research papers
A zone-plate-based two-color spectrometer for indirect X-ray absorption spectroscopy
aLaboratory for Micro- and Nanotechnology, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland, bInstitute of Materials Physics, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany, cPhoton Science, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, 22607 Hamburg, Germany, dMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany, and eInstitute of X-ray Physics, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: florian.doering@psi.ch
0.6Sr0.4MnO3 by analysis of three emission lines simultaneously at the detector, namely the O 2p–1s, Mn 3s–2p and Mn 3d–2p transitions. This scheme allows the simultaneous measurement of an integrated total and the partial fluorescence yields (PFY) of the Mn 3s–2p and Mn 3d–2p transitions when scanning the Mn L-edge. In addition to this, the reduction in O fluorescence provides another measure for absorption often referred to as the inverse partial (IPFY). Among these different methods to measure XA, the Mn 3s PFY and IPFY deviate the least from the true XA spectra due to the negligible influence of selection rules on the decay channel. Other advantages of this new scheme are the potential to strongly increase the efficiency and throughput compared with similar measurements using conventional gratings and to increase the signal-to-noise of the XA spectra as compared with a photodiode. The ability to record undistorted bulk XA spectra at high is crucial for future in situ spectroscopy experiments on complex materials.
is a powerful element-specific technique that allows the study of structural and chemical properties of matter. Often an indirect method is used to access the X-ray absorption (XA). This work demonstrates a new implementation that is based on off-axis transmission Fresnel zone plates to obtain the XA spectrum of La1. Introduction
). Depending on the proximity of the incident photon energy to the of the investigated material, is subdivided into near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS). The former provides element-specific information about the electronic structure of a material whereas the latter provides insights on the local arrangement of the atoms (Stöhr, 1996; deGroot & Kotani, 2008; Wende, 2004; deGroot, 1994).
is a widely used spectroscopic technique that has gained increasing interest in the last decades because of its capability to obtain electronic as well as spatial information of many different sample classes. In a core-level electron is excited to an unoccupied state by the absorption of an X-ray photon (Yano & Yachandra, 2009Typically, et al., 1977; Gudat & Kunz, 1972). When comparing EY with FY measurements, it is apparent that EY is very surface sensitive because of the low escape depth of electrons in matter. FY can be more bulk sensitive depending on the photon energy, but can also be applied with high surface sensitivity by using grazing-incidence geometry. Regarding FY measurements, one can distinguish between collecting all the emitted fluorescence integrated over all energies, which is called total (TFY), or selecting certain emission energy ranges by measuring the partial (PFY). For the latter, an energy-sensitive detection scheme must be used. In the case of measuring the Mn L-edge of La0.6Sr0.4MnO3 (LSMO), which will be of interest here, conventional PFY is dominated by Mn 3d to 2p transitions, whereas high-resolution PFY also separates the 3s to 2p transitions located between the oxygen 2p to 1s emission and the manganese 3d to 2p emission. In general though, PFY at the Mn L-edge requires enhanced energy resolution because of the relatively small energy separation between the different fluorescence channels. Besides TFY and PFY, the measurement of inverse partial (IPFY) has gained some attention (Achkar et al., 2011). In this method, one emission energy is chosen for a detailed spectral analysis, where the fluorescence is non-resonant with respect to the X-ray absorption and stems ideally from another element in the compound. Assuming a constant in this channel across the energy range of interest, the reduction of fluorescence in this channel is a direct measure for the absorption at the element of interest. Therefore, this channel also suffers much less from self-absorption effects, making it possible to gain an undistorted bulk X-ray absorption spectrum.
is measured either directly in transmission or via electron or channels. Although transmission measurements provide a direct method of obtaining X-ray absorption spectra, this option is often not feasible due to the low transmittance for bulk samples, especially in the soft X-ray regime. As an alternative, measurements of the electron yield (EY) and (FY) offer an alternative of measuring data indirectly, based on the assumed proportionality of the absorption and the emission of electrons or fluorescence photons (JaklevicIn this publication, we introduce a new analyzer scheme for et al., 2017; Döring et al., 2018; Marschall, Yin et al., 2017). The complete setup consists of two off-axis transmission Fresnel zone plates that collect the emitted fluorescence from the sample and disperse it across a region of the CCD detector (Fig. 1).
that uses transmission off-axis Fresnel zone plates (TZPs). These optics are designed in a way that combines energy dispersion in one direction with spatial resolution in the perpendicular direction. The optical setup has already been used for the analysis of resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) of solid as well as of liquid samples (Marschall, McNallyThis two-color scheme allows for focusing on two emission energies at the same time so that, under excitation at the Mn L-edge, two PFYs (Mn 3d to 2p transition and Mn 3s to 2p transition) and the IPFY (O 2p to 1s transition, resulting from non-resonant O K-edge emission) can be detected using both zone plates at the same time. By integrating over the dispersive direction on the detector, even a large part of the TFY can be obtained simultaneously. The possibility to measure in principle both PFYs, IPFY and TFY, with two different zone plates at the same time makes this scheme very efficient and allows high-throughput experiments. In addition, the ability to focus on two different emitted energies can be very interesting for measurements of complex materials or diluted samples, especially for in situ measurements where ambient conditions are varied.
2. Materials and methods
The new ). They were fabricated by spin-coating a hydrogen silsesquioxane film on a 250 nm-thick Si3N4 membrane and writing the zone plate structure by high-resolution electron beam lithography (Vistec EBPG 5000Plus). Each off-axis zone plate had a size of 3 mm × 3 mm, an outermost zone width of 35 nm which corresponds to 14285 lines mm−1, and a height of around 400 nm.
analyzer scheme presented here depends strongly on the optical components, namely the off-axis zone plates (see Fig. 2For the two-color experiments, two different zone plates were necessary for the corresponding energies of the absorption edges of the investigated materials. Their parameters can be found in Table 1.
|
The zone plates were placed between sample and detector with the energy-dispersive direction horizontal. In contrast to conventional reflecting variable-line-spacing grating analyzers, zone plates can be mounted very close to the optical axis such that only negligible offset for the beam path has to be considered in the setup. Moreover, zone plates have the advantage of being insensitive to tilt, which allowed us to align the analyzer zone plates within just a few minutes.
Depending on the photon energy and the zone plate period, the zone plates were mounted with a well defined inclination towards the optical axis. This special geometry was chosen in order to benefit from volume effects inside the zone structures and thereby enhancing the efficiency of the analyzer optics (Hambach et al., 2001). In order to achieve maximum efficiency, we exploited these volume effects and optimized the fabrication process concerning structure aspect ratio, which we pushed towards the current possible limits in nanofabrication (Rösner et al., 2018). For an estimation of the optimized efficiency, numerical calculations using rigorous coupled wave analysis were performed. In the case of the O zone plate, which was used at around 525 eV, we estimated an efficiency of up to 15%, whereas for the Mn zone plate at 637 eV we calculated an efficiency of up to 14% (Maser & Schmahl, 1992).
The zone plates, with optimized tilt angles, were mounted on a setup of Smaract nanopositioners, which was implemented in a small vacuum chamber with 153 mm diameter. This modular optics chamber can be easily connected to existing sample chambers. Fig. 3 shows the inner components of the modular optics chamber, consisting of eight nanopositioners, six off-axis zone plates of which two are used in parallel and an order sorting aperture (OSA). This optics chamber was attached to the ChemRIXS endstation (Yin et al., 2017), which was installed at the P04 beamline at PETRA III in Hamburg, Germany (Viefhaus et al., 2013). The ChemRIXS endstation provides a motorized sample stage and allows investigations of liquid jets and for conducting in situ experiments of solids in a water vapor atmosphere. The spectrometer arm of this setup is equipped with an ANDOR iKon-M 934 CCD with 1024 pixels × 1024 pixels with a size of 13 µm × 13 µm. The distance between the CCD and sample was 1.33 m and, due to the flexibility of the zone plate chamber, the whole setup could be realized with a straight vacuum pipe without any offsets or bellows. Additionally, two SXUV100 photodiodes (Opto Diode Corp) were mounted to simultaneously record the conventional total (PD-TFY). The emission energy scale of both zone plates was calibrated by setting the center of gravity of each transition to the tabulated energy of that emission line (i.e. O 2p–1s, Mn 3d–2p, etc.) (Thompson et al., 2009). The incident energy scale was calibrated by correcting for the shift between the spectrum extracted from the zone plate data (i.e. the ROIs giving the TFY, PFY and IPFY) and that of the simultaneously recorded PD-TFY.
Highly crystalline LSMO thin films were chosen to establish the new detection scheme as they are free of pin holes, uniform in structure and composition, and extremely flat. Furthermore, the material is of high interest for fundamental studies of energy storage processes at ambient temperature (Risch et al., 2014; Scholz et al., 2016). The LSMO films were prepared by ion-beam sputtering as reported previously (Scholz et al., 2017). Nb-doped SrTiO3 (STNO) 0.5 wt% (CrysTec GmbH) was used as the substrate. The films were deposited at 750°C in an oxygen atmosphere of 1.7 × 10−4 mbar. To reduce the amount of preparation-induced defects, the prepared films were kept under preparation conditions for 30 min and slowly cooled to room temperature, including a resting point of 30 min at 500°C. These parameters were selected to yield films of 80 nm thickness as reported previously (Scholz et al., 2016).
Off-axis XRD, as shown in Fig. 4(a), demonstrated that the LSMO grew epitaxially on the STNO substrate, since only the reflections of the {001} family were detected. The LSMO films have the expected double peaks where one matches that of the STNO substrate [aSTNO = 3.91 Å (Mitchell et al., 2000)] and the other peak at a higher angle was attributed to the slightly shorter pseudo-cubic lattice parameter of LSMO [aLSMO = 3.88 Å (Zemni et al., 2004)]. Moreover, the films produced were extremely flat as shown by atomic force microscopy (AFM) in Fig. 4(b). The film had a decorated terraced surface that reflects the terrace structure of the STNO substrate. The terraces were about 250 nm wide and the step height is comparable with the pseudo-cubic lattice parameter of LSMO. Overall, the physical properties of the produced films equal those in our previous studies where additional characterization and a discussion can be found elsewhere (Scholz et al., 2016, 2017).
3. Results and discussion
We excited an epitaxial LSMO thin film with synchrotron radiation at different soft X-ray energies in the ranges 520–580 eV and 630–665 eV spanning across the absorption edges of O-K and Mn-L3,2, respectively. For maximal the vertical monochromator exit slit was fully opened, which resulted not only in a high number of incident photons but also in a variation of the incident energy along the vertical axis of about 0.5% spread (up to 3.8 eV) over a line of ca. 800 µm. An essential advantage of zone plate analyzers is their imaging capabilities that allow for mapping the variable incident energy from the sample to the one axis of the detector and combining this information with the fluorescence information which is perpendicular to it (Marschall, Yin et al., 2017; Strocov, 2010). This enabled us to adjust the beamline to one energy value and probe the around this energy by mapping the range of incident energies together with the emitted energies at the same time. Such an acquired signal for one range of incident energies is shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 5 shows a representative detector image, which results from applying the two-color analyzer setup after setting the central beamline energy to 651.5 eV. For each of the imaged transitions, an appropriate coordinate system combining the emitted energy on the x axis with the incident photon energy on the y axis was overlaid. Opening up the vertical monochromator exit slit increased the significantly and allowed for measuring incident energies between ∼650 eV and ∼653 eV in a single image. The lack of monochromated excitation is actually advantageous for our new approach as, due to the imaging capabilities of the zone plates, the experimental energy resolution in the direction of the incident energy dispersion is essentially limited by the pixel size, to 14 meV, which is much smaller than the intrinsic lifetime broadening of the core hole (0.4 eV at the Mn L3-edge and 1.5 eV at the Mn L2-edge; Fuggle & Inglesfield, 1992). However, the analysis procedure yielding at this very high resolution is complex and will be discussed elsewhere. Instead, the additional data is used here to reduce the statistical noise of the as discussed below. The possibility to decide in the analysis whether energy resolution of the X-ray absorption spectra or signal-to-noise is of greater importance for that very experiment is one of the unique features of the zone plate analyzer scheme. Together with the high efficiency and the – for zone plate values – large collected solid angle, measurements had an integrated of 18.27 × 105 counts s−1 under the full Mn-Lα1,2 and Lβ emission lines centered at 642.1 eV (in the range of 3.2 eV incident energy, corresponding to the energy range collected in a single image with the 3d-TZP) as compared with 0.91 × 105 counts s−1 using a conventional grating and monochromated radiation (Figs. S3 and S4). The at the detector was thus up to a factor of 17 higher using our new approach (Table S1).
Two independent maps of incident and emitted energy as imaged by two different zone plates can be collected at the detector at the same time [see Fig. 5(a)]. The image in Fig. 5(b) was focused on the Mn 3d–2p transition, which sharply imaged the corresponding emission line. To the right, the defocused Mn 3s–2p transition is also visible before the imaging area ends. In Fig. 5(c), the zone plate was focused on the O 2p–1s transition. Additionally, the Mn 3s–2p as well as the Mn 3d–2p transitions were imaged but defocused. Comparing Figs. 5(b) and 5(c), it can clearly be seen that the maximum of the defocused image is lower and it is much wider on the emission axis. Finally, Fig. 5 illustrates that the images of the emission lines must be separated vertically and horizontally to avoid interference between the signals originating from different zone plates, particularly of the defocused parts.
X-ray absorption spectra were obtained by summing up the counts within a region of interest (ROI) in the obtained camera images measured at beamline energies between 520 eV and 580 eV for the O K-edge and 630 eV to 665 eV for the Mn L3,2-edge, both in increments of 0.5 eV steps. The ROIs were chosen for a width of 0.5 eV around the corresponding incident energy and the FWHM along the emitted energy. The sum in the ROI is then plotted against the beamline energy producing the spectra in Fig. 6, where they are compared with the output of a photodiode. The signal of the photodiode was also used to align the FY spectra along the incident energy by matching the maxima of the L2-edges. Note that the color of the ROIs in Fig. 5 and the color of the spectra in Fig. 6(b) match, yet Fig. 5 represents only one point in the indirect data excited at the Mn L-edge. In the lower energy range, only the core holes in oxygen can be excited, over which the O K-edge was scanned [Fig. 6(a)]. This has two consequences, namely that the image of the Mn 3d zone plate was not analyzed for this edge and that the spectra obtained by the TFY and PFY are nearly identical to that of the photodiode. On closer inspection, the pre-peak at ∼530 eV was reduced in the spectra of the photodiode, which might be avoidable by an optimized placement of the diode in the measurement chamber. The spectra at the Mn L3,2-edge differ significantly [Fig. 6(b)]. For these spectra, we used the images of both zone plates, where the Mn 3d-PFY, the Mn 3s-PFY and the zone plate TFY was obtained on the Mn 3d zone plate while the IPFY was obtained from the O 2p zone plate. The Mn 3s-PFY can also be obtained using the O 2p zone plate, which gives a qualitatively similar spectrum (Fig. S2). Here, we used the spectrum from the Mn 3d zone plate as it is more in focus. In the extracted spectra, the signal of the Mn L3-edge was drastically reduced as compared with the Mn L2-edge for the TFY, either accessed through the zone plates (TFY-TZP), the photodiode (TFY-PD) or the Mn 3d-PFY due to self-absorption effects (Eisebitt et al., 1993). Only the Mn 3s-PFY and IPFY spectra showed a qualitatively undistorted spectrum where the Mn L3-edge is larger than the Mn L2-edge. A comprehensive discussion and quantification of the distortions are beyond the scope of this manuscript. Nonetheless, we can conclude that our new detection scheme can successfully measure undistorted Mn-L3,2 in contrast to the conventional photodiode.
Another way of comparing the zone plate analyser with the photodiode is concerning their respective signal-to-noise ratio, as shown in Table 2. For the calculation of these values, the signal was globally set to the edge jump height, which was normalized to 1. The edge jump (before normalization) is proportional to the total absorption of the material, which gives us the signal. The noise values were calculated as the root-mean-square in a relevant area below the onset of the resonant absorption, namely from 521.5 eV to 524.5 eV for the O K-edge and from 632.5 eV to 636.0 eV for the Mn L-edge. It is apparent that the signal-to-noise ratio for the zone plate analyzers are about twice that of the classical photodiode when the TFY is compared and even higher for most of the partial yields.
|
Finally, we would like to point out that this scheme could, in future, also be used for investigations on later transition metals regarding, for instance, the M 3s–2p emissions (e.g. Fe 3s–2p at 615.2 eV) or the M 3d–2p transitions (e.g. Fe 3d–2p at 705.0 eV). With the possibility to store more than two zone plates in the optics chamber, these transitions could be captured by changing to a specially made zone plate. Thus, we recommend the two-color scheme with one zone plate focused on oxygen (O 2p–1s 524.5 eV) for IPFY and a second zone plate focused on the higher transition for PFY.
4. Conclusions
In this work, we have shown the first implementation of off-axis transmission Fresnel zone plates for d-PFY, 3s-PFY, the IPFY and an integrated resembling the TFY at the same time and with high efficiency. Thus, it allows undistorted data of complex materials with high throughput to be obtained.
measurements in a two-color scheme. This scheme offers the advantages of measuring the 3Supporting information
Supporting figures and tables. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577519003898/ve5095sup1.pdf
Acknowledgements
Parts of this research were carried out at P04, PETRA III at DESY, a member of the Helmholtz Association. We thank the beamline scientists at P04 for their support.
Funding information
The following funding is acknowledged: This work received funding from the EU-H2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement (grant Nos. 701647, 654360) NFFA-Europe and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB755 (Projects B03, B10) and SFB 1073 (Projects C02, C05) and the Helmholtz Association (HGF) (grant No. VH-NG-1105). The Max Planck Society (MPG, up to 2017) and the HGF are thanked for financial support. (grant Nos. 701647, 654360, VH-NG-1105).
References
Achkar, A. J., Regier, T. Z., Wadati, H., Kim, Y., Zhang, H. & Hawthorn, D. G. (2011). Phys. Rev. B, 83, 081106. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Bearden, J. A. (1967). Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 78–124. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
deGroot, F. M. F. (1994). J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 67, 529–622. CAS Google Scholar
deGroot, F. M. F. & Kotani, A. (2008). Core Level Spectroscopy of Solids. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Google Scholar
Döring, F., Marschall, F., Yin, Z., Rosner, B., Beye, M., Miedema, P., Kubicek, K., Glaser, L., Raiser, D., Soltau, J., Guzenko, V. A., Viefhaus, J., Buck, J., Risch, M., Techert, S. & David, C. (2018). Microsc. Microanal. 24(Suppl.2), 182–183. Google Scholar
Eisebitt, S., Böske, T., Rubensson J. -E. & Eberhardt W. (1993). Phys. Rev. B, 47, 14103. Google Scholar
Fuggle, J. C. & Inglesfield, J. E. (1992). Editors. Unoccupied Electronic States. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
Gudat, W. & Kunz, C. (1972). Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 169–172. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Hambach, D., Schneider, G. & Gullikson, E. M. (2001). Opt. Lett. 26, 1200–1202. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Jaklevic, J., Kirby, J. A., Klein, M. P., Robertson, A. S., Brown, G. S. & Eisenberger, P. (1977). Solid State Commun. 23, 679–682. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Krause, M. O. & Oliver, J. H. (1979). J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 8, 329–338. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Marschall, F., McNally, D., Guzenko, V. A., Rösner, B., Dantz, M., Lu, X., Nue, L., Strocov, V., Schmitt, T. & David, C. (2017). Opt. Express, 25, 15624. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Marschall, F., Yin, Z., Rehanek, J., Beye, M., Döring, F., Kubiček, K., Raiser, D., Veedu, S. T., Buck, J., Rothkirch, A., Rösner, B., Guzenko, V. A., Viefhaus, J., David, C. & Techert, S. (2017). Sci. Rep. 7, 8849. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Maser, J. & Schmahl, G. (1992). Opt. Commun. 89, 355–362. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. H., Chakhmouradian, A. R. & Woodward, P. M. (2000). Phys. Chem. Miner. 27, 583–589. Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
Risch, M., Stoerzinger, K. A., Maruyama, S., Hong, W. T., Takeuchi, I. & Shao-Horn, Y. (2014). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 5229–5232. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rösner, B., Koch, F., Döring, F., Bosgra, J., Guzenko, V. A., Kirk, E., Meyer, M., Ornelas, J. L., Fink, R. H., Stanescu, S., Swaraj, S., Belkhou, R., Watts, B., Raabe, J. & David, C. (2018). Microelectron. Eng. 191, 91–96. Google Scholar
Scholz, J., Risch, M., Stoerzinger, K. A., Wartner, G., Shao-Horn, Y. & Jooss, C. (2016). J. Phys. Chem. C, 120, 27746–27756. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Scholz, J., Risch, M., Wartner, G., Luderer, C., Roddatis, V. & Jooss, C. (2017). Catalysts, 7, 139. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Stöhr, J. (1996). NEXAFS Spectroscopy. New York: Springer. Google Scholar
Strocov, V. N. (2010). J. Synchrotron Rad. 17, 103–106. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Thompson, A., Lindau, I., Attwood, D., Liu, Y., Gullikson, E., Robinson, A., Kim, K.-J., Scofield, J., Kirz, J., Underwood J., Kortright, J., Williams G. & Winick, H. (2009). X-ray Data Booklet. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, CA, USA. Google Scholar
Viefhaus, J., Scholz, F., Deinert, S., Glaser, L., Ilchen, M., Seltmann, J., Walter, P. & Siewert, F. (2013). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 710, 151–154. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wende, H. (2004). Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 2105–2181. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yano, J. & Yachandra, V. K. (2009). Photosynth. Res. 102, 241–254. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Yin, Z., Peters, H.-B., Hahn, U., Gonschior, J., Mierwaldt, D., Rajkovic, I., Viefhaus, J., Jooss, C. & Techert, S. (2017). J. Synchrotron Rad. 24, 302–306. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Zemni, S., Dhahri, J., Cherif, K., Dhahri, J., Oummezzine, M., Ghedira, M. & Vincent, H. (2004). J. Solid State Chem. 177, 2387–2393. Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.