research papers
A portable ultrahigh-vacuum system for advanced synchrotron radiation studies of thin films and nanostructures: EuSi2 nano-islands
aLaboratory for Applications of Synchrotron Radiation, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany, bInstitute for Photon Science and Synchrotron Radiation, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany, cInstitute for Nuclear Waste Disposal, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany, dMax Planck Institute for Solid State Research, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany, and eSynchrotron Radiation Facility ANKA, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: svetoslav.stankov@kit.edu
A portable ultrahigh-vacuum system optimized for in situ variable-temperature X-ray scattering and spectroscopy experiments at synchrotron radiation beamlines was constructed and brought into operation at the synchrotron radiation facility ANKA of the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany. Here the main features of the new instrument are described and its capabilities demonstrated. The surface morphology, structure and stoichiometry of EuSi2 nano-islands are determined by in situ grazing-incidence small-angle X-ray scattering and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. A size reduction of about a factor of two of the nano-islands due to silicide decomposition and Eu is observed after sample annealing at 1270 K for 30 min.
Keywords: in situ experiments; GISAXS; EXAFS; XANES; rare-earth silicides.
1. Introduction
Nanoscale materials supported on a substrate exhibiting various surface morphologies, such as nano-clusters, -islands and -wires, have the potential to contribute immensely to various areas spanning energy, information technology and environmental research. The comprehensive morphology and structure characterization of such nanoscale objects is of fundamental importance for understanding the relationship of structure, shape and size to the physical properties and for their optimization and tailoring for specific applications.
The rapid development of synchrotron radiation sources combined with the progress of the X-ray optics and detectors during the last decades has offered the scientific community X-ray beams with enormously high in situ experiments with synchrotron radiation have been constructed and brought into operation (e.g. Döhrmann et al., 2013; Krause et al., 2012; Slobodskyy et al., 2012; Couet et al., 2008; Stankov et al., 2008).
focused on spots with micro- and nanometer dimensions. That facilitated the establishment of advanced X-ray scattering and spectroscopy methods as standard tools for non-destructive characterization of materials with dimensions on the nanometer length scale and of processes down to the nanosecond time scale. These investigations, however, require the development of dedicated instrumentation and sample environment in order to prepare the nanostructures and to investigate their crystallographic structure, morphology and the desired properties under controlled, very often ultrahigh-vacuum (UHV), conditions. In response to these needs for instrumentation, various vacuum and ultrahigh-vacuum multifunctional chambers optimized forThe increasingly important applications of rare-earth (RE)-based nanostructures in various fields such as micro- and nanoelectronics, catalysts, hydrogen storage and magnetism have motivated their intensive research in recent years. Among them the ultrathin RE sesquioxide films (high-k materials) and the self-organized RE silicide (RESi) nanostructures attract particular attention because of their relevance to the CMOS nanoelectronics. While the RESi nanowires have the potential to serve as ohmic contacts and interconnects in future nanoelectronics (Snider & Williams, 2007), the high-k layers have already replaced the SiO2 gate layer in the nano-MOSFETs (Fanciulli & Scarel, 2007). For such applications, however, the investigation of the thermal stability of the crystal phases and their morphology is essential since the heat dissipation became a demanding issue with the continuous downscaling of the electronic devices (Balandin, 2011).
To address these challenges we have designed and brought into operation a new portable UHV analysis chamber dedicated to variable-temperature in situ (under ultrahigh-vacuum conditions) X-ray scattering and spectroscopy experiments at synchrotron radiation sources. In this paper we describe the main features of the instrument and demonstrate its capabilities by in situ study of the surface morphology, stoichiometry and of europium silicide nano-islands applying grazing-incidence small-angle X-ray scattering (GISAXS) and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS).
2. Experimental details
2.1. A portable UHV analysis chamber for in situ scattering and spectroscopy experiments with synchrotron radiation
The UHV analysis chamber, delivered by CreaTec Fischer & Co. GmbH (https://www.createc.de), is stationed at the UHV-Analysis laboratory of the synchrotron radiation source ANKA in close vicinity to the scattering and spectroscopy beamlines. The chamber can be docked to the existing UHV-cluster in order to transfer the samples grown by molecular beam and characterized by the available analytical methods such as (RHEED), (LEED), (AES), X-ray photo-electron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning probe microscopy (AFM/STM).
The body of the chamber is based on a 200 CF flange and can be docked to the UHV cluster at ANKA as well as to other UHV systems through a 40 CF port. The distance from the sample surface to the surface of the heavy-duty diffractometer is set by design to 170 mm (or higher) allowing for mounting the UHV chamber on the two-circle segment cradle Huber 5203.20 (or 5203.80).
The heart of the UHV analysis chamber is the sample manipulator that allows for a motorized (Faulhaber DC servo motor) unlimited sample rotation around the surface normal. By decoupling from the motor, the sample can also be rotated manually. The sample rotation is particularly useful for GISAXS and surface diffraction experiments. A pneumatically actuated stamp fixes the sample holder to the manipulator by pressing it against the manipulator head, thus fixing the azimuthal angle during the experiments.
The sample manipulator is equipped with an integrated heater unit for resistive sample heating up to 1300 K. A thermocouple attached near the tungsten filament is used for temperature control and regulation. An integrated liquid-nitrogen tank ensures cooling the sample holders down to about 140 K. This tank can be coupled to the manipulator head with a clamping bracket that serves as a thermal bridge. A second thermocouple attached to the tank is used for temperature control during sample cooling.
Substrates with dimensions up to one inch can be mounted on the molybdenum sample holder. A sample storage compartment with the capacity to store up to five sample holders is an integral part of the UHV chamber. It is mounted on 16 CF feedthrough, allowing for 360° rotation around its axis and for vertical adjustment during the samples transfer. In order to protect the stored samples while heating the investigated sample, the storage compartment can be rotated by 180° exposing only the thermally shielded backside to the radiated heat from the manipulator. A wobble stick is used to transfer the samples between the storage compartment and the sample manipulator.
Depending on the desired experiments the UHV analysis chamber can be used in three different configurations described in detail below.
2.1.1. Configuration A
Configuration A, Fig. 1(a), is optimized for high energy resolution X-ray absorption near-edge structure (HR-XANES), resonant X-ray emission (RXES) and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) studies on thick films and nanostructures. These investigations are facilitated by a 0.5 mm-thick Be window diffusion bonded on a 160 CF flange providing a large solid angle that is a prerequisite for these experiments. A base pressure of about 8 × 10−10 mbar is ensured by a Pfeiffer Hi space 300 turbomolecular pump (TMP) directly connected to the UHV chamber via a 63 CF flange (Fig. 1b). In this configuration the chamber is mounted sidewise providing a vertical sample orientation that is favorable for the experiments. For the experiments an energy-dispersive solid-state detector is placed at 90° to the incident beam in the horizontal plane, in order to minimize the background from the Thomson-scattered X-rays (Fig. 1b).
2.1.2. Configuration B
Temperature-dependent a) and 2(b). In this configuration the large Be window from configuration A is replaced by a movable detector stage mounted on a 100 CF linear transfer with a stroke of 150 mm. The detector stage ends with a 63 CF Be window that can approach the sample surface as close as about 5 mm, thus covering a large solid angle. Positioning the detector stage at the top-most position automatically closes a shutter that protects the Be window from contamination by possible evaporation of material during the high-temperature annealing of the samples. Similarly to configuration A (Fig. 1b), the UHV condition is ensured by the turbomolecular pump directly connected to the chamber.
experiments on thin and ultrathin films and nanostructures of sub-monolayer coverages are possible by using configuration B of the UHV chamber, Figs. 2(2.1.3. Configuration C
Configuration C is designed for vertical mounting of the chamber on a heavy-duty diffractometer. This configuration is dedicated to in situ grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction and GISAXS experiments. Fig. 3(a) shows a schematic view of the chamber in this configuration. Details of the manipulator and the sample storage compartment are shown in Fig. 3(b). A 300 l s−1 ion pump (Gamma Vacuum) mounted on the top of the chamber ensures a base pressure of 2 × 10−10 mbar. A titanium pump and a cryo-shroud can be used to further reduce the pressure to about 4 × 10−11 mbar. Two diametrical 100 CF flanges with 0.5 mm-thick diffusion-bounded Be foils serve as X-ray entrance and exit windows ensuring a free aperture of 108 mm (∼35°). A photograph of the UHV analysis chamber in this configuration mounted on the heavy-duty diffractometer at the MPI beamline of ANKA is shown in Fig. 3(c). The vacuum flight tube, beamstop and Pilatus 100K detector are also visible.
2.2. Sample growth
Europium silicide with Eu coverages of 1.0 nm (islands) and 100 nm (film) were grown by molecular beam Ω cm) 20 mm × 20 mm × 1.0 mm Si(001) vicinal substrate with a miscut of 4° towards [110]. Details of the growth procedure can be found elsewhere (Seiler et al., 2014).
in the growth chamber of the UHV-Analysis laboratory at ANKA, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Germany. The vacuum-outgassed metallic Eu, supplied by the Ames laboratory, was sublimated from an effusion cell equipped with a PBN crucible on an n-type (P-doped, 10Commercially available Eu2O3 in powder form mixed with 100 mg of BN and pressed into a pellet of diameter 13 mm was used as a reference in the experiments.
2.3. In situ at the INE beamline of ANKA
The high-brilliance synchrotron radiation sources and advanced X-ray optics and detectors increased the ; Glatzel et al., 2009; Vitova et al., 2010). While XANES is an effective method for determination of the average (Vitova et al., 2008), both XANES and the extended X-ray absorption near-edge structure (EXAFS) provide valuable information about the crystal structure.
of the X-ray absorption/emission spectroscopy experiments and allowed for rapid development of photon-demanding methods such as RIXS and HR-XANES (de Groot & Kotani, 2008Room-temperature Eu L2-edge (7617 eV) and L3-edge (6977 eV) XANES spectra of europium silicide film and nano-islands as well as of a reference Eu2O3 sample were recorded at the INE beamline for actinide research (Rothe et al., 2012) at ANKA. A double-crystal monochromator (DCM) equipped with a set of Si(111) crystals was employed for energy monochromatization of the incident X-ray beam. The EXAFS/XANES data of the europium silicide and the reference Eu2O3 sample were collected in fluorescence and transmission mode, respectively. A five-element Ge solid-state detector (Canberra LEGe type) was used for all measurements in fluorescence mode. At least six/two EXAFS/XANES spectra were collected in order to check the reproducibility of the spectral features and to improve the counting statistics. The DCM was calibrated by assigning 7112 eV to the first inflection point of a repeatedly measured Fe K-edge XANES spectrum of an α-Fe foil. The deposited nanostructures were illuminated with the X-ray beam at an incidence angle of approximately 30° using configuration A of the UHV analysis chamber (Fig. 1b).
2.4. In situ GISAXS experiments at the MPI beamline of ANKA
A wide variety of methods are presently available for the morphological characterization of nanoscale objects deposited on a substrate. Owing to its non-destructive nature, large investigated area (up to several millimeters) and high ; Levine et al., 1989). The outstanding of the X-rays provided by the third-generation synchrotron radiation sources has reduced the data acquisition times down to the milliseconds range allowing for investigation of the nucleation processes and nanostructures growth in real time (Renaud et al., 2003, 2004). Recent real-time studies on sputter-deposited films have shown that in situ synchrotron GISAXS combined with proper modeling can be used to understand the growth mechanism and various growth regimes of nanostructured films by extracting the morphology and the correlations of such nanostructures (Santoro et al., 2014; Schwartzkopf et al., 2013; Metwalli et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2013).
of the X-rays, GISAXS was established as a unique method for investigating morphology and structure of surfaces and interfaces (Renaud, 1998In GISAXS geometry, the incident X-ray beam with a wavevector ki impinges on the sample at a glancing angle αi, close to the critical angle αc, as illustrated in Fig. 4. The X-rays are scattered off from the sample surface with a wavevector kf, at an angle αf with respect to the sample surface and at an in-plane angle 2θf with respect to the transmitted beam. The resultant momentum transfer, Q = ki − kf, can be decomposed to x, y and z components as follows (Renaud, 1998):
where λ is the wavelength of the incident beam. The sizes of the nanostructures are obtained from analysis of the cuts made from the two-dimensional GISAXS patterns recorded in the qyqz plane.
The in situ GISAXS experiment was performed at the hard X-ray scattering beamline MPI (Stierle et al., 2004) of ANKA using photons with energy of 12 keV. The beam size of 100 µm (vertical) and 300 µm (horizontal) was achieved by sagittally bent mirrors and a slit system. The GISAXS images were recorded using a Pilatus 100K (Dectris) pixel detector (487 × 190 pixels, 172 µm per pixel) positioned at a distance of 1.1 m from the sample. A cylindrical beam stop was placed before the detector. A photodiode that could be moved in and out of the X-ray beam, between the Pilatus detector and the beamstop, was used for the alignment of the sample and the beam stop. Fig. 3(c) shows a photograph of the experimental setup at the MPI beamline.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. In situ experiments on EuSi2 film and nano-islands
In order to determine the stoichiometry and structure of the europium silicides, an in situ study at the Eu L2 and L3 absorption edges was performed employing configuration A of the UHV analysis chamber. The ATHENA and ARTEMIS program packages, part of the IFEFFIT software (Ravel & Newville, 2005), were applied for data reduction of the XANES/EXAFS spectra and modeling the spectra, respectively. The scattering paths used to fit the spectra were generated by the FEFF9.6 code based on the multiple scattering theory (Rehr & Albers, 2000). The was accurately calculated by using the self-consistent field (SCF) card implying self-consistent calculation of the atomic scattering potentials. Europium silicide of type EuSi2 with tetragonal (I41/amdS), unit-cell parameters a = 4.304 (3) Å, b = 4.304 (3) Å, c = 13.65 (1) Å, α = β = γ = 90° was used to generate the atomic coordinates for the initial structural model (ICSD 1454). The signal χ(k) covering the k range 2.4–8 Å−1 was Fourier transformed FT[χ(k)kw] to R space using a k weighting w = 1, 2 or 3 and a Hanning window with window sills dk = 2. The ARTEMIS option for simultaneous fits with all three k weightings (1, 2 and 3) was used. Fits were performed in R space over the R = 1.9–4.5 Å range. The fitting procedure resulted in a very good agreement between the experiment and the model, i.e. a fit quality of 0.01 reporting about 1% difference between the data and the fit.
The Eu L2-edge spectra of the investigated silicide film and the obtained best fits are plotted in Fig. 5. The results from the analysis are summarized in Table 1. The amplitude reduction factor S0 2 was varied during the fit, 0.8 ± 0.1, whereas the Si and Eu coordination numbers were fixed. This value of S0 2 is in a reasonable agreement with the calculated FEFF9.6 code value, S0 2 = 0.95. The average interatomic Eu—Si (3.15 ± 0.01 Å), Eu—Eu1 (4.00 ± 0.03 Å) and Eu—Eu2 (4.40 ± 0.05 Å) distances obtained from the analysis slightly deviate from the distances Eu—Si (3.18 Å), Eu—Eu1 (4.03 Å) and Eu—Eu2 (4.30 Å) reported by X-ray diffraction studies (Evers et al., 1977). Such difference is possible as is a local atomic structure probe technique and, for example, the Eu atoms close to the surface also contribute to the signal, whereas X-ray diffraction is sensitive only to the long-range atomic order of the material. The obtained results from the analysis of the data confirm the assumed EuSi2 stoichiometry and the tetragonal (I41/amdS) structure of the investigated europium silicide film.
|
An alternative to the
analysis is a qualitative analysis of the XANES part of the X-ray absorption fine-structure spectrum by comparison with the spectra of suitable reference compounds. XANES absorption resonances describe the multiple scattering of the photo-electron from the surrounding atoms. Therefore the spectrum fingerprints the short- and long-range atomic structure of the material.Fig. 6 displays the Eu L3-edge XANES spectra of the EuSi2 nano-islands, the EuSi2 film and the Eu2O3 reference. The energy position of the first inflection point of the spectra of the silicides is shifted with 5 eV to lower energy compared with the spectrum of Eu2O3. This energy shift is caused by more effective screening of the Eu 2p3/2 core-hole created in the X-ray absorption process and implies Eu 2+ in EuSi2 compared with 3+ in Eu2O3. The energy positions and shapes of the absorption resonances of the Eu L3-edge XANES spectra of the EuSi2 film and nano-islands are very similar, confirming that the nano-islands exhibit the EuSi2 stoichiometry and the tetragonal (I41/amdS) structure found for the 100 nm-thick film by the analysis. Owing to the low count rate, an spectrum for Eu coverage of 1.0 nm in configuration A of the UHV analysis chamber was not feasible within the time frame of the experiment.1
3.2. In situ GISAXS studies of EuSi2 nano-islands
In order to investigate the changes of the surface morphology upon high-temperature annealing of EuSi2 nano-islands, GISAXS images were recorded at an incidence angle αi of ∼0.3°, i.e. close to the critical angle of Si for 12 keV (0.14°) using configuration C of the UHV-Analysis chamber, Fig. 3(c). Fig. 7(a) shows an AFM image of the sample with Eu coverage of 1.0 nm, before the heat treatment, revealing the formation of conglomerates of three-dimensional islands with average dimensions 92 (5) nm × 98 (5) nm × 8(2) nm. The GISAXS images recorded with the wavevector being parallel and perpendicular to the steps of the vicinal Si(001) surface are depicted in Figs. 8(a) and 8(b), respectively. The acquisition time per frame was 20 s. The data are converted into one-dimensional scattering curves by making out-of-plane cuts in the GISAXS patterns close to the critical angle (qz ≃ 0.45 nm−1) indicated by black lines [Figs. 8(a) and 8(b)].
The average lateral dimensions of the individual nano-islands are obtained by employing a less model-dependent unified fitting procedure, incorporating simultaneous Guinier and Porod fits, to the one-dimensional scattering intensity I(q) (Beaucage, 1995; Sztucki et al., 2007; Shyjumon et al., 2008):
where G = Δρe2V2 is the Guinier pre-factor and B is a constant-scattering power-law specific pre-factor, df is the mass-fractal dimension and = is the lower limit of the power-law decay regime. However, for the systematic study of more sophisticated systems with different geometries and correlations, one can use model-based simulations of full parameters using packages IsGISAXS (Lazzari, 2002; Lazzari et al., 2007; Kaune et al., 2009) and FitGISAXS (Babonneau, 2010). Fig. 8(c) shows the out-of-plane cuts, parallel and perpendicular to the steps and the corresponding unified fits to estimate the average lateral dimensions of the individual EuSi2 nano-islands. The fit gives an average lateral size of 75.6 ± 0.89 nm parallel and a somewhat smaller value of 68.6 ± 0.40 nm perpendicular to the vicinal steps. These values are slightly smaller compared with the dimensions derived from the AFM measurements on the same sample (Fig. 7a). This difference is caused by the fact that the sizes derived from the AFM images are affected by the convolution of the nano-object size with the AFM tip that has a finite size as well.
In order to investigate the thermal stability of the nano-islands the sample was heated to 1270 K for approximately 30 min and GISAXS images were recorded again at room temperature after the annealing. Figs. 9(a) and 9(b) show a comparison of the GISAXS images taken parallel to the steps before and after the high-temperature annealing. The main features of the GISAXS pattern are significantly changed. Fig. 9(c) plots the out-of-plane cuts and the unified fitting for the lateral sizes of the islands after annealing, revealing that the islands have reduced in size to 34.5 ± 0.96 nm parallel and 35.9 ± 0.90 nm perpendicular to the steps, which is almost by a factor of two smaller as compared with the corresponding values before heating. The AFM image recorded on the same sample after the heating experiment (Fig. 7b) confirms that the surface morphology has drastically changed. Namely, the average island size is reduced to ∼50 ± 5 nm in both directions, which is in agreement with the results from the GISAXS data. This result suggests that no further islands growth has taken place upon the post growth annealing. These observations differ from the reported DySi2–x islands coarsening via upon annealing at temperatures up to 1350 K (Zeman et al., 2014).
Previous isothermal thermal-desorption spectroscopy (ITDS) experiments performed on europium silicide upon annealing up to 1000 K suggested that at such elevated temperature the silicides decompose and the Eu atoms desorb from the surface, while the Si atoms remain on the substrate (Krachino et al., 2004). This phenomenon is observed in our annealing experiment as well, confirming that the processes taking place are silicide decomposition followed by of Eu atoms from the Si(001) surface. Most likely the pronounced difference in the melting temperatures of Eu (1099 K) and Dy (1680 K) is the reason for the distinct behavior of europium and dysprosium silicides upon high-temperature post-growth annealing.
4. Conclusions and outlook
A portable UHV analysis chamber for X-ray scattering and spectroscopy studies of thin films and nanostructures at synchrotron radiation beamlines was constructed and brought into operation at the UHV-Analysis laboratory of ANKA, KIT. The available three configurations of this instrument offer the opportunity for in situ variable-temperature high-resolution XANES, RXES/RIXS, grazing-incidence diffraction and GISAXS studies on thin/ultrathin films and nanostructures deposited on a substrate. Some of the functionalities of the new instrument are demonstrated by investigation of the structure, stoichiometry and morphology changes upon high-temperature post-growth annealing of europium silicide film and nano-islands. The performed and XANES study confirms the formation of EuSi2 with tetragonal (I41/amdS) structure. The in situ GISAXS experiments reveal that upon annealing at 1270 K for 30 min a decomposition of the EuSi2 nano-islands takes place and the Eu atoms desorb from the surface leading to an island size reduction by a factor of two. Islands coarsening via reported for DySi2–x nano-islands at high temperatures was not observed in EuSi2 most likely due to the notably lower melting temperature of Eu compared with that of Dy.
The new instrument offers the opportunity for systematic in situ (under UHV conditions) studies of the thermal stability, morphology and structural changes upon annealing up to very high temperatures of various nanostructures deposited on a substrate. The low base pressure is a key element for surface-sensitive studies. Information about the atomic dynamics at the nanoscale can be extracted from temperature-dependent studies of materials with coverages below one monolayer. Furthermore, the available free ports allow for controllable admission of various gases. Therefore, in situ investigation of oxidation phenomena would be possible using configurations A and B of the instrument. The rather compact UHV analysis chamber can transfer up to five samples grown and pre-characterized in the home laboratory to the beamlines of various synchrotron radiation sources. That offers new possibilities for comprehensive in situ investigation of the interplay between structure, dynamics and magnetism of nanoscale materials supported on substrates by advanced X-ray scattering and spectroscopy methods.
Footnotes
‡Present address: Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
1In situ variable-temperature EXAFS/XANES experiments on samples with sub-monolayer coverage of material will be possible in configuration B of the UHV analysis chamber that was still in the construction phase at the time of the experiment.
Acknowledgements
This work is financially supported by the Initiative and Networking funds of the President of the Helmholtz Association and the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology via the Helmholtz University Young Investigators Groups `Interplay between structure and lattice dynamics in epitaxial rare-earth nanostructures' contract VH-NG-625, `Advanced synchrotron-based systematic investigations of actinide (An) and lanthanide (Ln) systems to understand and predict their reactivity' contract VH-NG-734, and the project `Advanced investigations of model Ln nanostructures'. We are grateful to B. Krause, A. Weißhardt and H.-H. Gräfe for the support in the UHV-Analysis laboratory. Financial support for the UHV-Analysis laboratory via the Excellence Initiative within the project KIT-Nanolab@ANKA is acknowledged.
References
Babonneau, D. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 929–936. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Balandin, A. A. (2011). Nat. Mater. 10, 569–581. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Beaucage, G. (1995). J. Appl. Cryst. 28, 717–728. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Couet, S., Diederich, T., Schlage, K. & Röhlsberger, R. (2008). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 093908. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Döhrmann, R., Botta, S., Buffet, A., Santoro, G., Schlage, K., Schwartzkopf, M., Bommel, S., Risch, J. F., Mannweiler, R., Brunner, S., Metwalli, E., Müller-Buschbaum, P. & Roth, S. V. (2013). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84, 043901. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Evers, J., Oehlinger, G. & Weiss, A. (1977). J. Solid State Chem. 20, 173–181. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Fanciulli, M. & Scarel, G. (2007). Rare Earth Oxide Thin Films, in Topics in Applied Physics, Springer Series Vol. 106. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
Glatzel, P., Sikora, M., Smolentsev, G. & Fernández-García, M. (2009). Catal. Today, 145, 294–299. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Groot, F. M. F. de & Kotani, A. (2008). Core Level Spectroscopy of Solids. New York: Taylor and Francis. Google Scholar
Kaune, G., Ruderer, M. A., Metwalli, E., Wang, W., Couet, S., Schlage, K., Röhlsberger, R., Roth, S. V. & Müller-Buschbaum, P. (2009). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 1, 353–360. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Krachino, T. V., Kuzmin, M. V., Loginov, M. V. & Mittsev, M. A. (2004). Phys. Solid State, 46, 563–568. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Krause, B., Darma, S., Kaufholz, M., Gräfe, H.-H., Ulrich, S., Mantilla, M., Weigel, R., Rembold, S. & Baumbach, T. (2012). J. Synchrotron Rad. 19, 216–222. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lazzari, R. (2002). J. Appl. Cryst. 35, 406–421. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lazzari, R., Leroy, F. & Renaud, G. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 76, 125411. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Levine, J. R., Cohen, J. B., Chung, Y. W. & Georgopoulos, P. (1989). J. Appl. Cryst. 22, 528–532. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Metwalli, E., Körstgens, V., Schlage, K., Meier, R., Kaune, G., Buffet, A., Couet, S., Roth, S. V., Röhlsberger, R. & Müller-Buschbaum, P. (2013). Langmuir, 29, 6331–6340. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ravel, B. & Newville, M. (2005). J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 537–541. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rehr, J. J. & Albers, R. C. (2000). Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 621–654. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Renaud, G. (1998). Surf. Sci. Rep. 32, 1–90. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Renaud, G., Ducruet, M., Ulrich, O. & Lazzari, R. (2004). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, 222, 667–680. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Renaud, G., Lazzari, R., Revenant, C., Barbier, A., Noblet, M., Ulrich, O., Leroy, F., Jupille, J., Borensztein, Y., Henry, C. R., Deville, J. P., Scheurer, F., Mane-Mane, J. & Fruchart, O. (2003). Science, 300, 1416–1419. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Rothe, J., Butorin, S., Dardenne, K., Denecke, M. A., Kienzler, B., Löble, M., Metz, V., Seibert, A., Steppert, M., Vitova, T., Walther, C. & Geckeis, H. (2012). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 43105. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Santoro, G., Yu, S., Schwartzkopf, M., Zhang, P., Vayalil, S. K., Risch, J. F. H., Rübhausen, M. A., Hernández, M., Domingo, C. & Roth, S. V. (2014). Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 243107. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Schwartzkopf, M., Buffet, A., Körstgens, V., Metwalli, E., Schlage, K., Benecke, G., Perlich, J., Rawolle, M., Rothkirch, A., Heidmann, B., Herzog, G., Müller-Buschbaum, P., Röhlsberger, R., Gehrke, R., Stribeck, N. & Roth, S. V. (2013). Nanoscale, 5, 5053–5062. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Seiler, A., Ibrahimkutty, S., Bauder, O., Prüßmann, T., Vitova, T., Pradip, R., Baumbach, T., Fiederle, M. & Stankov, S. (2014). J. Cryst. Growth. 407, 74–77. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Shyjumon, I., Rappolt, M., Sartori, B., Amenitsch, H. & Laggner, P. (2008). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 043905. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Slobodskyy, T., Schroth, P., Grigoriev, D., Minkevich, A. A., Hu, D. Z., Schaadt, D. M. & Baumbach, T. (2012). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 105112. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Snider, G. S. & Williams, R. S. (2007). Nanotechnology, 18, 035204. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Stankov, S., Rüffer, R., Sladecek, M., Rennhofer, M., Sepiol, B., Vogl, G., Spiridis, N., Slezak, T. & Korecki, J. (2008). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 045108. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Stierle, A., Steinhäuser, A., Rühm, A., Renner, F. U., Weigel, R., Kasper, N. & Dosch, H. (2004). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 5302. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Sztucki, M., Narayanan, T. & Beaucage, G. (2007). J. Appl. Phys. 101, 114304. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Vitova, T., Hormes, J., Peithmann, K. & Woike, T. (2008). Phys. Rev. B, 77, 144103. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Vitova, T., Kvashnina, O., Nocton, G., Sukharina, G., Denecke, M. A., Butorin, S. M., Mazzanti, M., Caciuffo, R., Soldatov, A., Behrends, T. & Geckeis, H. (2010). Phys. Rev. B, 82, 235118. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Yu, S., Santoro, G., Sarkar, K., Dicke, B., Wessels, P., Bommel, S., Döhrmann, R., Perlich, J., Kuhlmann, M., Metwalli, E., Risch, J. F. H., Schwartzkopf, M., Drescher, M., Müller-Buschbaum, P. & Roth, S. V. (2013). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 3170–3175. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zeman, M. C., Nemanich, R. J. & Sunda-Meya, A. (2014). J. Mater. Sci. 49, 1812–1823. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.