research papers
Energy separation of neutrons scattered at small angles from silicon using time-of-flight techniques
aJ. J. Thomson Physical Laboratory, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AF, England, and bLarge Scale Structures Group, Institut Laue–Langevin, 6 rue Jules Horowitz, Grenoble CEDEX 9, F-38042, France
*Correspondence e-mail: r.j.stewart@reading.ac.uk
The time-of-flight technique is used on a small-angle neutron scattering instrument to separate the energies of the scattered neutrons, in order to determine the origin of the temperature-dependent scattering observed from silicon at Q > ∼0.1 Å−1. A quantitative analysis of the results in comparison with the phonon dispersion curves, determined by Dolling using a triple-axis neutron spectrometer, shows that the temperature-dependent scattering can be understood in terms of Umklapp processes whereby neutrons gain energy from phonons.
1. Introduction
Beddoe et al. (1983) reported anisotropic temperature-dependent small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) from Czochralski-grown silicon when the incident neutron beam was along a [111] direction. These measurements were made using the D11 (Ibel, 1976) and D17 SANS instruments at the Institut Laue–Langevin (ILL), Grenoble, France. Subsequently, Gupta et al. (1992) reported similar temperature-dependent scattering from silicon when the incident neutron beam was along a [100] direction. This temperature-dependent scattering was observed when short sample-to-detector distances (around 1 m) were used with neutrons in the range 6–10 Å. The anisotropic scattering at the edges of the detector, seen in the contour plot of the scattered neutron intensity shown in Fig. 1, is an example of this temperature-dependent scattering. The cross-shaped scattering recorded at the centre of the detector arises from from SiO2 precipitates in the silicon crystal. It was suggested by Beddoe et al. (1983) that one possible explanation for this temperature-dependent scattering might be inelastic processes and they carried out an experiment to determine whether the scattering was due to elastic or inelastic processes. This was performed using the D17 SANS instrument, with a chopper installed, which pulsed the incident neutron beam, thus enabling the time of flight (TOF) of the scattered neutrons to be recorded. The detector electronics available at the time were limited by memory constraints to a total of 16384 channels. Thus, in order to carry out the time-of-flight experiment, the spatial resolution of the detector had to be reduced from 16384 5×5 mm detector elements to 1024 20×20 mm detector elements. This reduction was achieved by grouping the output of 16 of the 5×5 mm detector elements together and recording the output in one memory channel. This process enabled 16 two-dimensional detector scattering patterns to be sequentially recorded, each lasting 240 µs, to produce a set of TOF data for each neutron pulse from the chopper. No measurable was seen. Beddoe et al. (1983) thus concluded that the temperature-dependent scattering possibly arose from a modification of the dispersion curves in the centre of the owing to the presence of SiO2 precipitates. The studies of Gupta et al. (1992) showed that the temperature-dependent scattering was not due to changes in the silicon phonon curves caused by oxygen precipitates in the matrix, since the magnitude and form of the temperature-dependent scattering was the same irrespective of the size, shape or distribution of the oxygen precipitates. Indeed, they observed the temperature-dependent scattering in a nominally oxygen-free float-zone-grown silicon crystal.
With the increase in neutron ) compared with D17, and the larger detector electronics memory now available, a further experiment was carried out using time-of-flight analysis and the full spatial resolution of the area detector on D22. The aim was to reinvestigate, with higher incident neutron and enhanced time and spatial resolution, whether the anisotropic temperature-dependent scattering had its origin in inelastic processes.
available on the D22 SANS instrument at the ILL (May, 20002. Theoretical background
q. Energy conservation must hold; therefore
studies can show how neutrons interact with the lattice vibrations of a crystalline sample. Neutrons of different energies enter the sample and they can either gain energy (+) or lose energy (−) by creating or absorbing lattice vibrations, that is phonons of wavevectorwhere is Planck's constant, h, divided by 2π, ki is the magnitude of the wavevector of incident neutrons (ki), kf is the magnitude of the wavevector of the scattered neutrons (kf), ω is the phonon angular frequency and mn is the neutron mass.
From momentum conservation, the difference kf − ki must be equal to Q, where Q is the scattering vector (Fig. 2):
Using the cosine rule, we obtain an expression for Q2,
where Q is the magnitude of the scattering vector Q and 2θ is the scattering angle.
Substituting kf2 with the value determined from equation (1), we arrive at the following expression for Q2:
Values of Q were calculated using equation (4) for neutron energy gain (+) and neutron energy loss (−) through phonon interaction at two scattering angles: 2θ = 0° and 2θ = 24.3°, where the latter is the maximum scattering angle of 2θ on D22 with the sample-to-detector distance set to 1.5 m. The loci of allowable ω and Q values are plotted in Fig. 3. The incident neutrons used had an energy of 1.3 meV (wavelength of 8 Å). Thus phonons with energy greater than this cannot be created. The maximum phonon frequency that could theoretically be created is thus ω = 1.9 Trad s−1. Thus in Fig. 3, the loci of allowable ω and Q values stop at ω = −1.9 Trad s−1. The boundary in the [100] direction in silicon is at Q = 1.157 Å −1; thus the allowable ω and Q values are truncated at Q = 1.157 Å −1. The phonon dispersion curves for silicon were obtained by Dolling (1963) using the `constant Q' technique on the triple-axis spectrometer at the NRU reactor, Chalk River. Three crystallographic directions of a single crystal of pure silicon were studied. Those for the [100] direction have been fitted and are shown by the dotted lines in Fig. 3. In order to create or annihilate a phonon, part of the dispersion curve must intersect the experimentally defined loci of allowable ω and Q values in order to conserve both energy and momentum in the neutron–phonon interaction. This intersection does not occur for phonon creation (see Fig. 3) and thus for 8 Å neutrons impinging on a silicon single crystal only phonon annihilation processes are allowed. From Fig. 3 it is also clear that there is no intersection corresponding to phonon annihilation in the first (i.e. corresponding to a normal process).
Fig. 4 shows the loci of allowable ω and Q values, based on the D22 instrument parameters used, superimposed on Dolling's dispersion curves for the [100] direction (the direction in which the neutron beam impinged on the silicon in the TOF experiment). A reduced zone scheme is used so that all possible phonon annihilation processes are included (i.e. both normal and Umklapp).
3. Experimental details
A sample that had been heat-treated for 500 h at 873 K, and for 1000 h at 773 K, was studied on D22 with the time-of-flight chopper in place (see Fig. 5).
A time-of-flight chopper was placed just before the sample area of the D22 instrument at the ILL. A continuous collimated neutron beam, originating from a velocity selector set to transmit 8 Å neutrons, impinges onto the chopper. A collimation distance of 2.8 m was chosen to match the angular resolution of the detector for the 1.5 m sample-to-detector distance employed in these experiments. The time-of-flight chopper consists of a disc made of highly neutron-absorbing material into which two openings are machined, thus producing two neutron pulses per revolution of the disc. The pulse separation of 25 ms is determined by the chosen rotation speed of the disc (1200 r.p.m.). The pulsed monochromatic neutron beam then impinges on the heat-treated silicon crystal being studied. A cadmium plate, with an aperture cut in it of 10 mm diameter, determined the size of the neutron beam; this was placed just in front of the sample. A large cadmium plate, with an aperture of 14 mm diameter cut in it, was positioned just before the chopper to reduce the thermal and cold neutron background signal. The neutrons scattered by the sample are detected using a two-dimensional He3 position-sensitive detector. The detector consists of a 128 × 128 array of detector elements, each of size 7.5 × 7.5 mm; this was positioned 1.5 m from the sample. The time of arrival of the detected neutrons was sorted into 50 time channels, each of 125 µs duration. The first time channel was triggered after a time delay. This process would repeat itself for a set amount of time. Three sets of runs were carried out, each run lasting 1 h. For each time channel, a two-dimensional record of the distribution of neutrons detected was recorded; each of these was assigned a run number and the TOF spectra obtained clearly showed that the from oxygen-containing precipitates could be separated in time from the temperature-dependent scattering (see §4). Empty can, cadmium and calibration runs were also carried out for 1 h each.
3.1. Experimental background
Assuming that some of the neutrons were inelastically scattered and some were elastically scattered, the variation in scattered neutron intensity with time of flight will follow a general trend, as indicated by Fig. 6. The times of flight of neutrons, in microseconds, arriving at the times t1, t2, t3 and t4, indicated in Fig. 6, can be calculated using:
where λ is the neutron wavelength in ångströms and L is the distance travelled by the neutron in metres.
Fig. 7 is a schematic diagram of the experimental setup, showing the neutron paths and how the fastest and slowest elastically and inelastically scattered neutrons are related to the times t1, t2, t3 and t4 (measured in microseconds);
λmin corresponds to the wavelength (in ångströms) of the fastest neutrons coming from the chopper and λmax is the wavelength (in ångströms) of the slowest neutrons. LCS is the distance (in metres) between the chopper and the sample, LSD is the distance (in metres) between the sample and the detector and Δs is the thickness of the sample (in metres). Finally, Δton is the total time (in microseconds) during which the chopper window allows neutrons to be transmitted. The chopper, to a first approximation, gives the same distribution of neutron wavelengths between ±10% of the mean wavelength as set by the helical velocity selector. In these experiments, the helical velocity selector was set to allow 8 Å neutrons through to the chopper. Therefore, λmin = 7.2 Å to λmax = 8.8 Å, to a good approximation, is the range of wavelengths coming through the chopper windows. (These values were confirmed in the experiment from the time-of-flight analysis.)
The energy of a neutron E (meV) corresponding to a wavelength λ (Å) can be obtained using the following expression:
This expression can then be used to find the minimum and maximum energies that can be imparted to the neutrons by the phonons:
To convert from the phonon energy (meV) to the corresponding phonon angular frequency ω (Trad s−1) the following relation is used:
4. Results
The sequence of neutron small-angle scattering patterns obtained for each time-of-flight channel is displayed in Fig. 8. The figures show that it is possible to separate most of the (TOF channels 16–23) from the (TOF channels 36–43). A plot of the total amount of scattering recorded over the whole detector is plotted against time-of-flight channel in Fig. 9. This plot is used to pinpoint the shortest times for t1 and t3 and the longest times for t2 and t4 described in equations (6)–(9), in terms of time channels. The times calculated using these equations would refer to the maximum values for t1, t2, t3 and t4 for neutrons travelling to the very edge of the detector and minimum values for neutrons that travel the least distance to the centre of the detector. The most important times are those that can be pinpointed on the TOF spectra, t1,min, t2,max, t3,min and t4,max.
The experimental values of times of flight are calculated by multiplying the time-channel number (1–49), where the fastest/slowest elastic/inelastic neutrons arrive, by the channel width of 125 µs. For example, the slowest elastically scattered neutrons are seen to arrive in channel 46, therefore t4 = 125 × 46 = 5750 µs. The calculated value, using equation (9), gives a value of 5510 µs. The difference of 240 µs between these two values is due to the relative position of the chopper start pulse, which triggers the time-of-flight electronics. Therefore, this value must be added to all the calculated times. The experimental values of t1,min, t2,max, t3,min and t4,max are taken from Fig. 9 and compared with the calculated values in Table 1. The values of Δλmin and Δλmax are determined from the experimental values for t1,min and t2,max using equations (6) and (7). Using these values of Δλmin and Δλmax, the energy transfers are calculated using equations (11), (12) and (13). The maximum and minimum energy transfers possible are thus given by
or in terms of phonon angular frequencies
A coincidence of the loci of allowable ω and Q values from the experiment with Dolling's dispersion curve for a [100] direction in silicon occurs at ω = 19 Trad s−1 and involves an Umklapp process (see Fig. 10).
|
5. Discussion
These experiments have shown that the temperature-dependent scattering seen at the edges of the detector is the result of inelastic processes. A quantitative analysis of the energies and momentums involved suggests that these are Umklapp processes whereby the phonons impart energy to the impinging neutrons. One overlap between the loci of allowable ω and Q values and Dolling's dispersion curves for a [100] direction lies within the range of possible energy transfers given by equation (14).
The time of flight of the neutrons can also be represented as in Fig. 11, where the times of flight of the shortest and longest wavelength neutrons have been plotted. The times of flight of the slowest and fastest neutrons, having gained phonon energies of 13.2 and 4.5 meV, have also been plotted. Had the fastest and slowest neutrons gained phonon energies more or less than the range calculated here, then the time-of-flight spectra would have shown neutron counts in time channels outside those found (i.e. TOF channels < 13 or > 29). The TOF spectra show that there were no neutron counts above the background in these channels, and thus there were no processes involving phonon energies greater than 13.2 or less than 4.5 meV.
Fig. 12 is a two-dimensional representation of a (100) section of the extended of a face-centred cubic crystal. The magnitude of the scattered wavevector kf,max is the maximum possible value of kf resulting from the annihilation of a phonon with the maximum possible energy in silicon of ∼66 meV (∼100 Trad s−1 or ∼16 THz). The direction of kf,max shown in Fig. 12 corresponds to the maximum scattering angle of the D22 set up with a sample-to-detector distance of 1.5 m. The directions of the vector kf have also been drawn in Fig. 12 for three other scattering angles, corresponding to different parts of the temperature-dependent scattering pattern. The spatial distribution of the observed is consistent with the shape of the (100) section of the of silicon. The same conclusion can be made for the measurements of Beddoe et al. (1983) for a [111] direction. Wu et al. (1999) have also observed similar effects in a non-energy analysed diffuse X-ray scattering study of silicon for a [111] direction.
A general conclusion is that the separation of elastic and e.g. if the arises from low concentrations of small precipitates). As far as the authors know, nearly all SANS experiments involve the measurement of the total differential scattering (i.e. elastic + inelastic). Fig. 13 shows the radially averaged cross sections obtained from a silicon crystal containing low concentrations of small SiO2 precipitates. It is clear from this figure that the contribution of the to the total scattering is significant and could lead to erroneous results. The inelastic contribution can be subtracted if the total scattering from a control sample with no SiO2 precipitates is also measured (see Fig. 14). If the samples are single crystals, this subtraction requires that the control sample and precipitate-containing samples must be accurately positioned so that the neutron beam impinges along the same crystallographic axis in both crystals. Small differences in sample and control alignment are probably the origin of the significant scatter in the points apparent when the control sample is subtracted from the precipitate-containing silicon sample (Fig. 14). It is also crucial that the presence of the SiO2 precipitates does not alter either the shape or the magnitude of the This later point also applies if measurements are made on polycrystals where the alignment would not be so important.
of neutrons is important if the is weak (6. Conclusions
These measurements have established that the temperature-dependent neutron scattering observed in silicon single crystals for small scattering vectors is an inelastic process. To satisfy energy and momentum conservation in the interaction between the incident neutrons and the crystal phonons, an Umklapp process is needed in which the neutron gains energy in the range 4.5–13.2 meV from a phonon.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the EPSRC for supporting this research and the ILL for the provision of the neutron spectrometer. Professor R. C. Newman, Professor A. C. Wright, Dr D. Dunn and Dr M. J. L. Sangster are thanked for a number of useful discussions.
References
Beddoe, R. E., Messoloras, S., Stewart, R. J., Kostorz, G. & Mitchell, E. W. J. (1983). Philos. Mag. 48, 935–952. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Dolling, G. (1963). Neutron Inelastic Scattering, Vol 2, pp. 37–48. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. Google Scholar
Gupta, S., Messoloras, S., Stewart, R. J. & Schneider, J. R. (1992). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 4, 5383–5390. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Ibel, K. (1976). J. Appl. Cryst. 9, 296–309. CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
May, R. P. (2000). https://www.ill.fr/YellowBook/D22. Google Scholar
Wu, Z., Hong, H., Aburano, R., Zschack, P., Jemian, P., Tischler, J., Chen, H., Luh, D. A. & Chiang, T. C. (1999). Phys. Rev. B, 59, 3283–3286. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.