supplementary materials


hb5583 scheme

Acta Cryst. (2010). E66, o2223    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536810030369 ]

Redetermination of 4-(dimethylamino)pyridinium tribromide

S. W. Ng

Abstract top

In the title salt, C7H11N2+·Br3-, the essentially planar cation (r.m.s. deviation = 0.006 Å) forms an N-H...Br hydrogen bond to one of the Br atoms of the almost linear anion [Br-Br-Br = 179.31 (2)°]. The crystal studied was found to be a racemic twin. The whole-molecule disorder of the cation and anion about a twofold rotation axis described earlier [Ng (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o1276] is an artifact of halving one of the axes of the orthorhombic unit cell.

Comment top

Dimethylaminopyridinium tribromide (I) was refined as a whole-molecule-disordered cation and anion that was disordered about a crystallographic twofold rotation axis (Ng, 2009) in the orthorhombic P2221 space group [unit cell parameters 4.1688 (1), 8.8349 (2), 14.7255 (4) Å]. The automatic cell-searching program had, in fact, missed some weaker reflections, so that the true b-axis should be doubled, so that the space group would be P22121 [4.1689 (1), 17.6696 (3), 14.7253 (2) Å]. In the standard P21212 setting, the structure refines smoothly, without disorder, to a final R index of 0.019 (Fig. 1). The disorder is an artifact of halving one of the axis, and a chemically reasonable model coincidentally arose owing to the nature of both the planar cation and linear anion.

Related literature top

For the refinement based on a unit cell half as large, see: Ng (2009).

Experimental top

The diffraction measurements were those used in the previous study (Ng, 2009). Measurements on another different specimen gave the same refinement results, especially with respect to the 0.5 Flack parameter.

Refinement top

Carbon-bound H-atoms were placed in calculated positions (C—H 0.95 Å for the aromatic H-atoms and 0.98 Å for the methyl H-atoms) and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with U(H) set to 1.2 to 1.5U(C).

The ammonium H-atom was located in a difference Fourier map, and was refined without a restraint.

The structure is a racemic twin; the Flack parameter was refined on 999 Friedel pairs.

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2009); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: X-SEED (Barbour, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I) at the 70% probability level; hydrogen atoms are drawn as spheres of arbitrary radius.
4-(dimethylamino)pyridinium tribromide top
Crystal data top
C7H11N2+·Br3F(000) = 688
Mr = 362.91Dx = 2.222 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P21212Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2 2abCell parameters from 4074 reflections
a = 14.7253 (2) Åθ = 2.7–28.3°
b = 17.6696 (3) ŵ = 11.11 mm1
c = 4.1689 (1) ÅT = 100 K
V = 1084.71 (4) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.20 × 0.15 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX CCD
diffractometer
2502 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2300 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.029
ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 1.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
h = 1919
Tmin = 0.215, Tmax = 0.403k = 2222
10364 measured reflectionsl = 55
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.040 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0204P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.98(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2502 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.38 e Å3
116 parametersΔρmin = 0.31 e Å3
0 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 999 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: 0.51 (2)
Crystal data top
C7H11N2+·Br3V = 1084.71 (4) Å3
Mr = 362.91Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P21212Mo Kα radiation
a = 14.7253 (2) ŵ = 11.11 mm1
b = 17.6696 (3) ÅT = 100 K
c = 4.1689 (1) Å0.20 × 0.15 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX CCD
diffractometer
2502 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
2300 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.215, Tmax = 0.403Rint = 0.029
10364 measured reflectionsθmax = 27.5°
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.040Δρmax = 0.38 e Å3
S = 0.98Δρmin = 0.31 e Å3
2502 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 999 Friedel pairs
116 parametersFlack parameter: 0.51 (2)
0 restraints
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.422049 (17)0.112471 (15)0.72575 (7)0.01934 (7)
Br20.261320 (17)0.120225 (14)0.47003 (7)0.01501 (7)
Br30.106438 (17)0.127359 (14)0.23133 (7)0.01826 (7)
N10.60669 (15)0.13040 (13)0.2738 (6)0.0196 (5)
H10.553 (2)0.1299 (18)0.387 (8)0.038 (10)*
N20.85347 (15)0.12901 (12)0.1849 (6)0.0162 (5)
C10.6420 (2)0.06411 (16)0.1723 (7)0.0218 (7)
H1A0.60950.01850.20930.026*
C20.72305 (19)0.06148 (15)0.0185 (7)0.0182 (6)
H20.74680.01430.05200.022*
C30.77231 (17)0.12906 (14)0.0370 (6)0.0148 (5)
C40.73201 (19)0.19758 (15)0.0729 (7)0.0179 (6)
H40.76210.24450.03960.021*
C50.65084 (18)0.19580 (14)0.2248 (8)0.0200 (6)
H50.62460.24180.29820.024*
C60.89406 (19)0.05789 (14)0.2953 (8)0.0221 (7)
H6A0.90210.02370.11240.033*
H6B0.95320.06830.39360.033*
H6C0.85400.03410.45380.033*
C70.90234 (17)0.19907 (14)0.2435 (9)0.0215 (6)
H7A0.86530.23240.37820.032*
H7B0.95970.18790.35320.032*
H7C0.91500.22420.03870.032*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.01273 (13)0.02577 (14)0.01951 (15)0.00074 (11)0.00148 (13)0.00173 (13)
Br20.01278 (13)0.01445 (12)0.01779 (13)0.00072 (11)0.00346 (11)0.00043 (11)
Br30.01313 (13)0.02064 (13)0.02101 (14)0.00046 (11)0.00112 (13)0.00002 (14)
N10.0121 (11)0.0263 (12)0.0204 (13)0.0014 (10)0.0026 (12)0.0015 (13)
N20.0133 (11)0.0125 (10)0.0228 (13)0.0005 (9)0.0026 (10)0.0024 (10)
C10.0188 (16)0.0211 (15)0.0255 (18)0.0030 (13)0.0007 (14)0.0025 (12)
C20.0195 (15)0.0157 (13)0.0196 (16)0.0012 (11)0.0001 (15)0.0015 (12)
C30.0135 (13)0.0170 (12)0.0140 (12)0.0004 (12)0.0034 (12)0.0014 (12)
C40.0154 (14)0.0157 (13)0.0225 (16)0.0005 (12)0.0018 (14)0.0014 (11)
C50.0177 (14)0.0186 (13)0.0236 (17)0.0051 (11)0.0038 (17)0.0030 (14)
C60.0183 (15)0.0178 (13)0.0303 (19)0.0030 (12)0.0047 (18)0.0008 (14)
C70.0141 (14)0.0179 (13)0.0323 (18)0.0011 (11)0.0072 (18)0.0024 (15)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
Br1—Br22.5994 (4)C2—H20.9500
Br2—Br32.4915 (4)C3—C41.424 (4)
N1—C51.342 (3)C4—C51.353 (4)
N1—C11.350 (4)C4—H40.9500
N1—H10.92 (3)C5—H50.9500
N2—C31.345 (3)C6—H6A0.9800
N2—C71.453 (3)C6—H6B0.9800
N2—C61.466 (3)C6—H6C0.9800
C1—C21.356 (4)C7—H7A0.9800
C1—H1A0.9500C7—H7B0.9800
C2—C31.416 (4)C7—H7C0.9800
Br3—Br2—Br1179.314 (16)C5—C4—H4120.0
C5—N1—C1120.9 (2)C3—C4—H4120.0
C5—N1—H1120 (2)N1—C5—C4121.3 (3)
C1—N1—H1119 (2)N1—C5—H5119.4
C3—N2—C7121.1 (2)C4—C5—H5119.4
C3—N2—C6120.5 (2)N2—C6—H6A109.5
C7—N2—C6118.4 (2)N2—C6—H6B109.5
N1—C1—C2121.2 (3)H6A—C6—H6B109.5
N1—C1—H1A119.4N2—C6—H6C109.5
C2—C1—H1A119.4H6A—C6—H6C109.5
C1—C2—C3119.9 (3)H6B—C6—H6C109.5
C1—C2—H2120.0N2—C7—H7A109.5
C3—C2—H2120.0N2—C7—H7B109.5
N2—C3—C2122.0 (2)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
N2—C3—C4121.2 (2)N2—C7—H7C109.5
C2—C3—C4116.8 (2)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C5—C4—C3119.9 (3)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C5—N1—C1—C20.1 (5)C1—C2—C3—N2179.1 (3)
N1—C1—C2—C30.2 (4)C1—C2—C3—C40.6 (4)
C7—N2—C3—C2179.1 (3)N2—C3—C4—C5179.1 (3)
C6—N2—C3—C20.1 (4)C2—C3—C4—C50.6 (4)
C7—N2—C3—C41.2 (4)C1—N1—C5—C40.1 (5)
C6—N2—C3—C4179.8 (3)C3—C4—C5—N10.3 (5)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···Br10.92 (3)2.41 (3)3.323 (2)171 (3)
Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (Å)
top
Br1—Br22.5994 (4)Br2—Br32.4915 (4)
Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···Br10.92 (3)2.41 (3)3.323 (2)171 (3)
Acknowledgements top

I thank the University of Malaya for supporting this study.

references
References top

Barbour, L. J. (2001). J. Supramol. Chem. 1, 189–191.

Bruker (2009). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.

Ng, S. W. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o1276.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.

Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.