view article
Figure 5
Reconstruction of concentration profile for three different simulated experimental acquisition setups: (a) and (b) five attenuation lengths over the range [1.62, 1.95] nm (N5); (c) and (d) five attenuation lengths over the range [1.28, 5.5] nm (W5); and (e) and (f) ten attenuation lengths over the range [1.28, 5.5] nm (W10). The panels (a), (c) and (e) show the estimates and the different variability, with respect to the measurement noise in orange ([\Gamma_{\hat{\rho}|A^{m}\!,{\bf y}_{0}}]), and with respect to the measurement model error in red ([\Gamma_{\hat{\rho}|A^{m}_{0}{\bf y}}]). The panels (b), (d) and (f) show the conditional posterior probability [{\cal P}(\rho|A^{m}\!,{\bf y})] (blue), and the marginals [{\cal P}(\rho|A^{m}\!,{\bf y}_{0})] (orange) and [{\cal P}(\rho|A^{m}_{0},{\bf y})] (red).

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Volume 30| Part 5| September 2023| Pages 941-961
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577523006124
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS