research papers\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775

Solid/liquid-interface-dependent synthesis and immobilization of copper-based particles nucleated by X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aLaboratory of Advanced Science and Technology for Industry, University of Hyogo, 3-1-2 Kouto, Kamigori, Hyogo 678-1205, Japan, bAichi Synchrotron Radiation Center, 250-3 Minamiyamaguchi-cho, Seto-shi, Aichi 489-0965, Japan, and cHyogo Prefectural Institute of Technology, 3-1-12 Yukihira, Suma, Kobe 654-0037, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: yamaguti@lasti.u-hyogo.ac.jp

Edited by Y. Amemiya, University of Tokyo, Japan (Received 14 January 2020; accepted 13 April 2020; online 19 May 2020)

X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction of a liquid solution enables the direct synthesis and immobilization of nano/micro-scale particles and their aggregates onto a desired area. As is well known, the synthesis, growth and aggregation are dependent on the pH, additives and X-ray irradiation conditions. In this study, it was found that the topography and composition of synthesized particles are also dependent on the types of substrate dipped in an aqueous solution of Cu(COOCH3)2 in the X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction. These results are attributed to the fact that a secondary electron induced by the X-ray irradiation, surface or interface on which the particles are nucleated and grown influences the particle shape and composition. This study will shed light on understanding a novel photochemical reaction route induced under X-ray irradiation. The development of this process using the X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction in aqueous liquids enables us to achieve the rapid and easy operation of the synthesis, growth and immobilization of special nano/micro-scale complex materials or multifunctional composites.

1. Introduction

Interfaces and surfaces are of utmost importance in both physical and chemical reactions. Many studies have been carried out investigating these reactions. Here, we focus on the preparation of metal and oxide nano/microparticles on various substrates as it is a key issue in all fields of modern science and technology covering electronics, photonics, catalysis, bio­technology and so on. Electrochemical and electroless wet chemical deposition and other methods utilizing lasers (Bae et al., 2002[Bae, C. H., Nam, S. H. & Park, S. M. (2002). Appl. Surf. Sci. 197-198, 628-634.]; Akamatsu et al., 2004[Akamatsu, K., Ikeda, S., Nawafune, H. & Yanagimoto, H. (2004). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 10822-10823.]), ion beams (Yamaguchi et al., 2005[Yamaguchi, H., Uchihori, Y., Yasuda, N., Takada, M. & Kitamura, H. (2005). J. Radiat. Res. (Tokyo), 46, 333-341.]), electron beams (Jonah & Miller, 1977[Jonah, C. D. & Miller, J. R. (1977). J. Phys. Chem. 81, 1974-1976.]), X-rays (Ma et al., 2000[Ma, Q., Moldovan, N., Mancini, D. C. & Rosenberg, R. A. (2000). Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2014-2016.]; Borse et al., 2004[Borse, P. H., Yi, J. M., Je, J. H., Tsai, W. L. & Hwu, Y. (2004). J. Appl. Phys. 95, 1166-1170.]; Karadas et al., 2005[Karadas, F., Ertas, G., Ozkaraoglu, E. & Suzer, S. (2005). Langmuir, 21, 437-442.]; Oyanagi et al., 2014[Oyanagi, H., Orimoto, Y., Hayakawa, K., Hatada, K., Sun, Z., Zhang, L., Yamashita, K., Nakamura, H., Uehara, M., Fukano, A. & Maeda, H. (2014). Sci. Rep. 4, 7199.]; Yamaguchi et al., 2015[Yamaguchi, A., Matsumoto, T., Okada, I., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2015). Mater. Chem. Phys. 160, 205-211.], 2016a[Yamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2016a). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 055502.],b[Yamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Ishihara, M., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2016b). J. Nanomater. 2016, 8584304.], 2017[Yamaguchi, A., Fukuoka, T., Okada, I., Ishihara, M., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2017). J. Synchrotron Rad. 24, 653-660.], 2019[Yamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Sakurai, I., Izumi, H., Ishihara, M., Fukuoka, T., Suzuki, S., Elphick, K., Jackson, E., Hirohata, A. & Utsumi, Y. (2019). J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 1986-1995.]; Saegusa et al., 2019[Saegusa, S., Sakurai, I., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Suzuki, S., Utsumi, Y. & Yamaguchi, A. (2019). Trans. Jpn Inst. Electronics Packaging, 12, E19-003.]; Bharti et al., 2016[Bharti, A., Bhardwaj, R., Agrawal, N., Goyal, S. & Gautam, S. (2016). Sci. Rep. 6, 22394.]; Remita et al., 2007[Remita, S., Fontaine, P., Lacaze, E., Borensztein, Y., Sellame, H., Farha, R., Rochas, C. & Goldmann, M. (2007). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, 263, 436-440.]) and γ-rays (Bárta et al., 2010[Bárta, J., Pospíšil, M. & Čuba, V. (2010). J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 286, 611-618.]; Dey, 2005[Dey, G. R. (2005). Radiat. Phys. Chem. 74, 172-184.]) have also been studied for incorporating metal clusters onto substrates in the desired chemical and morphological states. In particular, photochemical processes induced by broad-sense light irradiation in heterogeneous systems have been widely used in recent years because of their easy operation and wide applications. Of particular interest are photochemical reactions and processes on inorganic metal and oxide surfaces. Many excellent studies have appeared in recent years demonstrating the various possible ways with which the support materials control the photochemical reaction properties. The reduction effect induced by the additive alcohol has also been investigated in sonochemistry, hydro­thermal microwave irradiation and photochemical reactions using UV, laser, X-ray and γ-ray irradiation. The role of support materials is to assist the electron transfer resulting in reduction of metal or oxide particles and clusters, frequently having the functionality as scavenger (Yamaguchi et al., 2016b[Yamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Ishihara, M., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2016b). J. Nanomater. 2016, 8584304.], 2017[Yamaguchi, A., Fukuoka, T., Okada, I., Ishihara, M., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2017). J. Synchrotron Rad. 24, 653-660.], 2019[Yamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Sakurai, I., Izumi, H., Ishihara, M., Fukuoka, T., Suzuki, S., Elphick, K., Jackson, E., Hirohata, A. & Utsumi, Y. (2019). J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 1986-1995.]; Saegusa et al., 2019[Saegusa, S., Sakurai, I., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Suzuki, S., Utsumi, Y. & Yamaguchi, A. (2019). Trans. Jpn Inst. Electronics Packaging, 12, E19-003.]; Dey, 2005[Dey, G. R. (2005). Radiat. Phys. Chem. 74, 172-184.]).

The synthesis of cupric particles has attracted considerable attention due to their fundamental importance and potential future applications (Siegfried & Choi, 2005[Siegfried, M. J. & Choi, K. (2005). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 3218-3223.]; Zoolfakar et al., 2014[Zoolfakar, A. S., Rani, R. A., Morfa, A. J., O'Mullane, A. P. & Kalantar-zadeh, K. (2014). J. Mater. Chem. C, 2, 5247-5270.]; Meyer et al., 2012[Meyer, B. K., Polity, A., Reppin, D., Becker, M., Hering, P., Klar, P. J., Sander, Th., Reindl, C., Benz, J., Eickhoff, M., Heiliger, C., Heinemann, M., Bläsing, J., Krost, A., Shokovets, S., Müller, C. & Ronning, C. (2012). Phys. Status Solidi B, 249, 1487-1509.]; Su et al., 2015[Su, D., Xie, X., Dou, S. & Wang, G. (2015). Sci. Rep. 4, 5753.]; Poizot et al., 2000[Poizot, P., Laruelle, S., Grugeon, S., Dupont, L. & Tarascon, J. M. (2000). Nature, 407, 496-499.]; Tamaki et al., 1998[Tamaki, J., Shimanoe, K., Yamada, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Miura, N. & Yamazoe, N. (1998). Sens. Actuators B Chem. 49, 121-125.]; Wang et al., 1996[Wang, L., Wu, H., Desai, S. R. & Lou, L. (1996). Phys. Rev. B, 53, 8028-8031.]; Zaman et al., 2011[Zaman, S., Asif, M. H., Zainelabdin, A., Amin, G., Nur, O. & Willander, M. (2011). J. Electroanal. Chem. 662, 421-425.], 2012[Zaman, S., Zainelabdin, A., Amin, G., Nur, O. & Willander, M. (2012). J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 73, 1320-1325.]; Izaki et al., 2007[Izaki, M., Shinagawa, T., Mizuno, K., Ida, Y., Inaba, M. & Tasaka, A. (2007). J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 40, 3326-3329.]; Zhang et al., 2014[Zhang, Q., Zhang, K., Xu, D., Yang, G., Huang, H., Nie, F., Liu, C. & Yang, S. (2014). Prog. Mater. Sci. 60, 208-337.]; Wang et al., 2018[Wang, W., Zhu, L., Lv, P., Liu, G., Yu, Y. & Li, J. (2018). Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10, 37287-37297.]; Volanti et al., 2008[Volanti, D. P., Keyson, D., Cavalcante, L. S., Simões, A. Z., Joya, M. R., Longo, E., Varela, J. A., Pizani, P. S. & Souza, A. G. (2008). J. Alloys Compd. 459, 537-542.]). Cupric oxides are p-type semiconductor materials with narrow band gap energy, resulting in their use in the anodes of lithium ion cells and solar-cell panels, etc. Until now, using a hydro­thermal microwave oven technique has enabled synthesis of CuO nanostructures (Zaman et al., 2012[Zaman, S., Zainelabdin, A., Amin, G., Nur, O. & Willander, M. (2012). J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 73, 1320-1325.]; Zhang et al., 2014[Zhang, Q., Zhang, K., Xu, D., Yang, G., Huang, H., Nie, F., Liu, C. & Yang, S. (2014). Prog. Mater. Sci. 60, 208-337.]; Volanti et al., 2008[Volanti, D. P., Keyson, D., Cavalcante, L. S., Simões, A. Z., Joya, M. R., Longo, E., Varela, J. A., Pizani, P. S. & Souza, A. G. (2008). J. Alloys Compd. 459, 537-542.]). Recently, Wang et al. have succeeded in synthesizing the novel candy-like Cu4O3 microstructure by facile wet chemical synthesis (Wang et al., 2018[Wang, W., Zhu, L., Lv, P., Liu, G., Yu, Y. & Li, J. (2018). Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10, 37287-37297.]). They have also reported long-term antibacterial activities of the candy-like Cu4O3 microstructure. Caltrop cupric oxide micro/nanoparticles including both Cu2O and CuO have been directly synthesized from Cu(COOCH3)2 aqueous solution by X-ray radiolysis with additive alcohols (Yamaguchi et al., 2017[Yamaguchi, A., Fukuoka, T., Okada, I., Ishihara, M., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2017). J. Synchrotron Rad. 24, 653-660.], 2019[Yamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Sakurai, I., Izumi, H., Ishihara, M., Fukuoka, T., Suzuki, S., Elphick, K., Jackson, E., Hirohata, A. & Utsumi, Y. (2019). J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 1986-1995.]; Saegusa et al., 2019[Saegusa, S., Sakurai, I., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Suzuki, S., Utsumi, Y. & Yamaguchi, A. (2019). Trans. Jpn Inst. Electronics Packaging, 12, E19-003.]). Recently, it has been found that alkyl alcohols with a chain length longer than four are unable to synthesize any particles in aqueous solutions of Cu(COOCH3)2 due to X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction (Yamaguchi et al., 2019[Yamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Sakurai, I., Izumi, H., Ishihara, M., Fukuoka, T., Suzuki, S., Elphick, K., Jackson, E., Hirohata, A. & Utsumi, Y. (2019). J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 1986-1995.]). From these results it is deduced that the solvable ratio of alcohol to water plays a significant role in the synthesis, growth and aggregation of particles. Thus, the recent investigations reveal, to some extent, the controllability of particle synthesis by the X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction.

X-ray irradiation can provide radicals from the radiolysis of liquids and secondary electron generation from substrates dipped in liquid solution. There are two possible routes for the nucleation and immobilization of particles. One is a normal process (Route 1) which sequentially precedes nucleation, growth and aggregation in the liquid solution (La Mer & Dinegar, 1950[La Mer, V. K. & Dinegar, R. H. (1950). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72, 4847-4854.]; La Mer, 1952[La Mer, V. K. (1952). Ind. Eng. Chem. 44, 1270-1277.]), schematically illustrated in Fig. 1(a)[link]. The grown particles are attached onto a substrate through van der Waals interactions and finally immobilized. In the other route (Route 2) particles are generated on the surface of the substrate and particles reduced by secondary electron generation from the substrate by X-ray irradiation are involved in particle growth on the substrate surface, as shown in Fig. 1(b)[link]. Therefore, the nucleation, growth and aggregation of particles could be influenced, in particular, near the surface of the substrate and the interface between the particles and substrate. We should investigate the controllability of cupric particle synthesis by type of substrate on which the synthesized particles are grown and immobilized in liquid solution using X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction to understand the mechanism of particle nucleation, ripening and aggregation. In this study, we study the substrate type dependence of synthesis, growth and immobilization of cupric particles by X-ray-induced photochemical reaction using synchrotron radiation.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of particles synthesized in X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction in a liquid and near the surface of a substrate dipped in solution. (a) Route 1 shows the series of particle nucleation, growth, ripening and aggregation induced by the X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction in a liquid solution. After the particle ripening is partially completed, it adheres to the surface of the substrate. (b) Route 2 shows that a secondary electron induced from the substrate by X-ray irradiation contributes to the reduction of metallic ions and precedes the nucleation and growth of particles on the surface of substrate.

2. Experiments

We performed synchrotron-radiation-induced X-ray radiolysis experiments using beamline BL8S2 at the Aichi Synchrotron Radiation Center, Aichi Science and Technology Foundation (Yamaguchi et al., 2015[Yamaguchi, A., Matsumoto, T., Okada, I., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2015). Mater. Chem. Phys. 160, 205-211.], 2016a[Yamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2016a). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 055502.],b[Yamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Ishihara, M., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2016b). J. Nanomater. 2016, 8584304.], 2017[Yamaguchi, A., Fukuoka, T., Okada, I., Ishihara, M., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2017). J. Synchrotron Rad. 24, 653-660.], 2019[Yamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Sakurai, I., Izumi, H., Ishihara, M., Fukuoka, T., Suzuki, S., Elphick, K., Jackson, E., Hirohata, A. & Utsumi, Y. (2019). J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 1986-1995.]; Saegusa et al., 2019[Saegusa, S., Sakurai, I., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Suzuki, S., Utsumi, Y. & Yamaguchi, A. (2019). Trans. Jpn Inst. Electronics Packaging, 12, E19-003.]). The storage ring current and energy were in operation at 300 mA and 1.2 GeV with super-bending magnets of 5 T. The X-ray spectrum is displayed in Fig. 2(a)[link]. The substrates except LiNbO3 were purchased from the Nilaco Corporation (https://nilaco.jp/en/), a specialized trading company which mainly treats various materials for scientific researchers and engineers. The pure grade for Cu, Al and Ni plates was 99.96%, 99+% and 99%, respectively. Silicon substrates were `eleven nines' and doped. LiNbO3 substrates were purchased from Yamaju Ceramics Co. Ltd – they were purchased in the form of plates and cut into 10 mm × 10 mm pieces for use. Substrate cleaning was performed after ultrasonic cleaning with pure water and acetone. The silicon substrate was not subjected to a process for removing a naturally occurring oxide layer. Here, we prepared 20 ml aliquots of 0.05 M (mol L−1) Cu(COOCH3)2 (purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Wako 1st Grade) as a stock solution. In this study we used an ultra-pure water prepared by a Milli-Q system (Merck KGaA). We siphoned off 200 µL of the stock solution into a microtube and added 1 µL of methanol to obtain the mixed solution. The methanol was also purchased as Wako 1st Grade from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation. We siphoned off 20 µL aliquots of the mixed solution and poured it into the apparatus for the liquid irradiation. To investigate the substrate type dependence of the X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction, each substrate listed in Table 1[link] (size: 10 mm × 10 mm) was dipped into the solution in the apparatus as schematically illustrated in Fig. 2(b)[link]. Then the specimen was exposed to polychromatic X-ray irradiation (for 5 min). The cell used for the X-ray radiolysis process was then insulated from the ground. In this experimental setup there was no flow of electrons from the ground to the substrate/liquid interface. All electrons participating in the reduction process were supplied from X-ray irradiation. After the irradiation, the specimen temperature was anticipated to be raised by about 15°C. After 5 min of X-ray irradiation some particles and their aggregates were deposited and immobilized on the substrate. The substrate was taken from the specimen and gently washed with ionized water to remove residual materials. The residual dross was adequately removed but the immobilized particles were not. The particles on each substrate were examined by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; Jeol JSM-7001F) with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) to perform topological and elemental analyses. We also measured the Raman spectra of the particles using a micro-Raman spectrometer (NR-5100; JASCO). The excitation source had a wavelength of 532 nm, a power of 3.2 mW and was magnified using a 100× field lens. The laser spot size was about 1 µm. All experiments were performed at room temperature and in ambient atmosphere.

Table 1
Summary of substrates dipped in the cell

Number Substrate
1 SiO2/Si
2 Si(100) n-type, sheet resistivity, 1–10 Ω cm
3 Si(100) p-type, sheet resistivity, 1–20 Ω cm
4 Cu
5 Ni
6 Al
7 128° Y-cut LiNbO3
8 PTFE
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
(a) X-ray spectrum for this experimental setup at BL8S1 of Aichi Synchrotron Radiation Center. (b) Schematic of the X-ray irradiation experimental setup. This cell, used for the X-ray radiolysis process, was insulated from the ground. All electrons participating in the reduction process are supplied from X-ray irradation only. There is no flow of electrons from the ground to the substrate/liquid interface.

3. Results and discussion

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of particles synthesized and immobilized on the substrates listed on Table 1[link] by X-ray-radiolysis-induced-photochemical reaction in the solution are shown in Figs. 3[link]–10[link][link][link][link][link][link][link]. Comparing these figures, the particle shape and elemental composition were found to be strongly dependent on the type of substrate. For example, relatively sharp shaped particles tended to synthesize on Ni, n-doped Si(100), p-doped Si(100) and Al substrates; various shaped particles immobilized on the SiO2/Si and Cu substrates; and distorted particles formed on the LiNbO3 and polytetrafluorethyl­ene (PTFE) substrates.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
(a) SEM image of particles deposited on SiO2/Si substrate dopped in a Cu(COOCH3)2 solution with methanol after X-ray irradiation for 5 min. (b) The EDX spectrum measured from the position indicated by the red cross mark in (a).
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
(a) SEM image and (b) EDX spectrum of particles synthesized and deposited on an n-doped Si substrate.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
(a) SEM image and (b) EDX spectrum of particles synthesized and deposited on a p-doped Si substrate.
[Figure 6]
Figure 6
(a) SEM image and (b) EDX spectrum of particles synthesized and deposited on a Cu substrate.
[Figure 7]
Figure 7
(a) SEM image and (b) EDX spectrum of particles synthesized and deposited on an Ni substrate.
[Figure 8]
Figure 8
(a) SEM image and (b) EDX spectrum of particles synthesized and deposited on an Al substrate.
[Figure 9]
Figure 9
(a) SEM image and (b) EDX spectrum of particles synthesized and deposited on a 128° Y-cut LiNbO3 substrate.
[Figure 10]
Figure 10
(a) SEM image and (b) EDX spectrum of particles synthesized and deposited on a PTFE substrate.

Next, to investigate the composition of the substrate dependence of cupric particles synthesized by the X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction, the micro-Raman spectra were measured. Fig. 11[link] shows a summary of Raman spectra of the particles synthesized and immobilized on each substrate described in Table 1[link]. Comparing these spectra obtained from (a) SiO2/Si, (b) n-doped Si and (c) p-doped Si substrates, we notice that the obtained Raman spectra are almost the same. This result indicates that the composition of the synthesized particles deposited on the silicon substrates is independent of doping but the morphology is strongly dependent on the surface crystalline nature. This fact is easily understandable from the viewpoint of the crystal growth mechanism.

[Figure 11]
Figure 11
Micro-laser Raman spectra of particles immobilized on (a) SiO2/Si, (b) n-doped Si, (c) p-doped Si, (d) Cu, (e) Ni, (f) Al, (g) 128° Y-cut LiNbO3 and (h) PTFE substrates.

The Raman spectrum obtained from the particles grown on the Cu substrate is quite different from those of the others. Besides, we notice that the Raman spectrum of particles on Ni, LiNbO3 and PTFE substrates are also unique. The Raman spectrum of particles on Al substrates is almost the same as those Raman spectra obtained from the SiO2/Si and Si substrates. There are three cupric oxides candidates: CuO, Cu2O and Cu4O3. Peaks at 283, 333 and 622 cm−1 are deduced to be Raman signals from the Ag (283.8 cm−1) and Bg (333.5 and 622.5 cm−1) modes of cupric oxide CuO. Here, according to Debbichi et al. (2012[Debbichi, L., Marco de Lucas, M. C., Pierson, J. F. & Krüger, P. (2012). J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, 10232-10237.]), the Ag and Bg peaks denote the Raman modes only with the oxygen atom displacement along the b direction and perpendicular to the b axis, respectively. The Raman spectra from particles on SiO2, n-doped Si, p-doped Si and Al substrates are expected to be almost originated from CuO. The Raman signal at about 215 cm−1 and broad Raman peak structure ranging from 500 to 630 cm−1 originate from Cu2O. By comparison with these Raman spectra, in the particles synthesized on Cu, Ni, LiNbO3 and PTFE substrates, Cu2O is included. The particles synthesized on Ni and LiNbO3 substrates consist of both CuO and Cu2O, while the particles synthesized on Cu substrate are made from the complex of Cu2O and Cu4O3. These results may be reasonable for Cu/O (at %) ratios of the particles comparing with EDX analyses. Here, it allows us to deduce that the synthesized particle composition is strongly dependent on substrate type. Basically, the main component of the particles synthesized on a substrate except the Cu substrate tends to be CuO and Cu2O. Consequently, cupric oxide particles consisting of mainly Cu4O3 are synthesized, grown and immobilized only on the Cu substrate, while the other conditions synthesized cupric particles composed mainly of CuO or Cu2O. The results indicate that the composition of the synthesized and immobilized cupric particles is strongly dependent on substrate type.

Here, paramelaconite, Cu4O3, is difficult to synthesize using normal methods. Cu4O3 is a naturally occurring scarce mineral (Zoolfakar et al., 2014[Zoolfakar, A. S., Rani, R. A., Morfa, A. J., O'Mullane, A. P. & Kalantar-zadeh, K. (2014). J. Mater. Chem. C, 2, 5247-5270.]; Meyer et al., 2012[Meyer, B. K., Polity, A., Reppin, D., Becker, M., Hering, P., Klar, P. J., Sander, Th., Reindl, C., Benz, J., Eickhoff, M., Heiliger, C., Heinemann, M., Bläsing, J., Krost, A., Shokovets, S., Müller, C. & Ronning, C. (2012). Phys. Status Solidi B, 249, 1487-1509.]). Recently, some processes have succeeded in the synthesis of Cu4O3 that contains both +1 and +2 valence states with average composition Cu2+1Cu2+2O3 as Wang et al. investigated the electronic structure (Wang et al., 1996[Wang, L., Wu, H., Desai, S. R. & Lou, L. (1996). Phys. Rev. B, 53, 8028-8031.]). Basically, it had only been synthesized as thin films, never as a bulk material. As described above, Wang et al. synthesized candy-like Cu4O3 particles successfully by microwave-irradiation synthesis method (Wang et al., 2018[Wang, W., Zhu, L., Lv, P., Liu, G., Yu, Y. & Li, J. (2018). Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10, 37287-37297.]). This photochemical reaction can provide bulk material of paramelaconite and immobilize it onto desired areas.

To date, many different approaches for the synthesis of nano/microstructured copper oxide have been investigated and implemented using not only vapor- but also liquid-phase-based methods. For example, physical vapor deposition including sputtering, thermal evaporation, thermal oxidation, molecular beam epitaxy, pulse vapor deposition and electron beam epitaxy have been used for the deposition of thin film and nanostructured copper oxide. Several groups have successfully demonstrated the synthesis of single CuO, Cu2O and Cu4O3 phases by varying the oxygen flow rate using a reactive magnetron sputtering technique from a Cu target. Cu4O3 films have also been synthesized with a CuO target at a lower sputtering power (Zoolfakar et al., 2014[Zoolfakar, A. S., Rani, R. A., Morfa, A. J., O'Mullane, A. P. & Kalantar-zadeh, K. (2014). J. Mater. Chem. C, 2, 5247-5270.]; Meyer et al., 2012[Meyer, B. K., Polity, A., Reppin, D., Becker, M., Hering, P., Klar, P. J., Sander, Th., Reindl, C., Benz, J., Eickhoff, M., Heiliger, C., Heinemann, M., Bläsing, J., Krost, A., Shokovets, S., Müller, C. & Ronning, C. (2012). Phys. Status Solidi B, 249, 1487-1509.]; Medina-Valtierra et al., 2009[Medina-Valtierra, J., Frausto-Reyes, C., Camarillo-Martínez, G. & Ramírez-Ortiz, J. A. (2009). Appl. Catal. Gen. 356, 36-42.]).

Chemical vapor deposition processes, which are very popular deposition techniques, have often been used for depositing different CuxO stoichiometries. Medina-Valtierra et al. have demonstrated the synthesis of nanostructured Cu4O3 and CuO thin films (Medina-Valtierra et al., 2009[Medina-Valtierra, J., Frausto-Reyes, C., Camarillo-Martínez, G. & Ramírez-Ortiz, J. A. (2009). Appl. Catal. Gen. 356, 36-42.]). Pola-Albores et al. have successfully demonstrated the deposition of Cu4O3 films on ZnO nano-rods using spray pyrolysis techniques (Pola-Albores et al., 2012[Pola-Albores, F., Antúnez-Flores, W., Amézaga-Madrid, P., Ríos-Valdovinos, E., Valenzuela-Zapata, M., Paraguay-Delgado, F. & Miki-Yoshida, M. (2012). J. Cryst. Growth, 351, 77-82.]). The solid reaction between CuO and Cu2O results in paramelaconite phase formation which can be described by (Zoolfakar et al., 2014[Zoolfakar, A. S., Rani, R. A., Morfa, A. J., O'Mullane, A. P. & Kalantar-zadeh, K. (2014). J. Mater. Chem. C, 2, 5247-5270.]; Meyer et al., 2012[Meyer, B. K., Polity, A., Reppin, D., Becker, M., Hering, P., Klar, P. J., Sander, Th., Reindl, C., Benz, J., Eickhoff, M., Heiliger, C., Heinemann, M., Bläsing, J., Krost, A., Shokovets, S., Müller, C. & Ronning, C. (2012). Phys. Status Solidi B, 249, 1487-1509.])

[2{\rm{CuO}}\,\,+\,\,{\rm{Cu}}_2{\rm{O}} \,\,\rightarrow\,\, {\rm{Cu}}_4{\rm{O}}_3. \eqno(1)]

Liquid-phase techniques including electrodeposition, hydro­thermal/solvothermal and sol-gel are generally chosen due to their low cost and better control of the material's morphology at relatively low temperatures. Zhao et al. have synthesized pure polycrystalline Cu4O3 microspheres using copper (II) nitrate as the precursor in the presence of N,N-di­methyl­formamide and ethanol. They successfully deposited Cu4O3 films using the reaction of equation (1)[link] in a closed system (Zhao et al., 2012[Zhao, L., Chen, H., Wang, Y., Che, H., Gunawan, P., Zhong, Z., Li, H. & Su, F. (2012). Chem. Mater. 24, 1136-1142.]). In terms of the electrochemical reaction characteristics, as the lithium-ion storage electrodes deposited CuO thin film to enlarge the storage properties, the Cu4O3 phase appears. It is found that Cu4O3 plays an important role in the reversible electrochemical reactions that take place during the charging process (Chen et al., 2015[Chen, W., Zhang, H., Ma, Z., Yang, B. & Li, Z. (2015). J. Mater. Chem. A, 3, 14202-14209.]). Recently, Wang et al. have successfully synthesized Cu4O3 particles for the first time using a facile wet chemical method and investigated the formation mechanism based on a series of control experiments (Wang et al., 2018[Wang, W., Zhu, L., Lv, P., Liu, G., Yu, Y. & Li, J. (2018). Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10, 37287-37297.]). They reported that the candy-like Cu4O3 microstructure was formed via Cu(NH3)42+ → Cu(OH)42– → Cu(OH)2 → CuO → Cu4O3 nuclei → Cu4O3 crystal growth → candy-like Cu4O3. They also reported that the synthesized candy-like Cu4O3 microstructure exhibits good long-term antibacterial activities to both E. coli and S. aureus bacteria because the release of Cu2+ ions from the Cu4O3 is responsible for the antibacterial activity. On the other hand, Yamaguchi et al. have added the X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical synthesis of copper oxide materials as liquid-based phase reaction (Yamaguchi et al., 2016a[Yamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2016a). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 055502.],b[Yamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Ishihara, M., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2016b). J. Nanomater. 2016, 8584304.], 2017[Yamaguchi, A., Fukuoka, T., Okada, I., Ishihara, M., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2017). J. Synchrotron Rad. 24, 653-660.], 2019[Yamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Sakurai, I., Izumi, H., Ishihara, M., Fukuoka, T., Suzuki, S., Elphick, K., Jackson, E., Hirohata, A. & Utsumi, Y. (2019). J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 1986-1995.]; Saegusa et al., 2019[Saegusa, S., Sakurai, I., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Suzuki, S., Utsumi, Y. & Yamaguchi, A. (2019). Trans. Jpn Inst. Electronics Packaging, 12, E19-003.]). Until now, a single Cu4O3 phase has not been obtained by X-ray-irradiation of the liquid phase. In this study, the Cu4O3 phase is firstly synthesized by the X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction.

On the surface of the Cu substrate, the Cu ions are always supplied to the spurs at which the X-ray-radiolysis-induced and secondary-electron-scattering-induced photochemical reaction occurs, as schematically illustrated in Figs. 1(a) and 1(b)[link], respectively. The number of Cu ions is high enough to react near the Cu substrate. Therefore, the oxidization of Cu on Cu substrate is expected to proceed more slowly than the other cases, resulting in the Cu4O3 being synthesized, grown and deposited on the Cu substrate.

Two growth processes – habit formation and branching growth – govern the basic crystal shape. In habit formation, the relative order of surface energies of different crystallographic planes of a crystal determines the crystal habit. As a result, lower energy surfaces tend to increase in area, while higher energy surfaces are eliminated or reduced. Therefore, a habit can be modified when the relative order of the surface energies is altered or when crystal growth along certain directions is selectively hindered. In contrast, diffusion effects play a significant role in branching growth. Ions or molecules near the surface are consumed by the growth of the crystal. Then, a polyhedral crystal grows and the shape is dependent on the ion special distribution and kinetic coefficient in these regions. The crystal is grown to compensate for the diffusion effect resulting in faceting growth (Siegfried & Choi, 2005[Siegfried, M. J. & Choi, K. (2005). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 3218-3223.]).

The results suggest that the substrate surface crystal structure and electronic state are sufficient to induce lateral distortion of growing crystal structures, with the type of structure formed depending primarily on the lattice constant of the terminated surface. The results suggest that Si(100) and Al substrates are good templates for the growth of ordered copper oxide particles. The surface morphology of copper oxide particles synthesized by the X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction varies with substrate types dipped in the Cu(COOCH3)2 solution with the additive methanol.

4. Conclusion

We investigated the substrate type dependence of cupric particles synthesized by X-ray-radiolysis-induced photochemical reaction in Cu(COOCH3)2 liquid solution with the additive methanol. Comparing the morphologies of particles synthesized and immobilized on various types of substrates, we found that the morphologies are strongly dependent on the substrate type. In addition, the substrate type also influences the particle composition.

Knowledge of the substrate type dependence of particle synthesis by X-ray-radiolysis-induced-photochemical reaction can provide flexibility within the constraints of any particular applications needs. This finding is essential for the exploration of nanostructures consisting of various copper metallic and oxide nanoparticles. This study opens the door to more innovative and novel routes to improve the future of the complex nanostructures and its many applications.

As Wang et al. demonstrated, the copper oxide microstructure exhibited useful antibacterial activity (Wang et al., 2018[Wang, W., Zhu, L., Lv, P., Liu, G., Yu, Y. & Li, J. (2018). Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10, 37287-37297.]). In addition, other copper oxides have been used for sensor devices (Tamaki et al., 1998[Tamaki, J., Shimanoe, K., Yamada, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Miura, N. & Yamazoe, N. (1998). Sens. Actuators B Chem. 49, 121-125.]; Zaman et al., 2011[Zaman, S., Asif, M. H., Zainelabdin, A., Amin, G., Nur, O. & Willander, M. (2011). J. Electroanal. Chem. 662, 421-425.], 2012[Zaman, S., Zainelabdin, A., Amin, G., Nur, O. & Willander, M. (2012). J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 73, 1320-1325.]). Thus, as with the other copper oxide nanostructures, from this study emerges many potentials to develop three-dimensional printing or additive manufacturing processes for any of these applications (Sachs et al., 1992[Sachs, E., Cima, M., Williams, P., Brancazio, D. & Cornie, J. (1992). J. Eng. Ind. 114, 481-488.]; Gibson et al., 2015[Gibson, I., Rosen, D. & Stucker, B. (2015). Additive Manufacturing Technologies - 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufaturing, 2nd ed. Springer.]; Saile et al., 2009[Saile, V., Wallradbe, U., Tabata, O. & Korvink, J. G. (2009). Advanced Micro and Nanosystems, Vol. 7, LIGA and its Applications. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.]). The authors believe that this study of fabricating nanostructured Cu4O3 might provide possible novel materials insights and unique opportunities for incorporation into a wide range of applications.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Atsushi Yamaguchi of Hyogo Prefectural Institute of Technology for SEM and EDX measurement support. We appreciate Dr Saiki and Dr Takizawa of Hyogo Prefectural Institute of Technology for fruitful discussions. We thank the Mitsutoyo Association for Science and Technology. This research and development work was supported in part by a JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research B (No. 17H02755). These experiments were conducted at the BL8S2 of Aichi Synchrotron Radiation Center, Aichi Science and Technology Foundation, Aichi, Japan. (Proposal No. 2018a0016 and No. 2017a0049) with the financial support of Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, Nagoya University.

References

First citationAkamatsu, K., Ikeda, S., Nawafune, H. & Yanagimoto, H. (2004). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 10822–10823.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationBae, C. H., Nam, S. H. & Park, S. M. (2002). Appl. Surf. Sci. 197–198, 628–634.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationBárta, J., Pospíšil, M. & Čuba, V. (2010). J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 286, 611–618.  Google Scholar
First citationBharti, A., Bhardwaj, R., Agrawal, N., Goyal, S. & Gautam, S. (2016). Sci. Rep. 6, 22394.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationBorse, P. H., Yi, J. M., Je, J. H., Tsai, W. L. & Hwu, Y. (2004). J. Appl. Phys. 95, 1166–1170.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationChen, W., Zhang, H., Ma, Z., Yang, B. & Li, Z. (2015). J. Mater. Chem. A, 3, 14202–14209.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationDebbichi, L., Marco de Lucas, M. C., Pierson, J. F. & Krüger, P. (2012). J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, 10232–10237.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationDey, G. R. (2005). Radiat. Phys. Chem. 74, 172–184.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationGibson, I., Rosen, D. & Stucker, B. (2015). Additive Manufacturing Technologies – 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufaturing, 2nd ed. Springer.  Google Scholar
First citationIzaki, M., Shinagawa, T., Mizuno, K., Ida, Y., Inaba, M. & Tasaka, A. (2007). J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 40, 3326–3329.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationJonah, C. D. & Miller, J. R. (1977). J. Phys. Chem. 81, 1974–1976.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationKaradas, F., Ertas, G., Ozkaraoglu, E. & Suzer, S. (2005). Langmuir, 21, 437–442.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationLa Mer, V. K. (1952). Ind. Eng. Chem. 44, 1270–1277.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationLa Mer, V. K. & Dinegar, R. H. (1950). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72, 4847–4854.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationMa, Q., Moldovan, N., Mancini, D. C. & Rosenberg, R. A. (2000). Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2014–2016.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMedina-Valtierra, J., Frausto-Reyes, C., Camarillo-Martínez, G. & Ramírez-Ortiz, J. A. (2009). Appl. Catal. Gen. 356, 36–42.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationMeyer, B. K., Polity, A., Reppin, D., Becker, M., Hering, P., Klar, P. J., Sander, Th., Reindl, C., Benz, J., Eickhoff, M., Heiliger, C., Heinemann, M., Bläsing, J., Krost, A., Shokovets, S., Müller, C. & Ronning, C. (2012). Phys. Status Solidi B, 249, 1487–1509.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationOyanagi, H., Orimoto, Y., Hayakawa, K., Hatada, K., Sun, Z., Zhang, L., Yamashita, K., Nakamura, H., Uehara, M., Fukano, A. & Maeda, H. (2014). Sci. Rep. 4, 7199.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationPoizot, P., Laruelle, S., Grugeon, S., Dupont, L. & Tarascon, J. M. (2000). Nature, 407, 496–499.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationPola-Albores, F., Antúnez-Flores, W., Amézaga-Madrid, P., Ríos-Valdovinos, E., Valenzuela-Zapata, M., Paraguay-Delgado, F. & Miki-Yoshida, M. (2012). J. Cryst. Growth, 351, 77–82.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationRemita, S., Fontaine, P., Lacaze, E., Borensztein, Y., Sellame, H., Farha, R., Rochas, C. & Goldmann, M. (2007). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, 263, 436–440.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSachs, E., Cima, M., Williams, P., Brancazio, D. & Cornie, J. (1992). J. Eng. Ind. 114, 481–488.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationSaegusa, S., Sakurai, I., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Suzuki, S., Utsumi, Y. & Yamaguchi, A. (2019). Trans. Jpn Inst. Electronics Packaging, 12, E19-003.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationSaile, V., Wallradbe, U., Tabata, O. & Korvink, J. G. (2009). Advanced Micro and Nanosystems, Vol. 7, LIGA and its Applications. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.  Google Scholar
First citationSiegfried, M. J. & Choi, K. (2005). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 3218–3223.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSu, D., Xie, X., Dou, S. & Wang, G. (2015). Sci. Rep. 4, 5753.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationTamaki, J., Shimanoe, K., Yamada, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Miura, N. & Yamazoe, N. (1998). Sens. Actuators B Chem. 49, 121–125.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationVolanti, D. P., Keyson, D., Cavalcante, L. S., Simões, A. Z., Joya, M. R., Longo, E., Varela, J. A., Pizani, P. S. & Souza, A. G. (2008). J. Alloys Compd. 459, 537–542.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationWang, L., Wu, H., Desai, S. R. & Lou, L. (1996). Phys. Rev. B, 53, 8028–8031.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationWang, W., Zhu, L., Lv, P., Liu, G., Yu, Y. & Li, J. (2018). Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10, 37287–37297.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationYamaguchi, A., Fukuoka, T., Okada, I., Ishihara, M., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2017). J. Synchrotron Rad. 24, 653–660.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationYamaguchi, A., Matsumoto, T., Okada, I., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2015). Mater. Chem. Phys. 160, 205–211.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationYamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Ishihara, M., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2016b). J. Nanomater. 2016, 8584304.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationYamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Fukuoka, T., Sakurai, I. & Utsumi, Y. (2016a). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 055502.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationYamaguchi, A., Okada, I., Sakurai, I., Izumi, H., Ishihara, M., Fukuoka, T., Suzuki, S., Elphick, K., Jackson, E., Hirohata, A. & Utsumi, Y. (2019). J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 1986–1995.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationYamaguchi, H., Uchihori, Y., Yasuda, N., Takada, M. & Kitamura, H. (2005). J. Radiat. Res. (Tokyo), 46, 333–341.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationZaman, S., Asif, M. H., Zainelabdin, A., Amin, G., Nur, O. & Willander, M. (2011). J. Electroanal. Chem. 662, 421–425.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationZaman, S., Zainelabdin, A., Amin, G., Nur, O. & Willander, M. (2012). J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 73, 1320–1325.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationZhang, Q., Zhang, K., Xu, D., Yang, G., Huang, H., Nie, F., Liu, C. & Yang, S. (2014). Prog. Mater. Sci. 60, 208–337.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationZhao, L., Chen, H., Wang, Y., Che, H., Gunawan, P., Zhong, Z., Li, H. & Su, F. (2012). Chem. Mater. 24, 1136–1142.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationZoolfakar, A. S., Rani, R. A., Morfa, A. J., O'Mullane, A. P. & Kalantar-zadeh, K. (2014). J. Mater. Chem. C, 2, 5247–5270.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds