research communications
Helicobacter pylori
of glutamyl-tRNA synthetase fromaDartmouth Cancer Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA, bCollege of Arts and Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA, cCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA, dCenter for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 307 Westlake Avenue, North Suite 500, Seattle, WA 98109, USA, eSeattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Diseases, Seattle, Washington, USA, and fUCB BioSciences, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: oluwatoyin.a.asojo@dartmouth.edu
This article is part of a focused issue on empowering education through structural genomics.
Helicobacter pylori is one of the most common bacterial infections; over two-thirds of the world's population is infected by early childhood. Persistent H. pylori infection results in gastric ulcers and cancers. Due to drug resistance, there is a need to develop alternative treatments to clear H. pylori. The Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease (SSGCID) conducts structure–function analysis of potential therapeutic targets from H. pylori. Glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) is essential for aminoacylation and is under investigation as a bacterial drug target. The SSGCID produced, crystallized and determined the apo structure of H. pylori GluRS (HpGluRS). HpGluRS has the prototypical bacterial GluRS topology and has similar binding sites and tertiary structures to other bacterial GluRS that are promising drug targets. Residues involved in glutamate binding are well conserved in comparison with Pseudomonas aeruginosa GluRS (PaGluRS), which has been studied to develop promising new inhibitors for P. aeruginosa. These structural similarities can be exploited for drug discovery and repurposing to generate new antibacterials to clear persistent H. pylori infection and reduce gastric ulcers and cancer.
Keywords: undergraduate education and training; glutamyl-tRNA synthetase; cancer; infectious diseases; gastric ulcers; Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease.
PDB reference: glutamyl-tRNA synthetase, 6b1p
1. Introduction
Helicobacter pylori is a Gram-negative, flagellated and helical bacterium that was first discovered in 1982 in the guts of patients with gastric ulcers and gastritis, establishing the causative role of H. pylori in the development of stomach ulcers (Warren & Marshall, 1983). According to the Centers for Disease Control, about two-thirds of the world's population is infected by H. pylori by early childhood, and transmission occurs through the fecal–oral, oral–oral or gastric–oral routes. The spiral-shaped H. pylori colonizes the gastric epithelium, and persistent H. pylori infection can lead to peptic ulcers, gastritis and gastric cancer (Malfertheiner et al., 2022). H. pylori causes peptic ulcers that involve the formation of sores in the stomach lining or part of the upper small intestine, while significantly increasing the risk of developing gastric cancer and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma (Crowe, 2019). The pathophysiology of H. pylori depends on environmental factors and the host immune system. Increasing antibiotic resistance of H. pylori is a global cause for concern, and H. pylori is currently treated with bismuth or non-bismuth quadruple therapy for 14 days as a first-line treatment in regions with high clarithromycin or metronidazole resistance (Boyanova et al., 2023; Suzuki et al., 2019). H. pylori is one of the major priorities for structure-based drug discovery by the Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease (SSGCID). Towards these ends, the SSGCID selected glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) from H. pylori (HpGluRS) as a drug-repurposing and drug-identification target. GluRS catalyzes aminoacylation: the covalent linkage of glutamate to Aminoacyl-tRNA synthases (aaRSs) are enzymes that catalyze the attachment of amino acids to molecules during transcription (aminoacylation), which is a crucial step in protein synthesis. GluRS and other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are crucial for bacterial survival and are promising targets for drug discovery for infectious diseases (Kwon et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2018; Moen et al., 2017; Narsimulu et al., 2024; Hu et al., 2018; Brooks et al., 2022). Here, we report the production, crystallization and 2.5 Å resolution structure of HpGluRS.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Macromolecule production
HpGluRS was cloned, expressed and purified using established protocols (Stacy et al., 2011; Serbzhinskiy et al., 2015; Rodríguez-Hernández et al., 2023). The gene for HpGluRS (UniProt B5Z6J9) encoding amino acids 1–463 was PCR-amplified from genomic DNA using the primers shown in Table 1. The gene was ligated into the expression vector BG1861 to generate plasmid DNA. Chemically competent Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)R3 Rosetta cells were transformed with the plasmid DNA. The plasmid-containing His-HpGluRS cells were tested for expression, and 2 l of culture was grown using auto-induction medium (Studier, 2005) in a LEX Bioreactor (Epiphyte Three) as described previously (Serbzhinskiy et al., 2015). The expression clone can be requested online at https://www.ssgcid.org/available-materials/expression-clones/.
|
HpGluRS was purified in two steps: an immobilized metal (Ni2+) (IMAC) step and (SEC) on an ÄKTApurifier 10 (GE Healthcare) using automated IMAC and SEC programs (Serbzhinskiy et al., 2015). Briefly, thawed bacterial pellets (25 g) were lysed by sonication in 200 ml lysis buffer [25 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 500 mM NaCl, 5%(v/v) glycerol, 0.5%(w/v) CHAPS, 30 mM imidazole, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM TCEP, 250 mg ml−1 AEBSF, 0.025%(w/v) sodium azide]. After sonication, the crude lysate was treated with 20 µl (25 units ml−1) of Benzonase and incubated while mixing at room temperature for 45 min. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 10 000g for 1 h using a Sorvall centrifuge (Thermo Scientific). The treated supernatant was then passed over an Ni–NTA HisTrap FF 5 ml column (GE Healthcare) which had been pre-equilibrated with loading buffer [25 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 500 mM NaCl, 5%(v/v) glycerol, 30 mM imidazole, 1 mM TCEP, 0.025%(w/v) sodium azide]. The column was washed with 20 column volumes (CV) of loading buffer and was eluted with elution buffer [25 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 500 mM NaCl, 5%(v/v) glycerol, 30 mM imidazole, 1 mM TCEP, 0.025%(w/v) sodium azide, 250 mM imidazole] over a 7 CV linear gradient. Peak fractions were pooled, concentrated to 5 ml and loaded onto a Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with running buffer [20 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5%(v/v) glycerol, 1 mM TCEP]. The peak fractions were collected and analyzed using SDS–PAGE. HpGluRS eluted as a symmetrical monodisperse peak accounting for >90% of the protein product at a molecular mass of ∼50 kDa, suggesting purification as a monomer (the expected monomer molecular weight was 54 kDa). The peak fractions were pooled and concentrated to 62.8 mg ml−1 using an Amicon filtration system (Millipore). Aliquots of 110 µl were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until use. Purified HpGluRS can be requested online at https://www.ssgcid.org/available-materials/ssgcid-proteins/.
2.2. Crystallization
HpGluRS was crystallized at 290 K using sitting-drop vapor diffusion. Briefly, 20.6 mg ml−1 protein was mixed in a 1:1 ratio with the precipitant solution as described in Table 2. Before data collection, the crystals were harvested and cryoprotected with 15%(v/v) ethylene glycol (Table 2).
|
2.3. Data collection and processing
Data were collected at 100 K on beamline 21-ID-G at the Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory (Table 3). Data were integrated with XDS and reduced with XSCALE (Kabsch, 2010). Raw X-ray diffraction images have been stored at the Integrated Resource for Reproducibility in Macromolecular Crystallography at https://www.proteindiffraction.org.
|
2.4. Structure solution and refinement
The structure of HpGluRS was determined by with Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007) from the CCP4 suite of programs (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994; Krissinel et al., 2004; Winn et al., 2011; Agirre et al., 2023) using PDB entry 2ja2 (G. P. Bourenkov, N. Strizhov, L. A. Shkolnaya, M. Bruning & H. D. Bartunik, unpublished work) as the search model. The structure was refined using Phenix (Liebschner et al., 2019). The structure quality was checked using MolProbity (Williams et al., 2018). Data-reduction and are shown in Table 4. Coordinate and structure factors have been deposited with the Worldwide PDB (wwPDB) as entry 6b1p. The accuracy of the ligands and waters was also checked with the CheckMyBlob server (Kowiel et al., 2019; https://checkmyblob.bioreproducibility.org/server/).
|
3. Results and discussion
HpGluRS assembles as a monodisperse monomer in solution with a calculated molecular weight of ∼50 kDa, close to the theoretical mass of 54.3 kDa. One HpGluRS monomer is present in the which also appears to correspond to the biological unit (Fig. 1a). HpGluRS has the prototypical bacterial GluRS topology containing N-terminal synthetase class I (E and Q) catalytic and C-terminal anticodon-binding domains. The only ligand in this structure is an ethylene glycol from the crystallization solution (Fig. 1a).
data suggest thatENDScript (Gouet et al., 2003; Robert & Gouet, 2014) analysis (Figs. 1b and 1c) reveals that HpGluRS is a prototypical bacterial GluRS. PDBeFold (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/msd-srv/ssm/) analysis (Krissinel & Henrick, 2004) using a default threshold of 70% validated the ENDScript analysis (Supplementary Fig. S2). ENDScript analysis confirms that HpGluRS shares significant secondary-structural similarity with other bacterial GluRS and other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, including some that have shown promise as drug targets (Supplementary Fig. S1). ENDScript analysis reveals the closest structural neighbors of HpGluRS to include Burkholderia thailandensis GluRS (BtGluRS; PDB entry 4g6z; Moen et al., 2017), which shares 42.5% sequence identity with HpGluRS, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia GluRS (SmGluRS; PDB entry 7k86; Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease, unpublished work), with 41.7% sequence identity to HpGluRS (Supplementary Fig. S1). These are also revealed to be close structural neighbors by PDBeFold (Supplementary Table S1). The regions of most significant structural similarity are in the N-terminal domain (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. S1), which is considerably thinner in the ENDScript sausage plot (Fig. 1b). Additional structural comparisons and phylogenetic analysis are detailed in Supplementary Figs. S1–S4.
The sizeable accessible glutamate-binding site in the N-terminal HpGluRS is evident in the surface plot (Fig. 1c). The glutamate-binding region is highly conserved, as indicated by a red color in the ribbon and surface plots (Figs. 1c and 1d). Bacterial GluRSs, like other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, are promising antimicrobial targets (Kwon et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2018; Moen et al., 2017; Pang et al., 2021). Pseudomonas aeruginosa GluRS (PaGluRS; PDB entry 5tgt; Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease, unpublished work), the glutamate-binding cavity of which has been probed to develop promising inhibitors for P. aeruginosa (Escamilla et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2015, 2018), shares considerable structural similarity with HpGluRS despite having less than 33% sequence identity (Fig. 2). More importantly, the amino acids involved in glutamate binding, indicated by green asterisks, are well conserved (Fig. 2). These glutamate-binding pockets are also conserved in other bacterial GluRSs (Supplementary Fig. S1), suggesting that structure-based and rational inhibitor design for PaGluRS and other bacterial GluRSs may be a starting point for HpGluRS.
synthetase binding domain of4. Conclusion
The production, crystallization and 2.5 Å resolution structure of H. pylori glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (HpGluRS) reveals a prototypical bacterial GluRS with well conserved glutamate-binding cavities. The structural similarity to the well studied P. aeruginosa GluRS and lessons learned from other bacterial GluRSs may accelerate the development of new inhibitors for H. pylori, a globally important bacterium that causes gastric ulcers and cancer.
Supporting information
PDB reference: glutamyl-tRNA synthetase, 6b1p
Supplementary figures. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053230X24011099/ir5036sup1.pdf
Footnotes
‡Co-first authors.
Acknowledgements
This project is part of a continuing SSGCID collaboration training undergraduate students in structural science, rational structure-based drug discovery and scientific communication funded partly by the Dartmouth Cancer Center.
Biographical information
Early career authors: Dylan E. Davis, Jesuferanmi P. Ayanlade and David T. Laseinde.Funding information
This project has been funded in part with Federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract No. 75N93022C00036. DED is funded by NCI (grant No. R25CA250956).
References
Agirre, J., Atanasova, M., Bagdonas, H., Ballard, C. B., Baslé, A., Beilsten-Edmands, J., Borges, R. J., Brown, D. G., Burgos-Mármol, J. J., Berrisford, J. M., Bond, P. S., Caballero, I., Catapano, L., Chojnowski, G., Cook, A. G., Cowtan, K. D., Croll, T. I., Debreczeni, J. É., Devenish, N. E., Dodson, E. J., Drevon, T. R., Emsley, P., Evans, G., Evans, P. R., Fando, M., Foadi, J., Fuentes-Montero, L., Garman, E. F., Gerstel, M., Gildea, R. J., Hatti, K., Hekkelman, M. L., Heuser, P., Hoh, S. W., Hough, M. A., Jenkins, H. T., Jiménez, E., Joosten, R. P., Keegan, R. M., Keep, N., Krissinel, E. B., Kolenko, P., Kovalevskiy, O., Lamzin, V. S., Lawson, D. M., Lebedev, A. A., Leslie, A. G. W., Lohkamp, B., Long, F., Malý, M., McCoy, A. J., McNicholas, S. J., Medina, A., Millán, C., Murray, J. W., Murshudov, G. N., Nicholls, R. A., Noble, M. E. M., Oeffner, R., Pannu, N. S., Parkhurst, J. M., Pearce, N., Pereira, J., Perrakis, A., Powell, H. R., Read, R. J., Rigden, D. J., Rochira, W., Sammito, M., Sánchez Rodríguez, F., Sheldrick, G. M., Shelley, K. L., Simkovic, F., Simpkin, A. J., Skubak, P., Sobolev, E., Steiner, R. A., Stevenson, K., Tews, I., Thomas, J. M. H., Thorn, A., Valls, J. T., Uski, V., Usón, I., Vagin, A., Velankar, S., Vollmar, M., Walden, H., Waterman, D., Wilson, K. S., Winn, M. D., Winter, G., Wojdyr, M. & Yamashita, K. (2023). Acta Cryst. D79, 449–461. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Boyanova, L., Hadzhiyski, P., Gergova, R. & Markovska, R. (2023). Antibiotics, 12, 332. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Brooks, L., Subramanian, S., Dranow, D. M., Mayclin, S. J., Myler, P. J. & Asojo, O. A. (2022). Acta Cryst. F78, 306–312. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 760–763. CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Crowe, S. E. (2019). N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 1158–1165. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Escamilla, Y., Hughes, C. A., Abendroth, J., Dranow, D. M., Balboa, S., Dean, F. B. & Bullard, J. M. (2020). Protein Sci. 29, 905–918. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gouet, P., Courcelle, E., Stuart, D. I. & Métoz, F. (1999). Bioinformatics, 15, 305–308. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Gouet, P., Robert, X. & Courcelle, E. (2003). Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3320–3323. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Hu, Y., Guerrero, E., Keniry, M., Manrrique, J. & Bullard, J. M. (2015). SLAS Discov. 20, 1160–1170. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hu, Y., Palmer, S. O., Robles, S. T., Resto, T., Dean, F. B. & Bullard, J. M. (2018). SLAS Discov. 23, 65–75. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ito, T., Kiyasu, N., Matsunaga, R., Takahashi, S. & Yokoyama, S. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 813–820. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kabsch, W. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 125–132. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kowiel, M., Brzezinski, D., Porebski, P. J., Shabalin, I. G., Jaskolski, M. & Minor, W. (2019). Bioinformatics, 35, 452–461. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 2256–2268. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Krissinel, E. B., Winn, M. D., Ballard, C. C., Ashton, A. W., Patel, P., Potterton, E. A., McNicholas, S. J., Cowtan, K. D. & Emsley, P. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 2250–2255. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kwon, N. H., Fox, P. L. & Kim, S. (2019). Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18, 629–650. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lee, E. Y., Kim, S. & Kim, M. H. (2018). Biochem. Pharmacol. 154, 424–434. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liebschner, D., Afonine, P. V., Baker, M. L., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Croll, T. I., Hintze, B., Hung, L.-W., Jain, S., McCoy, A. J., Moriarty, N. W., Oeffner, R. D., Poon, B. K., Prisant, M. G., Read, R. J., Richardson, J. S., Richardson, D. C., Sammito, M. D., Sobolev, O. V., Stockwell, D. H., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A. G., Videau, L. L., Williams, C. J. & Adams, P. D. (2019). Acta Cryst. D75, 861–877. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Malfertheiner, P., Megraud, F., Rokkas, T., Gisbert, J. P., Liou, J., Schulz, C., Gasbarrini, A., Hunt, R. H., Leja, M., O'Morain, C., Rugge, M., Suerbaum, S., Tilg, H., Sugano, K. & El-Omar, E. M. (2022). Gut, 71, 1724–1762. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Moen, S. O., Edwards, T. E., Dranow, D. M., Clifton, M. C., Sankaran, B., Van Voorhis, W. C., Sharma, A., Manoil, C., Staker, B. L., Myler, P. J. & Lorimer, D. D. (2017). Sci. Rep. 7, 223. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Narsimulu, B., Jakkula, P., Qureshi, R., Nasim, F. & Qureshi, I. A. (2024). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 254, 127756. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Pang, L., Weeks, S. D. & Van Aerschot, A. (2021). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 1750. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Robert, X. & Gouet, P. (2014). Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W320–W324. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Hernández, D., Vijayan, K., Zigweid, R., Fenwick, M. K., Sankaran, B., Roobsoong, W., Sattabongkot, J., Glennon, E. K. K., Myler, P. J., Sunnerhagen, P., Staker, B. L., Kaushansky, A. & Grøtli, M. (2023). Nat. Commun. 14, 5408. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Serbzhinskiy, D. A., Clifton, M. C., Sankaran, B., Staker, B. L., Edwards, T. E. & Myler, P. J. (2015). Acta Cryst. F71, 594–599. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Stacy, R., Begley, D. W., Phan, I., Staker, B. L., Van Voorhis, W. C., Varani, G., Buchko, G. W., Stewart, L. J. & Myler, P. J. (2011). Acta Cryst. F67, 979–984. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Studier, F. W. (2005). Protein Expr. Purif. 41, 207–234. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Suzuki, S., Esaki, M., Kusano, C., Ikehara, H. & Gotoda, T. (2019). World J. Gastroenterol. 25, 1907–1912. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Warren, J. R. & Marshall, B. (1983). Lancet, 321, 1273–1275. Google Scholar
Williams, C. J., Headd, J. J., Moriarty, N. W., Prisant, M. G., Videau, L. L., Deis, L. N., Verma, V., Keedy, D. A., Hintze, B. J., Chen, V. B., Jain, S., Lewis, S. M., Arendall, W. B., Snoeyink, J., Adams, P. D., Lovell, S. C., Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, J. S. (2018). Protein Sci. 27, 293–315. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Winn, M. D., Ballard, C. C., Cowtan, K. D., Dodson, E. J., Emsley, P., Evans, P. R., Keegan, R. M., Krissinel, E. B., Leslie, A. G. W., McCoy, A., McNicholas, S. J., Murshudov, G. N., Pannu, N. S., Potterton, E. A., Powell, H. R., Read, R. J., Vagin, A. & Wilson, K. S. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.