beamlines
GIWAXS experimental methods at the NFPS-BL17B beamline at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility
aNational Facility for Protein Science in Shanghai, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Pudong District, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: qinwenming@sari.ac.cn
The BL17B beamline at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility was first designed as a versatile high-throughput protein crystallography beamline and one of five beamlines affiliated to the National Facility for Protein Science in Shanghai. It was officially opened to users in July 2015. As a bending magnet beamline, BL17B has the advantages of high
energy resolution and continuous adjustable energy between 5 and 23 keV. The experimental station excels in crystal screening and providing cost-effective routine experimental services to numerous users. Given the interdisciplinary and green energy research demands, BL17B beamline has undergone optimization, expanded its range of experimental methods and enhanced sample environments for a more user-friendly testing mode. These methods include single-crystal X-ray diffraction, powder crystal X-ray diffraction, wide-angle X-ray scattering, grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS), and fully scattered atom pair distribution function analysis, covering structure detection from crystalline to amorphous states. This paper primarily presents the performance of the BL17B beamline and the application of the GIWAXS methodology at the beamline in the field of perovskite materials.Keywords: synchrotron radiation; X-ray; GIWAXS; perovskite cells.
1. Introduction
Proteins play a crucial role in human life, composing cells and governing various aspects of life, impacting our health, development and survival. The ongoing quest by scientists and the medical community to comprehend the profound impact of proteins on human life is essential for advancing wellbeing and health. Concurrently, the field of materials science has made substantial contributions, particularly in energy materials development. According to the growing demand for efficient energy solutions, perovskite has emerged as a key material in battery and https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html, see Fig. 1) has compiled certified efficiency data of various solar energy technologies, revealing remarkable progress of perovskite solar cells, with an efficiency of 26% (Zhao, Ma et al., 2022).
applications due to its exceptional electrical and light absorption properties. This has positioned perovskite as a pivotal player in advancing renewable energy technologies. The America's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL,In recent decades, perovskite cells have surpassed dye-sensitized solar cells and CdTe-based solar cells in production cost while maintaining high efficiency, gaining prominence in the solar cell materials field. In 2009, Kojima et al. (2009) used organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite materials for the first time to prepare perovskite dye-sensitized solar cells, achieving an efficiency of 3.8%. Since then, organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cells have received much attention in the field of optoelectronics due to their excellent optoelectronic properties such as superior long carrier diffusion length and high optical and have broad prospects in optoelectronic applications (Ma et al., 2022; Im et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2012). In recent years, with the improvement of perovskite film material preparation methods and sample conditions, the photoelectric conversion efficiency of this type of material has been increasing year by year. (Burschka et al., 2013; Jeon et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2015; Bi, Tress et al., 2016; Bi, Yi et al., 2016; Saliba et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2019; Min et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2019; Yoo et al., 2021). Until 2022, You and co-workers (Zhao, Ma et al., 2022) converted PbI2 into an inactive (PbI2)2RbCl compound by RbCl doping, which effectively stabilizes the perovskite phase. They obtained a certified power conversion efficiency of 25.6% for FAPbI3 (where FA is formamidinium) perovskite solar cells on the basis of this strategy. As a new photoelectric material with high efficiency, low cost and convenient preparation, the performance of perovskite battery material is closely related to its and morphology. However, perovskite materials have complex compositions and variable phases, and more advanced characterization techniques are urgently needed to study their internal structural changes and microscopic mechanisms. Characterizing material structure is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of material properties and performance. Synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD) technology, with advantages such as high intensity and high resolution, allows for in-depth exploration of the and crystallographic properties of crystalline materials. This advanced technique provides a key means to fully comprehend material structure characteristics. Particularly for perovskite thin film materials, grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS) technology is indispensable.
GIWAXS based on synchrotron X-rays is a powerful analytical tool for the study of perovskite solar cells. GIWAXS data typically consists of two-dimensional diffraction patterns of a diffraction ring with different crystal planes (Wang et al., 2021), which is widely used in the field of perovskite research because of its advantages such as high signal-to-noise ratio, high structural resolution, non-contact, non-destructive detection, rich structural information, and in situ observation. It provides information about the crystallinity, grain size and orientation of the perovskite material in thin films, which is crucial for understanding the material's performance and stability. It can be used to study the formation and evolution of perovskite grains during the fabrication process, as well as the effect of processing conditions on grain size, orientation and crystallinity. This information can help optimize the fabrication process to produce high-quality perovskite thin films with improved performance and stability. This method can also be used to study the interface between the perovskite material and other layers in the solar cell, such as the electron transport layer and the hole transport layer. Understanding the interface structure and composition can provide insight into the charge transfer and transport processes in the solar cell, and help identify ways to improve their efficiency. In summary, GIWAXS technology is an important tool for the study of perovskite solar cells and provides valuable information for understanding the material properties and optimizing their performance. Above all, in situ GIWAXS measurements are highly attractive in perovskite research as they offer a fast way to track the microstructural changes of perovskite materials, including crystallization and aging processes. This is crucial for revealing the dynamic processes of perovskite materials. The film formation process involves a liquid film gelation stage and a crystallization stage. Many studies have shown that the orientation and phase structure of perovskite are established in the gelation stage. The in situ GIWAXS technique for real-time monitoring of the perovskite crystallization process can be traced back to as early as 2015, when Miyadera et al. (2015) analyzed in situ the crystallization kinetics of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite at SPring-8, Japan, by X-ray diffraction immediately after combining PbI2 thin film with CH3NH3I solution. In 2018, Zhang et al. (2018) investigated the film formation mechanism and its dependence on choice of solvent and substrate temperature by performing in situ time-resolved GIWAXS at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS) during spin coating. In 2020, Hoffman et al. (2020) used in situ GIWAXS to monitor film formation during spin-coating, elucidating the general film formation mechanism of 2D halide perovskites during one-step spin-coating at the Advanced Photon Source in Argonne National Laboratory, USA. In the same year, Song et al. (2020) measured the and orientation of perovskite films prepared with and without KI and DMSO additives based on the GIWAXS technique at the Advanced Light Source (ALS), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA. In the past three years in particular, a number of research groups have explored the structural mechanism of perovskite solar thin film cells based on the Shanghai synchrotron radiation light source, which has promoted the improvement of the conversion efficiency of multiple types of cells (Jiang, Sun et al., 2022; Zhao, Ma et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2023; Liang et al., 2023). The in situ methodology and some in situ experimental results are shown in Fig. 2.
Currently, synchrotron beamlines both domestically and internationally, such as SPring-8 BL46XU, ALS 7.3.3, Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) BL14B and BL17B, and CHESS D-line, are capable of conducting GIWAXS methodological studies. In comparison with others, SSRF-BL17B not only possesses the capability for batch testing but also integrates various in situ experimental conditions significantly, including heating, spin-coating, different atmospheric environments, and dropwise solvent addition, among others. The BL17B high-throughput protein crystallography beamline station consists of a bending magnet source, front-end, optical elements, experimental station and sample predation area. The photon source of the beam is a bending magnet light source, which is based at the SSRF. The electron energy of the storage ring is 3.5 GeV, and the natural divergence is 3.9 nm rad. The magnetic field intensity is 1.2726 T and the bending radius is 9.1673 m. The station uses a standard SSRF bending magnet front-end to achieve high-throughput beamlines. The beamline is 42 m long from the source to the sample position [see Fig. 3(a)]. A photograph of the experiment station for XRD is shown in Fig. 3(b).
The beam design uses the pre-collimator as the first optical element. The collimating mirror is a bent mirror for vertical focusing to enhance the energy resolution. Also, it is used to cut off the high-order harmonics. To eliminate the high-order harmonics, the surface of the mirror will be divided into two tracks parallel to the X-ray direction. One of the tracks has no coating and the other track is coated with rhodium. At a setting of 2.8 mrad, the uncoated track is used for photon energies below 8 keV and the Rh-coated track for energies in the range 8–23 keV. These settings will reject the higher-order harmonics. The high-order harmonics (mainly third harmonics) over base harmonics will be below 10−3 when we use a Si surface within the energy range between 5 and 8 keV and use a Rh surface within the energy range between 8 and 23 keV. For reference, the characteristics of this bending magnet source and relevant parameters are detailed in Table 1. Properties of the beamline BL17B are given in Table 2.
|
|
The BL17B beamline station utilizes synchrotron radiation as the X-ray source, offering advantages such as high in situ experiments. By altering the incident angle, scattering signals from the surface to the bulk can be obtained. Therefore, experiments employing the synchrotron-radiation-based GIWAXS methodology have significantly contributed to the advancement of energy storage materials.
high collimation and tunable wavelength. Equipped with a two-dimensional area Pilatus detector, the experimental station not only rapidly acquires crystallographic information but also detects diffraction signals both in-plane and out-of-plane, providing detailed orientation distribution information for the same crystal plane. This capability facilitates time-resolved1.1. Experimental station
The experimental hutch offers room to house all the required equipment, e.g. beryllium window, quadrant beam-position monitor, attenuator, slits, ion chamber, fast shutter, micro-diffractometer, Pilatus detector (3S 2M). Additionally, supplementary components such as sample alignment microscopes, sample cryocoolers, fluorescence detectors and more are available. The layout of the experimental station is shown in Fig. 4.
The MD2 diffractometer system boasts a high-precision air-bearing rotation axis with a programmable controller, enabling the issuance of shutter commands based on the rotation axes' speed and position. The comprehensive beamline control system integrates slits, light intensity detectors and scatter blockers, among other components. External attachments to the diffractometer include a liquid nitrogen cooling apparatus and an adjustable bracket for fluorescence detection. The low-temperature cooling equipment for the sample consists of a cold head, a liquid nitrogen dewar, a pump, a cold head controller, a liquid nitrogen level controller and a manual controller. The cold head's adjustable temperature range spans from 80 to 500 K (Oxford Cryostream 800 series), facilitating in situ studies of temperature effects on the sample. A user-friendly goniometer head allows for easy manual installation of a standard test sample, enhancing operational efficiency.
The Pilatus 3S 2M detector is classified as a medium-sized area detector, and employs water cooling to maintain low temperatures (https://www.dectris.com/en/support/manuals-docs/pilatus3-x-for-synchrotron/pilatus3-x-2m/). This detector offers high frame rates for shorter data collection times, and increasing efficiency. Simultaneously, it possesses the advantage of minimal noise background, allowing it to record stronger diffraction signals and minimizing the risk of overexposure. Detailed specifications for this detector are presented in Table 3.
|
During the data collection process, the motion of all goniometer motors is controlled by the MD2 control software, which enables real-time monitoring of camera and sample center positions. Additionally, this software allows for the selection of beam apertures to modify the beam size and offers functions for controlling the shutter, sample loop automatic centering and beam alignment. The MD2 control software communicates with the motors through the PMAC control system. Data acquisition for the Pilatus 2M detector is managed by Camserver (Zhang et al., 2019). All hardware control software is coordinated through the Macromolecular Xtallography Customized Beamline Environment (MXCuBE) system (Oscarsson et al., 2019). The Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System (EPICS) is employed to govern the motion of all motors for optical and support systems. It is also used to retrieve signals from beamline devices following protocols specified by SSRF. The beamline station features a 20 TB capacity storage server for data storage. Due to storage limitations, diffraction images are currently retained on the server for one month. Furthermore, commonly used crystallography software includes HKL3000, XDS, APEX4, the CCP4 suite, PHENIX, SHELX, etc. Commonly used powder, film and other test data processing software include Fit2d (Hammersley, 1997), Dioptas (Prescher & Prakapenka, 2015), pyFAI (Ashiotis et al., 2015), GIWAXS-tools (Pan et al., 2021) and so on.
In order to improve the performance of the beamline station and protect the equipment in the experimental hutch, an air conditioning system is equipped to ensure that the temperature in the experimental hutch is 25 ± 1°C. The humidity in the laboratory chamber is controlled by an industrial dehumidifier and the reading humidity control system has been upgraded. In 2022, the BL17B data acquisition system was replaced with the MXCuBE system. The development of this system can be traced back to 2004 when it was initially co-developed by the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) and other partners. Its primary aim was to provide a comprehensive tool for simplifying and automating the process of data collection in macromolecular crystallography. MXCuBE has been made available as an open-source platform, encouraging participation from the research community and customization as needed. Over time, MXCuBE has undergone multiple versions of improvements and updates, including added functionalities, enhanced user interfaces, expanded detector support and performance optimizations. This tool has found widespread use globally, serving not only at ESRF but also at various other international synchrotron facilities. It is worth noting that, due to the evolving nature of this field, MXCuBE may have undergone further developments and improvements. This system is a customizable experimental control system designed specifically for macromolecular crystallography data collection. It provides automated control, a user-friendly interface, real-time data analysis, data storage and management, as well as support for various X-ray detectors. MXCuBE accommodates various experimental plans, such as standard data collection, rapid acquisition and high-throughput strategies, with the aim of offering convenient tools for researchers in macromolecular structural biology, expediting the data collection and analysis process, thus advancing the study of molecular structures. The specific functionalities of MXCuBE may vary depending on the laboratory or beamline, and an example of its user interface is shown in Fig. 5.
2. GIWAXS methodology of BL17B
2.1. Sample preparation
Typically, samples for GIWAXS testing are thin films grown on substrates, and there are various methods for preparing thin film materials like perovskite solar cell films. The key to preparing this material lies in the perovskite layer. In addition to the intrinsic optoelectronic properties of the material itself, the microstructure of the perovskite thin film also significantly affects the optoelectronic performance of the solar cell. This impact includes factors like light absorption, charge diffusion distance and lifetime, carrier transport and recombination, all of which are influenced by the morphology of the active layer thin film. An ideal perovskite crystal thin film should be dense, free of pinholes and have large and uniformly distributed grains. Such a film is crucial for achieving high photovoltaic performance in solar devices. To obtain high-quality perovskite crystal thin films, various film fabrication methods have been attempted, with the most commonly used methods being one-step solution deposition, two-step solution deposition and vapor deposition (Choi et al., 2020) (see Fig. 6). Furthermore, the exploration of fabrication processes for highly crystalline, uniform and dense perovskite thin films is a prerequisite for achieving high-efficiency photovoltaic devices, and it is considered a crucial step towards the large-scale commercial production of perovskite solar cells in the future. Apart from the three perovskite thin film preparation methods mentioned earlier, there are a multitude of other methods, especially for large-area films, such as blade coating techniques (Xiao et al., 2021), spray coating (Heo et al., 2016), magnetron sputtering (Gao et al., 2021), hybrid chemical vapor deposition (Leyden et al., 2014) and more.
BL17B experimental users can select the most appropriate preparation method based on the characteristics of their samples. For in situ sample testing, it is recommended that the sample substrate area does not exceed 2 cm × 2 cm, the substrate is typically a silicon wafer or a glass slide, and the sample on the substrate should be uniformly coated with a thickness on the micro-nanometre scale.
2.2. Experimental method
The multifunctional GIWAXS testing apparatus at SSRF's BL17B beamline, complete with hardware controllers and software, is depicted in Figs. 7(a) and 7(b), which also showcase a photograph and software interface. It comprises four main components: the support system, motion control system, sample multi-environmental variable system and signal reception system. The support and motion control systems offer multi-directional mobility to accurately position the device between the X-ray beam and the detector during experiments. Linear motors on the support system facilitate vertical movement of the sample on the support platform along the Z-axis (the Z-axis has a travel range of 290 mm, adjustable with a precision of 0.01 mm per step), ensuring precise X-ray exposure to the sample. The X-rays are monitored through readings from photodiodes and picoammeters in the signal reception system. Additionally, the motion control system can adjust the tilt angle of the electric turntable to precisely control the incident angle and of the X-rays, meeting various sample requirements (the Y-axis has a range from 0 to 8°, with an adjustable increment of 0.1° per step). This system allows us to adapt flexibly to different experimental needs, enabling detailed research into sample crystalline behavior. The multi-environmental variable system for samples can be precisely configured according to user requirements, including, but not limited to, parameters such as temperature, spin-coating speed, atmospheric conditions, and more. This system's flexibility and adjustability empower researchers to exercise comprehensive control and fine-tuning to match various experimental objectives and material characteristics, ensuring the optimal match of experimental conditions and obtaining accurate and reliable results. Finally, a user-friendly interface is designed to facilitate users in easily configuring experimental parameters and monitoring experiment progress. The remote-control system should possess the capability for remote operation, facilitating remote experimentation and data acquisition. Fig. 7(c) illustrates an example of data testing results during the calibration of the GIWAXS equipment.
Currently, the GIWAXS testing methods at the BL17B beamline are categorized into offline experiments and in situ experiments. Offline experiments refer to testing pre-prepared samples directly on the sample stage in the laboratory. Our designed sample stage can accommodate ten samples at once for automatic testing, significantly enhancing testing efficiency compared with the traditional method of testing individual samples sequentially. The method described in this paper greatly improves the testing throughput. In addition, in situ experiments encompass in situ spin-coating, heating and variations in environmental atmosphere. When in situ spin-coating and heating tests are required, the multifunctional control station is positioned between the X-ray beam and the detector, and the sample to be tested is securely placed and fixed on the sample stage. The motion control system and the spin-coating and heating device are used to accurately adjust the platform to achieve the desired X-ray exposure on the sample. The spin-coating and heating system is a fixture on the motion system, capable of heating the spin coater. The sample is placed on the spin head, either mechanically secured or attached with specific adhesives to ensure full contact with the spin head without obstructing incident and diffracted light.
The spin-coating heating device utilized at our beamline is a customized adaptation of commercial equipment, enabling remote operation. The maximum rotation speed of the spin-coating and heating device is 5000 r.p.m., with a rotation speed resolution of 1 r.p.m. The longest time for a single rotation is 50 min, and the rotation time resolution is 0.1 s. The maximum acceleration is 5000 r.p.m. s−1. The temperature can be elevated from room temperature to 423 K (heating time: 5 min), with a heating plate temperature uniformity of ≤±2%. Cooling can be assisted by the cold head. Additionally, another spin-coating apparatus is also remotely controllable, with a maximum rotation speed of 9999 r.p.m., maximum acceleration of 9999 r.p.m. s−1, rotation speed accuracy of ±1 r.p.m. and rotation speed resolution of 1 r.p.m. If additional liquids need to be added during the spin-coating and heating process, this can be done remotely through a pipetting gun. The pipetting gun is controlled by a pneumatic pump. If it is necessary to maintain a specific atmospheric environment during the spin-coating and heating process, an atmospheric hood can be placed on top of the spin-coating and heating device. This hood has two through holes in the direction of the light path. Since the incident X-ray beam is narrow while the diffracted X-ray beam is broader, the diffracted beam hole needs to be much larger than the incident beam hole. To ensure the atmosphere during spin-coating, the through holes and the sample outlet need to be sealed with Kapton film during usage. The atmospheric hood is equipped with intake and exhaust vents at both ends. During experiments, the intake vents should be connected to the required gas pipeline (such as nitrogen), and the desired gas should be continuously supplied throughout the testing period. An illustrative diagram of the experimental method is provided in Fig. 8. The specific equipment parameters are presented in Table 4.
|
In GIWAXS testing, beam cutting is the first and most crucial step. Beam cutting refers to aligning the sample parallel to the X-ray beam and partially blocking the beam to ensure that the light can impinge on the sample surface in a grazing incidence manner during testing. Firstly, the sample is positioned lower than the beam so that the detector fully receives the beam, resulting in the highest detector count. In the second step, the sample position is raised along the Z-axis until the detector count decreases to half of the previous count, indicating that half of the beam is blocked. Finally, the sample is oscillated around the Y-axis within a small angular range. It can be observed that, when the sample is perfectly parallel to the beam, the beam is least obstructed, resulting in the maximum detector count. This angle is set as 0°, and afterward the incident angle can be controlled by tilting the sample stage. For testing perovskite thin film samples, an incident angle of 0.3° is typically chosen, as it achieves a good balance between diffraction signal and background signal. If it is necessary to limit the the incident angle can be adjusted accordingly. Additionally, the penetration ability of X-rays is closely related to their wavelength. Beamline BL17B usually employs X-rays with two wavelengths, 10 keV and 18 keV. The use of 18 keV X-rays provides a higher signal-to-noise ratio in the two-dimensional diffraction pattern, but it also has a higher penetration power and is less sensitive to changes in incident angle. Therefore, when performing angle-resolved tests, 10 keV X-rays are typically selected.
2.3. Scientific highlights of GIWAXS
Since 2015, beamline BL17B has served more than 400 research groups and 900 research topics, achieved fruitful results, and published a number of cutting-edge scientific research papers. These publications have a significant impact on perovskite research and serve as important references for potential users conducting GIWAXS studies on the BL17B beamline (Zhang et al., 2021; Li et al., 2020; Lu et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Zong et al., 2020; Jeong et al., 2021; Jia et al., 2021; Kong et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021; Ma et al., 2021; Niu et al., 2021; Xiang et al., 2021 ;Yang et al., 2021; Jiang, Chu et al., 2022); Jiang, Sun et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2022; Lu et al., 2022; Zhao, Ma et al., 2022; Yu, Pavlica et al., 2022; Yu, Meng et al., 2022; Zhao, Zhang et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2023; Liang et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2024) (see Fig. 9)
In recent years, research scholars have conducted studies utilizing the GIWAXS testing apparatus at beamline BL17B, achieving significant breakthroughs and repeatedly setting world records in energy conversion efficiency. For instance, Pan research group (Liang et al., 2023) devised a strategy utilizing 1-(phenylsulfonyl)pyrrole to achieve a homogeneous distribution of cation composition within perovskite thin films. The resulting p-i-n device yielded a certified steady-state photon-to-electron conversion efficiency of 25.2% and enduring stability. This study was conducted at the in situ synchrotron beamline BL17B, utilizing in situ spin-coating and heating methods coupled with grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS) to investigate two key kinetic processes – crystallization and – during the formation of perovskite materials. It reveals that the introduction of perovskite precursor solution accelerates both of these processes. Compared with other synchrotron beamlines, the GIWAXS testing at BL17B offers advantages in terms of rapid data collection speed as well as simple and portable remote operation. These studies have shown that excellent battery performance can be obtained by adjusting the uniformity of the out-of-plane distribution of perovskite components. Compared with other beamlines, BL17B boasts outstanding features as a bending magnet light source line. Its characteristics include high and energy resolution, with tunable energy ranging between 5 and 23 keV. Within the experimental hutch, there is ample space between the diffractometer and detector, facilitating the setup of GIWAXS workstations. The GIWAXS methodology developed at this beamline integrates offline and in situ experiments, addressing issues encountered at other beamlines such as narrow energy ranges or challenges with certain in situ experiments. The GIWAXS technology takes a crucial step forward in advancing the research and development of perovskite solar cells in academia and industry.
3. Conclusion
This article outlines the performance of the BL17B beamline station and the methodology of GIWAXS, including experimental testing, auxiliary facilities, data acquisition and user achievements. BL17B is a high-throughput structural analysis beamline with a high degree of automation, enabling rapid, scalable and efficient sample collection and structural determination. A portable/integrated/high-precision GIWAXS testing device developed based on this beamline allows for various in situ experiments, such as in situ coating, heating and atmospheric conditions. This device facilitates real-time monitoring of the crystallization and decomposition processes of perovskites, providing valuable support for the development of more stable and efficient perovskite solar cells.
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff of the NFPS and SSRF team for design, installation and continuing collaboration. We would like to express our deep appreciation to Professor Yang Yingguo for his expert guidance and invaluable assistance on the design of the GIWAXS equipment.
Funding information
The following funding is acknowledged: Chinese Academy Science (CAS) Key Technology Talent Program (grant No. 2021000022).
References
Ashiotis, G., Deschildre, A., Nawaz, Z., Wright, J. P., Karkoulis, D., Picca, F. E. & Kieffer, J. (2015). J Appl. Cryst. 48, 510–519. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bi, D., Tress, W., Dar, M. I., Gao, P., Luo, J., Renevier, C., Schenk, K., Abate, A., Giordano, F., Correa Baena, J., Decoppet, J., Zakeeruddin, S. M., Nazeeruddin, M. K., Grätzel, M. & Hagfeldt, A. (2016). Sci. Adv. 2, e1501170. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Bi, D., Yi, C., Luo, J., Décoppet, J.-D., Zhang, F., Zakeeruddin, S. M., Li, X., Hagfeldt, A. & Grätzel, M. (2016). Nat. Energy, 1, 16142. CrossRef Google Scholar
Burschka, J., Pellet, N., Moon, S. J., Humphry-Baker, R., Gao, P., Nazeeruddin, M. K. & Grätzel, M. (2013). Nature, 499, 316–319. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, J., Yang, Y., Dong, H., Li, J., Zhu, X., Xu, J., Pan, F., Yuan, F., Dai, J., Jiao, B., Hou, X., Jen, A. K.-Y. & Wu, Z. (2022). Sci. Adv. 8, eabk2722. CSD CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, P., Xiao, Y., Hu, J., Li, S., Luo, D., Su, R., Caprioglio, P., Kaienburg, P., Jia, X., Chen, N., Wu, J., Sui, Y., Tang, P., Yan, H., Huang, T., Yu, M., Li, Q., Zhao, L., Hou, C.-H., You, Y.-W., Shyue, J.-J., Wang, D., Li, X., Zhao, Q., Gong, Q., Lu, Z.-H., Snaith, H. J. & Zhu, R. (2024). Nature, 625, 516–522. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Choi, K., Choi, H., Min, J., Kim, T., Kim, D., Son, S. Y., Kim, G., Choi, J. & Park, T. (2020). Sol. RRL, 4, 2070021. CrossRef Google Scholar
Dang, H. X., Wang, K., Ghasemi, M., Tang, M., De Bastiani, M., Aydin, E., Dauzon, E., Barrit, D., Peng, J., Smilgies, D., De Wolf, S. & Amassian, A. (2019). Joule, 3, 1746–1764. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gao, B., Hu, J., Tang, S., Xiao, X., Chen, H., Zuo, Z., Qi, Q., Peng, Z., Wen, J. & Zou, D. (2021). Adv. Sci. 8, 2102081. CrossRef Google Scholar
Hammersley, A. (1997). FIT2D: An Introduction and Overview, https://www.esrf.fr/computing/scientific/FIT2D/FIT2D_INTRO/fit2d.html. Google Scholar
Heo, J. H., Lee, M. H., Jang, M. H. & Im, S. H. (2016). J. Mater. Chem. A, 4, 17636–17642. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hoffman, J. M., Strzalka, J., Flanders, N. C., Hadar, I., Cuthriell, S. A., Zhang, Q., Schaller, R. D., Dichtel, W. R., Chen, L. X. & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2020). Adv. Mater. 32, 2002812. CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Im, J. H., Lee, C. R., Lee, J. W., Park, S. W. & Park, N. G. (2011). Nanoscale, 3, 4088–4093. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jeon, N. J., Noh, J. H., Kim, Y. C., Yang, W. S., Ryu, S. & Seok, S. I. (2014). Nat. Mater. 13, 897–903. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jeong, J., Kim, M., Seo, J., Lu, H., Ahlawat, P., Mishra, A., Yang, Y., Hope, M. A., Eickemeyer, F. T., Kim, M., Yoon, Y. J., Choi, I. W., Darwich, B. P., Choi, S. J., Jo, Y., Lee, J. H., Walker, B., Zakeeruddin, S. M., Emsley, L., Rothlisberger, U., Hagfeldt, A., Kim, D. S., Grätzel, M. & Kim, J. Y. (2021). Nature, 592, 381–385. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jia, L., Huang, F., Ding, H., Niu, C., Shang, Y., Hu, W., Li, X., Yu, X., Jiang, X., Cao, R., Zhu, J., Wang, G., Chen, M. & Yang, S. (2021). Nano Today, 39, 101164. CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Jiang, J., Chu, Z., Yin, Z., Li, J., Yang, Y., Chen, J., Wu, J., You, J. & Zhang, X. (2022). Adv. Mater. 34, 2204460. CrossRef Google Scholar
Jiang, Q., Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Yang, X., Chen, Y., Chu, Z., Ye, Q., Li, X., Yin, Z. & You, J. (2019). Nat. Photon. 13, 460–466. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Jiang, Y., Sun, C., Xu, J., Li, S., Cui, M., Fu, X., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Wan, H., Wei, K., Zhou, T., Zhang, W., Yang, Y., Yang, J., Qin, C., Gao, S., Pan, J., Liu, Y., Hoogland, S., Sargent, E. H., Chen, J. & Yuan, M. (2022). Nature, 612, 679–684. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jung, E. H., Jeon, N. J., Park, E. Y., Moon, C. S., Shin, T. J., Yang, T., Noh, J. H. & Seo, J. (2019). Nature, 567, 511–515. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim, H. S., Lee, C. R., Im, J. H., Lee, K. B., Moehl, T., Marchioro, A., Moon, S. J., Humphry-Baker, R., Yum, J. H., Moser, J. E., Grätzel, M. & Park, N. G. (2012). Sci. Rep. 2, 591. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kim, M., Kim, G.-H., Lee, T. K., Choi, I. W. & Dong, S. K. (2019). Joule, 3, 2179–2192. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kojima, A. K. T., Teshima, K., Shirai, Y. & Miyasaka, T. (2009). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6050–6051. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kong, L., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Wang, H., Jiang, Y., Wang, S., You, M., Zhang, C., Zhang, T., Kershaw, S. V., Zheng, W., Yang, Y., Lin, Q., Yuan, M., Rogach, A. L. & Yang, X. (2021). Nat. Commun. 12, 1246. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Lee, M. M., Teuscher, J., Miyasaka, T., Murakami, T. & Snaith, H. J. (2012). Science, 338, 643–647. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Leyden, M. R., Ono, L. K., Raga, S. R., Kato, Y., Wang, S. & Qi, Y. (2014). J. Mater. Chem. A, 2, 18742–18745. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Li, M., Zuo, W., Ricciardulli, A. G., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, K., Li, G., Saliba, M., Di Girolamo, D., Abate, A. & Wang, Z. (2020). Adv. Mater. 32, 2003422. CrossRef Google Scholar
Li, Y., Ding, J., Liang, C., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Jakob, D. S., Wang, B., Li, X., Zhang, H., Li, L., Yang, Y., Zhang, G., Zhang, X., Du, W., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Xu, X., Qiu, X. & Zhou, H. (2021). Joule, 5, 3154–3168. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Liang, Z., Zhang, Y., Xu, H., Chen, W., Liu, B., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Kang, D., Zeng, J., Gao, X., Wang, Q., Hu, H., Zhou, H., Cai, X., Tian, X., Reiss, P., Xu, B., Kirchartz, T., Xiao, Z., Dai, S., Park, N., Ye, J. & Pan, X. (2023). Nature, 624, 557–563. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lu, H., Liu, Y., Ahlawat, P., Mishra, A., Tress, W. R., Eickemeyer, F. T., Yang, Y., Fu, F., Wang, Z., Avalos, C. E., Carlsen, B. I., Agarwalla, A., Zhang, X., Li, X., Zhan, Y., Zakeeruddin, S. M., Emsley, L., Rothlisberger, U., Zheng, L., Hagfeldt, A. & Grätzel, M. (2020). Science, 370, eabb8985. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Lu, J., Yang, T., Niu, T., Bu, N., Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Fang, J., Chang, X., Luo, T., Wen, J., Yang, Y., Ding, Z., Zhao, K. & Liu, S. (2022). Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 1144–1155. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ma, G., Shao, H., Xu, J., Liu, Y., Huang, Q., Taberna, P. L., Simon, P. & Lin, Z. (2021). Nat. Commun. 12, 5085. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Ma, J., Qin, M., Li, P., Han, L., Zhang, Y. & Song, Y. (2022). Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 413–438. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Min, H., Kim, M., Lee, S. U., Kim, H., Kim, G., Choi, K., Lee, J. H. & Seok, S. I. (2019). Science, 366, 749–753. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Miyadera, T., Shibata, Y., Koganezawa, T., Murakami, T. N., Sugita, T., Tanigaki, N. & Chikamatsu, M. (2015). Nano Lett. 15, 5630–5634. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Niu, Y., Tian, C., Gao, J., Fan, F., Zhang, Y., Mi, Y., Ouyang, X., Li, L., Li, J., Chen, S., Liu, Y., Lu, H., Zhao, X., Yang, L., Ju, H., Yang, Y., Ding, C., Xu, M. & Xu, Q. (2021). Nano Energy, 89, 106455. CrossRef Google Scholar
Oscarsson, M., Beteva, A., Flot, D., Gordon, E., Guijarro, M., Leonard, G., McSweeney, S., Monaco, S., Mueller-Dieckmann, C., Nanao, M., Nurizzo, D., Popov, A. N., von Stetten, D., Svensson, O., Rey-Bakaikoa, V., Chado, I., Chavas, L. M. G., Gadea, L., Gourhant, P., Isabet, T., Legrand, P., Savko, M., Sirigu, S., Shepard, W., Thompson, A., Mueller, U., Nan, J., Eguiraun, M., Bolmsten, F., Nardella, A., Milàn-Otero, A., Thunnissen, M., Hellmig, M., Kastner, A., Schmuckermaier, L., Gerlach, M., Feiler, C., Weiss, M. S., Bowler, M. W., Gobbo, A., Papp, G., Sinoir, J., McCarthy, A. A., Karpics, I., Nikolova, M., Bourenkov, G., Schneider, T., Andreu, J., Cuní, G., Juanhuix, J., Boer, R., Fogh, R., Keller, P., Flensburg, C., Paciorek, W., Vonrhein, C., Bricogne, G. & de Sanctis, D. (2019). J Synchrotron Rad, 26, 393–405. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Pan, Y., Huang, J., Gao, D., Chen, Z., Zhang, W. & Yu, G. (2021). Polym. Chem. 12, 2471–2480. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Prescher, C. & Prakapenka, V. B. (2015). High Pressure Res. 35, 223–230. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Saliba, M., Matsui, T., Seo, J.-Y., Domanski, K., Correa-Baena, J.-P., Nazeeruddin, M. K., Zakeeruddin, S. M., Tress, W., Abate, A., Hagfeldt, A. & Grätzel, M. (2016). Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1989–1997. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Song, Z., Li, H., Liu, W., Zhang, H., Yan, J., Tang, Y., Huang, J., Zhang, H. & Li, X. (2020). Adv. Mater. 32, 2001001. CrossRef Google Scholar
Wang, C., Han, D., Wang, J., Yang, Y., Liu, X., Huang, S., Zhang, X., Chang, S., Wu, K. & Zhong, H. (2020). Nat. Commun. 11, 6428. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, C., Zuo, C., Chen, Q. & Ding, L. (2021). J. Semicond. 42, 060201. CrossRef Google Scholar
Xiang, J., Shen, W., Guo, Z., Meng, J., Yuan, L., Zhang, Y., Cheng, Z., Shen, Y., Lu, X. & Huang, Y. (2021). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 14313–14318. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Xiao, Y., Zuo, C., Zhong, J. X., Wu, W. Q., Shen, L. & Ding, L. (2021). Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2100378. CrossRef Google Scholar
Yang, W. S., Noh, J., Jeon, N. J., Kim, Y. C., Ryu, S., Seo, J. & Seok, S. (2015). Science, 348, 1234–1237. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, W. S., Park, B., Jung, E. H., Jeon, N. J., Kim, Y. C., Lee, D. U., Shin, S. S., Seo, J., Kim, E. K., Noh, J. H. & Seok, S. I. (2017). Science, 356, 1376–1379. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Lu, H., Feng, S., Yang, L., Dong, H., Wang, J., Tian, C., Li, L., Lu, H., Jeong, J., Zakeeruddin, S. M., Liu, Y., Grätzel, M. & Hagfeldt, A. (2021). Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 3447–3454. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Yang, L., Feng, S., Niu, Y., Li, X., Cheng, L., Li, L., Qin, W., Wang, T., Xu, Q., Dong, H., Lu, H., Qin, T. & Huang, W. (2023). Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2300661. CrossRef Google Scholar
Yoo, J. J., Seo, G., Chua, M. R., Park, T. G., Lu, Y., Rotermund, F., Kim, Y. K., Moon, C. S., Jeon, N. J., Correa-Baena, J. P., Bulović, V., Shin, S. S., Bawendi, M. G. & Seo, J. (2021). Nature, 590, 587–593. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yu, L., Pavlica, E., Li, R., Zhong, Y., Silva, C., Bratina, G., Müller, C., Amassian, A. & Stingelin, N. (2022). Adv. Mater. 34, 2103002. CrossRef Google Scholar
Yu, S., Meng, J., Pan, Q., Zhao, Q., Pullerits, T., Yang, Y., Zheng, K. & Liang, Z. (2022). Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 3321–3330. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, F., Zhang, X., Wang, C., Sun, M., Luo, X., Yang, Y., Chang, S., Zhang, D. & Duan, L. (2021). Nano Energy, 79, 105486. CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Munir, R., Xu, Z., Liu, Y., Tsai, H., Nie, W., Li, J., Niu, T., Smilgies, D., Kanatzidis, M. G., Mohite, A. D., Zhao, K., Amassian, A. & Liu, S. (2018). Adv. Mater. 30, 1707166. CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhang, W. Z., Tang, J. C., Wang, S. S., Wang, Z. J., Qin, W. M. & He, J. H. (2019). Nucl. Sci. Tech. 30, 170. CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhao, J.-W., Zhang, H., Li, C.-F., Zhou, X., Wu, J.-Q., Zeng, F., Zhang, J. & Li, G.-R. (2022). Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 3912–3922. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Ma, F., Qu, Z., Yu, S., Shen, T., Deng, H., Chu, X., Peng, X., Yuan, Y., Zhang, X. & You, J. (2022). Science, 377, 531–534. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhou, H., Chen, Q., Li, G., Luo, S., Song, T., Duan, H., Hong, Z., You, J., Liu, Y. & Yang, Y. (2014). Science, 345, 542–546. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhu, P., Wang, D., Zhang, Y., Liang, Z., Li, J., Zeng, J., Zhang, J., Xu, Y., Wu, S., Liu, Z., Zhou, X., Hu, B., He, F., Zhang, L., Pan, X., Wang, X., Park, N. & Xu, B. (2024). Science, 383, 524–531. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zong, W., Yang, C., Mo, L., Ouyang, Y., Guo, H., Ge, L., Miao, Y., Rao, D., Zhang, J., Lai, F. & Liu, T. (2020). Nano Energy, 77, 105189. CrossRef Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.