inorganic compounds
2SO4 – a redetermination
of HgaInstitute for Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Division of Structural Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/164-SC, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
*Correspondence e-mail: mweil@mail.zserv.tuwien.ac.at
The 2SO4, was re-determined based on modern CCD data. In comparison with the previous determination from Weissenberg film data [Dorm (1969). Acta Chem. Scand. 23, 1607–1615], all atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters, leading to higher precision in terms of bond lengths and angles [e.g. Hg—Hg = 2.5031 (7) compared to 2.500 (3)Å]. The structure consists of alternating rows along [001] of Hg22+ dumbbells (generated by inversion symmetry) and SO42− tetrahedra (symmetry 2). The dumbbells are linked via short O—Hg—Hg—O bonds to the sulfate tetrahedra into chains extending parallel to [20-1]. More remote O—Hg—Hg—O bonds connect these chains into a three-dimensional framework.
of mercury(I) sulfate (or mercurous sulfate), HgKeywords: crystal structure; redetermination; mercurous; Hg/S/O system.
CCDC reference: 1004277
1. Related literature
Structural data of the previous 2SO4 (Dorm, 1969) were deposited with the ICSD (2014), but contain an error in the z coordinate of the sulfur atom. Other phases in the system Hg/S/O were structurally characterized by Aurivillius & Stålhandske (1980) [HgSO4], Weil (2001) [Hg3(SO4)O2] and Logemann & Wickleder (2013) [Hg(S2O7)]. For a review on Hg—Hg bond lengths in mercurous compounds, see: Weil et al. (2005).
of Hg2. Experimental
2.1. Crystal data
|
2.3. Refinement
|
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2005); cell SAINT (Bruker, 2005); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ATOMS for Windows (Dowty, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1004277
10.1107/S1600536814011155/hb0012sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814011155/hb0012Isup2.hkl
1 g HgO was suspended in 20 ml water. 4 ml sulfuric acid (96%wt) and 2 drops CS2 were added to the mixture, transferred into a 50 ml polypropylene beaker that was sealed and heated for 12 h at 393 K. Besides a polycrystalline dirty-white solid with an unknown diffraction pattern, few colourless and transparent single crystals of the title compound were present in the reaction mixture.
The coordinates of the previous
(Dorm, 1969) were used as starting parameters. The highest and lowest remaining electron density is 0.84 Å and 1.25 Å, respectively, from the Hg atom. It should be noted that in the current version (01/2014) of the Inorganic Structure Data Base (ICSD, 2014), the deposited structure data of the previous by Dorm (1969) contain an error: The z parameter of the sulfur atom must be 1/4, not 3/4.Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2005); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2005); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ATOMS for Windows (Dowty, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).Fig. 1. The crystal structure of Hg2SO4 in a projection along [010]. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 74% probability level; short Hg—O bonds are displayed with closed black lines, longer Hg—O bonds with open lines. |
Hg2O4S | F(000) = 416 |
Mr = 497.24 | Dx = 7.109 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2yc | Cell parameters from 1233 reflections |
a = 6.2771 (8) Å | θ = 3.3–30.4° |
b = 4.4290 (6) Å | µ = 66.35 mm−1 |
c = 8.3596 (10) Å | T = 295 K |
β = 91.695 (4)° | Fragment, colourless |
V = 232.31 (5) Å3 | 0.18 × 0.08 × 0.04 mm |
Z = 2 |
Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer | 701 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 629 reflections with I > 2σ(I)' |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.060 |
ω–scans | θmax = 30.4°, θmin = 4.6° |
Absorption correction: numerical (HABITUS; Herrendorf, 1997) | h = −8→8 |
Tmin = 0.012, Tmax = 0.119 | k = −6→6 |
1737 measured reflections | l = −11→8 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: isomorphous structure methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.052P)2 + 1.7115P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
wR(F2) = 0.087 | Δρmax = 3.57 e Å−3 |
S = 1.06 | Δρmin = −3.18 e Å−3 |
701 reflections | Extinction correction: SHELXL, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
34 parameters | Extinction coefficient: 0.0118 (12) |
0 restraints |
Hg2O4S | V = 232.31 (5) Å3 |
Mr = 497.24 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P2/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 6.2771 (8) Å | µ = 66.35 mm−1 |
b = 4.4290 (6) Å | T = 295 K |
c = 8.3596 (10) Å | 0.18 × 0.08 × 0.04 mm |
β = 91.695 (4)° |
Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer | 701 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: numerical (HABITUS; Herrendorf, 1997) | 629 reflections with I > 2σ(I)' |
Tmin = 0.012, Tmax = 0.119 | Rint = 0.060 |
1737 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035 | 34 parameters |
wR(F2) = 0.087 | 0 restraints |
S = 1.06 | Δρmax = 3.57 e Å−3 |
701 reflections | Δρmin = −3.18 e Å−3 |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Hg | 0.19318 (5) | 0.05289 (9) | −0.02034 (4) | 0.0275 (2) | |
S | 0.5000 | 0.5674 (5) | 0.2500 | 0.0134 (5) | |
O1 | 0.6943 (11) | 0.3901 (16) | 0.2586 (8) | 0.0224 (12) | |
O2 | 0.5038 (9) | 0.7720 (13) | 0.1058 (6) | 0.0172 (10) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Hg | 0.0119 (2) | 0.0392 (3) | 0.0315 (3) | −0.00369 (11) | 0.00211 (13) | 0.00072 (13) |
S | 0.0125 (12) | 0.0141 (11) | 0.0136 (11) | 0.000 | 0.0000 (8) | 0.000 |
O1 | 0.018 (3) | 0.027 (3) | 0.022 (3) | 0.009 (2) | −0.001 (2) | 0.004 (2) |
O2 | 0.015 (2) | 0.020 (2) | 0.016 (2) | 0.001 (2) | 0.0010 (18) | 0.004 (2) |
Hg—O2i | 2.193 (6) | S—Hgiii | 3.7082 (15) |
Hg—O2ii | 2.518 (6) | S—Hgix | 3.8936 (17) |
Hg—O1iii | 2.725 (6) | S—Hgiv | 3.8936 (17) |
Hg—O1iv | 2.898 (7) | O1—Hgiii | 2.725 (6) |
Hg—Hgv | 2.5031 (7) | O1—Hgiv | 2.898 (7) |
S—O1iii | 1.450 (7) | O1—Hgi | 3.261 (7) |
S—O1 | 1.450 (7) | O1—Hgvii | 3.716 (7) |
S—O2iii | 1.509 (6) | O1—Hgx | 4.090 (6) |
S—O2 | 1.509 (6) | O2—Hgi | 2.193 (6) |
S—Hgvi | 3.2315 (13) | O2—Hgviii | 2.518 (6) |
S—Hgi | 3.2315 (13) | O2—Hgvi | 3.812 (5) |
S—Hgvii | 3.6309 (15) | O2—Hgvii | 4.097 (6) |
S—Hgviii | 3.6309 (15) | ||
O2i—Hg—Hgv | 164.47 (14) | S—O1—Hgx | 156.0 (3) |
O2i—Hg—O2ii | 69.1 (2) | Hgiii—O1—Hgx | 36.63 (8) |
Hgv—Hg—O2ii | 126.30 (13) | Hgiv—O1—Hgx | 77.69 (14) |
O2i—Hg—O1iii | 82.0 (2) | Hgi—O1—Hgx | 117.52 (19) |
Hgv—Hg—O1iii | 102.86 (14) | Hgvii—O1—Hgx | 89.04 (14) |
O2ii—Hg—O1iii | 75.8 (2) | S—O1—Hg | 62.8 (3) |
O2i—Hg—O1iv | 77.5 (2) | Hgiii—O1—Hg | 115.4 (2) |
Hgv—Hg—O1iv | 102.91 (14) | Hgiv—O1—Hg | 64.22 (13) |
O2ii—Hg—O1iv | 75.64 (18) | Hgi—O1—Hg | 95.95 (15) |
O1iii—Hg—O1iv | 149.3 (3) | Hgvii—O1—Hg | 138.14 (18) |
O1iii—S—O1 | 114.5 (6) | Hgx—O1—Hg | 129.82 (18) |
O1iii—S—O2iii | 109.4 (3) | S—O2—Hgi | 120.5 (3) |
O1—S—O2iii | 108.6 (4) | S—O2—Hgviii | 126.9 (3) |
O1iii—S—O2 | 108.6 (4) | Hgi—O2—Hgviii | 110.9 (2) |
O1—S—O2 | 109.4 (3) | S—O2—Hgvi | 56.41 (19) |
O2iii—S—O2 | 106.2 (5) | Hgi—O2—Hgvi | 131.7 (2) |
S—O1—Hgiii | 122.3 (4) | Hgviii—O2—Hgvi | 80.47 (14) |
S—O1—Hgiv | 123.6 (4) | S—O2—Hg | 72.7 (2) |
Hgiii—O1—Hgiv | 96.8 (2) | Hgi—O2—Hg | 129.6 (2) |
S—O1—Hgi | 76.0 (3) | Hgviii—O2—Hg | 85.11 (15) |
Hgiii—O1—Hgi | 148.1 (3) | Hgvi—O2—Hg | 97.20 (13) |
Hgiv—O1—Hgi | 91.77 (18) | S—O2—Hgvii | 61.6 (2) |
S—O1—Hgvii | 75.3 (3) | Hgi—O2—Hgvii | 77.46 (15) |
Hgiii—O1—Hgvii | 85.41 (17) | Hgviii—O2—Hgvii | 122.59 (19) |
Hgiv—O1—Hgvii | 153.3 (2) | Hgvi—O2—Hgvii | 58.72 (8) |
Hgi—O1—Hgvii | 73.82 (14) | Hg—O2—Hgvii | 134.35 (14) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (ii) x, y−1, z; (iii) −x+1, y, −z+1/2; (iv) −x+1, −y, −z; (v) −x, −y, −z; (vi) x, −y+1, z+1/2; (vii) −x+1, y+1, −z+1/2; (viii) x, y+1, z; (ix) x, −y, z+1/2; (x) x+1, −y, z+1/2. |
Hg—O2i | 2.193 (6) | Hg—Hgv | 2.5031 (7) |
Hg—O2ii | 2.518 (6) | S—O1 | 1.450 (7) |
Hg—O1iii | 2.725 (6) | S—O2 | 1.509 (6) |
Hg—O1iv | 2.898 (7) | ||
O2i—Hg—Hgv | 164.47 (14) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (ii) x, y−1, z; (iii) −x+1, y, −z+1/2; (iv) −x+1, −y, −z; (v) −x, −y, −z. |
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Berthold Stöger who assisted in the preparative work. The X-ray centre of the Vienna University of Technology is acknowledged for providing access to the single-crystal diffractometer.
References
Aurivillius, K. & Stålhandske, C. (1980). Z. Kristallogr. 153, 121–129. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bruker (2005). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Dorm, E. (1969). Acta Chem. Scand. 23, 1607–1615. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Dowty, E. (2006). ATOMS. Shape Software, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA. Google Scholar
Herrendorf (1997). HABITUS. University of Giessen, Germany. Google Scholar
ICSD (2014). Inorganic Database, FIZ-Karlsruhe, Germany. http://www.fiz-karlsruhe.de/icsd_home.html Google Scholar
Logemann, C. & Wickleder, M. S. (2013). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 228, 161–162. CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Weil, M. (2001). Acta Cryst. E57, i98–i100. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Weil, M., Tillmanns, E. & Pushcharovsky, D. Yu. (2005). Inorg. Chem. 44, 1443–1451. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.