research communications
Structural and biochemical characterization of the M405S variant of Desulfovibrio vulgaris formate dehydrogenase
aUCIBIO, Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Department of Chemistry, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal, bAssociate Laboratory i4HB – Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal, and cInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Avenida da República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
*Correspondence e-mail: cd.mota@fct.unl.pt
This article is part of a collection of articles from the IUCr 2023 Congress in Melbourne, Australia, and commemorates the 75th anniversary of the IUCr.
Molybdenum- or tungsten-dependent formate dehydrogenases have emerged as significant catalysts for the chemical reduction of CO2 to formate, with biotechnological applications envisaged in climate-change mitigation. The role of Met405 in the active site of Desulfovibrio vulgaris formate dehydrogenase AB (DvFdhAB) has remained elusive. However, its proximity to the metal site and the conformational change that it undergoes between the resting and active forms suggests a functional role. In this work, the M405S variant was engineered, which allowed the active-site geometry in the absence of methionine Sδ interactions with the metal site to be revealed and the role of Met405 in catalysis to be probed. This variant displayed reduced activity in both formate oxidation and CO2 reduction, together with an increased sensitivity to oxygen inactivation.
1. Introduction
The conversion of CO2 to value-added products is in high demand as climate-change mitigation measures become increasingly relevant. Nonetheless, these are chemically challenging reactions as CO2 is inherently thermodynamically stable, posing extensive challenges to an energy-efficient industrial implementation (Appel et al., 2013; Calzadiaz-Ramirez & Meyer, 2022; Aresta et al., 2013). Metal-dependent formate dehydrogenases (Fdhs) have been tailored by evolution to accomplish this reaction efficiently, selectively and with high activity, leading to an increasing interest in the development of optimized versions of these enzymes as well as of bio-inspired inorganic catalysts (Szczesny et al., 2020; Lodh & Roy, 2022; Kanega et al., 2020).
Molybdenum/tungsten-dependent Fdhs present diverse quaternary structures, allowing them to assume diverse metabolic roles (da Silva et al., 2013) while interacting with a large assortment of electron acceptors/mediators that are located in membranes or soluble in the cytoplasm and periplasm (Boyington et al., 1997; Jormakka et al., 2002; Radon et al., 2020; Young et al., 2020; Oliveira et al., 2020; Raaijmakers et al., 2002). These enzymes accommodate a wide diversity of β and/or γ subunits harbouring iron–sulfur clusters, haem groups and but the catalytic subunit (α subunit) is ubiquitously conserved. This subunit contains the molybdenum/tungsten active site and one [4Fe–4S] cluster (for electron shuttling) and is responsible for the reversible conversion of formate to CO2 with a substantially higher turnover than its metal-independent counterparts (Maia et al., 2015; Nielsen et al., 2019).
In the active site, the Mo/W atom coordinates two dithiolenes from two molybdopterin guanine dinucleotides (MGDs), one terminal sulfido ligand (—SH/=S) and a (seleno)cysteine residue from the polypeptide chain in a distorted trigonal prismatic geometry (Romão, 2009; Hille et al., 2014; Grimaldi et al., 2013). The two MGD ligands are structurally equivalent but have different roles. MGD1 (the proximal MGD) is involved in from the molybdenum/tungsten centre to the first [4Fe–4S] cluster (Oliveira et al., 2020; Raaijmakers et al., 2002; Supplementary Fig. S1). MGD2 (the distal MGD) is believed to play a role in modulation of the molybdenum/tungsten (Oliveira et al., 2020). In the second coordination sphere of the metal, two conserved residues are catalytically relevant: a histidine thought to play a role in proton transfer (Oliveira et al., 2020) and an arginine involved in substrate orientation and stabilization of putative catalytic intermediates (Oliveira et al., 2020; Siegbahn, 2022).
In the particular case of the tungsten FdhAB from Desulfovibrio vulgaris (DvFdhAB), a selenocysteine coordinates the tungsten ion and the enzyme displays a simple heterodimeric structure: a catalytic α subunit (harbouring the tungsten active site and one [4Fe–4S] centre) and a β subunit (with three [4Fe–4S] clusters) involved in to/from electron acceptors/donors (Oliveira et al., 2020).
In spite of several studies, doubts persist regarding the catalytic mechanism, particularly in relation to the dissociation of the (seleno)cysteine during catalysis (Raaijmakers & Romão, 2006; Schrapers et al., 2015; Oliveira et al., 2022) and/or the transfer of a formal hydride (H+ + 2e−) between the metal site and the substrate (Schrapers et al., 2015; Niks & Hille, 2019; Siegbahn, 2022).
In a recent study of DvFdhAB, a disulfide redox switch was shown to be crucial in an allosteric mechanism for enzyme activation (yielding maximum activity) or inactivation (resulting in protection against O2 damage) (Oliveira et al., 2024). When the disulfide bond is reduced, the highest for CO2 reduction is achieved. On the other hand, in the presence of the disulfide bond the kcat decreases by 90% and the Km increases. The allosteric mechanism involves large conformational changes, namely of the side chain of Met405, a residue located near the active site that is fully conserved in the subclass of Fdhs that contain the recently reported allosteric redox switch for protection against oxygen-induced damage. The M405A mutation virtually abolished the (Oliveira et al., 2024) and its structure revealed a significant distortion of the active site, particularly the protein backbone near SeCys192 (U192), preventing modelling of the side chain of U192. The mutation proved to be too severe, preventing clarification of the possible catalytic role of Met405 and suggesting a major structural role for this residue.
Here, we report the DvFdhAB and its kinetic characterization. The hexacoordinated tungsten active site could now be fully modelled and allowed the prominent role of Met405 in the geometry of the metal site to be probed.
of the M405S variant of2. Materials and methods
2.1. Expression, purification and kinetic assays of D. vulgaris FdhAB
DvFdhAB M405S was expressed and affinity-purified from D. vulgaris Hildenborough as described in Oliveira et al. (2020) (Table 1). was performed aerobically and anaerobically using Strep-TactinXT 4Flow resin (IBA Lifesciences), eluting the protein with 100 mM Tris–HCl buffer containing 150 mM NaCl and 50 mM biotin. Anaerobic purification was performed inside a Coy anaerobic chamber (2% H2/98% N2) using the same method as aerobic purification. The protein concentration was determined based on ɛ410 nm = 43.45 mM−1 cm−1. After protein purification, kinetic assays were performed as reported in Oliveira et al. (2020) with DTT pretreatment and a final DvFdhAB M405S concentration of 14 nM using a UV-1800 Shimadzu spectrophotometer inside a Coy anaerobic chamber (2% H2/98% N2).
|
2.2. Crystallization, data collection, structure solution and refinement
To obtain the crystallization conditions for the M405S variant, we started from the wild-type (WT) crystallization conditions reported in Oliveira et al. (2020) and performed microseeding. The conditions were optimized by varying the PEG 3350 concentration and by microseed dilution.
DvFdhAB M405S [15 mg ml−1 in 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.6, 10%(v/v) glycerol, 10 mM NaNO3 buffer] was crystallized at 20°C using the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method in 24-well plates (24-well XRL plates from Molecular Dimensions) with drops containing precipitant solution consisting of 32%(w/v) PEG 3350, 0.1 M Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 1 M LiCl (Oliveira et al., 2020) and a 1:500 dilution from a stock of microseeds of DvFdhAB WT with a 1:1:0.2 ratio of protein:precipitant:microseeds (Table 2).
|
Crystals appeared within 24 h, grew for 72 h and were flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen using the harvesting buffer supplemented with 20%(v/v) glycerol as a cryoprotectant.
X-ray diffraction experiments were performed on beamline ID30B (McCarthy et al., 2018) at the ESRF synchrotron, Grenoble, France. The crystals were cryocooled at 100 K and data processing was performed using XDS (Kabsch, 2010) and STARANISO (Vonrhein et al., 2018). As the data showed anisotropy, STARANISO was used to improve the overall quality of the final electron-density maps. with Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007) from the CCP4 suite (Agirre et al., 2023) was used to solve the structure using the oxidized WT DvFdhAB structure (PDB entry 6sdr) as a search model. The model was iteratively refined by cycles of automatic with REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al., 2011) and manual model building with Coot (Emsley et al., 2010). The model was rebuilt using the online PDB-REDO server (Joosten et al., 2009) and publication images were generated with PyMOL (Schrödinger). Data-collection and processing statistics and model-refinement statistics are presented in Tables 3 and 4, respectively.
|
|
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Biochemical characterization of DvFdhAB M405S
The DvFdhAB M405S variant presents an eightfold lower activity for formate oxidation and an 18-fold lower activity for CO2 reduction compared with the WT enzyme (Table 5). A strong loss of activity was previously reported for the M405A variant, where the activities were 16-fold and eightfold lower than those of WT DvFdhAB for formate oxidation and CO2 reduction, respectively (Table 5; Oliveira et al., 2024). The Km of the M405S variant for formate was twice that of the WT and the M405A variant (Table 5). On the other hand, the Km for CO2 was equally high for both variants and was two orders of magnitude higher than that of the WT (Oliveira et al., 2024). Although the difference in the kinetic parameters of both variants relative to the WT was not the same, the efficiencies (kcat/Km) for formate oxidation and CO2 reduction were similar (Table 5). The activities of both variants increased slightly when the proteins were purified anaerobically (Figs. 1a and 1b). This reveals that the variants are more sensitive to oxygen than WT DvFdhAB, for which the activity after anaerobic purification did not increase (Oliveira et al., 2024; Figs. 1a and 1b). The activity profile of the M405S variant is similar to that observed for the M405A variant (Oliveira et al., 2024) and the results confirm and reinforce that Met405 is essential for the activity and substrate affinity of DvFdhAB. Furthermore, mutation of this residue results in an increased sensitivity to oxygen.
3.2. Structure of DvFdhAB M405S
DvFdhAB M405S yielded crystals that belonged to P212121 and diffracted to 2.0 Å resolution (Table 3). The diffraction pattern showed anisotropy and the data were processed using STARANISO to improve the statistics and maps (Vonrhein et al., 2018). Considering an ellipsoid cutoff, the statistics showed a completeness of 93.02% and 49.47% for the overall data set and the highest resolution shell, respectively, an overall CC1/2 of 0.996 for the overall data set and 0.562 for the highest resolution shell, and a 〈I/σ(I)〉 of 1.5 for the last shell. The model was refined with good geometry indicators (0.17% Ramachandran outliers and a MolProbity score of 1.60 Å) with R-factor and Rfree values of 0.212 and 0.253, respectively (Table 4). As expected, the overall structure of the M405S variant is very similar to the WT and to M405A variant structures. Superimposition of the M405S variant with oxidized WT DvFdhAB (PDB entry 6sdr) yields an r.m.s.d. of 0.37 Å for 1177 Cα atoms, superimposition with the reduced WT enzyme (PDB entry 6sdv) yields an r.m.s.d. of 0.40 Å for 1177 Cα atoms and superimposition with the M405A variant (PDB entry 8cm7) yields an r.m.s.d. of 0.28 Å for 1170 Cα atoms. However, the mutation induced structural changes in the protein backbone near the tungsten active site and its ligands (Fig. 2). In the previously reported structure of the M405A variant, the structural changes in this region were unclear due to very poor electron density; the selenocysteine side chain could not be modelled and was omitted from the deposited structure (PDB entry 8cm7).
3.3. Structure comparison of DvFdhAB M405S with other variants and the wild type
In the new variant the electron density for the Ser405 side chain is well defined and its Oγ atom is stabilized by hydrogen bonds to O2α and O2β of two phosphate groups of MGD1 (Fig. 2a). This interaction, which is not present in M405A, stabilizes this region and may provide an explanation for the enhanced quality of the crystals of the M405S variant and for the lack of disorder at the tungsten active site (Fig. 2b).
The mutation of Met405 to serine (or alanine) led the Gln409 side chain to occupy the space left vacant by the absence of the Met405 side chain, resulting in a backbone rearrangement that pulls Thr408 4.3 Å away from its original position and causes it to interact with the protein backbone near U192 (Figs. 2c, 2d and 2e). Gln409 and Thr408 are superposed in M405S and C872A variants (Fig. 2f).
The helix portion Ile191–Thr196, which is affected by the positioning of Thr408, was modelled in a new conformation (similar to the M405A variant; Fig. 3) that was not previously seen in the WT (oxidized or reduced) or the recently reported activated C872A variant (PDB entry 8cm6), which mimics the physiological active state of the enzyme (Oliveira et al., 2024). This helix segment was modelled in a conformation closer to the oxidized WT form (Ile191–Ser194), moving closer to the reduced WT form and the activated C872A form from Pro195 onwards and becoming completely superposable as early as Thr196 (Fig. 3). Additionally, the catalytically essential residue His193 displays a new conformation that is closer to that in the oxidized WT enzyme, but is intermediate between the oxidized and reduced states. Therefore, this new conformation, which is associated with increased backbone flexibility, is likely to interfere with the catalytic role of His193, possibly accounting for some of the loss of activity of the M405S variant. Nonetheless, using the current data we cannot determine its exact impact on the catalytic activity.
As in the M405A variant, the B factors in this region (Ile191–Thr196) of the M405S variant are very high, indicating flexibility of this helix segment arising from the absence of the large residue (Fig. 4). Only loop Gly986–Ile992, which is located at the entrance to the substrate channel, has higher B factors than Ile191–Thr196 within the protein core (Fig. 4a), as observed in other Fdh structures (Vilela-Alves et al., 2023).
3.4. The tungsten-site geometry
In the structure of the M405S variant (in contrast to that of the M405A variant) the selenocysteine side chain could be modelled and the selenium location was clearly identified by the anomalous difference map (up to 4σ; Fig. 5b), enabling a direct comparison of the tungsten active site (WT versus M405S variant; Fig. 5a). The active site of the M405S variant is also significantly different from that in the C872A variant (equivalent to the active state of the enzyme), suggesting that the low activity displayed by the M405S variant is likely to be due to its altered active site. To better characterize the active-site geometry, the twisting and folding angles of the MGD dithiolenes were calculated as defined by Liu et al. (2022). The twisting angle is the angle obtained from the scalar product of the two vectors connecting the two S atoms within the same dithiolene ligand and the folding angle is defined as 180° − θ, where θ is the angle formed by the two vectors connecting the metal ion and the midpoint between the S atoms from the same dithiolene ligand. The twisting angle is intended to assess the extent to which the dithiolene S atoms lie in the same plane, whereas the folding angle gauges how much the metal ion is pulled out of the plane of the four S atoms (Liu et al., 2022). Comparison of the twisting and folding angles of the active-site coordination is presented in Fig. 6. Ultimately, the substantial disparity between the tungsten active-site geometry of the M405S variant and the highly active form of the C872A variant (PBD entry 8cm6), as shown by distinct twisting and folding angles of 35.8° and 26.9° and of 64.1° and 59.0°, respectively (Fig. 6), is probably correlated with the diminished reactivity of this variant. Adding to this, the metal site in the M405S variant presents higher B factors, suggesting instability (flexibility or metal depletion), which will also affect the activity.
4. Conclusion
The DvFdhAB allowed us to unequivocally model the complete catalytic site of an inactive form of the enzyme. The replacement of a large hydrophobic side chain by a polar and short residue, stabilized by hydrogen bonds, allowed the tungsten coordination sphere to be retained, resulting in well defined electron density to model the tungsten ligand, U192, with a clear position for the Se atom. Met405 was previously assigned to play a key structural role, but only in the present M405S variant could we confirm the significant rearrangement of the Ile191–Thr196 helical region (particularly the mechanistically relevant residues U192 and His193) and the consequent distortion of the metal coordination geometry. These observed structural changes complemented by the reported loss of activity confirm previously published results. To elucidate the putative catalytic role of Met405, further mutagenesis experiments are being planned.
of the M405S variant ofSupporting information
Supplementary Figure S1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053230X24003911/no5205sup1.pdf
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility for the provision of synchrotron-radiation facilities and we would like to thank the staff of the ESRF and EMBL Grenoble for assistance and support in using beamline ID30B.
Funding information
This work is financed by national funds from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (FCT) through fellowship 2023.00286.BD (to V-AG), project PTDC/BII-BBF/2050/2020, the Research Unit on Applied Molecular Biosciences (UCIBIO; UIDP/04378/2020 and UIDB/04378/2020) and MOSTMICRO-ITQB (UIDB/04612/2020 and UIDP/04612/2020) and Associate Laboratories Institute for Health and Bioeconomy i4HB (LA/P/0140/2020) and LS4FUTURE (LA/P/0087/2020).
References
Agirre, J., Atanasova, M., Bagdonas, H., Ballard, C. B., Baslé, A., Beilsten-Edmands, J., Borges, R. J., Brown, D. G., Burgos-Mármol, J. J., Berrisford, J. M., Bond, P. S., Caballero, I., Catapano, L., Chojnowski, G., Cook, A. G., Cowtan, K. D., Croll, T. I., Debreczeni, J. É., Devenish, N. E., Dodson, E. J., Drevon, T. R., Emsley, P., Evans, G., Evans, P. R., Fando, M., Foadi, J., Fuentes-Montero, L., Garman, E. F., Gerstel, M., Gildea, R. J., Hatti, K., Hekkelman, M. L., Heuser, P., Hoh, S. W., Hough, M. A., Jenkins, H. T., Jiménez, E., Joosten, R. P., Keegan, R. M., Keep, N., Krissinel, E. B., Kolenko, P., Kovalevskiy, O., Lamzin, V. S., Lawson, D. M., Lebedev, A. A., Leslie, A. G. W., Lohkamp, B., Long, F., Malý, M., McCoy, A. J., McNicholas, S. J., Medina, A., Millán, C., Murray, J. W., Murshudov, G. N., Nicholls, R. A., Noble, M. E. M., Oeffner, R., Pannu, N. S., Parkhurst, J. M., Pearce, N., Pereira, J., Perrakis, A., Powell, H. R., Read, R. J., Rigden, D. J., Rochira, W., Sammito, M., Sánchez Rodríguez, F., Sheldrick, G. M., Shelley, K. L., Simkovic, F., Simpkin, A. J., Skubak, P., Sobolev, E., Steiner, R. A., Stevenson, K., Tews, I., Thomas, J. M. H., Thorn, A., Valls, J. T., Uski, V., Usón, I., Vagin, A., Velankar, S., Vollmar, M., Walden, H., Waterman, D., Wilson, K. S., Winn, M. D., Winter, G., Wojdyr, M. & Yamashita, K. (2023). Acta Cryst. D79, 449–461. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Appel, A. M., Bercaw, J. E., Bocarsly, A. B., Dobbek, H., DuBois, D. L., Dupuis, M., Ferry, J. G., Fujita, E., Hille, R., Kenis, P. J. A., Kerfeld, C. A., Morris, R. H., Peden, C. H. F., Portis, A. R., Ragsdale, S. W., Rauchfuss, T. B., Reek, J. N. H., Seefeldt, L. C., Thauer, R. K. & Waldrop, G. L. (2013). Chem. Rev. 113, 6621–6658. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aresta, M., Dibenedetto, A. & Angelini, A. (2013). J. CO2 Util. 3–4, 65–73. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Boyington, J. C., Gladyshev, V. N., Khangulov, S. V., Stadtman, T. C. & Sun, P. D. (1997). Science, 275, 1305–1308. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Calzadiaz-Ramirez, L. & Meyer, A. S. (2022). Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 73, 95–100. Web of Science CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Grimaldi, S., Schoepp-Cothenet, B., Ceccaldi, P., Guigliarelli, B. & Magalon, A. (2013). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1827, 1048–1085. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hille, R., Hall, J. & Basu, P. (2014). Chem. Rev. 114, 3963–4038. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Joosten, R. P., Salzemann, J., Bloch, V., Stockinger, H., Berglund, A.-C., Blanchet, C., Bongcam-Rudloff, E., Combet, C., Da Costa, A. L., Deleage, G., Diarena, M., Fabbretti, R., Fettahi, G., Flegel, V., Gisel, A., Kasam, V., Kervinen, T., Korpelainen, E., Mattila, K., Pagni, M., Reichstadt, M., Breton, V., Tickle, I. J. & Vriend, G. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 376–384. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Jormakka, M., Törnroth, S., Byrne, B. & Iwata, S. (2002). Science, 295, 1863–1868. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kabsch, W. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 125–132. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kanega, R., Ertem, M. Z., Onishi, N., Szalda, D. J., Fujita, E. & Himeda, Y. (2020). Organometallics, 39, 1519–1531. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Liu, M., Nazemi, A., Taylor, M. G., Nandy, A., Duan, C., Steeves, A. H. & Kulik, H. J. (2022). ACS Catal. 12, 383–396. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Lodh, J. & Roy, S. (2022). J. Inorg. Biochem. 234, 111903. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Maia, L. B., Moura, J. J. G. & Moura, I. (2015). J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 20, 287–309. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McCarthy, A. A., Barrett, R., Beteva, A., Caserotto, H., Dobias, F., Felisaz, F., Giraud, T., Guijarro, M., Janocha, R., Khadrouche, A., Lentini, M., Leonard, G. A., Lopez Marrero, M., Malbet-Monaco, S., McSweeney, S., Nurizzo, D., Papp, G., Rossi, C., Sinoir, J., Sorez, C., Surr, J., Svensson, O., Zander, U., Cipriani, F., Theveneau, P. & Mueller-Dieckmann, C. (2018). J. Synchrotron Rad. 25, 1249–1260. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Nielsen, C. F., Lange, L. & Meyer, A. S. (2019). Biotechnol. Adv. 37, 107408. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Niks, D. & Hille, R. (2019). Protein Sci. 28, 111–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Oliveira, A. R., Mota, C., Klymanska, K., Biaso, F., Romao, M. J., Guigliarelli, B. & Pereira, I. C. (2022). ACS Chem. Biol. 17, 1901–1909. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Oliveira, A. R., Mota, C., Mourato, C., Domingos, R. M., Santos, M. F. A., Gesto, D., Guigliarelli, B., Santos-Silva, T., Romão, M. J. & Cardoso Pereira, I. A. (2020). ACS Catal. 10, 3844–3856. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Oliveira, A. R., Mota, C., Vilela-Alves, G., Manuel, R. R., Pedrosa, N., Fourmond, V., Klymanska, K., Léger, C., Guigliarelli, B., Romão, M. J. & Cardoso Pereira, I. A. (2024). Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 111–119. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Raaijmakers, H., Macieira, S., Dias, J. M., Teixeira, S., Bursakov, S., Huber, R., Moura, J. J. G., Moura, I. & Romão, M. J. (2002). Structure, 10, 1261–1272. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Raaijmakers, H. C. A. & Romão, M. J. (2006). J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 11, 849–854. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Radon, C., Mittelstädt, G., Duffus, B. R., Bürger, J., Hartmann, T., Mielke, T., Teutloff, C., Leimkühler, S. & Wendler, P. (2020). Nat. Commun. 11, 1912. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Romão, M. J. (2009). Dalton Trans., pp. 4053–4068. Google Scholar
Schrapers, P., Hartmann, T., Kositzki, R., Dau, H., Reschke, S., Schulzke, C., Leimkühler, S. & Haumann, M. (2015). Inorg. Chem. 54, 3260–3271. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Siegbahn, P. E. M. (2022). J. Phys. Chem. B, 126, 1728–1733. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Silva, S. M. da, Voordouw, J., Leitão, C., Martins, M., Voordouw, G. & Pereira, I. A. C. (2013). Microbiology, 159, 1760–1769. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Szczesny, J., Ruff, A., Oliveira, A. R., Pita, M., Pereira, I. A. C., De Lacey, A. L. & Schuhmann, W. (2020). ACS Energy Lett. 5, 321–327. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Vilela-Alves, G., Manuel, R. R., Oliveira, A. R., Cardoso Pereira, I., Romão, M. J. & Mota, C. (2023). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 476. Google Scholar
Vonrhein, C., Tickle, I. J., Flensburg, C., Keller, P., Paciorek, W., Sharff, A. & Bricogne, G. (2018). Acta Cryst. A74, a360. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Young, T., Niks, D., Hakopian, S., Tam, T. K., Yu, X., Hille, R. & Blaha, G. M. (2020). J. Biol. Chem. 295, 6570–6585. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.