research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X

Crystal structure of tyrosine-tRNA synthetase from Helicobacter pylori G27

crossmark logo

aDartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA, bUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA, cCenter for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 307 Westlake Avenue North, Suite 500, Seattle, WA 98109, USA, dSeattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Diseases, Seattle, Washington, USA, eUCB BioSciences, Bainbridge Island, Washington, USA, fChemistry and Biochemistry, Hampton University, Hampton, VA 23666, USA, gDartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA, and hBiochemistry and Cell Biology, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, New Hampshire, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

Edited by S. Sheriff, Bristol-Myers Squibb, USA (Received 10 August 2026; accepted 2 October 2026; online 23 October 2026)

This article is part of a special issue celebrating early career researchers in structural science.

Helicobacter pylori, a major cause of gastric ulcers and cancers, infects nearly half of the world's population. The crystal structure of a potential H. pylori structure-guided drug-discovery target, tyrosine-tRNA synthetase (HpTyrRS), has been determined by the Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease (SSGCID). HpTyrRS is an enzyme that catalyzes the ATP-dependent attachment of tyrosine to tRNA. HpTyrRS was produced and crystallized, and its structure was determined at 2.2 Å resolution. HpTyrRS has a prototypical bacterial TyrRS topology and forms dimers in solution. HpTyrRS shares a conserved binding cavity for a previously identified Staphylococcus aureus TyrRS inhibitor (SB-219383). The reported structure and analysis establish HpTyrRS as a potential target for structure-guided drug discovery and repurposing.

1. Introduction

Helicobacter pylori is a helical, Gram-negative, microaerophilic bacterium that colonizes the stomach of ∼50% of the world's human population (Costa et al., 2024View full citation). H. pylori causes chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease (PUD), gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALT) and gastric adenocarcinoma (Sabbagh et al., 2019View full citation). The helical shape of H. pylori facilitates movement in the human body, while the coccoid form allows colonization of the gastric epithelial cells (Al-Fakhrany & Elekhnawy, 2023View full citation). H. pylori colonization induces pathological changes in the gastric microenvironment (Wang et al., 2015View full citation). Increasing antibiotic resistance of infectious bacteria has been a global concern for decades, prompting the adoption of combination therapy involving two or more types of antibiotics, such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, levofloxacin and rifabutin, as well as bismuth, to enhance healing and protect the gastric mucosa (Wang et al., 2015View full citation). The increasing drug resistance of H. pylori reveals an unmet need for new therapeutics. The Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease (SSGCID) has identified H. pylori aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, including tyrosine-tRNA synthetase (HpTyrRS), as targets for structure-guided drug discovery and repurposing. TyrRS catalyzes the bonding of tyrosine to tRNA (Xin et al., 2000View full citation). Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are enzymes that catalyze the esterification of amino acids to the corresponding tRNA, where the product of the process plays a crucial role in protein synthesis (Rubio Gomez & Ibba, 2020View full citation). The aaRS family, specifically TyrRS, have been identified as promising targets for new antibacterials (Zhu et al., 2015View full citation; Sun et al., 2017View full citation; Monobe et al., 2024View full citation). Here, we present the purification, crystallization and structure of HpTyrRS as a first step towards structure-guided inhibitor design.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Macromolecule production

HpTyrRS was cloned, expressed and purified using previously described methods (Stacy et al., 2011View full citation; Serbzhinskiy et al., 2015View full citation; Rodríguez-Hernández et al., 2023View full citation). The full-length gene for tyrosine-tRNA synthetase (EC 6.1.1.1) from H. pylori G27 (UniProt B5Z7D7) encoding amino acids 1–402 was PCR-amplified from genomic DNA using the primers in Table 1[link]. The gene was cloned into the expression vector BG1861 to generate N-terminally His-tagged plasmid DNA. The plasmid was transformed into chemically competent Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) Rosetta cells. These cells are an institutional variation of the classic Rosetta expression strain that layer a protective phage-resistance mutation onto the rare-codon translation power of the Rosetta strain.

Table 1
Macromolecule-production information

Source organism Helicobacter pylori (strain G27)
DNA source Nina Salama, FHCRC
Forward primer 5′-CTCACCACCACCACCACCATATGGAACAAAAAATCAGTGTGGCC-3′
Reverse primer 5′-ATCCTATCTTACTCACTTAGTTGATATTTAATTTCATAAATCTTTTCT-3′
Expression vector BG1861
Expression host Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) R3 Rosetta
Complete amino-acid sequence of the construct produced† MAHHHHHHMEQKISVALKEIKRGANEIIGLEYIEKLVRKYYETNERFIVKAGFDPTAPDLHLGHTVLIQKLALLQQYGARVKFLIGDFTAMIGDPTGKNETRKPLNREQVLENAKTYEEQIYKILDQKHTEVCFNSTWLDALGAKGMIELCAKFSVARMLERDDFAKRHKENRPISIVEFLYPLLQGYDSVAMGADIELGGNDQKFNLLVGRFLQRAYGLNKEQSIITMPLLEGLDGVQKMSKSLGNYVGITEEPNAMFGKIMSVSDDLMWRYYTLLSAKTLEEIEDLKHGILNQTLHPKAVKEDLAGEIVARYYDNDQAFKAKEQFSKVFSANLLPEILSESDFDEGVGILDVLKQIGFCPSTSQARRDIQGGGVKINQEVIKDESYRFVKGNYVIQLGKKRFMKLNIN
†Additional residues from the His-tag are underlined. Disordered residues are shown in bold. Six vector-derived residues −8MAHHHH−3 are unmodelled. Seven residues 86DPTGKNE92 and the C-terminal residues from 319Q through 402N are also disordered and unmodelled.

After small-scale expression testing, a 2 l culture was grown in a LEX Bioreactor (Epiphyte Three) using auto-induction media (Studier, 2005View full citation) and standardized SSGCID methods (Serbzhinskiy et al., 2015View full citation). HpTyrRS was purified using the previously described two-step protocol of an immobilized metal (Ni2+)-affinity chromatography (IMAC) step followed by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) on an ÄKTApurifier 10 (GE Healthcare) using automated IMAC and SEC programs (Serbzhinskiy et al., 2015View full citation). Briefly, thawed bacterial pellets (25 g) were lysed by sonication in 200 ml lysis buffer [20 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5%(v/v) glycerol, 0.5%(w/v) CHAPS, 30 mM imidazole, 10 mM MgCl2 and five tablets of protease inhibitor cocktail (cOmplete Mini, EDTA-free Roche, Basel, Switzerland)]. After sonication, the crude lysate was incubated with 20 µl (25 units per µl) benzonase while mixing for 45 min at room temperature. The lysate was centrifuged at 5000g for 1 h to remove insoluble debris. The clarified supernatant was passed over an Ni–NTA HisTrap FF 5 ml column (GE Healthcare), which had been pre-equilibrated with wash buffer [20 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5%(v/v) glycerol, 30 mM imidazole]. The column was washed with 20 column volumes (CV) of wash buffer and eluted with elution buffer [20 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5%(v/v) glycerol, 500 mM imidazole] over a 7 CV linear gradient. Peak fractions were pooled and concentrated to a final volume of 5 ml for SEC. The 5 ml protein sample was loaded onto a Superdex 75 26/60 column (GE Biosciences) attached to an ÄKTAprime plus FPLC system (GE Biosciences) that had been pre-equilibrated with SEC buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 1 mM TCEP). HpTyrRS eluted as a single, symmetrical, monodisperse peak. The peak fractions were collected and assessed for purity by SDS–PAGE on a 4–20% protein gel (Invitrogen) and visualized by staining with InstantBlue colloidal stain (Expedeon, San Diego, California. USA). Recombinant HpTyrRS was ∼95% pure. The peak fraction was pooled and concentrated to ∼20 mg ml−1 using an Amicon purification system (Millipore). Aliquots were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until use.

2.2. Crystallization

HpTyrRS was screened for crystallization conditions using the Molecular Dimensions Morpheus commercial screen. Crystals were grown in Molecular Dimensions Morpheus condition D11 (Table 2[link]) and did not require additional cryoprotectant prior to data collection.

Table 2
Crystallization

Method Vapor diffusion, sitting drop
Plate type Tray 101-d6, 96-well plates
Temperature (K) 290
Protein concentration (mg ml−1) 23.6
Buffer composition of protein solution 20 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 1 mM TCEP
Composition of reservoir solution 10%(w/v) PEG 4000, 20%(v/v) glycerol, 0.02 M 1,6-hexanediol, 1-butanol, 0.02 M (RS)-1,2-propanediol, 0.02 M 2-propanol, 0.02 M 1,4-butanediol, 0.02 M 1,3-propanediol, 100 mM Bicine/Tris base pH 8.5
Volume and ratio of drop 0.4 µl, 1:1
Volume of reservoir (µl) 80

2.3. Data collection and processing

Data were collected as reported in Table 3[link]. Data were integrated with XDS and reduced with XSCALE (Kabsch, 2010View full citation). Raw X-ray diffraction images are stored at the Integrated Resource for Reproducibility in Macromolecular Crystallography at https://www.proteindiffraction.org.

Table 3
Data collection and processing

Values in parentheses are for the outer shell. Raw X-ray diffraction images have been deposited at https://proteindiffraction.org/project/6byq/. Data processing shows that ice rings could occur at 3.897, 3.669, 3.441, 2.671, 2.249, 2.072, 1.948, 1.918, 1.883 and 1.721 Å.

Diffraction source APS beamline 21-ID-G
Temperature (K) 100
Detector RayoniX MX-300 CCD
Space group C2
Mosaicity (°) 0.146
Detector distance (mm) 325
Oscillation width (°) 1.00
Total rotation (°) 200
No. of frames 200
Wavelength (Å) 0.97872
a, b, c (Å) 121.40, 43.36, 113.70
α, β, γ (°) 90, 121.21, 90
Resolution range (Å) 40.01–2.24 (2.26–2.24)
Completeness (%) 97.1 (84.8)
No. of reflections 106143 (6118)
No. of unique reflections 25454 (1646)
Multiplicity 4.17 (3.74)
〈I/σ(I)〉 18.0 (2.6)
CC1/2 0.99 (0.79)
Rr.i.m. 0.056 (0.58)
Overall B factor from Wilson plot (Å2) 40

2.4. Structure solution and refinement

The structure of HpTyrRS was determined by molecular replacement with SIMBAD (Simpkin et al., 2018View full citation) from the CCP4 suite of programs (Collaborative Computational Project, 1994View full citation; Krissinel & Henrick, 2004View full citation; Winn et al., 2011View full citation;Agirre et al., 2023View full citation) using PDB entry 1h3f (Yaremchuk et al., 2002View full citation) as the search model. The structure was refined using iterative cycles of phenix.refine (Afonine et al., 2012View full citation) followed by manual rebuilding of the structure using Coot (Emsley & Cowtan, 2004View full citation; Emsley et al., 2010View full citation).

One molecule is present in the asymmetric unit, consistent with a Matthews coefficient of 2.74 Å3 Da−1, corresponding to a 55% solvent content in the protein crystal. The final model included two N-terminal histidine residues from the His-tag and 311 main-chain residues (Fig. 1[link], Table 4[link]). Six vector-derived residues and 96 main-chain residues were not modeled because they lacked unambiguous electron density at a 0.9 r.m.s.d. cutoff in the 2Fo − Fc electron density after iterative cycles of model building and refinement. The structure quality was checked using MolProbity (Williams et al., 2018View full citation). Refinement statistics are shown in Table 4[link]. Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited with the Worldwide PDB (wwPDB) as entry pdb_00006byq.

Table 4
Structure refinement

Values in parentheses are for the outer shell. Validation and Ramachandran statistics were obtained with MolProbity within the wwPDB X-ray validation reports. Quality statistics are calculated using standard compilations of covalent geometry parameters (Engh & Huber, 2006View full citation; Parkinson et al., 1996View full citation), tools in MolProbity (Chen et al., 2010View full citation) and the wwPDB Chemical Component Dictionary. The majority of unmodeled residues are at the carboxyl-terminus.

Resolution range (Å) 40.01–2.20 (2.26–2.20)
Completeness (%) 97.3
σ Cutoff F > 1.36σ(F)
No. of reflections, working set 25445 (1434)
No. of reflections, test set 1964 (139)
Final Rcryst 0.178 (0.228)
Final Rfree 0.209 (0.257)
No. of non-H atoms
 Protein 2366
 Ligand (IPA) 4
 Solvent 123
 Total 2493
R.m.s. deviations
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.008
 Angles (°) 1.2
Average B factors (Å2)
 Protein 60
 Ligand (IPA) 50
 Water 60
Ramachandran plot
 Most favored (%) 98
 Allowed (%) 2
 Unmodelled/incomplete residues (%) 24
 Modeled/analyzed (%) 76
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
HpTyrRS structure. (a) HpTyrRS has a prototypical TyrRS topology (colored from blue at the N-terminus to red at the C-terminus). (b) ENDscript ribbon diagram. Ribbon thickness reflects secondary-structure similarity: thinner ribbons indicate more conserved regions and thicker ribbons suggest lower conservation, as determined by r.m.s.d. alignment of structures. The ribbon is colored by sequence identity (red = identical residues). (c) Solvent-accessible surface area of HpTyrRS colored by ENDscript sequence conservation, with identical residues colored red, reveals a large conserved central cavity. (d) SB-219383 in magenta sticks sits in the open central cavity in both SaTyrRS (blue) and HpTyrRS (gray). HpTyrRS (PDB entry 6byq) was aligned with SaTyrRS (PDB entry 1jii) within PyMOL to generate (d). (a)–(d) are in the same orientation. All figures were generated with PyMOL.

2.5. Inhibitor docking

Inhibitor docking was performed using AutoDock Vina v1.2.7 to determine whether HpTyrRS is suitable for drug repurposing (Eberhardt et al., 2021View full citation; Cosconati et al., 2010View full citation; Trott & Olson, 2010View full citation). UCSF Chimera DockPrep was used to prepare the ligand, add hydrogens and charges, remove solvent molecules and repair incomplete side chains in HpTyrRS (Lang et al., 2009View full citation; Moustakas et al., 2006View full citation). The docking search space was defined based on residues within 5 Å of SB-219383 in the predicted active site, after structural alignment with Staphylococcus aureus TyrRS (SaTyrRS; PDB entry 1jii; Qiu et al., 2001View full citation) within PyMOL. The grid box was centered at X = −17.1375 Å, Y = −20.2976 Å, Z = 14.9006 Å, with box dimensions of 17.6119 × 23.3816 × 26.8822 Å and a grid spacing of 0.375 Å. Docking simulations were conducted with an exhaustiveness of 12, using 8 CPU cores and a verbosity level of 1. As a control, the docking search was repeated with SaTyrRS.

3. Results and discussion

Preparative SEC revealed that HpTyrRS assembles as a ∼77 kDa dimer, consistent with PISA analysis (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/pisa/). This dimer suggests a monomer of ∼38 kDa, which is smaller than the expressed protein of 45 kDa. Approximately 24% of the sequence was missing and could not be modeled, notably 83 residues at the carboxyl terminus from Gln319 through Asn402 (Table 1[link]). Additionally, six vector-derived residues −8MAHHHH−3 and seven residues 86DPTGKNE92 could not be modeled. The expected molecular weight of the modeled protein is ∼37 kDa, consistent with SEC data. A possible hypothesis is C-terminal proteolysis. Mass-spectroscopic analysis of recombinant HpTyrRS and HpTyrRS crystals is planned to confirm their amino-acid sequence and predicted molecular mass.

HpTyrRS is a prototypical bacterial TyrRS with the canonical bacterial tyrosine-tRNA (TyrRS) architecture consisting of a compact, globular α/β fold comprising 19 α-helices and six β-strands, organized into three βαβ units, one β-bulge and a single β-sheet (Fig. 1[link]). ENDscript analysis (Gouet et al., 1999View full citation, 2003View full citation) revealed that HpTyrRS shares extensive secondary-structural similarity with other bacterial TyrRS, and the closest structural homologs of HpTyrRS are TyrRS from Acinetobacter baumannii (PDB entry 6bqy), Thermus thermophilus (PDB entry 1h3e) and E. coli (PDB entry 1vbm) (Yaremchuk et al., 2002View full citation; Kobayashi et al., 2005View full citation; Figs. 1[link]b, 1[link]c and Supplementary Fig. S1). Similarly, PDBeFold analysis (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/msd-srv/ssm; Krissinel & Henrick, 2004View full citation) with a default threshold cutoff of 70% identified the closest structural neighbor of HpTyrRS as the A. baumannii TyrRS structure (PDB entries 6bqy and 6bqz), with ∼57% sequence identity and ∼1.6 Å r.m.s.d for alignment of all main-chain atoms. Likewise, a DALI search for similar structures against the PDB was consistent with PDBeFold and established HpTyrRS as a prototypical bacterial TyrRS, supporting the feasibility of inhibitor repurposing from other bacterial TyrRS.

To assess the feasibility of future drug repurposing of HpTyrRS, (2S)-2-[[(2S)-2-amino-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoyl]amino]-2-[(1S,3S,4S,5R,8R)-2,4,5,8-tetrahydroxy-7-oxa-2-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-3-yl]acetic acid; SB-219383; Fig. 2[link]d), a competitive, selective and potent inhibitor of bacterial TyrRS, was docked to HpTyrRS. As a control, SB-219383 was docked back into SaTyrRS. SB-219383 is a potent (IC50 of ∼0.5 nM) SaTyrRS inhibitor produced by Micromonospora, and a weaker inhibitor of mammalian TyrRS, specifically with an IC50 of ∼2 µM for the rat liver orthologue (Stefanska et al., 2000View full citation; Greenwood & Gentry, 2002View full citation). This selectivity profile strengthens the rationale for testing SB-219383 against HpTyrRS.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Superposed and modelled SB-219383 inhibitor binding. (a) HpTyrRS has conserved amino-acid residues in the superposed SB-219383 binding cavity. (b) SB-219383 (magenta) binds to SaTyrRS (blue) residues shown as blue sticks, as identified from PDB entry 1jii. (c) Superposed HpTyrRS (gray) and SaTyrRS (blue) reveal conserved amino acids. (d) Top docking pose of SB-219383 with HpTyrRS; docking score −8.03. (e) Top docking pose of SB-219383 with SaTyrRS; docking score −8.28. (f) CHEMDRAW representation of SB-219383. HpTyrRS (PDB entry 6byq) was superposed with SaTyrRS (PDB entry 1jii) within PyMOL to generate (a)–(c). (a)–(e) are in the same orientation as Fig. 1[link] and are magnified to visualize SB-219383. All figures were generated with PyMOL unless otherwise stated.

The structure of SaTyrRS with bound SB-219383 has been reported as PDB entry 1jii (Qiu et al., 2001View full citation). SaTyrRS shares ∼26% sequence identity with HpTyrRS and modest structural alignment (r.m.s.d. 2.9 Å, alignment length 295 residues; Fig. 1[link]d). SB-219383 sits in a central binding cavity in SaTyrRS (Figs. 1[link]d, 2[link]b and 2[link]c). The central binding cavity of SaTyrRS shares similar amino acids with HpTyrRS (Figs. 2[link]a–2[link]c). Many residues within 5 Å of SB-219383 are conserved (Fig. 3[link] and Table 5[link]). Additionally, some of these residues are conserved in bacterial TyrRS (Supplementary Fig. S1). The top docking pose of SB-219383 into HpTyrRS (Fig. 2[link]d) does not resemble the superposed orientation (Fig. 2[link]a). The control docking of SB-219383 into SaTyrRS (Fig. 2[link]e) more closely resembles the crystal structure (Fig. 2[link]b) than the top pose obtained from docking into HpTyrRS (Fig. 2[link]d), which may reflect the cavity's large open size and suggest the need for more experimental data to define inhibitor binding by HpTyrRS.

Table 5
Residues within 5 Å of SB-219383

SaTyrRS HpTyrRS
Gly38 Gly44
Asp40 Asp46
Gly49 Gly55
His50 His56
Leu70 Leu76
Thr75 Thr81
Asp80 Asp86
Asn124 Ser128
Tyr170 Tyr174
Gln174 Gln178
Asp177 Asp181
Gly193 Gly193
Asp195 Asp195
Gln196 Gln196
Tyr36 Lys42
Cys37 Ala 43
Ala 39 Phe45
Pro53 Leu59
Gln190 Glu190
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Structure-based primary-sequence alignment of HpTyrRS (PDB entry 6byq) and SaTyrRS (PDB entry 1jii). The secondary-structure elements are as follows: α-helices are shown as large coils, 310-helices as small coils labeled η and β-strands as arrows labeled β, with β-turns labeled TT. Identical residues are shown in white font on a red background, while conserved residues are shown in red font and conserved regions are shown in blue boxes. The residues interacting with SB-219383 are indicated with green boxes. This figure was generated using ESPript 3.0 with alignment in Clustal Omega.

4. Conclusion

HpTyrRS is a prototypical bacterial TyrRS with a large central pocket. Computational docking suggests that the pocket may be capable of binding validated SaTyrRS inhibitors such as SB-219383 and may facilitate structure-guided H. pylori drug discovery and repurposing. Future studies will determine the activity of HpTyrRS and assess inhibition by known bacterial TyrRS inhibitors including SB-219383.

Acknowledgements

David Igbalajobi is a 2026 Program for Oncology Workforce Education and Research Experience at Dartmouth (POWERED) scholar funded by Friends of the Dartmouth Cancer Center. Jesuferanmi Ayanlade is a 2024 POWERED scholar. Jason Taylor is a Dartmouth 2025–2027 American Cancer Society Individualized Mentorship Program to Accelerate Cancer Training (IMPACT) post-baccalaureate fellow. Raymond Gao is a 2025 American Chemical Society Project SEED Fellow.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (contract No. 75N93022C00036 to Peter J. Myler, Bart Staker); American Cancer Society (grant No. 1310983 to Oluwatoyin A. Asojo).

References

Return to citationAfonine, P. V., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Moriarty, N. W., Mustyakimov, M., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A., Zwart, P. H. & Adams, P. D. (2012). Acta Cryst. D68, 352–367.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationAgirre, J., Atanasova, M., Bagdonas, H., Ballard, C. B., Baslé, A., Beilsten-Edmands, J., Borges, R. J., Brown, D. G., Burgos-Mármol, J. J., Berrisford, J. M., Bond, P. S., Caballero, I., Catapano, L., Chojnowski, G., Cook, A. G., Cowtan, K. D., Croll, T. I., Debreczeni, J. É., Devenish, N. E., Dodson, E. J., Drevon, T. R., Emsley, P., Evans, G., Evans, P. R., Fando, M., Foadi, J., Fuentes-Montero, L., Garman, E. F., Gerstel, M., Gildea, R. J., Hatti, K., Hekkelman, M. L., Heuser, P., Hoh, S. W., Hough, M. A., Jenkins, H. T., Jiménez, E., Joosten, R. P., Keegan, R. M., Keep, N., Krissinel, E. B., Kolenko, P., Kovalevskiy, O., Lamzin, V. S., Lawson, D. M., Lebedev, A. A., Leslie, A. G. W., Lohkamp, B., Long, F., Malý, M., McCoy, A. J., McNicholas, S. J., Medina, A., Millán, C., Murray, J. W., Murshudov, G. N., Nicholls, R. A., Noble, M. E. M., Oeffner, R., Pannu, N. S., Parkhurst, J. M., Pearce, N., Pereira, J., Perrakis, A., Powell, H. R., Read, R. J., Rigden, D. J., Rochira, W., Sammito, M., Sánchez Rodríguez, F., Sheldrick, G. M., Shelley, K. L., Simkovic, F., Simpkin, A. J., Skubak, P., Sobolev, E., Steiner, R. A., Stevenson, K., Tews, I., Thomas, J. M. H., Thorn, A., Valls, J. T., Uski, V., Usón, I., Vagin, A., Velankar, S., Vollmar, M., Walden, H., Waterman, D., Wilson, K. S., Winn, M. D., Winter, G., Wojdyr, M. & Yamashita, K. (2023). Acta Cryst. D79, 449–461.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationAl-Fakhrany, O. M. & Elekhnawy, E. (2023). Arch. Microbiol. 205, 301.  PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationChen, V. B., Arendall, W. B., Headd, J. J., Keedy, D. A., Immormino, R. M., Kapral, G. J., Murray, L. W., Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, D. C. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 12–21.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationCollaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 760–763.  CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationCosconati, S., Forli, S., Perryman, A. L., Harris, R., Goodsell, D. S. & Olson, A. J. (2010). Exp. Opin. Drug. Discov. 5, 597–607.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationCosta, L., das Graças Carvalho, M., La Guárdia Custódio Pereira, A. C., Teixeira Neto, R. G., Andrade Figueiredo, L. C. & Barros-Pinheiro, M. (2024). Med. Princ. Pract. 33, 173–184.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationEberhardt, J., Santos-Martins, D., Tillack, A. F. & Forli, S. (2021). J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61, 3891–3898.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationEmsley, P. & Cowtan, K. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 2126–2132.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationEmsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationEngh, R. A. & Huber, R. (2006). International Tables for Crystallo­graphy, Vol. F, 1st online ed., edited by M. G. Rossmann & E. Arnold, pp. 382–392. Chester: International Union of Crystallo­graphy.  Google Scholar
Return to citationGouet, P., Courcelle, E., Stuart, D. I. & Métoz, F. (1999). Bioinformatics, 15, 305–308.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationGouet, P., Robert, X. & Courcelle, E. (2003). Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3320–3323.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationGreenwood, R. C. & Gentry, D. R. (2002). J. Antibiot. 55, 423–426.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationKabsch, W. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 125–132.   Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationKobayashi, T., Takimura, T., Sekine, R., Kelly, V. P., Kamata, K., Sakamoto, K., Nishimura, S. & Yokoyama, S. (2005). J. Mol. Biol. 346, 105–117.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKrissinel, E. & Henrick, K. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 2256–2268.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationLang, P. T., Brozell, S. R., Mukherjee, S., Pettersen, E. F., Meng, E. C., Thomas, V., Rizzo, R. C., Case, D. A., James, T. L. & Kuntz, I. D. (2009). RNA, 15, 1219–1230.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMonobe, K., Taniguchi, H. & Aoki, S. (2024). Curr. Comput. Aided Drug. Des. 20, 452–462.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationMoustakas, D. T., Lang, P. T., Pegg, S., Pettersen, E., Kuntz, I. D., Brooijmans, N. & Rizzo, R. C. (2006). J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 20, 601–619.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationParkinson, G., Vojtechovsky, J., Clowney, L., Brünger, A. T. & Berman, H. M. (1996). Acta Cryst. D52, 57–64.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationQiu, X., Janson, C. A., Smith, W. W., Green, S. M., McDevitt, P., Johanson, K., Carter, P., Hibbs, M., Lewis, C., Chalker, A., Fosberry, A., Lalonde, J., Berge, J., Brown, P., Houge–Frydrych, C. S. V. & Jarvest, R. L. (2001). Protein Sci. 10, 2008–2016.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationRodríguez-Hernández, D., Vijayan, K., Zigweid, R., Fenwick, M. K., Sankaran, B., Roobsoong, W., Sattabongkot, J., Glennon, E. K. K., Myler, P. J., Sunnerhagen, P., Staker, B. L., Kaushansky, A. & Grøtli, M. (2023). Nat. Commun. 14, 5408.  Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationRubio Gomez, M. A. & Ibba, M. (2020). RNA, 26, 910–936.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationSabbagh, P., Javanian, M., Koppolu, V., Vasigala, V. R. & Ebrahimpour, S. (2019). Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 38, 1035–1045.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationSerbzhinskiy, D. A., Clifton, M. C., Sankaran, B., Staker, B. L., Edwards, T. E. & Myler, P. J. (2015). Acta Cryst. F71, 594–599.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSimpkin, A. J., Simkovic, F., Thomas, J. M. H., Savko, M., Lebedev, A., Uski, V., Ballard, C., Wojdyr, M., Wu, R., Sanishvili, R., Xu, Y., Lisa, M.-N., Buschiazzo, A., Shepard, W., Rigden, D. J. & Keegan, R. M. (2018). Acta Cryst. D74, 595–605.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationStacy, R., Begley, D. W., Phan, I., Staker, B. L., Van Voorhis, W. C., Varani, G., Buchko, G. W., Stewart, L. J. & Myler, P. J. (2011). Acta Cryst. F67, 979–984.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationStefanska, A. L., Coates, N. J., Mensah, L. M., Pope, A. J., Ready, S. J. & Warr, S. R. (2000). J. Antibiot. 53, 345–350.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationStudier, F. W. (2005). Protein Expr. Purif. 41, 207–234.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSun, J., Lv, P. C. & Zhu, H. L. (2017). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 27, 557–564.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationTrott, O. & Olson, A. J. (2010). J. Comput. Chem. 31, 455–461.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationWang, X. D., Wei, W., Wang, P. F., Yi, L. C., Shi, W. K., Xie, Y. X., Wu, L. Z., Tang, N., Zhu, L. S., Peng, J., Liu, C., Li, X. H., Tang, S., Xiao, Z. P. & Zhu, H. L. (2015). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 23, 4860–4865.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationWilliams, C. J., Headd, J. J., Moriarty, N. W., Prisant, M. G., Videau, L. L., Deis, L. N., Verma, V., Keedy, D. A., Hintze, B. J., Chen, V. B., Jain, S., Lewis, S. M., Arendall, W. B., Snoeyink, J., Adams, P. D., Lovell, S. C., Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, J. S. (2018). Protein Sci. 27, 293–315.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationWinn, M. D., Ballard, C. C., Cowtan, K. D., Dodson, E. J., Emsley, P., Evans, P. R., Keegan, R. M., Krissinel, E. B., Leslie, A. G. W., McCoy, A., McNicholas, S. J., Murshudov, G. N., Pannu, N. S., Potterton, E. A., Powell, H. R., Read, R. J., Vagin, A. & Wilson, K. S. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationXin, Y., Li, W. & First, E. A. (2000). J. Mol. Biol. 303, 299–310.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationYaremchuk, A., Kriklivyi, I., Tukalo, M. & Cusack, S. (2002). EMBO J. 21, 3829–3840.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationZhu, N., Lin, Y., Li, D., Gao, N., Liu, C., You, X., Jiang, J., Jiang, W. & Si, S. (2015). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 70, 2287–2294.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X