research papers
Time-resolved synchrotron X-ray total scattering of alkali-activated materials with high and low calcium contents
aDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]
The reaction kinetics and structure of alkali-activated binders are known to be affected by their calcium (Ca) contents. However, the intrinsic difference between high Ca and low Ca alkali-activated systems, especially at the atomic scale, has not been fully investigated. Here, we compare local atomic ordering and reaction kinetics of blast furnace slag and metakaolin as representatives of high and low Ca systems, respectively. In situ X-ray pair distribution function (PDF) analysis and isothermal were utilized in parallel to investigate the evolution of local structure in these systems. Isothermal results showed contrasting reaction kinetics of high Ca (alkali-activated slag) and low Ca (alkali-activated metakaolin) systems, where the latter shows no The evolution of specific PDF peaks is related to the main binder gels in each respective system and can be used to track their reaction kinetics, exhibiting excellent correlation with the cumulative heat data (R2 > 0.97). Finally, and most importantly, the PDF results revealed that the atomic ordering of N-A-S-(H) gel is limited up to ∼10 Å, whereas C-(N)-A-S-H gel grew up to ∼40 Å, which suggests that there is an intrinsic difference in the formation mechanism and local structures of dominant gels formed in high and low Ca systems.
Keywords: pair distribution function; alkali-activated materials; reaction kinetics; isothermal calorimetry.
1. Introduction
Global demand for physical infrastructure is robust and expected to grow considerably, given the world population is expected to increase by 1.7 billion by the year 2050 (United Nations, 2022
). Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) continues to be the most widely used binder for concrete, mortar, blocks, and plaster applications (Habert et al., 2020
). Specifically, since the last decade, nearly four billion tons of OPC have continued to be produced annually worldwide, and its dominance is expected to continue due to its good mechanical performance and economic feasibility (Miller et al., 2021
). Despite several benefits of OPC, its production process, unfortunately, accounts for up to 6–8% of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions (Schneider, 2019
). This has accelerated interest in alternative binders such as alkali-activated materials and geopolymers, which can provide comparable mechanical performance with reduced CO2 emissions (Provis, 2018
). However, most of the alkali-activated binders derive their strength from poorly crystalline or X-ray amorphous reaction products, which are difficult to investigate using conventional diffraction methods.
In this context, total scattering combined with atomic pair distribution function (PDF) analysis has become a powerful method for characterizing disordered and nanocrystalline materials, including cementitious binders (du Plessis et al., 2011
; Cuesta et al., 2019
; Kwon et al., 2019
). Unlike conventional Bragg diffraction, which primarily probes long-range periodic order, total scattering captures both Bragg and diffuse scattering. Fourier transformation of the total scattering signal yields the PDF, G(r), which describes the probability of finding atom pairs separated by a real-space distance r. Consequently, PDF analysis provides direct insight into local coordination environments (short-range order) and structural connectivity over nanometre length scales (medium-range order), which are critical for the binding gels that govern the performance of alkali-activated systems. Synchrotron radiation is particularly advantageous to PDF measurements since high-energy X-rays enable access to large momentum transfer Q, improving real-space resolution, and high flux supports rapid acquisition for time-resolved, in situ studies of hydration and hardening.
PDF methods have been applied widely to materials in which functional properties are governed by local structure rather than long-range crystallinity, including batteries (Christensen et al., 2019
), xerogel (Petkov et al., 2002
), nanomaterials (Jensen et al., 2016
), and metal–organic frameworks (Firth et al., 2021
). In cement and concrete research, synchrotron- and neutron-based PDF analyses are increasingly used to characterize amorphous and nanocrystalline reaction products and to resolve dynamic processes during setting and hardening. Prior studies have shown that in situ PDF can track the evolution of atomic correlations during cement hydration and related phenomena, including carbonation (Morandeau & White, 2015
), retardation (Garg & White, 2017
), shrinkage (Yang et al., 2018
), mechanical deformation (Bae et al., 2018
; Jee et al., 2020
), and overall reaction kinetics for a range of systems (White et al., 2011
, 2013
; Peys et al., 2019
; Gong & White, 2022
). Collectively, these studies demonstrate that PDF enables continuous quantification of structural evolution even when the dominant products lack long-range order.
Alkali-activated binders are well suited to PDF analysis since their reactants and primary binding phases are typically low-crystallinity gels. Alkali activation involves mixing an alkaline activator (often NaOH and/or sodium silicate) with a reactive aluminosilicate precursor, driving dissolution followed by precipitation and condensation reactions that form a hardened binder (Provis & Bernal, 2014
). Precursor chemistry strongly influences the resulting gel products, with Ca content serving as a key variable. High Ca precursors (e.g. slag) commonly form alkali-containing calcium aluminosilicate hydrate [C-(N)-A-S-H]-type gels with local environments resembling poorly crystalline calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H)-like structures (Richardson et al., 1994
; Wang et al., 1995
; Fernández-Jiménez et al., 2003
; Myers et al., 2013
), whereas low Ca precursors (e.g. metakaolin) typically yield highly disordered alkaline aluminosilicate [N-A-S-(H)] gels (Duxson et al., 2007
; Khale & Chaudhary, 2007
; Provis & Bernal, 2014
). However, the extent of short- and medium-range ordering in these gels, and its evolution over time, needs to be further understood in the atomic scale. Moreover, increasing Ca content may induce transitions in binding environments and lead to contrasting durability properties (Bernal et al., 2013
; Sankar et al., 2018
) highlighting the need for methods that can quantify atomic-scale structure continuously during reaction.
While previous PDF studies have provided important insight into the reaction progress and local structural evolution of individual alkali-activated systems, a direct time-resolved comparison of high Ca and low Ca systems under the same PDF–calorimetry framework remains limited. In particular, the spatial extent of gel-associated atomic correlations of the main binder gels has not been systematically compared during reaction. Here, we employ synchrotron-based in situ X-ray total scattering and PDF analysis to compare reaction kinetics and atomic ordering in representative high and low Ca alkali-activated binders, as shown in Fig. 1
. Slag and metakaolin were selected as model precursors for the high Ca and low Ca systems, respectively, and the time evolution of PDF peak intensities was analyzed alongside isothermal calorimetry to relate heat-release signatures to atomistic structural development. Calorimetric response and PDF peak evolution correlate strongly (R2 = 0.97–0.99 for both systems), demonstrating that PDF provides a quantitative, time-resolved structural measure of reaction progress. The results reveal distinct early age kinetics, including a pronounced in the high Ca system (up to ∼8 h) that is not observed in the low Ca system under the conditions studied. PDF analysis further resolves contrasting medium-range order in the primary binding gels: atomic correlations in the C-(N)-A-S-H gel extend to ∼40 Å in the high Ca system, whereas correlations in the N-A-S-(H) gel are limited to ∼10 Å even after extended curing (five months). Collectively, these findings demonstrate the ability of synchrotron PDF to quantify both kinetics and nanoscale structural development in alkali-activated binders and to elucidate how Ca content governs gel ordering and reaction pathways.
| Figure 1 Schematic of the synchrotron in situ high-energy X-ray total scattering and pair distribution function (PDF) workflow used to track reaction kinetics in alkali-activated binders with contrasting calcium contents. The total scattering data are Fourier transformed to obtain the PDF from which the time-dependent evolution of selected PDF peaks (associated with the formation of the primary binder gels) is quantified. PDF-derived peak intensity evolution is compared with isothermal cumulative heat release, enabling a direct correlation between structural development measured by PDF and macroscopic reaction progress. |
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials and sample preparation
Two types of experimentally synthesized alkali-activated materials, which represent high and low Ca systems, were prepared for this study: alkali-activated slag (AAS) and alkali-activated metakaolin (AAM). The slag precursor was activated with the sodium silicate solution to formulate AAS. To make a sodium silicate solution, sodium metasilicate (Na2SiO3, CAS No. 6834–92–0, Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in deionized water (18 MΩ cm resistivity) and homogenized for 24 h using a magnetic stirrer bar. The ratio of Na2O and slag was 4% (4 g of Na2O per 100 g of slag), and the water-to-binder ratio (w/b) was maintained at 0.44. The oxide composition of slag used in this study was as follows: 43.0 wt% CaO, 32.6 wt% SiO2, 10.3 wt% MgO, 7.5 wt% Al2O3, 1.2 wt% SO3 and 5.4 wt% other elements. MetaMax from BASF was used as metakaolin (2SiO2·Al2O3) in this study. Sodium silicate solution was used as an alkaline activator for metakaolin. To prepare the sodium silicate solution, sodium hydroxide pellets (CAS No. 1310-73-2, Sigma-Aldrich) were first dissolved in water, and sodium silicate liquid (`D' product, PQ Corporation) was added into the solution and mixed with a magnetic stirrer bar for 24 h. The chemical composition of the sodium silicate liquid was 29.4 wt% SiO2, 14.7 wt% Na2O, and 55.9 wt% H2O with a SiO2/Na2O weight ratio of 2. The activating solution for metakaolin had a Na2O/SiO2 molar ratio of 0.5, and the w/b ratio was 0.9. The Na2O/metakaolin ratio was maintained at 0.28 (28 g of Na2O per 100 g of metakaolin).
2.2. High-energy X-ray total scattering and pair distribution function analysis
For in situ X-ray scattering experiments, slag and metakaolin were mixed with an alkaline activator in 50 ml polypropylene centrifuge tubes. The tubes were homogenized with a vortex mixer for one minute at 2500 rpm, taking one minute of rest, followed by another minute of mixing at 2500 rpm. Prepared AAS and AAM pastes were then loaded into a polyimide capillary (Masterflex Transfer Tubing, Cole-Parmer, USA) with a 1 mm diameter via suction. Both ends of the polyimide capillary were immediately sealed with quick-setting epoxy.
High-energy in situ X-ray total scattering experiments were conducted on the 11-ID-B beamline at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, at the high energy of 58 keV (λ = 0.2112 Å). The X-ray scattering signals were collected with an amorphous silicon imaging plate X-ray detector (XRD1621, Perkin-Elmer, USA) (Chupas et al., 2003
). The distance from the test samples to the imaging plate detector was set to 180 mm. X-ray scattering data were collected for a duration of 2 min at selected times, and in situ X-ray data were acquired up to 81.5 h and 58.1 h for AAS and AAM, respectively. The Fit2D program (Hammersley, 2016
, 1997
) was used for the conversion of 2D to 1D data, and the data was calibrated with CeO2. Background signals were corrected by subtracting the scattering contribution from an empty polyimide capillary measured under the same experimental geometry.
Atomic PDF [G(r)] data were obtained from the X-ray scattering results with the PDFgetX2 software (Qiu et al., 2004
). Equation (1)
shows the Fourier transform of the experimentally measured total scattering S(Q), with the momentum-transfer vector (Q). The maximum Q cutoff for the conversion of X-ray scattering data was 24 Å−1. The instrumental parameters were refined with a CeO2 standard (Sigma-Aldrich) using the PDFgui software (Farrow et al., 2007
). Peak positions in the G(r) curves were determined by searching for the maximum G(r) value within a predefined r range for each atom–atom correlation,
where G(r) = PDF results, and Q = .
2.3. Isothermal calorimetry
Heat evolution of AAS and AAM was assessed with an isothermal calorimeter (TAM Air, TA Instruments, USA). To conduct the isothermal measurement, 5 g of each AAS and AAM paste were prepared for the test. Initial heat flows of AAM and AAS were measured for ∼85 h at 23°C. Since the AAM and AAS samples were mixed with an alkaline solution outside of the calorimeter, and inserting the samples in the calorimeter can significantly disrupt initial heat flow, the first 1 h data was omitted. The cumulative heat of the reaction was calculated based on the obtained heat flow.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Reaction kinetics of alkali-activated slag and metakaolin via isothermal calorimetry
Here, we plan to investigate the difference between the heat curves of a high Ca and a low Ca system.
Fig. 2
depicts the heat flow curves and cumulative heat of the AAM and AAS examined with isothermal As shown in the figure, the type of solid precursors significantly affects the early heat evolution behavior. The initial heat evolution of AAS had a distinct second peak with the (∼7 h), which is similar to the hydration behavior of ordinary Portland cement. On the other hand, the heat evolution of AAM showed a single exothermic peak without the Accordingly, the cumulative heat curves of AAS and AAM [Fig. 2
(b)] showed contrasting behaviors. While the cumulative heat curve of AAS showed an S-shaped curve due to the presence of an induction period, the cumulative heat curve of AAM had a logarithmic type curve. Sun and Vollpracht observed strong dissolution period peaks before 1 h of reaction in the NaOH-activated metakaolin and ground-granulated blast furnace slag (Sun & Vollpracht, 2018
). These exothermic peaks are related to the initial dissolution of the aluminosilicate precursors in the alkali-activated solutions. However, these peaks were not observed in our work due to the omission of the initial 1 h data.
| Figure 2 Measured heat-flow and cumulative heat curves for (a) AAS (high Ca) and (b) AAM (low Ca). |
Several studies have pointed out the different reaction behaviors of alkali-activated systems with regard to the Ca content in the systems. Sankar et al. (2018
) investigated the early reaction kinetics of alkali-activated slag-fly ash systems. They revealed the formation of the C-N-S-H soft gel when the Ca contents were in the systems, whereas such a gel was not observed in the low Ca systems. Moreover, another study showed that the presence of Ca ions in the solid precursors served a crucial role in the retarding effect of zinc oxide on alkali-activated materials (Garg & White, 2017
). The role of Ca in controlling early age reaction pathways has also been reported in several alkali-activated systems. Lee & van Deventer (2002
) suggested that Ca-containing salts can shorten setting time by providing heterogeneous nucleation centers in alkali-activated fly ash systems. Suraneni et al. (2014
) also showed that Ca(OH)2 substitution substantially accelerated the setting of metakaolin geopolymer and made its stiffening behavior similar to that of slag geopolymer. More recently, Chen et al. (2018
) reported that calcium addition increased the rate and extent of metakaolin dissolution, thereby modifying the solution chemistry and accelerating geopolymer gel formation. These studies suggest that calcium can affect reaction kinetics not only by changing the final gel chemistry but also by modifying precursor dissolution, nucleation, and gel polymerization. Similarly, in this study, the early reaction behaviors of alkali-activated materials highly depend on the presence of calcium ions in solid precursors. The contrasting kinetics of AAS and AAM can therefore be interpreted as reflecting different gel-forming pathways: nucleation and growth of C-(N)-A-S-H-type products in the high Ca system, and dissolution and repolymerization of aluminosilicate species into an N-A-S-(H) framework in the low Ca system. The early reaction behaviors of the two systems will be further scrutinized on an atomistic scale via total X-ray scattering and PDF analysis in the following sections.
3.2. X-ray scattering and pair distribution function
The total X-ray scattering method and PDF analysis have been important tools to examine the crystalline structure and atomic scale ordering of materials (Warren et al., 1936
). Since PDF analysis can resolve the local atomic environment of non-crystalline structures, it has been an invaluable technique for the alkali-activated system in which precursors and final gel products are generally amorphous or nano-crystalline. Furthermore, the rapid data acquisition with a synchrotron X-ray source allowed researchers to analyze the real-time reaction progress of alkali-activated systems (Garg & White, 2017
; Gong & White, 2022
). Here, the crystalline structure and local atomic structure development of AAS and AAM paste were investigated using in situ X-ray scattering and PDF analysis.
Fig. 3
(a) depicts the in situ X-ray scattering patterns of the AAS at the selected reaction time. In Fig. 3
(a), the X-ray scattering curve of the precursor of the AAS showed a broad diffuse peak centered at ∼2.2 Å−1, indicating that the unreacted slag lacked crystallinity. The unreacted slag peak intensities decreased with the progress of the alkali-activated reaction. Concurrently, the X-ray scattering peaks of C-(N)-A-S-H gel (1.20, 2.05, 2.30, 2.65, 3.70, 4.15 and 4.50 Å−1) (Geng et al., 2017
; Myers et al., 2015a
) and hydrotalcite (Ht, Mg6Al2(OH)16CO3·4.5H2O, ICSD No. 107626) phase (0.78, 1.20, 1.68, 3.05, 3.48 and 4.15 Å−1) (Taylor, 1973
) were identified as the reaction progressed. C-(N)-A-S-H gel is the main binder gel in alkali-activated slag and is generally described as a poorly crystalline, layered C-S-H/tobermorite-like structure in which Al and alkali cations can be incorporated into C-S-H frameworks (Richardson et al., 1994
; Fernández–Jiménez et al., 2003
; Myers et al., 2013
). The peak intensities of reaction products [C-(N)-A-S-H gel and Ht] constantly evolved with the reaction up to ∼134 days. Moreover, the low-Q region (Q < ∼0.6 Å−1) showed an increase in intensity as the reaction progressed. This low-Q region includes the 002 basal reflection of C-S-H-type gel (Q = 0.45–0.50 Å−1), corresponding to a basal spacing of approximately 12–14 Å (Taylor, 1997
; Grangeon et al., 2013
). This basal spacing reflects the tobermorite-like layered structure of C-S-H-type gels and can vary with gel chemistry and interlayer structure, including Ca/Si ratio, Al/Si ratio, alkali content, interlayer water content, and the presence of cross-linking (Richardson, 2014
; Myers et al., 2015a
; Myers et al., 2015b
; Garg et al., 2019
). Thus, the increase in low-Q intensity is consistent with the formation and increasing medium-range ordering of C-(N)-A-S-H gel, although the exact peak position could not be analyzed because this region was partially obscured by the strong intensity near the direct beam.
| Figure 3 High-energy X-ray scattering patterns of (a) AAS (high Ca) and (b) AAM (low Ca). In the AAS, C-(N)-A-S-H gel and hydrotalcite (ICSD No. 107626; Taylor, 1973 |
The X-ray scattering patterns of the AAM paste with the progress of the reaction are plotted in Fig. 3
(b). The metakaolin precursor used in this study showed a broad hump centered at ∼1.6 Å−1. Some trace peaks are identified as characteristic peaks of TiO2 (anatase, ICSD No. 63711; Howard et al., 1991
), which was presented in the metakaolin precursor as an impurity. Since anatase is chemically inert, the peaks from TiO2 did not change during the reaction, indicating the TiO2 phase was not involved in the alkali-activated reaction. Except for the peaks originating from anatase, the lack of crystalline peaks in the precursor suggests that the structure of the metakaolin is largely amorphous. After the addition of sodium hydroxide solution for the alkali activation, another broad diffuse peak located at ∼2.05 Å−1 emerged. This is a typical diffraction pattern of the reaction product of the low calcium alkali-activated precursor, namely N-A-S-(H) gel (Abdelrahman & Garg, 2022
). N-A-S-(H) gel is known as the main binder phase of alkali-activated metakaolin, whose local atomic structure corresponds to a disordered zeolite structure (Provis et al., 2005
). The gradual increase of N-A-S-(H) peak height and sharpness indicated the continued formation of N-A-S-(H) gel during the reaction, together with the gradual reduction of the metakaolin-derived diffuse hump. (Yang et al., 2000
; Zhan et al., 2002
).
The X-ray scattering data were Fourier transformed to obtain the pair distribution function curves at selected times and reported in Figs. 4
and 5
. The corresponding longer r-range PDFs of AAS and AAM pastes are provided in Fig. S1 to show the persistence of atomic correlations beyond the local structure region. The longer-range ordering behavior of the primary reaction gels is discussed in more detail in Section 3.4
. All PDFs were generated using a Qmax value of 24 Å−1. Fig. 4
displays the in situ X-ray PDF results of AAS at the selected time in the short r range (r < 5.5 Å). The local atomic structure of the AAS paste showed the atom–atom correlation of T–O, Ca–O, T–T, and Ca–T peaks, where the symbol T indicates tetrahedral atoms such as silicon and aluminium, which were assigned based on previous literature (Garg & White, 2017
; Grangeon et al., 2017
; Gong & White, 2018
; McCaslin et al., 2025
). Recently, Gong and White have shed light on the PDF peak assignments of NaOH-activated slag by simulating the molecular structure of slag (Gong & White, 2022
), which enabled more accurate atom–atom correlation assignments. The peaks located below the first T–O peak (∼1.6 Å) originate from the truncation errors during the PDF analysis and convey no structural meaning (Egami & Billinge, 2012
). On the other hand, the peak assignments for the atom–atom correlation peaks above 5.5 Å were challenging due to the significant overlap between several atoms.
| | Figure 4 In situ X-ray pair distribution function of AAS. (a) Local atomic correlations over 0.5 to 5.5 Å. (b) The evolution of the Ca–T peak. |
| | Figure 5 In situ X-ray pair distribution functions of AAM. (a) Local atomic correlations over 0.5 to 5.5 Å. (b) The evolution of the T–O* peak. |
The local atomic structure of the AAS paste clearly showed the evolution of reaction products during the activation of slag. The intensity of the Ca–O peak (∼2.4 Å) significantly increased with the alkali-activated reaction, which is consistent with previous PDF results on alkali-activated slag systems (Garg & White, 2017
; Gong & White, 2022
). The evolution of the nearest Ca-O correlation intensity is likely to be due to (i) an increase in the coordination of calcium atoms and/or (ii) a more ordered calcium environment during the alkali activation. More importantly, the Ca–T peak located at ∼3.7 Å appeared to drastically increase over time, as shown in Fig. 4
(b). The Ca–T peak in the alkali-activated slag has been assigned to the nearest calcium and tetrahedral Si and Al correlation in C-(N)-A-S-H gel (Garg & White, 2017
; Gong & White, 2016
). Apart from the primary Ca–T correlation, the recent PDF study on sodium hydroxide-activated slag revealed that the atom–atom correlations of the second nearest T–O and the nearest Ca–Ca also contribute to the PDF peak located at ∼3.7 Å (Gong & White, 2022
), which is also attributed to the newly formed C-(N)-A-S-H gel structure. Thus, the growth of a peak at ∼3.7 Å can be a direct indication of the formation of nano-crystalline C-(N)-A-S-H gel in AAS systems.
Fig. 5
(a) shows the in situ X-ray PDF curves for the local atomic structure evolution of AAM paste up to 133 days. The overall trends of the atomic structure evolution of AAM were similar to the previous PDF studies (White et al., 2011
; White et al., 2013
; Garg & White, 2017
). The PDF peaks of AAM were assigned based on the previous studies on alkali-activated metakaolin (Garg & White, 2017
; White et al., 2013
). Although a small quantity of anatase was identified in the metakaolin precursor via X-ray diffraction, the atom–atom correlations from anatase did not clearly appear in the PDF results, possibly due to its small abundance. X-ray diffraction analysis also revealed that the anatase phase was not significantly involved in the alkali-activation reaction. Hence, the effect of anatase was disregarded in the following PDF analysis.
The peak located at ∼1.6 Å represents the nearest correlation of oxygen and tetrahedral atoms (silicon and aluminium). The Si–O contribution is typically located near ∼1.60 Å, whereas tetrahedral AlIV–O correlations in aluminosilicate frameworks occur at slightly longer distances, around ∼1.7–1.8 Å (Baur & Fischer, 2019
). Higher-coordinated Al–O environments in metakaolin appear at longer distances near ∼1.9 Å (White et al., 2010a
). In the present data, a distinct AlIV–O shoulder could not be clearly resolved from the main T–O peak, likely due to overlap with the Si–O contribution, structural disorder, and the finite real-space resolution associated with Qmax = 24 Å−1. Unlike the AAS paste, which showed no significant change in the intensity of the nearest T–O peak, the peak intensity of the T–O peak increased over time in the AAM system. One of the possible explanations for the growth of the T–O peak in the AAM system is the change of aluminium coordination during the formation of the N-A-S-(H) gel structure. Common metakaolin has a 2D sheet structure with tetrahedral, pentahedral, and octahedral aluminium coordination (White et al., 2010a
; White et al., 2010b
). During alkali activation, the pentahedrally and octahedrally coordinated aluminium dissolves from the metakaolin structure and forms a three-dimensional N-A-S-(H) gel structure (Provis & Van Deventer, 2009
). Moreover, Garg & Skibsted (2019
) revealed that the pentahedrally coordinated aluminium site is significantly responsible for the reactivity and dissolution of metakaolin. Hence, the growth of the first T–O peak height is attributed to the dissolution of AlV and AlVI species in metakaolin and the formation of AlIV in the newly formed aluminosilicate framework. The decrease of Al–O peak intensity located at ∼1.9 Å, which originated from the higher coordinated aluminium in the metakaolin structure, also supports the dissolution and repolymerization of aluminium species. Lastly, it has been recently shown that metakaolin layers undergo a nano-scale thinning process during the dissolution phase, which may also contribute to this change in the T–O peak observed here (Romero & Garg, 2022
).
In the higher-r region, the feature near ∼2.3 Å is assigned to Na–O correlations, while the broad feature near ∼2.7 Å is mainly associated with O–O correlations. The feature near ∼3.1 Å is primarily assigned to T–T correlations, with possible contribution from T–Na correlations associated with charge-balancing Na in the aluminosilicate framework. These assignments are based on previous in situ neutron and X-ray PDF studies of metakaolin-based geopolymers and partial PDF simulations of metakaolin and hydrosodalite-like aluminosilicate framework structures (White et al., 2011
; White et al., 2013
; Garg & White, 2017
). As the reaction progressed, the atom–atom correlation near ∼2.7 Å, which is primarily associated with O–O correlations in the aluminosilicate framework, showed a gradual decrease as the peak shifted to the lower-r region. Previous partial PDF analysis on alkali-activated metakaolin revealed that the Al–Al atom correlation also contributed to this r region, which originated from the geometrically strained aluminium in the metakaolin structure (White et al., 2013
). Therefore, the decrease and shift of this feature could be interpreted as reflecting the dissolution and reorganization of strained Al environments in the metakaolin precursor, superimposed on the O–O correlations of the evolving aluminosilicate framework. Concurrently, the peak located at ∼3.1 Å showed a notable increase, which has the atom–atom correlation of T–T and Na–T. The growth of this peak height indicates the formation of aluminosilicate networks as well as the inclusion of Na ions as the charge compensator in the geopolymer framework structure as the reaction progresses.
Lastly, the PDF peak at ∼4.3 Å has been mainly assigned to the T–O* correlation associated with the aluminosilicate framework of the N-A-S-(H) gel, which is plotted in Fig. 5
(b). The asterisk sign was added to differentiate this peak from the first T–O correlation at ∼1.6 Å. The T–O* peak is associated with locally ordered four-membered aluminosilicate rings in the N-A-S-(H) structure (White et al., 2013
). The T–T distance at 4.42 Å across the diagonal of four-membered rings in a hydrosodalite-like structure can also contribute to this r-region (Murshed & Gesing, 2008
). Hence, the growth of the T–O* correlation also indicates the evolution of the N-A-S-(H) aluminosilicate structure. Previous PDF studies also suggested that the T–O* correlation in the 4.15–4.35 Å region can directly relate to the reaction kinetics of alkali-activated metakaolin (White et al., 2011
; Garg & White, 2017
), which will be further discussed in the following section.
3.3. Correlation between PDF and isothermal calorimetry
Previous in situ PDF analysis studies on alkali-activated slag (Garg & White, 2017
; Gong & White, 2022
) and metakaolin (Garg & White, 2017
; White et al., 2011
; White et al., 2013
) suggested that the development of specific peak intensities can reflect the reaction kinetics of those materials. In this section, we attempt to correlate the cumulative heat data from isothermal calorimetry and the atomic structure development obtained via PDF analysis.
Fig. 6
(a) depicts the cumulative heat evolution of AAS obtained by isothermal calorimetry and the evolution of the Ca–T peak in PDF results located at ∼3.7 Å, respectively. It can be clearly observed that there is a strong correlation between the reaction kinetics obtained from two different techniques. As discussed in Section 3.2
, the PDF peak intensities of Ca–T correlation in the alkali-activated slag system reflect the formation and growth of the C-(N)-A-S-H gel, which is the primary reaction product of the slag system. Thus, the heat evolution of the AAS system has a substantial relationship with the formation of the primary gel.
| Figure 6 (a) Cumulative heat data and the intensity of the Ca–T peak of AAS. (b) Cumulative heat data and the intensity of the T–O* peak of AAM. Cumulative heat data was obtained via isothermal calorimetry (IC), and peak intensities were obtained via pair distribution function (PDF) analysis. |
Similar to the AAS system, a strong correlation between the main product and the cumulative heat in the AAM system was observed. Fig. 6
(b) shows the cumulative heat from isothermal calorimetry and the peak intensities evolution of the T–O* peak (∼4.3 Å) from PDF results in the AAM system, respectively. As shown in the figure, the evolution of the T–O* peak, which is the signature peak of the main reaction gel in the AAM system, was directly correlated with the cumulative heat obtained from isothermal calorimetry data. This result indicates that the main exothermic process in alkali-activated metakaolin is mainly attributed to the geopolymerization process and the formation of the main reaction gel product.
In Fig. 7
, the comparison between cumulative heat data and the intensity of atom–atom correlations from the PDF results is plotted. Fig. 7
(a) compares the Ca–T peak intensity with cumulative heat for AAS, whereas Fig. 7
(b) compares the T–O* peak intensity with cumulative heat for AAM. As shown in the figure, the close alignment between isothermal calorimetry data and PDF peak intensities in AAM and AAS systems was further clearly observed. For both AAM and AAS systems, there were strong linear correlations between PDF and cumulative heat with high R2 values. Although linear fitting showed good correlations between two different techniques for both alkali-activated systems, it was found that the logarithmic shape functions can better fit the correlation between PDF and results in AAM systems. Similarly, the correlation between the two techniques in AAS systems can be more accurately captured by sigmoidal functions. In this study, we could not figure out the underlying mechanisms of these trends; thus, future research will be needed to further elucidate these gaps.
| | Figure 7 Comparison between the cumulative heat from isothermal calorimetry data and (a) Ca–T correlation peak intensities in AAS paste and (b) T–O* correlation peak intensities in AAM paste obtained by PDF analysis. |
The possibilities of using PDF peak intensities as the indicators of reaction degrees in the alkali-activated system have been reported in our previous study (Garg & White, 2017
). In this study, the usage of Ca–T and T–O* correlation was validated for tracking the C-(N)-A-S-H and N-A-S-(H) gel formation and reaction progress in the alkali-activated system with a more comprehensive data set. By combining atomic-scale simulation and in situ X-ray PDF analysis, a recent study (Gong & White, 2022
) has also successfully investigated the degree of reaction of the NaOH-activated slag system. The degree of reaction of slag obtained by PDF analysis showed a strong correlation with other characterization techniques, such as isothermal calorimetry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Furthermore, the peak intensities of specific PDF atom–atom correlations related to the formation of C-(N)-A-S-H gel showed good agreement with cumulative heat from isothermal calorimetry data. The present results build on these previous studies by directly comparing representative high Ca and low Ca alkali-activated systems under the same PDF–calorimetry framework. In both systems, the time evolution of gel-associated PDF correlations closely follows the cumulative heat release, indicating that the main heat-evolving process is strongly linked to the formation of the dominant binder gel. This comparison highlights that PDF peak evolution can serve not only as a structural descriptor, but also as a time-resolved indicator of reaction progress across alkali-activated systems with different gel chemistries.
3.4. Nano-structural evolution of slag and metakaolin
In Section 3.3
, it has been suggested that the reaction kinetics of the alkali-activated materials system are significantly related to the evolution of atom–atom correlations of the main reaction products in PDF results. These main reaction products include C-(N)-A-S-H gel and N-A-S-(H) gel for AAS (high Ca) and AAM (low Ca) systems, respectively. To further investigate the atomic-scale structural evolution of these gels during the in situ reaction, we attempted to isolate the PDF curves of the gel products by subtracting the PDF curves of unreacted precursor phases as well as crystalline products.
In the X-ray scattering curves of AAS paste [Fig. 3
(a)], three different phases were identified: unreacted slag precursor, C-(N)-A-S-H gel, and hydrotalcite. To isolate the PDF pattern of C-(N)-A-S-H gel, the PDF curves originating from the unreacted slag and hydrotalcite phases were subtracted from the in situ PDF data. The PDF patterns of the hydrotalcite phase were calculated by refining the PDF data attributed to hydrotalcite (ICSD No. 107626; Taylor, 1973
) via PDFgui software (Farrow et al., 2007
). The PDF refinement for hydrotalcite was conducted for the in situ PDF data in the 40–60 Å range. The unreacted slag was largely amorphous, and the atom–atom correlations of the slag precursor in this study were present up to ∼20 Å. The C-(N)-A-S-H gel formed in the high Ca alkali-activated materials systems is a C-S-H (I)-type gel with sodium and aluminium ions substitution (Skibsted & Andersen, 2013
; Hong & Glasser, 2002
; Puertas et al., 2011
). The PDF of synthetic C-S-H (I) has shown that the structure of C-S-H (I) was present up to ∼35 Å, and the structural correlations diminished above that region (Skinner et al., 2010
). Moreover, it has been revealed that alkali ions can decrease the atomic-scale structural ordering of C-(N)-A-S-H gel (Garg et al., 2019
). Hence, unreacted slag and C-(N)-A-S-H gel would have limited contribution to the atom–atom correlations past ∼40 Å, and the 40–60 Å range in PDF patterns of AAS paste will be mostly attributed to the hydrotalcite phase. Unlike the hydrotalcite phase, the direct simulation of unreacted slag and evolved C-(N)-A-S-H gel was not possible in this study due to the lack of exact structural information on those phases. Gong & White (2016
) introduced the indirect method for quantifying the unreacted slag content in the alkali-activated slag system. Similarly, in this study, the content of unreacted slag in the AAS pastes with the function of time was estimated by fitting the atom–atom correlation peaks between the range of 2.8–3.8 Å. The PDF peak centered at ∼3.42 Å, which is tentatively assigned as Mg-Si/Al correlation in the slag, was used for estimating the content of the unreacted precursor.
Similar to the AAS system, the structural details of the unreacted precursor and the main binder gel of the AAM system are not explicitly disclosed. Therefore, a similar methodology with AAS paste was applied to investigate the quantification of unreacted metakaolin precursor in the AAM paste. The PDF peak fitting was conducted for the range of 1.4–2.1 Å with the Gaussian function. The atom–atom correlation located at ∼1.92 Å was utilized to estimate the unreacted metakaolin content, which represents the Al–O correlation in the metakaolin precursor (White et al., 2011
; White et al., 2013
; White et al., 2010a
; White et al., 2010b
). It should be noted that this subtraction procedure was used to obtain residual PDF signals associated with the reaction gels, rather than to perform a full quantitative phase refinement. Because the unreacted precursors and reaction gels are poorly crystalline and have overlapping atom-pair correlations, the estimated precursor contributions should be considered semi-quantitative. Therefore, the residual PDF signals are used here primarily to compare the relative extent of gel-associated atomic ordering, not to determine absolute phase fractions or unique gel structures.
Figs. 8
and 9
plot the evolution of the main binder gels in AAS and AAM pastes, respectively, by subtracting the unreacted precursors and secondary phase. In the long range [Figs. 8
(a) and 9
(a)], a significant difference between the nano-scale ordering of two alkali-activated systems was observed. In the AAS paste, the atomic ordering of C-(N)-A-S-H gel remains in the short-range as the reaction commences (∼1.1 h), and PDF patterns show no structural correlation above ∼10 Å. As the reaction progresses, the atomic correlations of C-(N)-A-S-H gradually extend to longer r ranges, which had atomic ordering up to ∼40 Å at 134 days of reaction. In contrast, N-A-S-(H) gel in the AAM paste shows no drastic change in the long r-range structure. At 133 days of reaction, the atomic ordering of N-A-S-(H) gel showed only short-range correlations up to ∼10 Å, suggesting that N-A-S-(H) gel in the AAM paste remains largely amorphous even after long-term reaction progression.
| | Figure 8 The pair distribution function curves of C-(N)-A-S-H gel in the AAS paste over (a) long r range (0–60 Å) and (b) short r range (0.5–5.5 Å). The curves were obtained by subtracting the unreacted slag and secondary crystalline phase (hydrotalcite) from the original pair distribution patterns at the specific reaction time. |
| | Figure 9 Pair distribution function curves of N-A-S-(H) gel in the AAM paste over (a) long r range (0–60 Å) and (b) short r range (0.5–5.5 Å). The curves were obtained by subtracting the unreacted metakaolin from the original pair distribution patterns at the specific reaction time. |
In order to quantitatively visualize the difference in long-range ordering of C-(N)-A-S-H and N-A-S-(H) gels formed in AAS and AAM systems, PDF curves of two gels were plotted in Fig. 10
(a). The envelope functions [fe(r, d)] with two different correlation lengths, 10 and 40 Å, were also plotted in the figure as visual guides to compare the r-range over which coherent atom-pair correlations persist in the two gel-associated residual PDF signals. The envelope function has been successfully adapted to assess the mean correlation length of nanoparticles as well as cementitious materials in PDF curves (Garg et al., 2019
; Hong et al., 2016
). The envelope function is defined as
where r is the distance between atoms in Å, d is the mean particle size in Å, and H is the Heaviside step function where H(d − r) goes to zero when r > d (Howell et al., 2006
). The comparison curves clearly showed the intrinsic difference between the atomic scale ordering of C-(N)-A-S-H and N-A-S-(H) gels. N-A-S-(H) gel formed in the AAM system predominantly showed an amorphous structure which structural features limited to 10 Å, whereas C-(N)-A-S-H gel in the AAS system presented higher long-range order up to 40 Å, as shown in Fig. 10
(b). This longer correlation length could be interpreted as greater long-range structural coherence in C-(N)-A-S-H, which may arise from a combination of coherent crystallite size, crystallinity, and network connectivity. This contrast is consistent with previous structural descriptions of these gels, where C-(N)-A-S-H is commonly described as a nano-crystalline C-S-H/tobermorite-like gel, while N-A-S-(H) is described as a highly disordered aluminosilicate framework.
| Figure 10 (a) Comparison of the PDF curves of C-(N)-A-S-H gel and N-A-S-(H) gel with envelope function (Howell et al., 2006 |
Although this research mainly focuses on the difference between high Ca and low Ca alkali-activated systems, activator chemistry can also influence the development of gel structure. Haha et al. (2011
) showed that NaOH and hydrous sodium metasilicate activators produce distinct Al-bearing C-S-H structures in alkali-activated slag, with NaOH activation leading to denser, less water-rich C-S-H. In blended slag–metakaolin systems, the silica modulus of the activator and slag/metakaolin ratio affect reaction kinetics, gel crosslinking, and the formation of C–S–H, Na-substituted C–S–H, and zeolitic aluminosilicate reaction products (Bernal et al., 2011
). In low Ca metakaolin systems, the speciation of soluble silicate in the activator affects the polymerization of the aluminosilicate framework (Poggetto et al., 2024
). These studies suggest that activator chemistry can alter the kinetics and structural development of alkali-activated gels. Therefore, future studies examining the effects of activator type and composition would provide further insight into how the C-(N)-A-S-H and N-A-S-(H) gels evolve under different activation conditions.
The results of this work show the clear difference in the evolution of local atomic structures between two different types of aluminosilicate precursors, blast furnace slag and metakaolin, which represent high calcium and low calcium precursors, respectively. The isothermal calorimetry results (Fig. 2
) showed that the reaction kinetics of two alkali-activated aluminosilicate precursors were significantly different. The reaction kinetics of AAS showed a clear dormant period similar to conventional Portland cement-based systems, whereas the reaction kinetics of AAM did not have such an induction period. In addition, the evolution of the local atomic structure of AAM and AAS via PDF analysis (Figs. 4
and 5
) was highly dissimilar. Most importantly, as shown in Fig. 10
, there was a significant difference in the long-range ordering of the reaction products of AAS and AAM. In the high calcium system, C-(N)-A-S-H gel continued to grow in the long-range region (∼40 Å) and showed the nano-crystalline structure after ∼5 months of reaction. In contrast, N-A-S-(H) gel in the AAM paste did not show the atomic correlation beyond ∼10 Å even after the long-term reaction had taken place.
4. Conclusion
In this study, in situ X-ray total scattering analysis and isothermal were utilized in tandem to investigate the atomic ordering and reaction kinetics of low Ca and high Ca alkali-activated systems. Ground-granulated blast furnace slag and metakaolin were used as the representation of high and low Ca alkali-activated precursors, respectively. Heat flow data obtained from isothermal revealed contrasting reaction behaviors of alkali-activated slag and metakaolin; where alkali-activated slag showed a clear alkali-activated metakaolin did not have an In addition, the growth of gel-associated atom–atom correlations in the in situ PDF, which are related to the main binding gels in both alkali-activated systems, has excellent agreement with cumulative heat from isothermal results (R2 > 0.97). Specifically, the Ca–T peak in alkali-activated slag, located at ∼3.7 Å, and the T–O* peak in alkali-activated metakaolin centered at ∼4.3 Å can be used to track the C-(N)-A-S-H and N-A-S-(H) gel formation for each system. This result highlights that time-resolved PDF peak evolution can serve as a structural indicator of reaction progress and directly links heat evolution to the formation of the dominant binder gels. Moreover, the isolated PDF results of C-(N)-A-S-H and N-A-S-(H) gels had a significant difference in long-range atomic ordering above ∼10 Å. While N-A-S-(H) gel did not show atomic correlations above ∼10 Å, C-(N)-A-S-H gel evolved to the nano-crystalline region (∼40 Å) with the reaction progress, suggesting an inherent difference in the atomic ordering of high and low Ca alkali-activated systems.
Supporting information
Fig. S1: X-ray pair distribution function for alkali-activated slag and alkali-activated metakaolin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577526006776/vl5057sup1.pdf
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the assistance and guidance provided by 11-ID-B staff members Dr Olaf Borkiewicz and Kevin Beyer.
Funding information
Use of the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
References
Abdelrahman, O. & Garg, N. (2022). Front. Chem. 9, 806532. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Bae, S., Jee, H., Kanematsu, M., Shiro, A., Machida, A., Watanuki, T., Shobu, T. & Suzuki, H. (2018). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 101, 408–418. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Baur, W. H. & Fischer, R. X. (2019). Chem. Mater. 31, 2401–2420. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ben Haha, M., Le Saout, G., Winnefeld, F. & Lothenbach, B. (2011). Cem. Concr. Res. 41, 301–310. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bernal, S. A., Provis, J. L., Rose, V. & Mejía de Gutierrez, R. (2011). Cem. Concr. Compos. 33, 46–54. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bernal, S. A., Provis, J. L., Walkley, B., San Nicolas, R., Gehman, J. D., Brice, D. G., Kilcullen, A. R., Duxson, P. & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2013). Cem. Concr. Res. 53, 127–144. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Chen, X., Sutrisno, A. & Struble, L. J. (2018). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 101, 957–968. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Christensen, C. K., Mamakhel, M. A. H., Balakrishna, A. R., Iversen, B. B., Chiang, Y.-M. & Ravnsbaek, D. B. (2019). Nanoscale 11, 12347–12357. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chupas, P. J., Qiu, X., Hanson, J. C., Lee, P. L., Grey, C. P. & Billinge, S. J. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 1342–1347. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Cuesta, A., Zea-Garcia, J. D., De la Torre, A. G., Santacruz, I. & Aranda, M. A. G. (2019). Adv. Cem. Res. 31, 138–146. CrossRef Google Scholar
du Plessis, H. E., de Villiers, J. P. R., Kruger, G. J., Steuwer, A. & Brunelli, M. (2011). J. Synchrotron Rad. 18, 266–271. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Duxson, P., Fernández-Jiménez, A., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., Palomo, A. & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2007). J. Mater. Sci. 42, 2917–2933. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Egami, T. & Billinge, S. J. L. (2012). Underneath the Bragg Peaks: Structural Analysis of Complex Materials. Amsterdam: Pergamon. Google Scholar
Farrow, C. L., Juhas, P., Liu, J. W., Bryndin, D., Božin, E. S., Bloch, J., Proffen, T. & Billinge, S. J. L. (2007). J. Phys. Condens. Matter 19, 335219. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Fernández–Jiménez, A., Puertas, F., Sobrados, I. & Sanz, J. (2003). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 86, 1389–1394. Google Scholar
Firth, F. C. N., Gaultois, M. W., Wu, Y., Stratford, J. M., Keeble, D. S., Grey, C. P. & Cliffe, M. J. (2021). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 19668–19683. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Garg, N., Özçelik, V. O., Skibsted, J. & White, C. E. (2019). J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 24873–24883. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Garg, N. & Skibsted, J. (2019). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 102, 7720–7734. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Garg, N. & White, C. E. (2017). J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 11794–11804. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Geng, G., Myers, R. J., Li, J., Maboudian, R., Carraro, C., Shapiro, D. A. & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2017). Sci. Rep. 7, 44032. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Gong, K. & White, C. E. (2016). Cem. Concr. Res. 89, 310–319. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gong, K. & White, C. E. (2018). J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 5992–6004. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gong, K. & White, C. E. (2022). Cem. Concr. Res. 151, 106642. CrossRef Google Scholar
Grangeon, S., Claret, F., Lerouge, C., Warmont, F., Sato, T., Anraku, S., Numako, C., Linard, Y. & Lanson, B. (2013). Cem. Concr. Res. 52, 31–37. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Grangeon, S., Fernandez-Martinez, A., Baronnet, A., Marty, N., Poulain, A., Elkaïm, E., Roosz, C., Gaboreau, S., Henocq, P. & Claret, F. (2017). J. Appl. Cryst. 50, 14–21. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Habert, G., Miller, S. A., John, V. M., Provis, J. L., Favier, A., Horvath, A. & Scrivener, K. L. (2020). Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 559–573. CrossRef Google Scholar
Hammersley, A. P. (1997). FIT2D: An Introduction and Overview. Internal Report ESRF97HA02T. European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France. Google Scholar
Hammersley, A. P. (2016). J. Appl. Cryst. 49, 646–652. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hong, S. Y. & Glasser, F. P. (2002). Cem. Concr. Res. 32, 1101–1111. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hong, X., Ehm, L., Zhong, Z., Ghose, S., Duffy, T. S. & Weidner, D. J. (2016). Sci. Rep. 6, 21434. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Howard, C. J., Sabine, T. M. & Dickson, F. (1991). Acta Cryst. B47, 462–468. CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Howell, R. C., Proffen, T. & Conradson, S. D. (2006). Phys. Rev. B 73, 094107. CrossRef Google Scholar
Jee, H., Im, S., Kanematsu, M., Suzuki, H., Morooka, S., Taku, K., Machida, A. & Bae, S. (2020). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 103, 7188–7201. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Jensen, K. M. Ø., Juhas, P., Tofanelli, M. A., Heinecke, C. L., Vaughan, G., Ackerson, C. J. & Billinge, S. J. L. (2016). Nat. Commun. 7, 11859. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Khale, D. & Chaudhary, R. (2007). J. Mater. Sci. 42, 729–746. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kwon, G., Cho, Y.-H., Kim, K.-B., Emery, J. D., Kim, I. S., Zhang, X., Martinson, A. B. F. & Tiede, D. M. (2019). J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 1600–1611. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lee, W. K. W. & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2002). Cem. Concr. Res. 32, 577–584. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
McCaslin, E. R., James, M. C., Almer, J., Cai, Z., Kenesei, P., Park, J. & White, C. E. (2025). Nat. Commun. 17, 491. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., Habert, G., Myers, R. J. & Harvey, J. T. (2021). One Earth 4, 1398–1411. CrossRef Google Scholar
Morandeau, A. E. & White, C. E. (2015). J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 8597–8605. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Murshed, M. M. & Gesing, T. M. (2008). Z. Kristallogr. 223, 178–185. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Myers, R. J., Bernal, S. A., San Nicolas, R. & Provis, J. L. (2013). Langmuir 29, 5294–5306. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Myers, R. J., L'Hôpital, E., Provis, J. L. & Lothenbach, B. (2015a). Dalton Trans. 44, 13530–13544. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Myers, R. J., L'Hôpital, E., Provis, J. L. & Lothenbach, B. (2015b). Cem. Concr. Res. 68, 83–93. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Petkov, V., Trikalitis, P. N., Bozin, E. S., Billinge, S. J. L., Vogt, T. & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2002). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 10157–10162. Web of Science CrossRef ICSD PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Peys, A., White, C. E., Rahier, H., Blanpain, B. & Pontikes, Y. (2019). Cem. Concr. Res. 122, 179–188. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Poggetto, G. D., Leonelli, C. & Spinella, A. (2024). J. Mater. Sci. 59, 16963–16980. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Provis, J. L. (2018). Cem. Concr. Res. 114, 40–48. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Provis, J. L. & Bernal, S. A. (2014). Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 44, 299–327. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C. & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2005). Chem. Mater. 17, 3075–3085. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Provis, J. L. & Van Deventer, J. S. J. (2009). Editors. Geopolymers: Structures, Processing, Properties and Industrial Applications. Elsevier. Google Scholar
Puertas, F., Palacios, M., Manzano, H., Dolado, J. S., Rico, A. & Rodríguez, J. (2011). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 31, 2043–2056. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Qiu, X., Thompson, J. W. & Billinge, S. J. L. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 678. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Richardson, I. G. (2014). Struct. Sci. 70, 903–923. CAS Google Scholar
Richardson, I. G., Brough, A. R., Groves, G. W. & Dobson, C. M. (1994). Cem. Concr. Res. 24, 813–829. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Romero, P. & Garg, N. (2022). Appl. Clay Sci. 222, 106486. CrossRef Google Scholar
Sankar, K., Stynoski, P. & Kriven, W. M. (2018). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 102, 3175–3190. CrossRef Google Scholar
Schneider, M. (2019). Cem. Concr. Res. 124, 105792. CrossRef Google Scholar
Skibsted, J. & Andersen, M. D. (2013). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96, 651–656. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Skinner, L. B., Chae, S. R., Benmore, C. J., Wenk, H. R. & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2010). Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 195502. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Sun, Z. & Vollpracht, A. (2018). Cem. Concr. Res. 103, 110–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Suraneni, P., Puligilla, S., Kim, E. H., Chen, X., Struble, L. J. & Mondal, P. (2014). Adv. Civ. Eng. Mater. 3, 177–192. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Taylor, H. F. W. (1973). Miner. Mag. 39, 377–389. CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Taylor, H. F. W. (1997). Cement Chemistry. London: Thomas Telford. Google Scholar
United Nations (2022). World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. UN DESA/POP/2021/TR/No.3. New York: United Nations. Google Scholar
Wang, S.-D., Pu, X.-C., Scrivener, K. L. & Pratt, P. L. (1995). Adv. Cem. Res. 7, 93–102. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Warren, B. E., Krutter, H. & Morningstar, O. (1936). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 19, 202–206. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
White, C. E., Page, K., Henson, N. J. & Provis, J. L. (2013). Appl. Clay Sci. 73, 17–25. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
White, C. E., Provis, J. L., Llobet, A., Proffen, T. & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2011). J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94, 3532–3539. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
White, C. E., Provis, J. L., Proffen, T., Riley, D. P. & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2010a). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 3239–3245. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
White, C. E., Provis, J. L., Proffen, T., Riley, D. P. & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2010b). J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 4988–4996. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, K., Özçelik, V. O., Garg, N., Gong, K. & White, C. E. (2018). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 8593–8606. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, S., Navrotsky, A. & Phillips, B. L. (2000). J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 6071–6080. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zhan, B. Z., White, M. A., Lumsden, M., Mueller-Neuhaus, J., Robertson, K. N., Cameron, T. S. & Gharghouri, M. (2002). Chem. Mater. 14, 3636–3642. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

journal menu
access



