nos. 2007CB310408 and 2006CB302901, and the Funding Project for Academic Human Resources Development in Institutions of Higher Learning Under the Jurisdiction of Beijing Municipality.

References

First citationBruker (2007). SMART, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationBurnett, M. N. & Johnson, C. K. (1996). ORTEPIII. Report ORNL-6895. OakRidge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationDemirtaş, G., Dege, N. & Büyükgüngör, O. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o1509–o1510.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationJiang, R.-W., Ming, D.-S., But, P. P. H. & Mak, T. C. W. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 594–595.  CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKozlov, L. & Goldberg, I. (2008). Acta Cryst. C64, o498–o501.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKozlov, L., Rubin-Preminger, J. M. & Goldberg, I. (2008). Acta Cryst. C64, o1–o3.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKulkarni, M. S., Rao, B. S. M., Sastri, C. V., Maiya, B. G., Mohan, H. & Mittal, J. P. (2004). J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 167, 101–109.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationOkabe, N., Kyoyama, H. & Suzuki, M. (2001). Acta Cryst. E57, o764–o766.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationPan, J. X. & Chen, Q. W. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o652.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationRabaca, S., Duarte, M. C., Santos, I. C., Pereira, L. C. J., Fourmigue, M., Henriques, R. T. & Almeida, M. (2008). Polyhedron, 27, 1999–2006.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationRamos Silva, M., Pereira Silva, P. S., Yuste, C. & Paixão, J. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o340.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationStephenson, M. D. & Hardie, M. J. (2006). Cryst. Growth Des. 6(2), 423–432.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationStephenson, M. D., Prior, T. J. & Hardie, M. J. (2008). Cryst. Growth Des. 8, 643–653.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationThallapally, P. K., Jetti, R. K. R., Katz, A. K., Carrell, H. L., Singh, K., Lahiri, K., Kotha, S., Boese, R. & Desiraju, G. R. (2004). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 1149–1155.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationXiao, Y. L., Jin, Q. H., Deng, Y. H., Li, Z. F., Yang, W., Wu, M. H. & Zhang, C. L. (2011). Inorg. Chem. Commun. Accepted, doi:10.1016/j.inoche.2011.10.011.  Google Scholar
First citationXu, Z. D., Liu, H., Wang, M., Xiao, S. L., Yang, M. & Bu, X. H. (2002). J. Inorg. Biochem. 92, 149–155.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds