research papers
accessDefect structure of yttria-stabilized hafnia nanoparticles
aCenter for Sustainable Energy Materials, Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 130, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, and bMAX IV Laboratory, Lund University, Fotongatan 224 84 Lund, Sweden
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]
High-temperature polymorphs of hafnia (HfO2) are of significant interest in electronics and fuel-cell applications, and stabilization at ambient conditions can be achieved by aliovalent substitution and nanosize effects. Y3+ stabilization of hafnia (YSH) introduces local cation disorder around charge-compensating oxygen-ion vacancies, and here we establish both the average and local structure of YSH nanoparticles using synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and pair distribution function (PDF) analysis. A range of phase-pure crystalline nanoparticles of Hf1–xYxO2–x/2 were prepared via continuous flow solvothermal synthesis and subsequent high-temperature annealing, and full stabilization of the cubic phase is achieved already at 13 at% Y3+. The average structure conforms to the cubic fluorite phase of HfO2, but local displacive disorder caused by electrostatic attraction of neighbouring oxygen ions and repulsion of neighbouring metal ions by the net-positive oxygen-ion vacancies is established. The well-known Zr3Y4O12 structure, which incorporates such relaxation motifs, provides a good proxy description of YSH. In situ X-ray total scattering experiments provide insight into the formation mechanism of the YSH nanoparticles and initial precipitation of an atomically mixed amorphous phase is followed by crystallization over several minutes. The crystallization rate increases with higher reaction temperature, whereas an increased doping level results in slower crystallization.
Keywords: yttria-stabilized hafnia; defect structure; in situ X-ray scattering; solvothermal synthesis; crystal structure.
1. Introduction
Hafnia (HfO2) is a rather ubiquitous transition-metal oxide, attracting increased attention, especially in the field of metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs). With a high dielectric constant and chemical compatibility with Si, HfO2 is a potential candidate to replace SiO2 as gate dielectrics in gate stacks of MOSFETs to prevent current leakage when decreasing transistor size (Robertson, 2004
; Robertson & Wallace, 2015
). The first discovery of ferroelectricity in Si-doped HfO2 thin films in 2011 (Böscke et al., 2011
), and later in Y-doped HfO2 thin films (Müller et al., 2011
), sparked hopes of leveraging the ferroelectric behaviour under MOSFET read operation. If doped, HfO2 also exhibits oxygen-ion conductivity and thus has potential use as an electrolyte in solid oxide fuel cells or electrolysers (Weyl & Janke, 1996
). The dielectric behaviour and oxygen-ion conductivity in HfO2, however, rely greatly on the ability to stabilize its high-temperature polymorphs (Zhao & Vanderbilt, 2002
; Wang et al., 2012
; Fischer & Kersch, 2008
; Alotaibi et al., 2021
). Because of very low thermal conductivity, HfO2 also sees use in thermal barrier coatings in high-temperature applications, such as metal protection in gas turbine engines (Lakiza et al., 2021
; Wu et al., 2023
).
Like its Group IV neighbour ZrO2, HfO2 adopts a monoclinic structure (P21/c, m-HfO2) at ambient conditions. At ∼2000 K, it transforms into a tetragonal structure (P42/nmc, t-HfO2) that eventually transforms into the cubic fluorite structure (Fmm, c-HfO2) at ∼2800 K (Cardarelli, 2008
; Shin et al., 2006
). The phase transformations are martensitic in nature and the structures involve only slight reorganization upon transformation (Tang et al., 2005
). Although the coordination number (CN) of Hf4+ changes from seven in m-HfO2 to eight in both t-HfO2 and c-HfO2, the three structures share a great resemblance, as evident from a comparison of the crystal structures (Fig. S1 in the supporting information). From powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), the two high-temperature polymorphs are difficult to distinguish if any significant instrumental or size broadening effects are present in the data (Fig. S2). The small peak splitting, visible as a faint asymmetry, e.g. in the second Bragg peak, is the only significant deviation between the two structures.
The high-temperature polymorphs are suggested to be stable in nanocrystalline powders because of their lower surface compared to m-HfO2, with `critical sizes' for c/t-HfO2 to m-HfO2 crossings in the range 30–40 nm (Sharma et al., 2018
; Zhou et al., 2012
). A similar rationale was originally proposed for ZrO2 (Garvie, 1965
), but the literature is scarce on size stabilization of undoped HfO2 (Lu et al., 2008
; Kumar et al., 2017
; Wan & Zhou, 2017
). In fact, several studies indicate a more complex behaviour, where m-HfO2 is stable significantly below the suggested `critical size' limits (Lu et al., 2008
; Christensen et al., 2021
; Waetzig et al., 2016
; Chaubey et al., 2012
).
Aliovalent doping with di- and trivalent cations, such as Group II, Group III and lanthanide cations, presents another avenue for stabilization of the high-temperature polymorphs in both HfO2 and ZrO2 (Kim, 1989
). As a charge-compensating mechanism, aliovalent doping generates oxygen vacancies, and it is believed that these vacancies stabilize the high-temperature phases by effectively giving a CN of seven for Zr4+/Hf4+, as in the monoclinic polymorph (Lee et al., 2008
; Schmidt et al., 2023
; Li et al., 1994a
). Y3+ doping of ZrO2, i.e. yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ), is the archetypical example of fluorite structure stabilization and the compound is widely used industrially as a solid oxide-ion electrolyte (Singh et al., 2021
). The hafnium analogue, i.e. yttria-stabilized hafnia (YSH), is less studied, but it displays a similar ability to stabilize the high-temperature phases and show ion conductivity, albeit slightly lower conductivity than that of YSZ (Sévin et al., 2020
; Zhang et al., 2013
; Trubelja & Stubican, 1991
). Aliovalent Y3+ doping also has a profound impact on the thermal conductivity of HfO2 (Ramana et al., 2012
), since the mass disorder from Y3+ substitution on Hf4+ sites and the resulting oxygen-ion vacancies cause defect-phonon scattering, thus lowering the conductivity (Winter & Clarke, 2006
; Klemens & Gell, 1998
). Unlike YSZ, there is no consensus on the critical doping level for the complete stabilization of YSH, but both Matović et al. (2012
) and Li et al. (2018
) reported complete stabilization at 20 at% Y for microcrystalline powders. By extrapolation, Li et al. (2018
) suggested a lower limit to be roughly 17 at% Y in comparison with 14.8 at% Y (8 mol% Y2O3) in YSZ (Badwal, 1992
).
By combining the two modes of stabilization, nanoparticles of YSH present an elegant way of stabilizing the high-temperature polymorphs at even lower Y3+ content. Upon of Hf4+ and Y3+ precursors using NH4OH, and subsequent annealing at 700 and 800 °C, complete stabilization at 10 at% Y for 10 and 12 nm YSH nanoparticles has been reported (Zhou et al., 2012
). Ball-milling and subsequent annealing at 1100 °C yielded completely stabilized 58 nm YSH nanoparticles at a 10 at% Y doping (Qiu et al., 2021
). Other ways of synthesizing YSH nanoparticles include auto-combustion and subsequent annealing (Matović et al., 2012
) and sol–gel synthesis (Gálvez-Barbosa et al., 2024
).
Here, we report a novel approach to ensure efficient mixing of the constituent elements via continuous flow solvothermal synthesis using supercritical ethanol as solvent. High-temperature annealing of the amorphous Hf1–xYxO2–x/2 powders induces crystallization and confirms the of the as-prepared powders, as seen from the Vegard-like behaviour of the unit-cell parameters in accurate PXRD analysis, and corroborates that, apart from vacancies generated by aliovalent doping, additional stabilizing effects are responsible for lowering the critical doping limit at the nanoscale. While the long-range order of the YSH powders conform to the cubic fluorite phase of HfO2, anomalously high refined atomic displacement parameters (ADPs) and detailed local structure analysis via the atomic pair distribution function (PDF) reveal distinct local disorder in the YSH nanoparticles upon doping.
2. Experimental
2.1. Precursor preparation
Hafnium(IV) chloride (98%, Thermo Scientific Chemicals), yttrium(III) chloride (99.9%, ChemPur) and absolute ethanol (≥99.8%, VWR) were used as received. The precursor powders of Y3+ and Hf4+ were mixed in different ratios, giving a composition series of Hf1–xYxO2–x/2, and dissolved in ethanol under stirring for approximately 30 min. The total metal ion concentration was 0.1 M for all ex situ syntheses, whereas the concentration was 0.5 M for in situ experiments to increase the sample-to-background ratio. For the ex situ syntheses, samples with x = 0.08, 0.16, 0.32 and 0.48 were prepared, and for the in situ experiments, samples with x = 0.00, 0.08, 0.16, 0.24 and 0.32 were prepared.
2.2. Ex situ syntheses
Amorphous YSH powders were synthesized on a custom-built continuous employing a T-shaped mixing piece for the mixing of a pre-heated solvent stream of absolute ethanol and a stream of room-temperature precursor solution, prepared as described above. Additional details on the can be found elsewhere (Hellstern et al., 2015
). The pressure inside the reactor was maintained at approximately 250 bar (1 bar = 105 Pa) by adjusting a proportional-release valve. The flow rates were 4.67 and 4.00 ml min−1 for the solvent and precursor stream, respectively. With a synthesis temperature of 300 °C, a total flow rate of 8.67 ml min−1 through a reactor volume of 11.8 ml gives an approximate residence time of 39 s using equation (1),![]()
where Vr is the reactor volume, QV is the total ρRT is the room-temperature density of ethanol at 250 bar and ρT is density of ethanol at 250 bar and the desired synthesis temperature. Densities of ethanol at elevated temperatures were obtained from the REFPROP software package (Huber et al., 2022
). After synthesis, the as-prepared powder suspensions were centrifuged, decanted and redispersed three times in H2O, ethanol absolute and then H2O again.
Powders were annealed at three different temperatures (600, 900 and 1200 °C) in atmospheric air, were placed in an Al2O3 container and inserted in a preheated muffle furnace (Thermolyne Furnace, Thermo Scientific). The powders were in all cases removed after 3 h and left to cool at ambient temperature.
2.3. X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy
(XRF) measurements were performed on a Rigaku NEX CG energy dispersive XRF analyzer to quantify the Y3+ content of the as-synthesized ex situ samples and to detect potential impurities. X-rays were generated from Al, Mo, Cu and RX9 targets. All measurements were performed under an He atmosphere. Quantification was done with the built-in software, and spectra for all samples are shown in Figs. S3–S6 in the supporting information. Five separate measurements were performed on each powder sample, and the average of these and the standard deviation is reported.
Peaks from Hf, Y, Zr, Cl, Fe, Cr, Ni, Mn and Co were identified. A background measurement of an empty sample holder suggests that the instrument itself produces X-ray fluorescence for Zr, and as such, any quantification of Zr is unreliable and has not been included in the quantification. The quantified amounts of the other elements are given in Table S1. The amount of Fe, Cr, Ni, Mn and Co corresponds to less than 0.5 mol% and presumably originates from corrosion of the stainless steel reactor tube. The detected amount of chloride is expected to originate from inadequate washing of the synthesized powders that bind the surface of the particles. Upon annealing, the chloride signal gradually diminishes and completely vanishes after annealing at 1200 °C [Fig. S7(a)], thus suggesting chloride ions only bind to the surface of the particles and do not incorporate into the crystalline structure.
2.4. Scanning transmission electron microscopy
(STEM) and energy-dispersive (EDS) were performed on an FEI Talos F200X instrument operated at 200 kV. A suspension of the as-prepared samples, as well as annealed samples, in ethanol (1 g powder in 1 ml ethanol) was first sonicated for 5 min and drop-casted onto TEM grids [Ultra-thin carbon (3 nm) on Lacey-Carbon–Copper mesh 400 from Plano GmbH]. Images were taken using a camera length of 98 mm, convergence angle of 10.5 mrad, a spot size of 5 and a high-angle annular dark field detector with a 60–200 mrad collection angle, together with the CemiSTEM X-ray detection system. The bright-field STEM images were collected using a 0–20 mrad collection angle. To improve statistics, an average of 14 pixels were binned in elemental maps.
2.5. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy
Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP–OES) measurements of the atomic contents of the produced powders were performed on a Spectro ARCOS ICP–OES equipped with a Burgener Nebulizer and a Cyclonic Spray Chamber with an ASX-520 Autosampler. Standard series for Hf, Zr and Y were made from elemental standards from PlasmaCAL. The standard solutions were diluted to yield solutions for the measurements in the standard series with concentrations of 200, 150, 100, 10 and 1 ppm for Hf, and 50, 25, 10, 5 and 1 ppm for Zr and Y. The as-prepared YSH powders (∼20 mg) were dissolved in concentrated H2SO4 (1 ml) heated to 170 °C under stirring, and the solutions were then diluted to a volume of 25.00 ml with 1 v/v% HNO3. For determining the Hf and Y contents, these solutions were diluted additionally by a factor of four.
2.6. In situ experiments
The in situ experiments were conducted using a batch-type reactor cell made for in situ X-ray scattering that mimics the reaction conditions of the solvothermal The setup is described in detail elsewhere (Roelsgaard et al., 2023
; Becker et al., 2010
). The reactor cell consists of fused-silica capillaries (0.7 mm ID) coated with Kapton on the outside. The capillaries are pressurized using an HPLC pump (LabAlliance PrepPump) and heated using a jet of hot air calibrated to provide the desired reaction temperature inside the capillary. The desired temperature can be reached within a few seconds after heating (Roelsgaard et al., 2023
), thus mimicking the temperature gradient inside a continuous flow reactor. Contrary to the continuous flow reactor, the precursor probed by the X-ray beam is not under continuous flow, and so the in situ experiments investigate the reaction as a function of residence time. During the synthesis, X-ray scattering data are continuously collected. Nine in situ experiments were conducted, covering a composition series (x = 0.00, 0.08, 0.16, 0.24 and 0.32) synthesized at 300 °C and a temperature series (200, 250, 300, 350 and 400 °C) for a composition of x = 0.24.
2.7. X-ray total scattering
X-ray total scattering (TS) data measured on ex situ samples were collected at the DanMAX beamline at MAX IV (Lund, Sweden) with a photon energy of ∼35 keV (λ = 0.35537 Å). The scattering data were collected on a DECTRIS PILATUS3 X 2M CdTe 2D detector placed perpendicular to the X-ray beam path. Both data suitable for pair distribution function (PDF) and powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analysis were collected with sample-to-detector distances (SDDs) of ∼9 and ∼39 cm, respectively, to yield Qmax,inst of 20.8 and 11.3 Å−1. The powders were packed in 0.2 mm glass capillaries.
The in situ TS experiments were conducted at the P21.1 beamline at PETRA III (DESY, Hamburg, Germany), with a photon energy of 101 keV (λ = 0.12273 Å). For the composition series, except x = 0.24, the scattering data were collected on a Perkin Elmer XRD 1621 2D detector, whereas the data for the temperature series were collected on a DECTRIS PILATUS3 X 2M CdTe 2D detector. The SDDs were 41.5 and 34.4 cm, resulting in a Qmax,inst of 21.8 and 25.0 Å−1, respectively.
All 2D detector images were azimuthally integrated using PyFAI (Kieffer & Karkoulis, 2013
) after calibration of detector position and orientation based on a measurement of an Si NIST SRM 640d or LaB6 NIST SRM 660b.
2.8. Analysis of X-ray scattering data
The scattering data were analysed both in via Rietveld refinements of the PXRD data and in by first obtaining the PDF and then analysing the data via a direct-space equivalent of Rietveld refinements.
The PDFs of ex situ samples were obtained using GudrunX (Soper & Barney, 2011
). GudrunX handles contributions by scaled table values by applying the method of Krogh-Moe (1956
) and Norman (1957
). Total scattering data obtained from an empty capillary and an empty beamline were used as background subtraction to remove non-sample coherent scattering contributions. The scattering patterns were corrected for a 2θ offset determined from on an Si NIST SRM 640d standard measurement. The composition from ICP–OES (Table 1
) was used as the elemental composition needed to obtain the PDFs, ignoring any contribution from Zr. For ex situ samples, a Qmin of 1 Å−1 and a Qmax of 20 Å−1 were used for the Fourier transform.
| ||||||||||||||||||||
The PDFs from the in situ experiments were obtained using PDFgetX3 (Juhás et al., 2013
), since this algorithm more efficiently treats large datasets. Here, the incoherent scattering contributions are treated using the ad hoc Rpoly polynomial correction to subtract the slowly varying incoherent features from the scattering patterns. Rpoly was chosen to be 0.9 Å for all datasets, meaning that the PDF will only be affected by the correction below 0.9 Å (Juhás et al., 2013
). As elemental composition, the nominal composition was used in obtaining these PDFs. For in situ samples, a Qmin of 1 Å−1 and a Qmax of 14 Å−1 were used for the Fourier transform.
All refinements of PXRD data were performed using TOPAS-Academic (Version 7; Coelho, 2018
). Analysis of PDF data was carried out using a modified version of the DebyePDFGenerator in DiffPy-CMI (Juhás et al., 2015
) to circumvent the Warren–Krutter–Morningstar approximation (Warren et al., 1936
) and to include the instrumental dampening of the PDF caused by Lorentzian broadening of the peaks in reciprocal space as suggested by Beyer et al. (2022
). See Section S1 in the supporting information concerning modification.
As input structures for the three polymorphs of HfO2, i.e. m-HfO2, t-HfO2 and c-HfO2, the following entries in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) were used; ICSD-142790 (m-HfO2) (Pathak et al., 2020
), ICSD-7146 (t-HfO2) (McCormack et al., 2018
) and ICSD-53033 (c-HfO2) (Jaffe et al., 2005
).
PXRD analysis of ex situ samples included either a single c-HfO2 phase or two phases of m-HfO2 and c-HfO2. The background was modelled using a measurement of an empty capillary, and to account for sample diffuse scattering, a multi-order Chebyshev polynomial and several broad Gaussian functions were used as well. Instrumental contributions to the peak profile were subtracted with an Si NIST SRM 640d measurement using the Thompson–Cox–Hastings pseudo-Voigt profile description. Size contributions to the peak profile were handled using whole powder pattern modelling (WPPM) assuming a lognormal size distribution of spherical particles using the built-in macro WPPM_Sphere_LogNormDist for samples annealed at 600 and 900 °C. The mean size and distribution width were extracted according to Scardi (2020
) by
For samples annealed at 1200 °C, simultaneous refinement of a distribution width and size resulted in non-meaningful values and a simpler WPPM model assuming monodisperse spherical particles was used for these samples using the custom macro:
macro WPPM_Sphere_Diameter(SDc, SDv) {
#m_argu SDc
If_Prm_Eqn_Rpt(SDc, SDv, min. 1 max = Min(2 Val +. 3, 10000);)
WPPM_ft_conv = 1 − 1.5*WPPM_L/CeV(SDc, SDv) +
0.5*(WPPM_L/CeV(SDc, SDv))^3;
WPPM_break_on_small = 1e-7;
WPPM_L_max = 2*CeV(SDc, SDv);
WPPM_th2_range = 55;}
which is based on Equation (8) from Scardi & Leoni (2001
).
Strain contributions were treated using the built-in macro e0_from_Strain. Other refined parameters include unit-cell parameters and ADPs. The occupancies of the ions in the c-HfO2 phase were adjusted according to Hf1–xYxO2–x/2, with x being the Y3+ concentration as determined from ICP–OES (Table 1
). Y3+ ions were assumed not to enter the m-HfO2 phase, and the Hf4+ and O2− sites in this phase were assumed to be fully occupied. Atomic positions were fixed according to the input structures.
PXRD analysis of data from in situ experiments included either a single c-HfO2 phase or two phases, m-HfO2 and c-HfO2. In all experiments, an amorphous phase precipitates from the precursor solution as the heating commences, and this amorphous phase subsequently crystallizes into the c-HfO2 phase. To model the crystallization from the amorphous phase, the background is modelled using both a measurement of a capillary loaded with pure solvent heated to the same reaction temperature and one of the initial frames of each experiment, where only the amorphous precipitate is present. In addition to these, a fourth-order Chebyshev polynomial is included in the background description. To ensure a robust sequential of the in situ data, apart from the background modelling, only the scale factors and coherent domain sizes (using the CS_L macro) of the crystalline phases were refined. Unit-cell parameters and ADPs were refined for the last frame in the experiment and fixed during the sequential refinement.
PDF analysis of the data from in situ experiments tracks the positions of select peaks, rather than a fully fledged model, to track the changes in the local structure. To extract the coherence length, G(r) in the range 5–50 Å was used, and a model using the c-HfO2 structure was employed. The refined parameters were scale, spherical dampening and the lattice parameter.
3. Results and discussion
Powders of Hf1–xYxO2–x/2 were synthesized with a continuous flow solvothermal synthesis reactor with nominal compositions in the range x = 0.08–0.48, designated YSHX with X being the nominal atomic percentage of Y3+. The structural coherence of the as-prepared powders is very limited, as evidenced by the broad peaks in the PXRD patterns [Fig. 1
(a)]. The peaks of the corresponding PDFs diminish around 15–20 Å, indicating that the structural coherence within the powders is not larger than the equivalent of ∼3–4 unit cells [Fig. 1
(b)]. Not surprisingly, modelling the PXRD data in a Rietveld approach is unsuccessful, because the synthesized powders are borderline crystalline and may more appropriately be described as amorphous. Structurally, however, the scattering patterns of the as-prepared powders share more resemblance with the c/t-HfO2 polymorph rather than the m-HfO2 polymorph, although neither phase adequately models the data (Fig. S8). Structural similarity between amorphous ZrO2 and its high-temperature polymorphs has been reported previously (Keramidas & White, 1974
; Li Vage et al., 1968
; Zhang et al., 2007
).
| Figure 1 (a) PXRD patterns and (b) PDFs of the as-prepared YSH samples, and (c)–(f) STEM–EDX images of the as-prepared YSH48 sample. (c) HAADF image and corresponding EDX maps of (d) Hf, (e) Y and (f) O. |
The amorphous nature of the as-prepared powders is supported by STEM images of the samples, as the samples predominantly consist of larger agglomerates with no distinct discernible isolated particles [Fig. 1
(c) for YSH48 and Figs. S9–S12 for the others]. As such, the vanishing peaks of the PDFs thus relate to the limited coherence of distinct local correlations within the borderline amorphous powders rather than size dampening from discrete nanoparticles.
For all samples, the experimental composition deviates from the nominal composition, revealing substantially less Y3+ in the precipitated powders than anticipated (Table 1
). This is most likely a result of incomplete hydrolysis of the Y3+ ions during the continuous flow synthesis. Irrespective of this, the STEM–EDX maps show a homogenous distribution of Hf, Y and O within these agglomerates, confirming the formation of atomic-scale mixed Hf1–xYxO2–x/2 powders that can serve as precursors for YSH nanoparticles in high-temperature annealing [Figs. 1
(d)–(f) and S9–S12]. For YSH8, the ICP–OES compositional analysis reveals a small impurity of Zr of ∼4 at% (Table S2) that is believed to originate from the HfCl4 precursor. The other samples contain less than 0.5 at% Zr. In the STEM–EDX map, Zr also seems to be homogenously distributed within the particle aggregates (Fig. S9). Since Hf and Zr are chemically similar, any impurity of Zr is expected to substitute randomly for Hf within the crystals.
Serving as a precursor to the formation of nanocrystalline YSH by high-temperature annealing, the as-prepared amorphous powders with homogenous mixing of Hf4+ and Y3+ were annealed for 3 h at 600 °C. As evidenced by the PXRD patterns, this causes a crystallization of the amorphous powders and formation of larger crystalline domains [Fig. 2
(a)]. The decreased peak broadening allows for differentiation between cubic and tetragonal HfO2. As no peak splitting or asymmetry is observed, formation of c-HfO2 is concluded. For YSH8, a two-phase product of c-HfO2 and m-HfO2 is obtained with 36.3 (3)% m-HfO2, suggesting that a Y3+ content of 5.31 (3) at% is insufficient to fully stabilize the high-temperature phase of HfO2. In contrast, the PXRD patterns of the other samples can be modelled with a single c-HfO2 phase, demonstrating that the critical doping limit required for the complete stabilization of these nanosized samples lies somewhere between 5.31 (3) and 12.81 (5) at%. This is much lower than the limit suggested by Li et al. (2018
) for microcrystalline YSH of 17 at%, but in agreement with other reports on nanocrystalline YSH that demonstrate complete stabilization with 10 at% (Zhou et al., 2012
; Qiu et al., 2021
).
| Figure 2 (a) Refined PXRD patterns of YSH samples annealed for 3 h at 600 °C. (b) Refined molar fractions against nominal composition. (c) Refined unit-cell parameters of the c-HfO2 phase versus experimental Y3+ content, x, as determined from ICP–OES. The black line corresponds to the fit obtained from orthogonal distance linear regression to unit-cell parameters of phase-pure samples. The grey point corresponds to the unit cell of YSH8 moved horizontally on the composition axis by dividing ICP–OES composition with refined molar fraction of the c-HfO2 phase. |
The refined unit-cell parameters of c-HfO2 corroborate the homogeneous distribution of Hf4+ and Y3+ in the as-prepared amorphous powders. The unit-cell parameters demonstrate Vegard-like behaviour, i.e. a linear increase against the experimentally determined Y3+ content [Fig. 2
(c)], in accordance with the effective ionic radii of Hf4+ and Y3+ of 0.83 and 1.019 Å (Shannon, 1976
).
The unit-cell parameters of the phase-pure samples fall on a perfectly straight line. Orthogonal distance linear regression to the data points suggests a hypothetical unit-cell parameter of undoped c-HfO2 of 5.0940 (5) Å, based on the intercept, and a slope of 0.189 (3) Å. Since undoped c-HfO2 is rarely stabilized at room temperature, only a few accounts of the unit-cell parameters without dopants are reported with values in the range 5.12–5.129 Å for non-stoichiometric HfO2–δ (Lu et al., 2008
; Manory et al., 2002
). These values are slightly higher than the value extracted from Vegard-type fitting here. The non-stoichiometric nature of the undoped cubic HfO2 could explain the discrepancy with Vegard-type fitting, as oxygen vacancies have been linked to enlarged lattice parameters (Marrocchelli et al., 2012
). In the literature on Y3+ doping of HfO2, it is customary to perform the Vegard analysis of the refined unit-cell parameters against the molar percentage of Y2O3 in the sample, i.e. (HfO2)1–y(Y2O3)y/2, rather than Hf1–xYxO2–x/2. Thus, for comparative purposes, the same Vegard analysis is performed when plotted against mol% Y2O3, yielding an intercept of 5.0969 Å and a slope of 3.12 (5) × 10−3 Å mol%−1 (Fig. S13). These values are in reasonable agreement with the literature values of 5.095–5.106 Å and 2.5 × 10−3–2.9 × 10−3 Å mol%−1, respectively, although the slope obtained here is slightly higher (Kim, 1989
; Sévin et al., 2020
; Weyl & Janke, 1996
).
Normalizing the composition of YSH8 by the refined molar fraction of the c-HfO2 phase almost moves its onto the straight line [grey point, Fig. 2
(c)], suggesting that phase-segregated domains of m-HfO2 are predominantly pure HfO2 and that the Y3+ remains in the c-HfO2 structure. If the Y3+ ions entered the m-HfO2 structure, this normalization would have moved the point to the right of the Vegard line. The remaining discrepancy, even after normalizing with the refined molar fraction, may be linked to the small amount of Zr4+ detected in this sample [Fig. S13(b)], given its slightly larger ionic radius of 0.84 Å compared with 0.83 Å for Hf4+ (Shannon, 1976
). Slight uncertainties in the estimations of both molar fraction and unit cell are equally possible explanations for this discrepancy, since all peaks from the c-HfO2 phase overlap with some from the m-HfO2 phase.
Annealing the samples at higher temperatures causes continued growth of the nanoparticles and induces progressive phase segregation (Figs. S14–S19). As mentioned, no distinct particles are found in the as-prepared samples, but after annealing at 600 °C, distinct regions resembling small crystallites are found. These regions appear larger and more coherent after 900 °C and fully crystalline particles are found after annealing at 1200 °C. At 1200 °C, even the most doped samples phase segregate, although the refined molar fractions of m-HfO2 are small, with values of 6.23 (9) and 2.29 (10)% for YSH32 and YSH48, respectively. A Y-segregation is identified using STEM–EDX of sample YSH16 annealed at 1200 °C supporting a phase segregation into Y-rich and Y-poor regions (Fig. S20), likely corresponding to c-HfO2 and m-HfO2, respectively. The annealing series re-emphasizes that the stabilization of the c-HfO2 is not exclusively driven by the creation of oxygen vacancies resulting from Y3+ incorporation into the lattice. This is evidenced by the fact that the c-HfO2 phase stabilizes at doping levels lower than the critical limit reported for microcrystalline samples.
Zhou et al. (2012
) observed similar stabilization in 10–12 nm-sized nanocrystalline samples at a doping level of 10 at%, whereas Qiu et al. (2021
) found complete stabilization in 52 nm nanoparticles at 10 at%. Here, coherent domain sizes are extracted using WPPM modelling of the PXRD patterns assuming lognormal distribution of spherical particles. The refined mean sizes and distribution widths can be found in Table S3 and are visualized in Fig. S21. In comparison with the results of Qiu et al. (2021
), the YSH16 sample with an actual composition of 12.81 (5) at% is completely stabilized in 5.4 (1) nm nanoparticles (average size from WPPM) when annealed at 600 °C, but phase segregation occurs in 9.8 (2) nm nanoparticles when annealed at 900 °C, i.e. in much smaller particles, even when considering the overall lognormal distribution.
Both Zhou et al. (2012
) and Qiu et al. (2021
) argued that lower surface free energy of the high-temperature phases compared with the thermodynamically stable m-HfO2 is responsible for its stabilization at the nanoscale. The idea of a `size effect' theory was initially put forth by Garvie (1965
) for undoped ZrO2, and it has later been predicted for HfO2 as well (Sharma et al., 2018
). Others suggest that instead, intrinsic oxygen-ion vacancies are responsible for the stabilization in undoped ZrO2 and that the elimination of these, rather than the domain growth itself at elevated temperatures, initiates phase segregation (Osendi et al., 1985
; Liu et al., 1995
). Again, this has been noted for undoped HfO2 as well (Lu et al., 2008
; Kumar et al., 2017
). The apparent effect of the preparation method, i.e. this study compared with previous studies, on the size and doping concentration relationship would further support this conjecture. As such, under-coordinated metal ions in the as-prepared amorphous powders are a potential source of additional oxygen-vacancy defects in the annealed samples presented here.
3.1. Doping-induced local disorder
The long-range order, as reflected in the PXRD patterns of all YSH samples, is well-modelled in Rietveld refinements with c-HfO2 only or in combination with m-HfO2, as demonstrated in Figs. 2
and S14. The refinements, however, also result in unusually large ADPs for both metal and oxygen sites (Fig. S22). Such high ADP values suggest that the long-range structural signal of the PXRD patterns is dampened, not only by the Debye–Waller factor from atomic thermal motion or factors such as absorption from the sample, but additionally by structural disorder. This is further corroborated by diffuse scattering contributing to the background of the PXRD patterns, apart from the scattering of the sample container [Fig. S23(a)], indicating correlated disorder within the YSH samples.
Both effects are reflected in the corresponding PDFs and manifest themselves in high values of refined ADPs (Fig. S24) and structurally in the very-short-range region of the PDFs below 4.5 Å (Fig. 3
). The PDF of YSH48 annealed at 900 °C exemplifies this, as the c-HfO2 phase provides an excellent description of all correlations above 4.5 Å, but the model is unable to fully describe the nearest-neighbour (NN) M—O and M—M correlations at 2.15 and 3.55 Å, respectively. The absence of any structural signal in the residual curve above the short-range region rules out the possibility of significant undetected crystalline impurity phases being responsible for the signal. Consequently, modelling only the PDF above 4.5 Å leads to an Rwp of 6.9%, compared with 19.2% for the full-range fit. The ADPs from the PDF refinements of the metal and oxygen site are 0.0277 (6) and 0.056 (6) Å2, respectively, in line with the results from the reciprocal-space refinements.
| Figure 3 (a) PDF of the YSH48 sample annealed at 900 °C modelled in the ranges 0–50 (top) and 4.5–50 Å (bottom) with the c-HfO2 (b) Comparison of (top) the PDF residual curves from 0–50 Å fits of YSH48 samples annealed at 600, 900 and 1200 °C, and (bottom) the PDF obtained by Fourier transformation of the diffuse contribution from Rietveld refinement of the YSH48 sample annealed at 1200 °C (see Fig. S23). (c) Zoom-ins of the first, third and sixth M—M (M = Hf4+, Y3+) peaks in the PDFs of samples annealed at 600 °C. Black arrows indicate the shift in peak position as the Y3+ concentration is increased. |
The residual curve in the full-range fit shows a predominant `positive–negative–positive' feature around the NN M—M peak [Fig. 3
(a)], which is an indication of displacive disorder (Støckler et al., 2024
). This feature is also present at the other annealing temperatures [Fig. 3
(b), top] and in the other phase-pure samples (Fig. S25). In fact, by separating the diffuse scattering from the other non-Bragg scattering contributions to the PXRD patterns and Fourier transforming this yields a PDF reproducing the `positive–negative–positive' feature of the residual curves (see Fig. S23). This is exemplified for YSH48 annealed at 1200 °C [Fig. 3
(b), bottom]. Combined, this suggests static displacive disorder within the metal sublattice that decreases the distance to some of the neighbouring metal ions while increasing it to others.
Comparing the first, third and sixth nearest M—M correlations in the PDFs of the phase-pure samples annealed at 600 °C (YSH16–48) strongly suggests that the displacive disorder is correlated with the Y3+ doping [Fig. 3
(c)]. Note that other M—O and O—O correlations will also contribute to the third and sixth M—M correlations. As presented in Fig. 2
(c), increasing the Y3+ dopant concentration expands the c-HfO2 consistent with Vegard's law, and the same expansion is reflected in the slight rightward shift of the third and sixth M—M correlation peaks in the PDFs as the dopant concentration increases [Fig. 3
(c)]. Counterintuitively, however, the first M—M peak shifts in the opposite direction, indicating a greater degree of disorder as the dopant concentration is increased.
In YSZ, it has been shown that, by virtue of its larger ionic radius, Y3+ more easily accommodates the eightfold coordination of the cubic fluorite structure, leaving the generated oxygen-ion vacancies for the smaller Zr4+ ions that consequently adopt their preferred CN of seven of the thermodynamically stable monoclinic structure (Li et al., 1994b
; Khan et al., 1998
; Ho, 1982
; Fèvre et al., 2005
). Studies of the diffuse scattering from single crystals of YSZ suggest local relaxation of the ions neighbouring the vacancies, with NN oxygen ions moving towards the vacancy along the 〈100〉 direction and NN Zr4+ ions moving away from the vacancy along 〈111〉 (Schmidt et al., 2023
; Fèvre et al., 2005
; Kaiser-Bischoff et al., 2005
; Frey et al., 2005
). Electrostatically, such relaxation is expected, as the negatively charged oxygen ions are attracted to the net positive oxygen-ion vacancies, whereas the positively charged Zr4+ ions are repelled. In the present case, a static displacement of the Hf4+ ions along 〈111〉 will inevitably introduce shorter and longer bonds to all neighbouring metal ions, in agreement with the `positive–negative–positive' feature, thus a relaxation scheme similar to YSZ is likely to be responsible for the signal in these YSH samples.
Fèvre et al. (2005
) showed that the diffuse scattering from single crystals of highly doped YSZ (∼18 to ∼43 at% Y3+) gradually condenses into broad Bragg-like features in 3D reciprocal space that can be indexed by a δ-phase with a composition of Zr3Y4O12 (space group R) of the Y3+-rich part of the ZrO2–Y2O3 system. The of Zr3Y4O12 was initially reported by Scott (1977
), but is also known from the ZrO2–Sc2O3, HfO2–Sc3O3 and other systems (Thornber et al., 1968
; Rossell, 1976
). Structurally, the δ-phase resembles the cubic fluorite structure, and it may best be described as a vacancy defect and disordered fluorite-type structure, as visualized in Fig. 4
(a). Here, its crystal structure is visualized down the [26] direction and overlaid with a black square emphasizing its resemblance with the cubic fluorite unit cell. In the δ-phase, the two types of cations are randomly distributed, but the vacancies order to give two distinct types of cation coordination sites: sixfold coordinated 3a sites [Fig. 4
(c)] and sevenfold coordinated 18f sites [Fig. 4
(d)]. These sites are distorted relative to the eightfold-coordinated ideal square-prismatic coordination of the fluorite structure [Fig. 4
(b)]. This is highlighted by the vertices of the cube, marking the oxygen positions in the ideal fluorite square prism, and the dashed guidelines indicating the central cation position in Figs. 4
(b)–(d). The vacancies around both sites are illustrated with small white spheres at the vertices of the cube.
| Figure 4 (a) The crystal structure of Hf3Y4O12 overlaid with a (black) corresponding to the c-HfO2 (b)–(d) Comparison of the cation coordination in (b) the ordered fluorite structure with (c) sixfold (3a) and (d) sevenfold (18f) coordinated sites in Hf3Y4O12. (e) The PDF of YSH48 annealed at 900 °C overlaid with calculated PDFs of c-HfO2 (green) and Hf3Y4O12 (orange), with adjusted unit-cell parameters to comply with the experimental PDF, but assuming atomic positions from Zr3Y4O12 reported by Scott (1977 |
Evidently, both cations and anions relax around the vacancies, seemingly following the same rules as derived from single-crystal diffuse scattering and electrostatic considerations: the NN oxygen ions displace directly towards the vacancy and the NN cations at the 18f site displace away from the vacancy along what would be the 〈100〉 and 〈111〉 directions of the fluorite lattice, respectively. Since the 3a sites have vacancies at opposing sides of the cation, the 3a cation does not displace.
In Fig. 4
(e), calculated PDFs of the c-HfO2 and δ-phase (Hf3Y4O12) are compared to the low r region of the experimental PDF of the YSH48 sample annealed at 900 °C. The first M—M peak of the c-HfO2 phase splits into two distinct distances for Hf3Y4O12, which matches well with the features of the experimental PDF that give rise to the `positive–negative–positive' features in the residual curves in Fig. 3
(b). This suggests that the similar local relaxation around vacancies observed in single-crystal diffuse scattering for YSZ may also be at play in the nanoparticles of YSH.
Full-range modelling of the PDF with either c-HfO2 or Hf3Y4O12 provides similar descriptions of the PDF above 5.5 Å [Fig. 4
(f)], and if the modelling is performed in the range 4.5–50 Å, the calculated PDFs become visually inseparable (Fig. S26). This reiterates that the δ-phase is simply a distorted and disordered fluorite-type structure. Yet, the Hf3Y4O12 structure provides a better description of the first M—O and M—M correlations [Fig. 4
(f)]. With the Hf3Y4O12 structure, the refined ADPs decrease to 0.01983 (7) and 0.020 (7) Å2 for metal and oxygen sites (Table S4), respectively, essentially showing that the structural disorder is decoupled from the atomic thermal motion with this model. Although it leads to an improved description of the PDF, the Hf3Y4O12 structure does not comply with the PXRD patterns of the YSH samples, as the lower symmetry of the trigonal structure dictates additional peaks in the calculated patterns which are not present in the experimental data (Fig. S27). This emphasizes that the actual relaxation around the vacancies is more complex and disordered than what the average Hf3Y4O12 crystalline model can represent, because the relaxation around the vacancies is uncorrelated and thus does not possess long-range order. However, the local coordination environment of the δ-phase resembles the local disorder in the YSH nanoparticles.
The lower thermal conductivity of YSH compared to undoped m-HfO2 is commonly ascribed to phonon scattering by oxygen vacancies and mass disorder from Y3+ ion substitution on Hf4+ sites (Ramana et al., 2012
; Winter & Clarke, 2006
; Klemens & Gell, 1998
). However, the identification of vacancy-associated displacive disorder in these samples suggests that local structural distortions surrounding the vacancies may also inhibit phonon propagation and thus contribute to the comparatively low thermal conductivity.
3.2. Crystallization mechanism
To shed light on the crystallization process of the amorphous YSH powders, the synthesis of Hf1–xYxO2–x/2 nanoparticles was investigated with in situ PXRD during solvothermal synthesis. Here, precursor solutions similar to those used in the continuous flow syntheses of the ex situ powders are loaded into a reactor capillary and heated rapidly to the desired synthesis temperature, while simultaneously collecting X-ray scattering data suitable for Rietveld and PDF analysis. A total of eight in situ experiments, covering the composition series of Hf1–xYxO2–x/2 for x = 0.00–0.32 and a temperature series in the range 250–400 °C (x = 0.24), have been performed. An overview of the experiments in terms of contour plots and selected refined frames can be found in Figs. S28–S32.
The refined PXRD patterns after 20 min of synthesis demonstrate the simultaneous incorporation of Hf4+ and Y3+ in the HfO2 lattice for all Y3+-doped samples [Fig. 5
(a)], as the c-HfO2 phase forms in all experiments, except the control experiment of undoped HfO2, where phase-pure m-HfO2 is obtained. At nominal compositions of x = 0.08 and 0.16, the amount of Y3+ is insufficient to completely stabilize the c-HfO2 phase, and during the experiments, increasing amounts of the m-HfO2 phase segregate (Fig. S33). Like for the ex situ samples, not all the Y3+ ions from the precursor solutions are hydrolysed and incorporated into the c-HfO2 structure, giving rise to non-linear dependence of the room-temperature unit-cell parameters of the c-HfO2 phase against nominal composition (Fig. S34).
| Figure 5 (a) Refined PXRD patterns from in situ syntheses for all compositions after 20 min of synthesis. (b) 2D contour plot of PDFs during the in situ experiment of x = 0.24. The inset shows the first 10 min of the experiment. |
Based on contour plots of the PDFs of the in situ experiments, the synthesis of the YSH nanoparticles can be divided into three stages, regardless of the phase purity of the products, with an example shown for x = 0.24 in Fig. 5
(b) and for other samples in Figs. S35–S36. Before heating, only the precursor solution with limited structural extent is present, but as soon as heating commences (t = 0), an immediate change in the local coordination occurs, with the structural signal extending substantially further than that of the precursor solution. The structural extent, however, is still limited to less than ∼20 Å, and the similarity with the PDF of the as-prepared ex situ samples is striking (Fig. S37). Photos monitoring the reactor capillary during the in situ experiment reveal that within seconds after heating, the initially translucent precursor solution inside the capillary turns white (Fig. S38). Together these observations suggest that the changed coordination in the PDF reflects the precipitation of an amorphous solid from the solution.
Entering the second stage of the synthesis, structural coherence within the amorphous precipitate builds and a clear expansion of the first M—M correlations occurs [inset, Fig. 5
(b)]. As the expansion concludes, the third stage of the synthesis begins, characterized by only modest changes in the PDFs. The local changes occurring during the second stage of the synthesis are explored in greater detail in Fig. 6
. In Fig. 6
(a), the low-r region of the PDFs is shown as a waterfall plot, with their colours indicating the progression of the synthesis. Here, the rightward shift of the first M—M distance and the simultaneous intensity increase of the longer M—M peaks is clearly visualized.
| Figure 6 Local changes in the short-range region of the PDF during the in situ solvothermal synthesis experiment (x = 0.24). (a) Low-r region of the raw PDFs. (b) Heating profile during the experiment, together with temporal evolution in peak position of (c) the first M—O and first M—M distances, (d) the third and sixth M—M distances, and (e) the refined coherent domain size, i.e. coherence length in the PDF. (f) The first M—M distance versus coherence length. The vertical dashed lines in (b)–(f) mark the end of an initial delay period before the first M—M distance expansion and the end of the gradual M—M expansion. |
By tracking the position of peak maxima via single of the first M—M peak, it appears that following an initial rapid increase, which coincides with the point of heating, this is followed by a corresponding increase in the first M—O distance, and a short delay period impedes the subsequent transformation [Figs. 6
(b)–(c)]. However, as this delay concludes, the first M—M distance continuously expands [Fig. 6
(c)] and is mirrored by a corresponding increase in the refined coherent domain size [Fig. 6
(e)]. The increase in coherence length is also reflected in the other M—M distances that sharpen and increase in intensity during this period [Fig. 6
(a)]. After approximately 8 min, the first M—M distance levels at a value of ∼3.53 Å, which is in line with the annealed ex situ YSH samples [Fig. 3
(c)]. Domain growth, on the other hand, continues, albeit at a much-reduced rate. The relatively low Qmax limits the ability to resolve features in the PDF; however, in this case, as relative changes of the same correlation peaks are reported, this is less of an issue.
Plotting the peak position of the first M—M distance against the refined coherent domain size shows that the change in the M—M distance correlates linearly with the structural coherence length observed in the PDF, until the M—M distance levels at a coherent domain size of ∼4.5 nm [Fig. 6
(e)]. This suggests that the observed reorganization reflects gradual ordering of the atoms within the amorphous precipitate, i.e. crystallization, rather than incorporation of more Y3+ ions in the structure. Similar crystallization from an amorphous matrix has been reported for the solvothermal synthesis of YSZ nanoparticles with a 15 at% Y3+ dopant concentration, also revealed by in situ PDF analysis (Tyrsted et al., 2014
).
Increasing the synthesis temperature increases the rate at which long-range order builds within the precipitate (Fig. S39). At 400 °C, the ordering occurs within a minute, whereas lowering the temperature to 250 °C impedes the transformation and a plateau is reached after 30 min. With more thermal energy available at higher temperatures, diffusion of the ions within the precipitate increases, thus facilitating enhanced local reorganization and ordering.
Interestingly, the degree of Y3+ doping also directly influences the crystallization kinetics by slowing the structural reorganization at increasing Y3+ concentration (Fig. S40). The time it takes for the first M—M distance to plateau increases substantially with nominal Y3+ concentration. For the phase-segregated samples, the average first M—M distance does not stay constant after the second stage of the synthesis has been concluded, but rather contracts slightly over the remainder of the experiment [Figs. S40(b)–(c)]. Since this correlates with the emergence of the second m-HfO2 phase [cf. Figs. S33(b)–(c) and S40(b)–(c)], it simply reflects the fact that the shortest M—M distance in m-HfO2 is slightly shorter than for the c-HfO2 phase. As more m-HfO2 phase segregates, the average M—M distance gradually decreases.
A substantial amount of time is required for complete ordering to occur at the local scale, and this correlates well with the amorphous nature of the YSH samples from the continuous flow syntheses, as the short residence time within the reactor (∼39 s) is insufficient to rearrange the atoms of the amorphous precipitate and achieve long-range crystalline order. Instead, substantially longer residence time or higher reaction temperatures would be required to obtain crystalline YSH nanoparticles from this one-step continuous flow synthesis method. For the as-prepared ex situ YSH samples, the thermal energy required for crystallization is supplied by annealing at 600–1200 °C, but the mechanism of local ordering is expected to be similar.
4. Conclusion
Homogenous amorphous YSH powders with variable Y3+ contents were obtained via continuous flow solvothermal synthesis using supercritical ethanol as reaction medium. The hydrolysis of the Y3+ ions was insufficient and less-than-nominal amounts of Y3+ were incorporated into the powders. Subsequent high-temperature annealing of the obtained amorphous powders induced crystallization, and this demonstrates the stabilizing effect of Y3+ doping on the high-temperature c-HfO2 polymorph at room temperature. The refined unit-cell parameters conform to a Vegard-like relationship against experimentally determined Y3+ content, reflecting the of the samples. Full stabilization of the c-HfO2 phase was achieved at a doping level of 13 at% Y3+, which is substantially lower than the suggested critical doping level in bulk YSH of ∼17 at%. This is attributed to non-doping-induced oxygen-ion vacancies that, together with the doping-induced vacancies, co-operatively stabilize the c-HfO2 phase at lower Y3+ concentrations.
While the long-range order of the annealed powders conforms to the ordered fluorite structure of c-HfO2, as demonstrated by Rietveld refinements of the PXRD patterns, the high ADP values of both metal and oxygen sites and the presence of diffuse scattering suggest local disorder of the structure. A deeper investigation of the local structure of the particles using PDF analysis reveals that, while the average long-range order conforms to the fluorite structure, the structure is locally disordered, and that the degree of disorder correlates with the degree of doping. The local disorder can be reasoned by electrostatic relaxation around the generated oxygen-ion vacancies, as previously identified in single crystals of YSZ. A model based on the well-known Zr3Y4O12 structure, which incorporates such relaxation motifs, provides a description of the main residual features from the PDF analysis. It is hypothesized that this local relaxation of the ions surrounding the oxygen vacancies will also affect phonon scattering and thus, together with mass disorder and vacancy point defects, contribute to the low thermal conductivity of YSH compared to undoped HfO2.
Investigation of the solvothermal synthesis of YSH using in situ total scattering experiments explains the amorphous nature of the as-synthesized powders, as the crystallization of the initially amorphous precipitate into the locally disordered c-HfO2 phase occurs over the course of several minutes, whereas the reaction time of the ex situ powders was only ∼40 s. The structural reorganization of the local structure during the crystallization is tracked via single of the PDFs, and interestingly the rate of crystallization depends not only on the synthesis temperature, but also on the degree of doping. Higher reaction temperatures result in faster crystallization and larger degrees of doping result in slower crystallization.
Supporting information
Supporting information. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252526003829/fc5086sup1.pdf
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge DESY (Hamburg, Germany), a member of the Helmholtz Association HGF, for provision of experimental facilities. Parts of this research were caried out at the P21.1 beamline at PETRA III, and we would like to thank Martin von Zimmermann and Ann-Christin Dippel for their assistance during the beam time. Beam time was allocated under proposals I-20191077 EC and I-20210572 EC. We acknowledge the MAX IV Laboratory for beamtime on the DanMAX beamline under proposal 20200749. Research conducted at MAX IV, a Swedish national user facility, is supported by Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council, VR) under contract 2018-07152, Vinnova (Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems) under contract 2018-04969 and Formas under contract 2019-02496. DanMAX is funded by the NUFI grant No. 4059-00009B. This work was supported by the Villum Foundation, The Danish National Research Foundation, The Carlsberg Foundation, The Independent Research Fund Denmark and The Danish Center for Synchrotron and Neutron Research (DanScatt). We would also like to thank Martin Roelsgaard, Ida Gjerlevsen Nielsen, Frederik Nøhr Søndergaard-Pedersen, Lise Joost Støckler, Nicolaj Brink Søgaard, Nils Lau Nyborg Broge, Rasmus Baden Stubkjaer, Jonas Beyer, Lasse Rabøl Jørgensen, Innokenty Kantor and Daniel Risskov Sørensen for their assistance during beam times.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Data availability
The data are available from the authors upon request.
Funding information
The following funding is acknowledged: Villum Fonden (award No. 25861); Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (award No. DNRF189).
References
Alotaibi, M., Li, L. & West, A. R. (2021). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23, 25951–25960. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Badwal, S. P. S. (1992). Solid State Ionics 52, 23–32. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Becker, J., Bremholm, M., Tyrsted, C., Pauw, B., Jensen, K. M. Ø., Eltzholt, J., Christensen, M. & Iversen, B. B. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 729–736. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Beyer, J., Roth, N. & Brummerstedt Iversen, B. (2022). Acta Cryst. A78, 10–20. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Böscke, T. S., Müller, J., Bräuhaus, D., Schröder, U. & Böttger, U. (2011). Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 102903. Google Scholar
Cardarelli, F. (2008). Materials Handbook. London: Springer London. Google Scholar
Chaubey, G. S., Yao, Y., Makongo, J. P. A., Sahoo, P., Misra, D., Poudeu, P. F. P. & Wiley, J. B. (2012). RSC Adv. 2, 9207–9213. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Christensen, R. S., Kløve, M., Roelsgaard, M., Sommer, S. & Iversen, B. B. (2021). Nanoscale 13, 12711–12719. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Coelho, A. A. (2018). J. Appl. Cryst. 51, 210–218. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fèvre, M., Finel, A. & Caudron, R. (2005). Phys. Rev. B 72, 104117. Google Scholar
Fischer, D. & Kersch, A. (2008). Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 012908. CrossRef Google Scholar
Frey, F., Boysen, H. & Kaiser-Bischoff, I. (2005). Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 220, 1017–1026. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gálvez-Barbosa, S., González, L. A., Bretado, L. A. & Rosas, G. (2024). Mater. Lett. 358, 135808. Google Scholar
Garvie, R. C. (1965). J. Phys. Chem. 69, 1238–1243. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Hellstern, H. L., Becker, J., Hald, P., Bremholm, M., Mamakhel, A. & Iversen, B. B. (2015). Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54, 8500–8508. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ho, S.-M. (1982). Mater. Sci. Eng. 54, 23–29. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Huber, M. L., Lemmon, E. W., Bell, I. H. & McLinden, M. O. (2022). Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 61, 15449–15472. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jaffe, J. E., Bachorz, R. A. & Gutowski, M. (2005). Phys. Rev. B 72, 144107. CrossRef Google Scholar
Juhás, P., Davis, T., Farrow, C. L. & Billinge, S. J. L. (2013). J. Appl. Cryst. 46, 560–566. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Juhás, P., Farrow, C., Yang, X., Knox, K. & Billinge, S. (2015). Acta Cryst. A71, 562–568. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kaiser-Bischoff, I., Boysen, H., Scherf, C. & Hansen, T. (2005). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 2061–2067. Web of Science PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Keramidas, V. G. & White, W. B. (1974). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 57, 22–24. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Khan, M. S., Islam, M. S. & Bates, D. R. (1998). J. Mater. Chem. 8, 2299–2307. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. & Karkoulis, D. (2013). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 425, 202012. CrossRef Google Scholar
Kim, D.-J. (1989). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 1415–1421. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Klemens, P. G. & Gell, M. (1998). Mater. Sci. Eng. A 245, 143–149. CrossRef Google Scholar
Krogh-Moe, J. (1956). Acta Cryst. 9, 951–953. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Kumar, N., George, B. P. A., Abrahamse, H., Parashar, V., Ray, S. S. & Ngila, J. C. (2017). Sci. Rep. 7, 9351. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Lakiza, S. M., Hrechanyuk, M. I., Red'ko, V. P., Ruban, O. K., Tyshchenko, J. S., Makudera, A. O. & Dudnik, O. V. (2021). Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 60, 78–89. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lee, C.-K., Cho, E., Lee, H.-S., Hwang, C. S. & Han, S. (2008). Phys. Rev. B 78, 012102. CrossRef Google Scholar
Li, C., Ma, Y., Xue, Z., Yang, Y., Chen, J. & Guo, H. (2018). Ceram. Int. 44, 18213–18221. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Li, P., Chen, I.-W. & Penner–Hahn, J. E. (1994a). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 118–128. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Li, P., Chen, I.-W. & Penner–Hahn, J. E. (1994b). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 1289–1295. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Liu, H., Feng, L., Zhang, X. & Xue, Q. (1995). J. Phys. Chem. 99, 332–334. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Li Vage, J., Doi, K. & Mazieres, C. (1968). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 51, 349–353. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lu, C.-H., Raitano, J. M., Khalid, S., Zhang, L. & Chan, S.-W. (2008). J. Appl. Phys. 103, 124303. CrossRef Google Scholar
Manory, R. R., Mori, T., Shimizu, I., Miyake, S. & Kimmel, G. (2002). J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 20, 549–554. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Marrocchelli, D., Bishop, S. R., Tuller, H. L. & Yildiz, B. (2012). Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 1958–1965. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Matović, B., Bučevac, D., Prekajski, M., Maksimović, V., Gautam, D., Yoshida, K. & Yano, T. (2012). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 32, 1971–1976. Google Scholar
McCormack, S. J., Weber, R. J. & Kriven, W. M. (2018). Acta Mater. 161, 127–137. Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Müller, J., Schröder, U., Böscke, T. S., Müller, I., Böttger, U., Wilde, L., Sundqvist, J., Lemberger, M., Kücher, P., Mikolajick, T. & Frey, L. (2011). J. Appl. Phys. 110, 114113. Google Scholar
Norman, N. (1957). Acta Cryst. 10, 370–373. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Osendi, M. I., Moya, J. S., Serna, C. J. & Soria, J. (1985). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68, 135–139. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Pathak, S., Das, P., Das, T., Mandal, G., Joseph, B., Sahu, M., Kaushik, S. D. & Siruguri, V. (2020). Acta Cryst. C76, 1034–1042. Web of Science CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Qiu, Z., Li, C.-H., Jinschek, J. R. & Gouma, P.-I. (2021). Ceram. Int. 47, 14208–14215. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ramana, C. V., Noor-A-Alam, M., Gengler, J. J. & Jones, J. G. (2012). Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 200–204. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Robertson, J. (2004). Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 265–291. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Robertson, J. & Wallace, R. M. (2015). Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep. 88, 1–41. CrossRef Google Scholar
Roelsgaard, M., Kløve, M., Christensen, R., Bertelsen, A. D., Broge, N. L. N., Kantor, I., Sørensen, D. R., Dippel, A.-C., Banerjee, S., Zimmermann, M. V., Glaevecke, P., Gutowski, O., Jørgensen, M. R. V. & Iversen, B. B. (2023). J. Appl. Cryst. 56, 581–588. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rossell, H. J. (1976). J. Solid State Chem. 19, 103–111. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Scardi, P. (2020). Cryst. Growth Des. 20, 6903–6916. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Scardi, P. & Leoni, M. (2001). Acta Cryst. A57, 604–613. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. M., Neder, R. B., Martin, J. D., Minelli, A., Lemée, M.-H. & Goodwin, A. L. (2023). Acta Cryst. B79, 138–147. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Scott, H. G. (1977). Acta Cryst. B33, 281–282. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Sévin, L., Razafindramanana, V., Julian-Jankowiak, A., Justin, J.-F., Mauvy, F. & Rebillat, F. (2020). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 40, 5859–5869. Google Scholar
Shannon, R. D. (1976). Acta Cryst. A32, 751–767. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Sharma, G., Ushakov, S. V. & Navrotsky, A. (2018). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 101, 31–35. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Shin, D., Arróyave, R. & Liu, Z.-K. (2006). Calphad 30, 375–386. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Singh, M., Zappa, D. & Comini, E. (2021). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46, 27643–27674. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Soper, A. K. & Barney, E. R. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 714–726. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Støckler, K. A. H., Roth, N., Feidenhans'l, A. A., Takahashi, S., Nishibori, E. & Iversen, B. B. (2024). Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 034409. Google Scholar
Tang, J., Zhang, F., Zoogman, P., Fabbri, J., Chan, S.-W., Zhu, Y., Brus, L. E. & Steigerwald, M. L. (2005). Adv. Funct. Mater. 15, 1595–1602. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Thornber, M. R., Bevan, D. J. M. & Graham, J. (1968). Acta Cryst. B24, 1183–1190. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Trubelja, M. F. (1991). Solid State Ionics 49, 89–97. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Tyrsted, C., Lock, N., Jensen, K. M. Ø., Christensen, M., Bøjesen, E. D., Emerich, H., Vaughan, G., Billinge, S. J. L. & Iversen, B. B. (2014). IUCrJ 1, 165–171. CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Waetzig, G. R., Depner, S. W., Asayesh-Ardakani, H., Cultrara, N. D., Shahbazian-Yassar, R. & Banerjee, S. (2016). Chem. Sci. 7, 4930–4939. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wan, Y. & Zhou, X. (2017). RSC Adv. 7, 7763–7773. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Zahid, F., Wang, J. & Guo, H. (2012). Phys. Rev. B 85, 224110. CrossRef Google Scholar
Warren, B. E., Krutter, H. & Morningstar, O. (1936). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 19, 202–206. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Weyl, A. & Janke, D. (1996). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 2145–2155. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Winter, M. R. & Clarke, D. R. (2006). Acta Mater. 54, 5051–5059. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wu, Y., Hong, D., Zhong, X., Niu, Y. & Zheng, X. (2023). Ceram. Int. 49, 21133–21141. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, F., Chupas, P. J., Lui, S. L. A., Hanson, J. C., Caliebe, W. A., Lee, P. L. & Chan, S.-W. (2007). Chem. Mater. 19, 3118–3126. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Chen, W.-Z., Sun, J.-Y. & Jiang, Z.-Y. (2013). Chin. Phys. B 22, 016601. CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhao, X. & Vanderbilt, D. (2002). Phys. Rev. B 65, 233106. CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhou, W., Ushakov, S. V. & Navrotsky, A. (2012). J. Mater. Res. 27, 1022–1028. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
access

journal menu



