crystallization communications
Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of a rice Rac/Rop GTPase, OsRac1
aInstitute for Protein Research, Osaka University, 3-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan, bLaboratory of Biophysics, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan, cLaboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan, and dDepartment of Advanced Bioscience, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kinki University, 3327-204 Nakamachi, Nara, Nara 631-8505, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: i-ooki@bs.naist.jp, kojima@protein.osaka-u.ac.jp
Small GTPases regulate a large variety of key cellular processes. Plant small Rac/Rop GTPases have recently received broad attention as it is becoming clear that these enzymes regulate various plant cellular processes. OsRac1, a rice Rac/Rop protein, is a key regulator of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and induces immune responses. Although four structures of plant small GTPases have been reported, all of these were of the inactive form. Here, OsRac1 was purified and co-crystallized with the GTP analogue 5′-guanylyl imidodiphosphate (GMPPNP). The crystal belonged to P212121 and a complete data set was collected to 1.9 Å resolution.
Keywords: small GTPase; GTP-binding form; OsRac1.
1. Introduction
The Ras superfamily of small GTPases (20–30 kDa) comprises five functional families of GTPases referred to as Ras, Ran, Rab, Arf and Rho/Rac. The interconversion between GDP-bound (inactive) and GTP-bound (active) forms allows Ras superfamily members to regulate a number of cellular processes by means of a molecular-switch mechanism for extracellular signals in eukaryotes. Although plants lack Ras family and typical animal Rho family members, they contain the Rho-related Rac/Rop GTPases (Nibau et al., 2006; Nagawa et al., 2010). Like other small GTPases, Rac/Rop family members function as molecular switches by interconversion between inactive GDP-bound and active GTP-bound forms in cells, and are an important regulator of signal transduction (Nibau et al., 2006; Mucha et al., 2011; Craddock et al., 2012).
In rice, OsRac1 (Rop of Oryza sativa) initiates defence responses through activation of the NADPH-mediated production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by direct binding to the plant NADPH oxidase OsRbohB (Rboh; respiratory burst oxidase homologue; Kawasaki et al., 1999; Wong et al., 2007; Oda et al., 2010). OsRac1-induced immune responses result in cell death as well as disease resistance against rice-blast fungus, rice bacterial blight and Tobacco mosaic virus (Kawasaki et al., 1999; Ono et al., 2001; Moeder et al., 2005). Moreover, the constitutively active form of OsRac1 interacts strongly with the nucleotide-binding (NB) domain of the rice intracellular immune receptor Pit, and OsRac1 regulates downstream of Pit in the signalling pathways (Kawano et al., 2010). Although it is known that OsRac1 plays important roles as a molecular switch in the innate immunity of rice, details of the molecular-switch mechanism involved remain largely unknown.
Here, the purification, crystallization and preliminary crystallographic study of activated OsRac1 are reported. A specific mutation (Gln68 to Leu) of the protein was employed and this mutant was co-crystallized with the GTP analogue 5′-guanylyl imidodiphosphate (GMPPNP) in order to maintain OsRac1 in the active form.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Macromolecule production
2.1.1. Protein expression
The O. sativa Rac1 gene (OsRac1; residues 8–183) was cloned into the pGEX6P-3 vector (GE Healthcare) using BamHI and XhoI restriction-enzyme sites. Point mutations (C32S, G19V and Q68L) were performed using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The nonconserved surface cysteine residue (Cys32) was substituted by serine to increase the stability of the protein. The OsRac1(8–183) C32S/Q68L (referred to as OsRac1-Q68L) or C32S/G19V (referred to as OsRac1-G19V) proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli Rosetta (DE3) cells (Novagen) using M9 minimal medium and were induced with 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at an (OD600) of 0.5. Following incubation at 288 K for 12 h, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4000g for 20 min at 277 K.
2.1.2. Purification
The cells were suspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 400 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT) and lysed by sonication on ice. The supernatant was collected by ultracentrifugation (110 000g for 30 min at 277 K) and then applied onto a Glutathione Sepharose 4B column (GE Healthcare). The column was washed with lysis buffer and the glutathione S-transferase tag was removed by on-column digestion at 277 K overnight with HRV 3C protease. The cleaved protein was eluted and purified by gel-filtration using a HiLoad 26/600 Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with buffer A (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT). Under denaturing and reducing conditions, the SDS–PAGE showed a single band at about 20 kDa for OsRac1-Q68L.
2.2. Crystallization
For nucleotide exchange, purified OsRac1 (1–2 mg ml−1) was incubated with a 25-fold excess of GMPPNP (Sigma) in buffer A for 12 h at 277 K. Following the addition of 10 mM MgCl2, excess GMPPNP was removed by passage through a HiLoad 26/600 Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare) in buffer B (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT). The protein was then concentrated to 4 mg ml−1 by ultrafiltration (10 kDa molecular-weight cutoff; Amicon Ultra, Millipore) in buffer B. The of the purified protein was confirmed by AutoFlex MALDI–TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics) or SDS–PAGE using a buffer consisting of 40 mM Tris–HCl pH 6.8, 0.4% SDS, 0.4% β-mercaptoethanol, 0.2% bromophenol blue, 20% glycerol, 9 M urea, 50 mM DTT, 10 mM EDTA.
Initial crystallization screening was carried out at 277 K by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method in a 96-well crystallization plate (Hampton Research) using commercial screening kits including Crystal Screen, Crystal Screen 2, PEG/Ion, Index, Grid Screen PEG 6000, Grid Screen Ammonium Sulfate (Hampton Research) and The JCSG Core Suites (Qiagen). Crystals of OsRac1-Q68L in complex with GMPPNP were grown at 293 K by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method by mixing 0.7 µl of a 4 mg ml−1 protein solution in buffer B with 0.7 µl reservoir solution consisting of 100 mM MES buffer pH 6.0, 10–30% PEG 6000.
2.3. Data collection and processing
For the X-ray diffraction experiments, crystals were flash-cooled in a 100 K dry nitrogen stream using reservoir solution supplemented with 25%(v/v) glycerol as a cryoprotectant. Diffraction data were collected from native crystals of OsRac1 using a Rayonix MX225HE CCD detector installed on the BL44 beamline at SPring-8, Harima, Japan. The oscillation width was 1.5° per image and 160 images were collected. All data were processed and scaled using the HKL-2000 program suite (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997). Data-collection and scaling statistics are given in Table 1.
|
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Preparation
In order to characterize the structure of OsRac1 in the GTP-bound active state, we introduced a specific mutation (Gln68 to Leu) as reported for the human small GTPase RhoA (Longenecker et al., 2003). In the RhoA protein, the single mutation Q63L (Q68L in OsRac1) results in a marked decrease in the GTP hydrolysis activity, thereby maintaining the protein in a constitutively active form (Longenecker et al., 2003). The OsRac1-Q68L protein was prepared from bacterial cultures and purified chromatographically (Fig. 1a). The nucleotide bound to the purified protein was exchanged for the nonhydrolyzable GTP analogue GMPPNP. In the gel-filtration analysis, OsRac1-Q68L containing GMPPNP eluted at a similar volume as myoglobin (∼17 kDa; Fig. 1b, marked D), suggesting that OsRac1-Q68L is a monomer in solution.
The OsRac1-G19V and wild-type OsRac1 proteins were also prepared for comparison with OsRac1-Q68L. The G19V (Gly19 to Val) mutation was introduced into OsRac1 since it has been shown that a G14V (G19V in OsRac1) mutation in RhoA results in a marked decrease in the GTP hydrolysis activity (Longenecker et al., 2003), thereby maintaining the protein in a constitutively active form in rice (Kawasaki et al., 1999). Although both the OsRac1-G19V and wild-type OsRac1 proteins were successfully purified and converted to GMPPNP-bound forms, crystals of these proteins have yet to be obtained.
3.2. Data collection and phase determination
The ) contained one OsRac1 molecule, corresponding to a Matthews coefficient VM of 1.75 Å3 Da−1 (Matthews, 1968). Since OsRac1 shows 76% sequence identity to Arabidopsis thaliana Rac7 (AtRac7), the structure of AtRac7–GDP (PDB entry 2j0v ; Sørmo et al., 2006) was considered to be a suitable search model for use in the molecular-replacement approach. Our study should be helpful in obtaining the structure of the active form of OsRac1, thereby contributing towards efforts to delineate the mechanism of immunity responses facilitated by OsRac1 activation.
of the crystal (Fig. 2Acknowledgements
We thank Hiroko Kinoshita, Akiko Yasuba and Momoko Yoneyama for help with sample preparations, Rie Kurata and Yuki Nishigaya for help with the
Kohei Takeshita and Yumiko Hara for help with the crystallization and Tomoyuki Mori and Kentaro Ihara for helpful comments. We would also like to thank the beamline staff of BL41XU and BL44XU of SPring-8 and NW12 of Photon Factory for help with the data collection, and Academia Sinica and the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (Taiwan, ROC) for use of the MX225-HE detector at BL44XU. This work was supported in part by grants from MEXT through the Target Proteins Research Program, the Global COE Program at NAIST, Grants-in-Aid for Science Research to IO, CK and KS, and Grants-in-Aid for Science Research on Priority Areas to KS.References
Craddock, C., Lavagi, I. & Yang, Z. (2012). Trends Cell Biol. 22, 492–501. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kawano, Y., Akamatsu, A., Hayashi, K., Housen, Y., Okuda, J., Yao, A., Nakashima, A., Takahashi, H., Yoshida, H., Wong, H. L., Kawasaki, T. & Shimamoto, K. (2010). Cell Host Microbe, 7, 362–375. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kawasaki, T., Henmi, K., Ono, E., Hatakeyama, S., Iwano, M., Satoh, H. & Shimamoto, K. (1999). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 10922–10926. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Longenecker, K., Read, P., Lin, S.-K., Somlyo, A. P., Nakamoto, R. K. & Derewenda, Z. S. (2003). Acta Cryst. D59, 876–880. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Moeder, W., Yoshioka, K. & Klessig, D. F. (2005). Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 18, 116–124. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Mucha, E., Fricke, I., Schaefer, A., Wittinghofer, A. & Berken, A. (2011). Eur. J. Cell Biol. 90, 934–943. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nagawa, S., Xu, T. & Yang, Z. (2010). Small GTPase, 1, 78–88. CrossRef Google Scholar
Nibau, C., Wu, H.-M. & Cheung, A. Y. (2006). Trends Plant Sci. 11, 309–315. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Oda, T., Hashimoto, H., Kuwabara, N., Akashi, S., Hayashi, K., Kojima, C., Wong, H. L., Kawasaki, T., Shimamoto, K., Sato, M. & Shimizu, T. (2010). J. Biol. Chem. 285, 1435–1445. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ono, E., Wong, H. L., Kawasaki, T., Hasegawa, M., Kodama, O. & Shimamoto, K. (2001). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 759–764. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sørmo, C. G., Leiros, I., Brembu, T., Winge, P., Os, V. & Bones, A. M. (2006). Phytochemistry, 67, 2332–2340. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Wong, H. L., Pinontoan, R., Hayashi, K., Tabata, R., Yaeno, T., Hasegawa, K., Kojima, C., Yoshioka, H., Iba, K., Kawasaki, T. & Shimamoto, K. (2007). Plant Cell, 19, 4022–4034. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.