organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 69| Part 5| May 2013| Pages o667-o668

2-(4-Methyl­phen­yl)-6-nitro-1,3-benzoxazole

aDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Università degli Studi di Napoli 'Federico II', Complesso di Monte S. Angelo, Via Cinthia, 80126 Napoli, Italy
*Correspondence e-mail: roberto.centore@unina.it

(Received 25 March 2013; accepted 2 April 2013; online 5 April 2013)

The title compound, C14H10N2O3, is a π-conjugated mol­ecule containing a benzoxazole aromatic fused heterobicycle. The benzoxazole ring system is planar within 0.01 Å. The mol­ecule assumes an approximately flat conformation, the benzoxazole ring system forming dihedral angles of 6.52 (12) and 7.4 (3)° with the benzene ring and the nitro group, respectively. In the crystal, mol­ecules are connected by very weak C—H⋯O hydrogen inter­actions, forming chains running parallel to the a or c axes. The methyl H atoms are disordered over two sets of sites of equal occupancy rotated by 60°.

Related literature

For general information on heterocycles in organic electronics and optoelectronics, see: Dalton (2002[Dalton, L. (2002). Adv. Polym. Sci. 158, 1-86.]); Heeger (2010[Heeger, A. J. (2010). Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 2354-2371.]). For heterocycle-based semiconductors, optoelectronic and piezoelectric materials, see: Carella, Centore, Sirigu et al. (2004[Carella, A., Centore, R., Sirigu, A., Tuzi, A., Quatela, A., Schutzmann, S. & Casalboni, M. (2004). Macromol. Chem. Phys. 205, 1948-1954.]); Centore, Ricciotti et al. (2012[Centore, R., Ricciotti, L., Carella, A., Roviello, A., Causà, M., Barra, M., Ciccullo, F. & Cassinese, A. (2012). Org. Electron. 13, 2083-2093.]); Centore, Concilio et al. (2012[Centore, R., Concilio, A., Borbone, F., Fusco, S., Carella, A., Roviello, A., Stracci, G. & Gianvito, A. (2012). J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 50, 650-655.]). For structural and theoretical analysis of conjugation in heterocycle-based organic mol­ecules, see: Carella, Centore, Fort et al. (2004[Carella, A., Centore, R., Fort, A., Peluso, A., Sirigu, A. & Tuzi, A. (2004). Eur. J. Org. Chem. pp. 2620-2626.]); Gainsford et al. (2008[Gainsford, G. J., Bhuiyan, M. D. H. & Kay, A. J. (2008). Acta Cryst. C64, o616-o619.]). For structural and theoretical analysis of conjugation in heterocycle-based metallorganic compounds, see: Takjoo et al. (2011[Takjoo, R., Centore, R., Hakimi, M., Beyramabadi, A. S. & Morsali, A. (2011). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 371, 36-41.]); Takjoo & Centore (2013[Takjoo, R. & Centore, R. (2013). J. Mol. Struct. 1031, 180-185.]). For theoretical computations on similar compounds, see: Capobianco et al. (2012[Capobianco, A., Esposito, A., Caruso, T., Borbone, F., Carella, A., Centore, R. & Peluso, A. (2012). Eur. J. Org. Chem. pp. 2980-2989.], 2013[Capobianco, A., Centore, R., Noce, C. & Peluso, A. (2013). Chem. Phys. 411, 11-16.]). For the synthesis of related heterocyclic compounds, see: Bruno et al. (2002[Bruno, V., Castaldo, A., Centore, R., Sirigu, A., Sarcinelli, F., Casalboni, M. & Pizzoferrato, R. (2002). J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 40, 1468-1475.]); Centore et al. (2007[Centore, R., Riccio, P., Fusco, S., Carella, A., Quatela, A., Schutzmann, S., Stella, F. & De Matteis, F. (2007). J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 45, 2719-2725.]); Piccialli et al. (2013[Piccialli, V., D'Errico, S., Borbone, N., Oliviero, G., Centore, R. & Zaccaria, S. (2013). Eur. J. Org. Chem. In the press. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201201554.]); Centore, Fusco, Capobianco et al. (2013[Centore, R., Fusco, S., Capobianco, A., Piccialli, V., Zaccaria, S. & Peluso, A. (2013). Eur. J. Org. Chem. In the press. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201201653.]). For hydrogen bonding in crystals see: Desiraju & Steiner (1999[Desiraju, G. R. & Steiner, T. (1999). In The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.]); Centore, Fusco, Jazbinsek et al. (2013[Centore, R., Fusco, S., Jazbinsek, M., Capobianco, A. & Peluso, A. (2013). CrystEngComm. 15, 3318-3325.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C14H10N2O3

  • Mr = 254.24

  • Orthorhombic, P b c a

  • a = 27.251 (4) Å

  • b = 7.4457 (6) Å

  • c = 11.990 (9) Å

  • V = 2432.8 (19) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.10 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.40 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm

Data collection
  • Enraf–Nonius MACH3 diffractometer

  • 2968 measured reflections

  • 2140 independent reflections

  • 970 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.020

  • 1 standard reflections every 120 min intensity decay: none

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055

  • wR(F2) = 0.168

  • S = 1.11

  • 2140 reflections

  • 174 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.14 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C10—H10⋯O2i 0.93 2.61 3.502 (6) 160
C1—H1B⋯O2ii 0.96 2.80 3.143 (5) 102
Symmetry codes: (i) [-x+{\script{1\over 2}}, -y, z-{\script{1\over 2}}]; (ii) [x-{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z].

Data collection: MACH3/PC Software (Nonius, 1996[Nonius (1996). MACH3/PC and CAD-4-PC. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]); cell refinement: CELLFITW (Centore, 2004[Centore, R. (2004). CELLFITW. Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.]); data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995[Harms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995). XCAD4. University of Marburg, Germany.]); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999[Altomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115-119.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012[Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849-854.]) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006[Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453-457.]); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012[Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849-854.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

Heterocycles are important compounds of synthetic chemistry. Besides their long standing and relevant application as drugs and bioactive compounds, aromatic heterocycles are playing a fundamental role in modern material chemistry as building blocks of conjugated active molecules in some emerging fields of organic electronics and optoelectronics: conducting polymers and organic solar cells (Heeger, 2010), organic field-effect transistors (Centore, Ricciotti et al., 2012), nonlinear optically active and piezoelectric compounds (Dalton, 2002; Carella, Centore, Sirigu et al. (2004); Centore, Concilio et al., 2012). The chemical investigation is mainly directed to the synthesis of new molecules or conjugated polymers containing heterocyclic moieties. However, also the structural investigation of the molecules is relevant, pointing towards the quantitative evaluation of the structural parameters related to the conjugation (Carella, Centore, Fort et al., 2004; Gainsford et al., 2008; Capobianco et al., 2012; Capobianco et al., 2013). Following our interest in the synthesis and characterization of new heterocyclic compounds, including metal containing heterocyclic compounds (Takjoo et al., 2011; Takjoo & Centore, 2013) for applications as advanced materials and bioactive compounds, and in the analysis of crystal structures controlled by the formation of H bonds (Centore, Fusco, Jazbinsek et al., 2013), we report, in the present paper, the structural investigation of the title compound, shown in Scheme 1. 2-(4-methyl)-phenyl-6-nitro-benzoxazole is an organic dye containing the 6-nitrobenzoxazole acceptor group conjugated with a 4-methylphenyl moiety. The 6-nitrobenzoxazole-2-yl moiety has been used in the synthesis of polymers showing quadratic NLO behaviour (Bruno et al., 2002).

The molecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1. The phenyl and benzoxazole rings are nearly coplanar, the dihedral angle between the mean planes being 6.7 (1)°. That structural feature is in accordance with the expected π conjugation of the compound.

Molecules in the crystal form rows through very weak hydrogen interactions between methyl or aromatic C–H donors and oxygen acceptors of the nitro group (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3; Table 1). The chains, which have graph set symbol C11(14) and C11(7) are generated, respectively, by the b and a glide planes.

Related literature top

For general information on heterocycles in organic electronics and optoelectronics, see: Dalton (2002); Heeger (2010). For heterocycle-based semiconductors, optoelectronic and piezoelectric materials, see: Carella, Centore, Sirigu et al. (2004); Centore, Ricciotti et al. (2012); Centore, Concilio et al. (2012). For structural and theoretical analysis of conjugation in heterocycle-based organic molecules, see: Carella, Centore, Fort et al. (2004); Gainsford et al. (2008). For structural and theoretical analysis of conjugation in heterocycle-based metallorganic compounds, see: Takjoo et al. (2011); Takjoo & Centore (2013). For theoretical computations on similar compounds, see: Capobianco et al. (2012, 2013). For the synthesis of related heterocyclic compounds, see: Bruno et al. (2002); Centore et al. (2007); Piccialli et al. (2013); Centore, Fusco, Capobianco et al. (2013). For hydrogen bonding in crystals see: Desiraju & Steiner (1999); Centore, Fusco, Jazbinsek et al. (2013).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared by reaction of 2-amino-5-nitrophenol (5.00 g, 32.4 mmol) with toluic acid (4.41 g, 32.4 mmol) in polyphosphoric acid (150 g) at 150°C. The dehydration procedure is analogous to that we have already described for the synthesis of similar chromophores (Bruno et al., 2002; Centore et al., 2007). Purification of the title compound was obtained by recrystallization from ethanol. The final yield was 5.69 g (69%). M. p. 437 K. Single crystals were obtained by slow evaporation of an ethanol solution. 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.47 (s, 3H), 7.38 (d, 2H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.82 (d, 1H, J= 8.5 Hz), 8.18 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz), 8.33 (d, 1H, J= 8.7 Hz), 8.48 (d, 1H, J= 1.8 Hz).

Refinement top

All H atoms were generated stereochemically. In particular, the methyl group is disordered over two sets of sites of equal occupancy rotated from each other by 60°. All H atoms were refined by a riding model with C—H = 0.93-0.96 Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl hydrogen atoms.

Computing details top

Data collection: MACH3/PC Software (Nonius, 1996); cell refinement: CELLFITW (Centore, 2004); data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEP view of the molecular structure of the title compound. Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 50% probability level. Only one orientation of the disordered methyl group is shown.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Row of molecules of the title compound running along the a axis. Only one orientation of the disordered methyl group is shown. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Row of molecules of the title compound running along the c. Only one orientation of the disordered methyl group is shown. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
2-(4-Methylphenyl)-6-nitro-1,3-benzoxazole top
Crystal data top
C14H10N2O3F(000) = 1056
Mr = 254.24Dx = 1.388 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 27.251 (4) Åθ = 12.2–12.4°
b = 7.4457 (6) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 11.990 (9) ÅT = 293 K
V = 2432.8 (19) Å3Prism, brown
Z = 80.40 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius MACH3
diffractometer
Rint = 0.020
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 1.5°
Graphite monochromatorh = 1232
non–profiled ω scansk = 38
2968 measured reflectionsl = 514
2140 independent reflections1 standard reflections every 120 min
970 reflections with I > 2σ(I) intensity decay: none
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.168H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0553P)2 + 0.383P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2140 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
174 parametersΔρmax = 0.14 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
Crystal data top
C14H10N2O3V = 2432.8 (19) Å3
Mr = 254.24Z = 8
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation
a = 27.251 (4) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 7.4457 (6) ÅT = 293 K
c = 11.990 (9) Å0.40 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius MACH3
diffractometer
Rint = 0.020
2968 measured reflections1 standard reflections every 120 min
2140 independent reflections intensity decay: none
970 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0550 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.168H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11Δρmax = 0.14 e Å3
2140 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
174 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
O10.05625 (9)0.1644 (3)0.0918 (2)0.0545 (7)
O20.25311 (13)0.0885 (6)0.2271 (3)0.1125 (14)
O30.19587 (12)0.0394 (6)0.3439 (3)0.1144 (14)
N10.08562 (12)0.1994 (4)0.0827 (3)0.0614 (10)
N20.21215 (15)0.0363 (6)0.2493 (4)0.0771 (11)
C10.14836 (14)0.4375 (6)0.1283 (4)0.0819 (15)
H1A0.16840.33290.13910.123*0.57 (5)
H1B0.14770.50680.19580.123*0.57 (5)
H1C0.16180.50900.06900.123*0.57 (5)
H1D0.15020.56630.13020.123*0.43 (5)
H1E0.17090.39230.07350.123*0.43 (5)
H1F0.15680.39010.20020.123*0.43 (5)
C20.09695 (16)0.3808 (5)0.0983 (4)0.0624 (12)
C30.05929 (17)0.3930 (6)0.1742 (4)0.0754 (13)
H30.06560.44110.24430.091*
C40.01233 (16)0.3358 (6)0.1496 (4)0.0710 (13)
H40.01220.34200.20350.085*
C50.00180 (14)0.2695 (5)0.0448 (3)0.0516 (10)
C60.03907 (14)0.2611 (5)0.0325 (3)0.0621 (11)
H60.03250.21820.10380.074*
C70.08606 (15)0.3154 (6)0.0058 (4)0.0682 (13)
H70.11070.30750.05920.082*
C80.04769 (15)0.2121 (5)0.0175 (3)0.0521 (10)
C90.12336 (14)0.1393 (5)0.0134 (3)0.0548 (11)
C100.17235 (15)0.1012 (6)0.0351 (4)0.0724 (13)
H100.18550.11460.10620.087*
C110.20086 (14)0.0426 (6)0.0532 (4)0.0718 (13)
H110.23370.01390.04160.086*
C120.18069 (14)0.0268 (6)0.1583 (4)0.0592 (11)
C130.13235 (14)0.0639 (5)0.1837 (3)0.0571 (11)
H130.11940.05250.25510.069*
C140.10530 (14)0.1191 (5)0.0941 (3)0.0509 (10)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0553 (17)0.0632 (18)0.0449 (16)0.0015 (13)0.0038 (13)0.0002 (14)
O20.057 (2)0.171 (4)0.110 (3)0.020 (2)0.005 (2)0.013 (3)
O30.086 (2)0.190 (4)0.068 (2)0.022 (3)0.004 (2)0.022 (3)
N10.064 (2)0.073 (3)0.0474 (19)0.0022 (18)0.010 (2)0.0039 (19)
N20.058 (2)0.096 (3)0.077 (3)0.006 (2)0.004 (2)0.006 (3)
C10.073 (3)0.070 (3)0.103 (4)0.010 (3)0.024 (3)0.008 (3)
C20.071 (3)0.051 (3)0.066 (3)0.000 (2)0.008 (3)0.011 (3)
C30.090 (3)0.087 (3)0.049 (3)0.014 (3)0.011 (3)0.007 (3)
C40.075 (3)0.086 (3)0.052 (3)0.009 (3)0.002 (2)0.001 (3)
C50.060 (2)0.051 (3)0.044 (2)0.000 (2)0.002 (2)0.003 (2)
C60.064 (3)0.073 (3)0.050 (2)0.004 (3)0.002 (2)0.004 (2)
C70.060 (3)0.078 (3)0.067 (3)0.006 (2)0.004 (2)0.001 (3)
C80.067 (3)0.051 (3)0.038 (2)0.000 (2)0.001 (2)0.003 (2)
C90.058 (3)0.058 (3)0.048 (2)0.009 (2)0.008 (2)0.007 (2)
C100.065 (3)0.093 (4)0.058 (3)0.003 (3)0.019 (3)0.001 (3)
C110.053 (3)0.092 (3)0.070 (3)0.001 (3)0.010 (2)0.003 (3)
C120.050 (2)0.066 (3)0.062 (3)0.003 (2)0.005 (2)0.002 (2)
C130.059 (3)0.060 (3)0.052 (3)0.004 (2)0.005 (2)0.001 (2)
C140.048 (2)0.051 (2)0.054 (3)0.005 (2)0.006 (2)0.005 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C81.378 (4)C3—H30.9300
O1—C141.379 (4)C4—C51.380 (5)
O2—N21.212 (4)C4—H40.9300
O3—N21.218 (5)C5—C61.376 (5)
N1—C81.299 (4)C5—C81.452 (5)
N1—C91.396 (5)C6—C71.381 (5)
N2—C121.465 (5)C6—H60.9300
C1—C21.506 (5)C7—H70.9300
C1—H1A0.9600C9—C141.387 (5)
C1—H1B0.9600C9—C101.389 (5)
C1—H1C0.9600C10—C111.383 (6)
C1—H1D0.9600C10—H100.9300
C1—H1E0.9600C11—C121.380 (5)
C1—H1F0.9600C11—H110.9300
C2—C71.373 (6)C12—C131.380 (5)
C2—C31.375 (6)C13—C141.366 (5)
C3—C41.381 (6)C13—H130.9300
C8—O1—C14104.2 (3)C5—C4—H4120.1
C8—N1—C9104.6 (3)C3—C4—H4120.1
O2—N2—O3122.3 (4)C6—C5—C4118.4 (4)
O2—N2—C12118.5 (4)C6—C5—C8121.4 (4)
O3—N2—C12119.1 (4)C4—C5—C8120.2 (4)
C2—C1—H1A109.5C5—C6—C7121.0 (4)
C2—C1—H1B109.5C5—C6—H6119.5
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C7—C6—H6119.5
C2—C1—H1C109.5C2—C7—C6121.0 (4)
H1A—C1—H1C109.5C2—C7—H7119.5
H1B—C1—H1C109.5C6—C7—H7119.5
C2—C1—H1D109.5N1—C8—O1114.8 (3)
H1A—C1—H1D141.1N1—C8—C5128.7 (4)
H1B—C1—H1D56.3O1—C8—C5116.6 (3)
H1C—C1—H1D56.3C14—C9—C10119.5 (4)
C2—C1—H1E109.5C14—C9—N1109.0 (3)
H1A—C1—H1E56.3C10—C9—N1131.4 (4)
H1B—C1—H1E141.1C11—C10—C9117.4 (4)
H1C—C1—H1E56.3C11—C10—H10121.3
H1D—C1—H1E109.5C9—C10—H10121.3
C2—C1—H1F109.5C12—C11—C10120.1 (4)
H1A—C1—H1F56.3C12—C11—H11119.9
H1B—C1—H1F56.3C10—C11—H11119.9
H1C—C1—H1F141.1C13—C12—C11124.4 (4)
H1D—C1—H1F109.5C13—C12—N2117.3 (4)
H1E—C1—H1F109.5C11—C12—N2118.3 (4)
C7—C2—C3117.7 (4)C14—C13—C12113.7 (4)
C7—C2—C1121.1 (4)C14—C13—H13123.1
C3—C2—C1121.2 (4)C12—C13—H13123.1
C2—C3—C4122.0 (4)C13—C14—O1127.8 (4)
C2—C3—H3119.0C13—C14—C9124.8 (4)
C4—C3—H3119.0O1—C14—C9107.4 (4)
C5—C4—C3119.9 (4)
C7—C2—C3—C42.4 (7)N1—C9—C10—C11179.9 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C4177.7 (4)C9—C10—C11—C121.1 (7)
C2—C3—C4—C52.1 (7)C10—C11—C12—C130.8 (7)
C3—C4—C5—C60.5 (7)C10—C11—C12—N2179.8 (4)
C3—C4—C5—C8178.9 (4)O2—N2—C12—C13172.0 (4)
C4—C5—C6—C70.8 (6)O3—N2—C12—C135.9 (7)
C8—C5—C6—C7179.8 (4)O2—N2—C12—C117.0 (7)
C3—C2—C7—C61.0 (6)O3—N2—C12—C11175.1 (5)
C1—C2—C7—C6179.0 (4)C11—C12—C13—C140.0 (6)
C5—C6—C7—C20.6 (7)N2—C12—C13—C14179.0 (4)
C9—N1—C8—O10.3 (4)C12—C13—C14—O1179.4 (4)
C9—N1—C8—C5179.6 (4)C12—C13—C14—C90.6 (6)
C14—O1—C8—N10.7 (4)C8—O1—C14—C13179.2 (4)
C14—O1—C8—C5179.2 (3)C8—O1—C14—C90.8 (4)
C6—C5—C8—N1174.5 (4)C10—C9—C14—C130.3 (6)
C4—C5—C8—N16.1 (7)N1—C9—C14—C13179.3 (3)
C6—C5—C8—O15.6 (6)C10—C9—C14—O1179.7 (3)
C4—C5—C8—O1173.8 (4)N1—C9—C14—O10.7 (4)
C8—N1—C9—C140.2 (4)C4—C5—C8—N16.1 (7)
C8—N1—C9—C10179.8 (4)C4—C5—C8—O1173.8 (4)
C14—C9—C10—C110.5 (6)C11—C12—N2—O3175.1 (5)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C10—H10···O2i0.932.613.502 (6)160
C1—H1B···O2ii0.962.803.143 (5)102
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y, z1/2; (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC14H10N2O3
Mr254.24
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pbca
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)27.251 (4), 7.4457 (6), 11.990 (9)
V3)2432.8 (19)
Z8
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.10
Crystal size (mm)0.40 × 0.20 × 0.20
Data collection
DiffractometerEnraf–Nonius MACH3
diffractometer
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
2968, 2140, 970
Rint0.020
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.594
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.055, 0.168, 1.11
No. of reflections2140
No. of parameters174
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.14, 0.19

Computer programs: MACH3/PC Software (Nonius, 1996), CELLFITW (Centore, 2004), XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006), WinGX (Farrugia, 2012).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C10—H10···O2i0.932.613.502 (6)160.0
C1—H1B···O2ii0.962.803.143 (5)102.2
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y, z1/2; (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Centro Inter­dipartimentale di Metodologie Chimico-Fisiche, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", for support.

References

First citationAltomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115–119.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
First citationBruno, V., Castaldo, A., Centore, R., Sirigu, A., Sarcinelli, F., Casalboni, M. & Pizzoferrato, R. (2002). J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 40, 1468–1475.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationCapobianco, A., Centore, R., Noce, C. & Peluso, A. (2013). Chem. Phys. 411, 11–16.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationCapobianco, A., Esposito, A., Caruso, T., Borbone, F., Carella, A., Centore, R. & Peluso, A. (2012). Eur. J. Org. Chem. pp. 2980–2989.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef
First citationCarella, A., Centore, R., Fort, A., Peluso, A., Sirigu, A. & Tuzi, A. (2004). Eur. J. Org. Chem. pp. 2620–2626.  CSD CrossRef
First citationCarella, A., Centore, R., Sirigu, A., Tuzi, A., Quatela, A., Schutzmann, S. & Casalboni, M. (2004). Macromol. Chem. Phys. 205, 1948–1954.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS
First citationCentore, R. (2004). CELLFITW. Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
First citationCentore, R., Concilio, A., Borbone, F., Fusco, S., Carella, A., Roviello, A., Stracci, G. & Gianvito, A. (2012). J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 50, 650–655.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationCentore, R., Fusco, S., Capobianco, A., Piccialli, V., Zaccaria, S. & Peluso, A. (2013). Eur. J. Org. Chem. In the press. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201201653.
First citationCentore, R., Fusco, S., Jazbinsek, M., Capobianco, A. & Peluso, A. (2013). CrystEngComm. 15, 3318–3325.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS
First citationCentore, R., Riccio, P., Fusco, S., Carella, A., Quatela, A., Schutzmann, S., Stella, F. & De Matteis, F. (2007). J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 45, 2719–2725.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationCentore, R., Ricciotti, L., Carella, A., Roviello, A., Causà, M., Barra, M., Ciccullo, F. & Cassinese, A. (2012). Org. Electron. 13, 2083–2093.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationDalton, L. (2002). Adv. Polym. Sci. 158, 1–86.  CrossRef CAS
First citationDesiraju, G. R. & Steiner, T. (1999). In The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
First citationGainsford, G. J., Bhuiyan, M. D. H. & Kay, A. J. (2008). Acta Cryst. C64, o616–o619.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
First citationHarms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995). XCAD4. University of Marburg, Germany.
First citationHeeger, A. J. (2010). Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 2354–2371.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed
First citationMacrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
First citationNonius (1996). MACH3/PC and CAD-4-PC. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.
First citationPiccialli, V., D'Errico, S., Borbone, N., Oliviero, G., Centore, R. & Zaccaria, S. (2013). Eur. J. Org. Chem. In the press. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201201554.
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
First citationTakjoo, R. & Centore, R. (2013). J. Mol. Struct. 1031, 180–185.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS
First citationTakjoo, R., Centore, R., Hakimi, M., Beyramabadi, A. S. & Morsali, A. (2011). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 371, 36–41.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 69| Part 5| May 2013| Pages o667-o668
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds