view article
Figure 9
A close-up of Fig. 8[link] to observe subsampling ratios smaller than 10%. We see that, for many of the datasets, CURISS performs exceptionally well even for very small subsampling ratios. The best possible accuracy is approximately attained at ratios as small as 2%, and consistently attained for 6% subsampling. RISS is comparable in performance, except for the smallest subsampling ratios. Both methods outperform random raster sampling considerably.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Volume 33| Part 5| September 2026|
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577526006491
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS