research papers
Femtosecond soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy of warm dense matter at the PAL-XFEL
aDepartment of Physics and Photon Science, GIST, Gwangju 61005, Republic of Korea, bCenter for Relativistic Laser Science, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Gwangju 61005, Republic of Korea, and cPohang Accelerator Laboratory, Pohang, Gyeongbuk 37673, Republic of Korea
*Correspondence e-mail: bicho@gist.ac.kr
Free-electron laser pulse-based X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements on warm dense copper are presented. The incident X-ray pulse energies were measured with a detector assembly consisting of a photocathode membrane and microchannel plates, and the transmitted energies were measured simultaneously with a photodiode detector. The precision of the absorption measurements was evaluated. For a warm dense copper foil irradiated by an intense femtosecond laser pulse, the enhanced X-ray absorption below the L3-edge, followed by the rapid evolution of highly excited Fermi liquid within a picosecond, were successfully measured. This result demonstrates a unique capability to study femtosecond non-equilibrium electron–hole dynamics in extreme states of matter.
1. Introduction
et al., 2009; Volkov et al., 2019) and their structures (Bressler & Chergui, 2004). Its experimental simplicity makes this technique attractive for various fields of research including material science, biology and chemistry.
is a simple but powerful spectroscopic technique. It can provide information on local geometry, symmetries and spin configurations of element-specific electronic structures. In combination with optical lasers, it is apparent that time-resolved is a powerful tool for tracking the dynamics of electronic systems (BresslerWarm dense matter (WDM) is an emerging field of research between plasma and condensed matter physics. The term refers to a state of matter. It is loosely defined by a temperature of 1–10 eV and a density of 1–100 g cc−1 (Lee et al., 2002). Matter with both the temperature of plasma and the density of condensed matter is widespread in the universe and laboratories, for example the interior of giant planets and stars, the atmosphere of white dwarfs, laser ablation and inertial confinement fusion research (Ichimaru, 1982; Gattass & Mazur, 2008; Glenzer et al., 2010; Booth et al., 2015). The investigation of WDM can provide an understanding of non-equilibrium phase transitions and energy relaxation processes under extreme conditions. Owing to its high temperature and high density, however, there is a complicated interplay of physical processes. This creates significant challenges for both experimental and theoretical study.
There has been keen interest to apply a powerful time-resolved et al. performed time-resolved X-ray absorption near-edge structure (TR-XANES) measurements near the K-edge of warm dense aluminium heated by an intense laser pulse, and demonstrated the structural disordering from solid to gas (Dorchies et al., 2011; Leguay et al., 2013). Cho et al. used the synchrotron-based TR-XANES technique for the isochorically heated copper L-edge and showed that the evolution of Fermi distribution and electron–phonon coupling in WDM can be determined. (Cho et al., 2011, 2016). The temporal resolutions of these measurements were of the order of picoseconds which was not fast enough to capture non-equilibrium electron–hole dynamics. In the femtosecond regime, a few measurements using laser-based short-wavelength sources have been reported. Absorption spectroscopy using high-order harmonic extreme ultraviolet and soft X-ray sources demonstrated that chemical reactions in molecules and non-equilibrium electron distributions in highly excited systems can be probed with femtosecond resolutions (Pertot et al., 2017; Lee et al., 2018). The betatron radiation showed possibility as a broadband femtosecond source that can be extended to the hard X-ray regime for TR-XAS measurement (Mahieu et al., 2018; Kozlova et al., 2020). These laser-based sources have advantages in compactness, easy accessibility and intrinsic little-to-no timing jitter between pump and probe pulses. However, for application to the broad range of elements and parameters, further developments including improved and tunability in energy and wavelength are still required.
technique for WDM research. In the picosecond regime, using laser plasma X-ray sources, DorchiesX-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs) produce tunable, high-flux, femtosecond X-ray pulses (Emma et al., 2010; Ishikawa et al., 2012; Kang et al., 2017). This would be ideal for ultrafast measurements in WDM research. The stochastic self-amplified (SASE) process and the inherently large shot-to-shot fluctuation in intensity distribution of the XFEL pulse make the application of TR-XAS at XFELs challenging (Bernstein et al., 2009; Gaudin et al., 2014). This problem is particularly significant for WDM applications. Owing to the high temperature and pressure of WDM, laser irradiated samples typically undergo irreversible destructive processes, and the integration of numerous X-ray pulses for quality data is hindered by slow sample refreshment. By adopting improved diagnostics and normalization techniques for SASE pulses, an XFEL transmission measurement with an accuracy of 1% or better was obtainable (Lemke et al., 2013; Higley et al., 2016).
In the present article, we report on the femtosecond L3-edge and the rapid evolution of highly excited Fermi liquid within a few picoseconds were successfully measured. This capability could give rise to opportunities for direct investigation of the femtosecond non-equilibrium electron–hole dynamics in extreme conditions of matter.
measurement of copper irradiated by an intense laser pulse at the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory X-ray Free-Electron Laser (PAL-XFEL). The apparatus is set up at the soft X-ray scattering and spectroscopy (SSS) experimental station. The incident X-ray pulse energy measurement system consists of the photocathode membrane and microchannel plates (MCPs). Its implementation allows for proper normalization of the incident XFEL pulse energy, and for transmission through the sample to be determined with a single pulse. The precision of the X-ray absorption measurement was evaluated. For the warm dense copper sample irradiated by an intense femtosecond laser pulse, the strongly enhanced X-ray absorption below the Cu2. Experimental setup
Fig. 1 shows the schematic diagram of the TR-XAS measurement setup at the SSS experimental station of the PAL-XFEL. The soft X-ray undulator provides X-ray pulses with photon energies ranging from 250 eV to 1200 eV. Each pulse typically delivers 200 µJ of energy in less than 50 fs full width at half-maximum (FWHM) with a bandwidth of 0.44%. The maximum repetition rate is 60 Hz. A monochromator system equips two varied-line-spacing gratings (100 and 200 lines mm−1) to cover the energy range 250–1200 eV. A resolution of ΔE/E = 1/11000 is achieved at the exit slit. For the pump–probe measurement a Ti:sapphire laser is coupled upstream of the sample plane in the near-collinear geometry of ∼1°. A laser pulse can deliver up to 4 mJ of energy in 40 fs FWHM at 800 nm wavelength. The temporal jitter between the optical and X-ray pulses is less than 270 fs FWHM. More details on the general beamline equipment are described in the literature (Kang et al., 2017; Park et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2019).
The key component is the incident X-ray pulse energy measurement system (hereafter referred to as the I0 monitor). The detector assembly (Hamamatsu F2223-21SH) consists of two MCPs and a single metal anode with a central hole. TheX-ray beam passes through the hole causing a secondary electron from the membrane (5 nm Pt on 200 nm Si3N4) located 20 mm downstream from the MCPs. A portion of electrons can be detected by the active area within a 27 mm diameter of the MCP. This assembly was also successfully commissioned at the LCLS free-electron laser (Higley et al., 2016). A set of filters (10 µm Al, 20 µm Al and 400 nm Au on a 200 nm Si3N4 membrane) can be inserted downstream of the detector. Depending on the photon energy, these filters provide up to 105 attenuations. This prevents possible damage to the sample.
Transmitted X-ray pulses are detected with either an Si PIN photodiode (Hamamastu S3590-09) or a back-illuminated charge-coupled device (CCD) (Andor iKon-L SO). The photodiode has a large active area (10 mm × 10 mm) and high-speed response (40 MHz). The CCD is a 16-bit detector with a square sensor of 27 mm × 27 mm active area and 2048 × 2048 pixels.
is as high as 95% at around 1000 eV. In front of the detectors, another set of metal foils (150 nm Al, 300 nm Al, 150 nm Ti and 300 nm Ti) can be inserted to block optical lights and, if needed, to provide additional attenuation of the X-rays.Firstly, an XFEL pulse energy of 300 pulses passing through the exit slit of the monochromator was measured with only a photodiode detector. The histograms for energy distribution are shown in Fig. 2. Photodiode signals were normalized using the mean. With a bandwidth of 0.2 eV and an energy of 932 eV, a standard deviation of 52% was measured. Increasing the bandwidth to 0.5 eV reduced the standard deviation to 45%. This large fluctuation can be attributed to the noisy nature of the energy distribution in the SASE spectra. Secondly, the energy of the incident pulse is normalized with utilization of the I0 monitor. Fig. 2(b) displays the positive correlation between the I0 monitor and photodiode signals (sample out). Filter sets and voltage settings for the MCPs and photodiode were tuned for linearity between the two detectors. For 300 individual pulses, a linear of 99.8% was obtained. When the photodiode signals were divided by the MCP signals, energy distribution histograms showed that the standard deviations were reduced to 4.6% and 3.7% for bandwidths of 0.2 eV and 0.5 eV, respectively.
For the linear correlation data in Fig. 2(b), the slope of the linear fit (y = ax) is the X-ray transmission, and the relative error is a standard deviation of the fitted slope which indicates the sensitivity of this measurement. Fig. 3 shows this error as a function of the number of shots, N, used for the fitting. As N increases, the transmission error reduces by ∼N−1/2, dropping below 1% with ten shots.
3. X-ray absorption spectra of warm dense copper
Copper L3-edge XANES were measured using the setup described. A 40 nm free-standing copper foil (fabricated by Luxel Corporation) was used as the sample. To prevent oxidation, a 100 nm coating of SiO2 was applied to each side of the copper foil. The addition of fine Ni mesh (70 lines per inch) prevented the distortion and ripping of the large-area (20 mm × 20 mm) nano-foil. For proper X-ray attenuation, 10 µm Al and 150 nm Ti filters were employed in front of the sample and the detector, respectively.
Fig. 2(b) shows 300 measurements of incidence (I0 monitor) and transmission through the copper (photodiode) (blue dots). The XFEL photon energy is 932 eV with 0.5 eV bandwidth. A linear fit shows a transmission of 0.871 ± 0.001. The error is consistent with Fig. 3. In order to obtain a full XANES spectrum, the photon energy was scanned from 925 eV to 945 eV with increments of 0.5 eV and a 2 Hz repetition rate.
Fig. 4 shows the measured (black dots) with 3 pulses and 100 pulses averaged for each data point. The for each data point follows the trend in Fig. 3, i.e. ±0.3 and ±1.5% for 100 shot and 3 shot averaged data, respectively. As a reference, the spectrum obtained by density functional theory (DFT) calculation (Cho et al., 2011) convoluted with the experimental resolution (0.5 eV rectangular function) is also presented (solid curves). In the 925–945 eV range, the root-mean-square deviations of the measured spectra from the reference are 1.7% and 1.2% for the 3 shot and 100 shot averaged data, respectively.
The changes caused by irradiation (by a femtosecond laser pulse) in the −2. The range of fluence sampled by an X-ray probe (30 µm × 60 µm) was 1.85–2.07 J cm−2. It was noted that sample heating was completed by the end of the laser (40 fs). The hydrodynamic expansion of the sample can be ignored and the initial sample density does not change. This is because the time scale of electron–phonon coupling is of the order of 10 ps. Therefore, this heating is an isochoric process, and, considering the laser energy absorbed by the sample, the corresponding electron temperature at the end of the laser pulse is as high as 1.6 eV. After each laser pulse, the sample was translated as 370 µm to avoid the damaged area. Typically, the available laser shots on a single foil are over 2500 and the repetition rate is ∼0.67 Hz.
of warm dense copper were measured. The incidence wavelength and peak fluence were 800 nm. The FWHM diameter on the sample was 150 µm and the corresponding peak fluence was 2.07 ± 0.02 J cmThe measured difference between warm dense and cold Cu L3-XANES at the selected pump–probe delays are shown in Fig. 5. For each data point, ten measurements were made. The errors in measurement were 2.0–4.0%. It is noted that these are larger than the estimated error in Fig. 3. This is due to the fluctuations in pulse energy and pointing of the optical laser, and an uncertainty in the sample thickness (40 ± 5 nm). Between 200 fs and 1400 fs after pumping, the data exhibit strong enhancement in absorption below the L3-edge (E − EF < 0) and fast evolution. It indicates that the Cu d band, which is fully occupied under ambient conditions, becomes highly excited. This causes a significant portion of the d band to become unoccupied under the WDM condition. The distribution of unoccupied states varies rapidly in a picosecond.
In the picosecond range (2–20 ps), the enhanced X-ray absorption below the L3-edge has been successfully explained by the Fermi distribution of electrons with a few-electronvolt temperature (Cho et al., 2011, 2016). At 2 ps, the excited electronic system is already in equilibrium, and the formation of a high-temperature Fermi distribution induces unoccupied states in the 3d band. The decrement of electron–hole temperatures and the evolution of X-ray absorption spectra over 20 ps could be well described via enhanced electron–phonon coupling (Lin et al., 2008), the two-temperature model (Anisimov et al., 1974) and the corresponding XANES calculations with finite temperatures (Cho et al., 2011, 2016).
We apply the same theoretical approach for the measurement in 200–1400 fs. The red curves in Fig. 5 are the differential XANES calculations assuming the Fermi-distributions with 16000–19000 K, predicted by the two-temperature model. Up to 1000 fs, significant disagreement between measurement and calculation is found. This result infers that, in the first picosecond after the laser excitation, the electrons and holes in the d band may not be in equilibrium and are hardly described by the Fermi distribution. At 1200 fs and thereafter, the measurements agree well with the calculations, and the Fermi distribution with a temperature of ∼16000 K is established. The detailed physical interpretations of the non-equilibrium electron–hole distributions and the lifetimes of non-thermal particles are perhaps beyond the scope of this article and could be discussed in another contribution. It is emphasized that the femtosecond XANES measurement presented could provide valuable experimental insights to explore the ultrafast electron dynamics and the material properties under strong non-equilibrium conditions.
4. Conclusions
We have presented the X-ray absorption spectroscopy setup at the SSS experimental station of PAL-XFEL. Despite a large shot-to-shot fluctuation in the energy distribution of SASE spectra, the incident FEL pulse energy was properly normalized with the photocathode membrane and MCP detector, and the transmission of a monochromatic beam can be determined. Although the wide spectral range is hardly obtainable in single-shot mode with the given bandwidth (0.44%) of FEL pulse, the quality of the spectra presented and the measurement sensitivity with a small number of shots provided crucial advantages for scanning large parameter space in destructive samples. In particular, the pump–probe measurement for copper foil demonstrated its ability to capture femtosecond non-equilibrium electron–hole dynamics under WDM conditions. This will be an essential experimental capability for further understanding of energy transport, phase transitions and material properties in the extreme state of matter.
Acknowledgements
The technical support from the PAL-XFEL accelerator and beamline divisions is gratefully acknowledged.
Funding information
This work has been supported by the Institute for Basic Science (grant No. IBS-R012-D1) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (grant Nos. NRF-2015R1A5A1009962; NRF-2019R1A2C2002864; NRF-2019K2A9A2A08000160; NRF-2018R1D1A1B07046676).
References
Anisimov, S., Kapeliovich, B. & Perelman, T. (1974). Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 66, 375–377. Google Scholar
Bernstein, D. P., Acremann, Y., Scherz, A., Burkhardt, M., Stöhr, J., Beye, M., Schlotter, W. F., Beeck, T., Sorgenfrei, F., Pietzsch, A., Wurth, W. & Föhlisch, A. (2009). Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 134102. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Booth, N., Robinson, A. P. L., Hakel, P., Clarke, R. J., Dance, R. J., Doria, D., Gizzi, L. A., Gregori, G., Koester, P., Labate, L., Levato, T., Li, B., Makita, M., Mancini, R. C., Pasley, J., Rajeev, P. P., Riley, D., Wagenaars, E., Waugh, J. N. & Woolsey, N. C. (2015). Nat. Commun. 6, 8742. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Bressler, C. & Chergui, M. (2004). Chem. Rev. 104, 1781–1812. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Bressler, C., Milne, C., Pham, V.-T., Elnahhas, A., van der Veen, R. M., Gawelda, W., Johnson, S., Beaud, P., Grolimund, D., Kaiser, M., Borca, C. N., Ingold, G., Abela, R. & Chergui, M. (2009). Science, 323, 489–492. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Cho, B. I., Engelhorn, K., Correa, A. A., Ogitsu, T., Weber, C. P., Lee, H. J., Feng, J., Ni, P. A., Ping, Y., Nelson, A. J., Prendergast, D., Lee, R. W., Falcone, R. W. & Heimann, P. A. (2011). Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 167601. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Cho, B. I., Ogitsu, T., Engelhorn, K., Correa, A. A., Ping, Y., Lee, J. W., Bae, L. J., Prendergast, D., Falcone, R. W. & Heimann, P. A. (2016). Sci. Rep. 6, 18843. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Dorchies, F., Lévy, A., Goyon, C., Combis, P., Descamps, D., Fourment, C., Harmand, M., Hulin, S., Leguay, P. M., Petit, S., Peyrusse, O. & Santos, J. J. (2011). Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 245006. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Emma, P., Akre, R., Arthur, J., Bionta, R., Bostedt, C., Bozek, J., Brachmann, A., Bucksbaum, P., Coffee, R., Decker, F. J., Ding, Y., Dowell, D., Edstrom, S., Fisher, A., Frisch, J., Gilevich, S., Hastings, J., Hays, G., Hering, P., Huang, Z., Iverson, R., Loos, H., Messerschmidt, M., Miahnahri, A., Moeller, S., Nuhn, H. D., Pile, G., Ratner, D., Rzepiela, J., Schultz, D., Smith, T., Stefan, P., Tompkins, H., Turner, J., Welch, J., White, W., Wu, J., Yocky, G. & Galayda, J. (2010). Nat. Photon. 4, 641. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Gattass, R. R. & Mazur, E. (2008). Nat. Photon. 2, 219. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Gaudin, J., Fourment, C., Cho, B. I., Engelhorn, K., Galtier, E., Harmand, M., Leguay, P. M., Lee, H. J., Nagler, B., Nakatsutsumi, M., Ozkan, C., Störmer, M., Toleikis, S., Tschentscher, T., Heimann, P. A. & Dorchies, F. (2014). Sci. Rep. 4, 4724. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Glenzer, S. H., MacGowan, B. J., Michel, P., Meezan, N. B., Suter, L. J., Dixit, S. N., Kline, J. L., Kyrala, G. A., Bradley, D. K., Callahan, D. A., Dewald, E. L., Divol, L., Dzenitis, E., Edwards, M. J., Hamza, A. V., Haynam, C. A., Hinkel, D. E., Kalantar, D. H., Kilkenny, J. D., Landen, O. L., Lindl, J. D., LePape, S., Moody, J. D., Nikroo, A., Parham, T., Schneider, M. B., Town, R. P. J., Wegner, P., Widmann, K., Whitman, P., Young, B. K. F., Van Wonterghem, B., Atherton, L. J. & Moses, E. I. (2010). Science, 327, 1228–1231. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Higley, D. J., Hirsch, K., Dakovski, G. L., Jal, E., Yuan, E., Liu, T., Lutman, A. A., MacArthur, J. P., Arenholz, E., Chen, Z., Coslovich, G., Denes, P., Granitzka, P. W., Hart, P., Hoffmann, M. C., Joseph, J., Le Guyader, L., Mitra, A., Moeller, S., Ohldag, H., Seaberg, M., Shafer, P., Stöhr, J., Tsukamoto, A., Nuhn, H. D., Reid, A. H., Dürr, H. A. & Schlotter, W. F. (2016). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 033110. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Ichimaru, S. (1982). Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 1017–1059. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Ishikawa, T., Aoyagi, H., Asaka, T., Asano, Y., Azumi, N., Bizen, T., Ego, H., Fukami, K., Fukui, T., Furukawa, Y., Goto, S., Hanaki, H., Hara, T., Hasegawa, T., Hatsui, T., Higashiya, A., Hirono, T., Hosoda, N., Ishii, M., Inagaki, T., Inubushi, Y., Itoga, T., Joti, Y., Kago, M., Kameshima, T., Kimura, H., Kirihara, Y., Kiyomichi, A., Kobayashi, T., Kondo, C., Kudo, T., Maesaka, H., Maréchal, X. M., Masuda, T., Matsubara, S., Matsumoto, T., Matsushita, T., Matsui, S., Nagasono, M., Nariyama, N., Ohashi, H., Ohata, T., Ohshima, T., Ono, S., Otake, Y., Saji, C., Sakurai, T., Sato, T., Sawada, K., Seike, T., Shirasawa, K., Sugimoto, T., Suzuki, S., Takahashi, S., Takebe, H., Takeshita, K., Tamasaku, K., Tanaka, H., Tanaka, R., Tanaka, T., Togashi, T., Togawa, K., Tokuhisa, A., Tomizawa, H., Tono, K., Wu, S., Yabashi, M., Yamaga, M., Yamashita, A., Yanagida, K., Zhang, C., Shintake, T., Kitamura, H. & Kumagai, N. (2012). Nat. Photon. 6, 540–544. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kang, H.-S., Min, C.-K., Heo, H., Kim, C., Yang, H., Kim, G., Nam, I., Baek, S. Y., Choi, H.-J., Mun, G., Park, B. R., Suh, Y. J., Shin, D. C., Hu, J., Hong, J., Jung, S., Kim, S.-H., Kim, K., Na, D., Park, S. S., Park, Y. J., Han, J.-H., Jung, Y. G., Jeong, S. H., Lee, H. G., Lee, S., Lee, S., Lee, W.-W., Oh, B., Suh, H. S., Parc, Y. W., Park, S.-J., Kim, M. H., Jung, N.-S., Kim, Y.-C., Lee, M.-S., Lee, B.-H., Sung, C.-W., Mok, I.-S., Yang, J.-M., Lee, C.-S., Shin, H., Kim, J. H., Kim, Y., Lee, J. H., Park, S.-Y., Kim, J., Park, J., Eom, I., Rah, S., Kim, S., Nam, K. H., Park, J., Park, J., Kim, S., Kwon, S., Park, S. H., Kim, K. S., Hyun, H., Kim, S. N., Kim, S., Hwang, S., Kim, M. J., Lim, C., Yu, C.-J., Kim, B.-S., Kang, T.-H., Kim, K.-W., Kim, S.-H., Lee, H.-S., Lee, H.-S., Park, K.-H., Koo, T.-Y., Kim, D.-E. & Ko, I. S. (2017b). Nat. Photon. 11, 708–713. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kim, M., Min, C.-K. & Eom, I. (2019). J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 868–873. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kozlova, M., Andriyash, I., Gautier, J., Sebban, S., Smartsev, S., Jourdain, N., Chulagain, U., Azamoum, Y., Tafzi, A., Goddet, J.-P., Oubrerie, K., Thaury, C., Rousse, A. & Ta Phuoc, K. (2020). Phys. Rev. X, 10, 011061. Google Scholar
Lee, J.-W., Geng, X., Jung, J. H., Cho, M. S., Yang, S. H., Jo, J., Lee, C., Cho, B. I. & Kim, D. (2018). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 895, 120–125. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lee, R. W., Baldis, H. A., Cauble, R. C., Landen, O. L., Wark, J. S., Ng, A., Rose, S. J., Lewis, C., Riley, D., Gauthier, J. C. & Audebert, P. (2002). Laser Part. Beams, 20, 527–536. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Leguay, P. M., Lévy, A., Chimier, B., Deneuville, F., Descamps, D., Fourment, C., Goyon, C., Hulin, S., Petit, S., Peyrusse, O., Santos, J. J., Combis, P., Holst, B., Recoules, V., Renaudin, P., Videau, L. & Dorchies, F. (2013). Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 245004. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Lemke, H. T., Bressler, C., Chen, L. X., Fritz, D. M., Gaffney, K. J., Galler, A., Gawelda, W., Haldrup, K., Hartsock, R. W., Ihee, H., Kim, J., Kim, K. H., Lee, J. H., Nielsen, M. M., Stickrath, A. B., Zhang, W., Zhu, D. & Cammarata, M. (2013). J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 735–740. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lin, Z., Zhigilei, L. V. & Celli, V. (2008). Phys. Rev. B, 77, 075133. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Mahieu, B., Jourdain, N., Ta Phuoc, K., Dorchies, F., Goddet, J. P., Lifschitz, A., Renaudin, P. & Lecherbourg, L. (2018). Nat. Commun. 9, 3276. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Park, S. H., Kim, M., Min, C.-K., Eom, I., Nam, I., Lee, H.-S., Kang, H.-S., Kim, H.-D., Jang, H. Y., Kim, S., Hwang, S., Park, G. S., Park, J., Koo, T. Y. & Kwon, S. (2018). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 055105. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Pertot, Y., Schmidt, C., Matthews, M., Chauvet, A., Huppert, M., Svoboda, V., von Conta, A., Tehlar, A., Baykusheva, D., Wolf, J.-P. & Wörner, H. J. (2017). Science, 355, 264–267. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Volkov, M., Sato, S. A., Schlaepfer, F., Kasmi, L., Hartmann, N., Lucchini, M., Gallmann, L., Rubio, A. & Keller, U. (2019). Nat. Phys. 15, 1145–1149. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.