research papers\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775

Sample chamber for synchrotron based in-situ X-ray diffraction experiments under electric fields and temperatures between 100 K and 1250 K

crossmark logo

aInstitute of Experimental Physics, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, 09596 Freiberg, Germany, bLeibniz-Institut für Kristallzüchtung, 12489 Berlin, Germany, cNaMLab gGmbH, Nöthnitzer Strasse 64a, 01187 Dresden, Germany, dDESY Photon Science, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, 22607 Hamburg, Germany, and eInstitute of Ion Beam Physics and Materials Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: melanie.nentwich@desy.de

Edited by S. Svensson, Uppsala University, Sweden (Received 21 April 2020; accepted 28 October 2020)

Many scientific questions require X-ray experiments conducted at varying temperatures, sometimes combined with the application of electric fields. Here, a customized sample chamber developed for beamlines P23 and P24 of PETRA III at DESY to suit these demands is presented. The chamber body consists mainly of standard vacuum parts housing the heater/cooler assembly supplying a temperature range of 100 K to 1250 K and an xyz manipulator holding an electric contact needle for electric measurements at both high voltage and low current. The chamber is closed by an exchangeable hemispherical dome offering all degrees of freedom for single-crystal experiments within one hemisphere of solid angle. The currently available dome materials (PC, PS, PEEK polymers) differ in their absorption and scattering characteristics, with PEEK providing the best overall performance. The article further describes heating and cooling capabilities, electric characteristics, and plans for future upgrades of the chamber. Examples of applications are discussed.

1. Introduction

One of the major advantages of X-rays over other probes in material characterization is the compatibility with complex sample environments based on the large X-ray penetration depth. This ability allows the study of physical properties of materials under real conditions and of structural transitions due to external perturbations by various physical fields, like temperature and electric field. The determination of cross-coupling coefficients of such material properties can be used to study ferroelectricity and related effects, e.g. piezo- and pyroelectricity, but also higher-order effects like electro­striction and flexoelectricity. For instance, the knowledge of piezo- and pyroelectric coefficients at non-ambient conditions is essential for the development of high-temperature-stable sensors and actuators. Up to now, commercial sample environments for X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiments providing access to a large solid angle are rare [e.g. Anton Paar DCS 500 and DHS 1100 (Anton Paar, 2020a[Anton Paar (2020a). Anton Paar, https://www.anton-paar.com/de-de/.],b[Anton Paar (2020b). Heater assembly DCS 500 for 4 circle goniometres, T range: −180°C to 500°C, https://www.anton-paar.com/de-de/produkte/details/kuehl-und-heizzusatz-fuer-vierkreis-goniometer-dcs-500/.][Anton Paar (2020c). Heater assembly DHS 1100 for 4 circle goniometres and several xyz stages, T range: 25°C to 1100°C, https://www.anton-paar.com/de-de/produkte/details/heizzusatz-fuer-vierkreis-goniometer-dhs-1100/.]) or ADC XRD-1500 (Advanced Design Consulting, 2020[Advanced Design Consulting (2020). XRD-1500 high temperature oven, T range: 25°C to 1000°C, vacuum down to 1 × 10−6 mbar, https://nebula.wsimg.com/8186ac9263915c9d307bc1624111aec3?AccessKeyId=6724FDA0721B120F44FE&disposition=0&alloworigin=1.])]. In particular, systems combining low or high temperatures with high electric fields and low sample-stage-induced current background in vacuum are not available. However, customized chambers for nearly every purpose can be designed individually (Richard et al., 2017[Richard, M.-I., Fernández, S., Hofmann, J. P., Gao, L., Chahine, G. A., Leake, S. J., Djazouli, H., De Bortoli, Y., Petit, L., Boesecke, P., Labat, S., Hensen, E. J. M., Thomas, O. & Schülli, T. (2017). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 093902.]).

The electrical and simultaneous structural investigation represents the major application of this chamber. For instance, we can determine pyroelectric coefficients using the Sharp–Garn method (Sharp & Garn, 1982[Sharp, E. J. & Garn, L. E. (1982). J. Appl. Phys. 53, 8980-8987.]; Garn & Sharp, 1982[Garn, L. E. & Sharp, E. J. (1982). J. Appl. Phys. 53, 8974-8979.]) or characterize ferroelectric hysteresis loops (Sawyer & Tower, 1930[Sawyer, C. B. & Tower, C. H. (1930). Phys. Rev. 35, 269-273.]), by implementing well defined, alternating temperature and/or electrical functions. In parallel, crystal structure analysis is possible via standard XRD or in combination with resonant techniques like X-ray absorption fine structure, and resonant X-ray diffraction (RXD) (Zschornak et al., 2014[Zschornak, M., Richter, C., Nentwich, M., Stöcker, H., Gemming, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2014). Cryst. Res. Technol. 49, 43-54.]; Richter et al., 2018[Richter, C., Zschornak, M., Novikov, D., Mehner, E., Nentwich, M., Hanzig, J., Gorfman, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2018). Nat. Commun. 9, 178.]) comprising various kinds of scans such as energy, azimuthal, and rocking scans. For instance, a simultaneous structural and electrical characterization of pyroelectrics was discussed recently, where the spontaneous polarization is determined from structure as a function of temperature using a semi-theoretical approach based on Born effective charges from density functional theory calculations (Weigel, 2016[Weigel, T. (2016). Master's thesis, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany.]).

The presented sample environment is particularly apt for the study of polar materials (e.g. ferroelectrics discussed in Section 8[link]), but also of charge/discharge processes of batteries and their parts at different temperatures for an improved understanding of the underlying processes, which are of particular importance for renewable energy research. The combination of electrical measurements at varying temperatures with (powder) XRD measurements allows the analysis of volume changes caused by migrating and intercalating ions (Yoon et al., 2006[Yoon, W.-S., Chung, K. Y., McBreen, J. & Yang, X.-Q. (2006). Electrochem. Commun. 8, 1257-1262.]; Weigel et al., 2019[Weigel, T., Schipper, F., Erickson, E. M., Susai, F. A., Markovsky, B. & Aurbach, D. (2019). ACS Energy Lett. 4, 508-516.]). Simultaneous resonant scattering experiments give insights into changes of the oxidation state and of the local environment (Terada et al., 2000[Terada, Y., Yasaka, K., Nishikawa, F., Konishi, T., Yoshio, M. & Nakai, I. (2000). J. Solid State Chem. 156, 286-291.]; Giorgetti et al., 2019[Giorgetti, M., Mullaliu, A. & Conti, P. (2019). Radiat. Phys. Chem. 175, 108252.]).

Here, we present a highly modular sample chamber for the application of temperature and electric field in large ranges, in combination or individually, while simultaneously characterizing the structure of an extended crystal in non-ambient conditions using synchrotron radiation. The chamber provides X-ray access to a full hemisphere of solid angle and a large angular degree of freedom, allowing, for instance, to measure several oblique reflections without readjustement as described in Section 8.1[link] This large angular flexibility allows XRD measurements, for example for structure determination and reciprocal space mapping on single-crystalline samples or grazing-incidence diffraction on thin films. The available temperature range spans from 100 K to 1250 K, and the electrical equipment is designed for measuring currents between 1 pA and 1 A at voltages between 1 V and 5 kV.

2. Overall specifications

The vacuum chamber (Fig. 1[link]) weighs in total less than 7 kg at a height of ∼180 mm and a diameter of maximum 239 mm (see Figs. 2[link] and 3[link]). The chamber houses a heating/cooling assembly (11) also representing the sample holder, an outer heat shield (12), and an xyz piezostage (13) with probing tip for electrical manipulation. The distance between sample position and bottom of the chamber is 125 mm which equates to the minimum distance required between the diffractometer sample mount and the X-ray beam to accommodate this chamber.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Technical drawing of the environmental chamber. 1: vacuum cross; 2–6: different ports; 7: bottom; 8/9: lid; 10: dome; 11: heater/cooler with inner heat shield; 12: outer heat shield; 13: xyz piezo stage.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Technical drawing of the top, side and bottom view (left to right) of the environmental chamber with measurements given in mm.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Photographs of the environmental chamber using the same labels as Fig. 1[link].

As the chamber will be used for experiments under extreme conditions in terms of electric field and temperature, special care is needed for thermal and electrical insulation. Both points are addressed by restricting the chamber to experiments under high vacuum.

3. Vacuum system

An advantageous basis of the chamber design is a highly modular vacuum vessel. Fig. 1[link] gives a detailed overview of the chamber parts, consisting of a standard ISO-K reducing cross (1), of stainless steel 304 with two ISO-K160 ports (lid and bottom), three KF25 ports (3, 5, 6), one CF40 rotatable port (4), and one KF40 port (2) for electrical feedthroughs, the vacuum system, the heater power supply and control, as well as cooling pipes. By replacing the relatively cheap ISO-K reducing cross, arbitrary ports can be implemented to this setup. The bottom is closed with an ISO-K160 blank flange, whereas the lid consists of an ISO-K160 flange with a circular hole (8) (inner diameter of 102 mm), a fixation ring (9), and the dome (10). A vacuum sensor Edwards AIGX-S-NW25 (Edwards, 2020[Edwards (2020). Edwards AIGX-S-NW25, https://shop.edwardsvacuum.com/products/d04850000/view.aspx.]) is attached to port (3). Other ports will be discussed in the following sections.

We performed heating tests to characterize the chamber's high-temperature compatibility, which is limited by potential outgassing or melting of the dome materials PEEK, PS and PC (polyether ether ketone, polystyrene and polycarbonate, respectively (Sections 4[link] and 5[link]). In particular, outgassing leads to increased pressure that, in turn, leads to higher thermal conductivity and therefore even higher dome temperatures. Before each measurement, the vacuum pumps have been left running for at least 24 h to provide highest vacuum conditions. The pressure was measured with vacuum sensors at the chamber and at the pumping station, with respective values pc and pp. Fig. 4[link] shows that the initial pressure at T = 300 K depends strongly on the dome materials: pc = 3.9 × 10−6 mbar for PEEK, 7.7 × 10−6 mbar for PC, and 1.2 × 10−5 mbar for PS (Section 5[link]). With increasing temperature the pressure increases almost linearly. A sudden increase of pressure has been observed for heater temperatures above 1250 K for different dome materials. This may be connected to the critical temperature of the SmarAct stage (13) of 328 K, as explained in Section 4[link].

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Top: pressure development at the pump pp and in the chamber pc. Bottom: temperature development at the inner heat shield of the heater, at the outer heat shield (12), and at the topmost point on the outside of the dome. The gray dashed lines mark critical temperatures defined by different chamber components, which should not be exceeded at the outer heat shield or at the dome.

4. Temperature control

The setup for the temperature control consists of a heater/cooler assembly (11), an outer heat shield (12), a feedthrough (4) using the cooling-circuit for water, air, or liquid nitrogen (LN), temperature sensors, and a temperature control unit. The heater/cooler assembly is a customized version of the heater model 104200 by HeatWave Labs Inc. (HeatWave Labs, 2020a[HeatWave Labs (2020a). Model 104200 ø1.0′′ 1200°C O2 heater in water cooled housing. HeatWave Labs, Inc., Watsonville, CA, USA.],b[HeatWave Labs (2020b). Model 110603 ø0.5′′ 1200°C O2 heater assembly. HeatWave Labs, Inc., Watsonville, CA, USA.]). Fig. 5[link] shows the setup, which consists of a 0.5′′ ultra-high-vacuum (UHV) button heater with two cylindrical shields. Threaded holes in the inner shield allow fixing a sample with metallic or ceramic clips. Additionally, the heater includes a single type N thermocouple, a LN-cooled heater base, and stress-relieved cryogen tubes, which are fed through a CF40 flange mount at port (4). Beside the cRIO control-system (compact reconfigurable in-/out-modules), the heater may be also controlled by any PID controller such as the available Omega CN8PT-305-006-C24-EIP (Omega Engineering GmbH, 2020b[Omega Engineering GmbH (2020b). PlatinumTM Temperatur- und Prozessregler mit PID-Regelung und USB-Port, https://www.omega.de/pptst/CNPT_SERIES.html.]). Typical operation settings of the heater are, for example, 7.8 V at 2.4 A for 1550 K and 12.1 V at 3.2 A for 1750 K, according to the supplier (HeatWave Labs, 2020a[HeatWave Labs (2020a). Model 104200 ø1.0′′ 1200°C O2 heater in water cooled housing. HeatWave Labs, Inc., Watsonville, CA, USA.],b[HeatWave Labs (2020b). Model 110603 ø0.5′′ 1200°C O2 heater assembly. HeatWave Labs, Inc., Watsonville, CA, USA.]). A maximum short-term peak power of 60 W is possible, but reduces the heater lifetime.

[Figure 5]
Figure 5
Technical drawing of the heater/cooler assembly with a short description of the components; measures given in inches (HeatWave Labs, 2020a[HeatWave Labs (2020a). Model 104200 ø1.0′′ 1200°C O2 heater in water cooled housing. HeatWave Labs, Inc., Watsonville, CA, USA.],b[HeatWave Labs (2020b). Model 110603 ø0.5′′ 1200°C O2 heater assembly. HeatWave Labs, Inc., Watsonville, CA, USA.]).

The type N thermocouple is attached below the heating unit, the cooling components are outside the heater. Therefore, the thermocouple tends to measure slightly too high values at low temperatures.

To protect the equipment inside the chamber from thermal radiation, we attached an additional heat shield (12) (outer shield). Next to the thermocouple of the heater, we added two Pt1000 sensors to the setup (type Omega P1K0-516-8K-B-300-S (Omega Engineering GmbH, 2020a[Omega Engineering GmbH (2020a). Omega Engineering GmbH, https://www.omega.de/.]) to be applied at several possible mounting positions (e. g. at the inner and outer heat shield). These sensors are specified for a temperature range of 73 K to 1123 K. All sensors can be connected to a Fischer connector [S 104A086-130+ (Fischer Connectors, 2020b[Fischer Connectors (2020b). Fischer connector S 104 A086-130+, core series cable mount, circular connector, 16 pole plug, https://rodantech.com/product/fischer-connectors-s-104-a086-130/.])] within a flange socket at port (6). Currently, the temperature values can be read out by an Omega data acquisition module Pt104A (Omega Engineering GmbH, 2020c[Omega Engineering GmbH (2020c). Pt104A: 4 channel data acquisition module for Pt100/Pt1000 temperature sensor with USB/Ethernet port, https://www.omega.de/pptst/PT-104A.html.]). Prospectively, the read-out will be automated (Section 7[link]).

The system has successfully been tested up to temperatures of 1300 K. At this point, the temperature at the outer shield (12) rises above the operating limit of the SmarAct stage (13) of 328 K. The lubricant of the SmarAct stage releases gas, which leads to an increase of pressure, which in turn increases the temperature due to the additional heat transfer. The replacement by an UHV SmarAct stage (SmarAct GmBH, 2020d[SmarAct GmBH (2020d). Ultra high vacuum piezo stages, temperatures up to 150°C, https://www.smaract.com/UHV-Piezo-Stages.]), which can be operated at up to 423 K, may enhance the temperature range of the setup. However, to reach 1300 K, the heater was already operated at its long-term stability limit. Therefore, these two facts defined the limit for the feasible temperature range to 1300 K. In the case of using the PS dome, the operation range is limited to a maximum of 1200 K (Fig. 4[link]) due to the critical temperature of the material.

Hoses for coolant can be connected directly via VCR 1/4′′ fittings at port (4). The lowest temperature measured at the sample position was at 100 K, which depends on the quality of insulation of the hoses to reduce thermal losses during the LN transport (Fig. 6[link]). Starting at room temperature, the initial cooling rate was −1.13 K min−1 limited by the heat capacity of the hoses. This is followed by an increase to a constant value of −3.17 K min−1 for the major part of the cooling range. An intermediate increase of the cooling range just above the low limit may be due to a decreasing heat capacity of the assembly.

[Figure 6]
Figure 6
Decrease of the temperature measured at the heater/cooler assembly during cooling with liquid nitrogen with the heater switched off.

5. Domes

Using X-ray transparent domes (10) allows the analysis of samples within one hemisphere of solid angle with almost constant absorption conditions. The different domes are almost hemispheric (Fig. 7[link]) and are fixed between flange (8) and the retaining ring (9). The inner diameter is 4′′ (≃ 102 mm) in order to provide sufficient space for electric manipulation of the sample and to reduce the heat load on the dome material.

[Figure 7]
Figure 7
Technical drawing of the PEEK dome with measurements given in mm.

The domes made of polycarbonate (PC) and polystyrene (PS) are commercially available and were manufactured by deep drawing. Thus, they have a simple and slightly imprecise shape. The polyether ether ketone (PEEK) domes are custom-made by Anton Paar (Anton Paar, 2020a[Anton Paar (2020a). Anton Paar, https://www.anton-paar.com/de-de/.]) via turning (Fig. 7[link]), allowing to have the sample holder centered in the hemisphere. This is not the case for the ready-made PC and PS domes. Therefore, a spacer is provided to fix these domes in the correct position.

We characterized the functionality of the different domes with regard to temperature stability as well as X-ray scattering and attenuation. Fig. 8[link](a) shows XRD measurements of a standard silicon powder sample (Si NIST SRM 640d powder) with Cu Kα radiation. The measurements were performed without sample rotation, with symmetric parallel beam (0.1 mm) configuration, 2.5° axial collimation, and a 2.7° 1D detector. During the measurements, the domes were evacuated to a rough vacuum of 280 mbar. Relative to the air measurement, the PEEK dome has the highest average transmission of 25.3%, followed by PC (21.2%) and PS (5.9%). However, the theoretical transmission values in Table 1[link] indicate that the PS dome should have comparable experimental values to PEEK. These differences could be due to the actual material parameters being different to those assumed in the calculation that is, for instance, neglecting potential polymer additives. For 2θ angles below 30° using Cu Kα radiation, the background depends on the scattering geometry and on the dome material [Fig. 8[link](a)]. Thus, for precise correction the background needs to be investigated before each measurement. At high scattering angles, the signal-to-noise ratio in powder diffraction measurements is not impaired by the presence of the domes, Fig. 8[link](c).

Table 1
Properties of the different dome materials (Ensinger, 2020[Ensinger (2020). Halbzeuge - Technische Kunststoffe - Das Handbuch. 10/12 E9911075A011DE.]; Henke et al., 1993[Henke, B. L., Gullikson, E. M. & Davis, J. C. (1993). At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 54, 181-342.])

In addition to the currently available domes made of polyether ether ketone (PEEK), polystyrene (PS) and polycarbonate (PC), we also listed the properties of prospective beryllium (Be) and polyimide (Kapton) domes. The upper limit of the temperature range is determined by the glass transition temperature. Mo Kα at 17.5 keV and Cu Kα radiation at 8.0 keV.

  PC PS PEEK Be Kapton
Color Transparent White Brown/gray Gray Orange/brown
Assumed sum formula C15H16O2 C8H8 C19H12O3 Be C22O5N2H10
Density (g cm−3) 1.20 1.00 1.32 1.85 1.42
Thickness (mm) 1.2 1.6 1.0 0.5 0.25
Price (Euros) 30 30 1800 11000 (+500) 180 (+3500)
Temperature range (K) 213…398 263…343 173…533 …1560 …633
TM Mo Kα 0.854 0.861 0.861 0.961 0.957
TM Cu Kα 0.232 0.272 0.242 0.827 0.656
AL, Mo Kα (mm) 15.162 21.428 13.331 25.339 11.512
AL, Cu Kα (mm) 1.642 2.455 1.410 5.276 1.187
Radiation stability (kGy) 1000 <1000 20000 40000
†Transmission, double passage through the dome (in and out).
‡Attenuation length, at 90° glancing angle.
[Figure 8]
Figure 8
Powder XRD measurements with Cu Kα radiation of a Si standard sample (NIST SRM 640d) with different domes and without dome (air). The domes were evacuated to a rough vacuum of 280 mbar. (a) Complete measured pattern. (b) Reflection 111 in detail. (c) Signal-to-noise ratio.

The maximum working temperature of the heater depends on the dome material corresponding to the different glass transition temperatures, summarized in Table 1[link]. To assess the operating temperature range for each dome, we attached a type K thermocouple to the top of the domes monitoring its temperature with a handheld data logger during heating. For the PS dome, we aborted the measurement at a heater temperature of 953 K as the glass transition temperature of 340 K was approached on the outside of the dome. This may be due to both a poorer vacuum inside the chamber when using the PS dome as well as higher heat absorption of PS. Using the PC and PEEK domes, the materials' glass transition temperatures were not limiting the temperature range during the test.

In conclusion, the PEEK dome has the best physical properties for the intended experiments; however, it is also the most expensive choice. The PC dome is the next best choice, offering the additional advantage of being transparent. The usage of the PS dome does not lead to any advantages.

6. Electric fields

The setup for the electrical measurements is based on a customized xyz stage for electrical and mechanical micro-manipulation by the SmarAct piezo drive (13) holding a probing needle (right of Fig. 1[link]). The moving range is 16 mm in the x and y direction (SmarAct GmBH, 2020a[SmarAct GmBH (2020a). MSC-3H-TAB hand control module for up to three positioner, https://www.smaract.com/control-systems-and-software/product/mcs2.]) and 12 mm in the vertical z direction (SmarAct GmBH, 2020b[SmarAct GmBH (2020b). Positioner SLC-1720-D-S-HV, 12 mm travelling distance, hv compatible, https://www.smaract.com/linear-stages/product/slc-1720.]). The position is read out by optical encoders to nanometre-resolution and may be controlled by software or using the hand control module (SmarAct GmBH, 2020c[SmarAct GmBH (2020c). Positioner SLC-2430-D-S-HV, 16 mm travelling distance, hv compatible, https://www.smaract.com/linear-stages/product/slc-2430.]). The allowed maximum temperature of the xyz stage is 328 K and 353 K during operation and when switched off, respectively. Port (2) provides a LEMO feedthrough (LEMO Elektronik GmbH, 2020[LEMO Elektronik GmbH (2020). LEMO vacuum feedthrough, 32 pins, SJG. 2B. 332.CLASV, two plugs, https://www.lemo.com/catalog/ROW/UK_English/unipole_multipole.pdf#page=%14.]) for two connectors compatible with high-voltage coaxial cables (32 pins, SJG.2B.332.CLASV) controlling the SmarAct stage. For the electrical feedthrough of the sample signal, we used high-voltage feedthroughs [Fischer S 102 A018 ø4.1 (Fischer Connectors, 2020a[Fischer Connectors (2020a). Fischer connector S 102 A018 ø4.1, core series cable mount, circular connector, coax, https://fischerconnectors.com/app/uploads/2021/10/Fischer_Connectors_Technical_Specification_Volume_1_Brass.pdf.])]. Inside the chamber, one of these two contacts is connected to the probing needle. The second contact may be attached to custom sample carriers, unless a ground connection through the button heater (11) is acceptable. For the measurement of small currents generated for example from pyroelectric characterization, a current amplifier DDPCA-300 from FEMTO Messtechnik GmbH is available (FEMTO Messtechnik, 2020[FEMTO Messtechnik (2020). Variable Gain Sub Femto Ampere Current Amplifier DDPCA-300, https://www.femto.de/images/pdf-dokumente/de-ddpca-300.pdf.]). High-voltage experiments may employ a Matsusada AMT 5B20 high-voltage amplifier (Matsusada Precision, 2020[Matsusada Precision (2020). High voltage amplifier AMT-5B20-(230V), https://www.matsusada.com/product/psel/amp/hiv/000051/.]), which allows driving samples with up to 5 kV at a slew rate of 360 V µs−1.

The chamber itself (i.e. the feedthroughs, cables and adapters) is also devised for high-voltage applications up to 5 kV, although the use cases demonstrated here did not require voltages higher than 1000 V.

7. Multi-parameter control and monitoring

The present setup allows to control and monitor temperature and electric field manually and, partly implemented, from beamline P23 of PETRA III at DESY. However, more holistic control and monitoring of all important environmental parameters is desirable and will be achieved by a compact reconfigurable input/output system (cRIO) from National Instruments (NI) (National Instruments, 2020[National Instruments (2020). CompactRIO-Controller cRIO-9066, https://www.ni.com/de-de/support/model.crio-9066.html.]), which is part of the setup periphery. The components of the system are listed in Appendix A[link]. The NI cRIO provides real-time control of the setup on account of the included high-speed, high-dynamic-range digital-to-analog, and analog-to-digital converters allowing fast monitoring and control of temperature, electric field etc. The system's programming is based on the NI cRIO-9066 with a dual-core processor and Artix-7 FPGA (field programmable gate array). This high dynamic setup is, among other things, intended for the determination of the pyroelectric coefficient with the Sharp–Garn method (Sharp & Garn, 1982[Sharp, E. J. & Garn, L. E. (1982). J. Appl. Phys. 53, 8980-8987.]; Garn & Sharp, 1982[Garn, L. E. & Sharp, E. J. (1982). J. Appl. Phys. 53, 8974-8979.]), which we already applied elaborately with a highly precise laboratory setup (Mehner et al., 2017[Mehner, E., Jachalke, S., Hanzig, J., Leisegang, T., Stöcker, H. & Meyer, D. C. (2017). Ferroelectrics, 510, 132-151.]; Jachalke et al., 2017[Jachalke, S., Mehner, E., Stöcker, H., Hanzig, J., Sonntag, M., Weigel, T., Leisegang, T. & Meyer, D. C. (2017). Appl. Phys. Rev. 4, 021303.], 2018[Jachalke, S., Schenk, T., Park, M. H., Schroeder, U., Mikolajick, T., Stöcker, H., Mehner, E. & Meyer, D. C. (2018). Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 142901.]; Jachalke, 2019[Jachalke, S. (2019). Dissertation, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany (https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:105-qucosa2-339698).]). The therefore already existing software of the laboratory setup is to be adapted for the integration into the synchrotron beamlines P23 and P24 of PETRA III, to allow the synchronization of the synchrotron experiment with the simultaneous external perturbations.

8. Examples for applications

The environment chamber is intended for the extensive investigation of functional materials. The flexible design provides the possibility to customize experiments individually to the given scientific case. In particular, ferroelectrics, requiring simultaneous electric and photon energy dependent characterization, are the target group of the chamber. The following sections briefly describe different examples of applications including structural characterizations of pyro- and ferroelectrics at low temperatures using synchrotron radiation in Section 8.1[link], structural characterizations of a field stabilized phase over a wide temperature range with synchrotron radiation in Section 8.2[link], and the electric characterization of a ferroelectric using high electric fields in a small temperature range without structural characterization in Section 8.3[link].

8.1. Synchrotron studies of functional materials at low temperatures

Even without using the full capabilities of the chamber, highly interesting scientific cases can be investigated. For instance, the low-temperature regime allows the separation of thermal-motion-induced contributions (Ovchinnikova et al., 2005[Ovchinnikova, E. N., Dmitrienko, V. E., Ishida, K., Kirfel, A., Collins, S. P., Oreshko, A. P., Cabaret, D., Vedrinskii, R. V., Kraizman, V. L., Novakovich, A. A., Krivitskii, E. V. & Tolochko, B. P. (2005). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 543, 122-126.], 2010[Ovchinnikova, E. N., Dmitrienko, V. E., Oreshko, A. P., Beutier, G. & Collins, S. P. (2010). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 22, 355404.]) and point-defect-induced contributions (Dmitrienko & Ovchinnikova, 2003[Dmitrienko, V. E. & Ovchinnikova, E. N. (2003). J. Synchrotron Rad. 10, 376-379.]; Ovchinnikova et al., 2005[Ovchinnikova, E. N., Dmitrienko, V. E., Ishida, K., Kirfel, A., Collins, S. P., Oreshko, A. P., Cabaret, D., Vedrinskii, R. V., Kraizman, V. L., Novakovich, A. A., Krivitskii, E. V. & Tolochko, B. P. (2005). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 543, 122-126.]) to the reflection intensity. This separation is particularly important while measuring RXD at `forbidden' reflections, which is a powerful technique to study atomic displacements (Richter et al., 2014[Richter, C., Novikov, D. V., Mukhamedzhanov, E. K., Borisov, M. M., Akimova, K. A., Ovchinnikova, E. N., Oreshko, A. P., Strempfer, J., Zschornak, M., Mehner, E., Meyer, D. C. & Dmitrienko, V. E. (2014). Phys. Rev. B, 89, 094110.], 2018[Richter, C., Zschornak, M., Novikov, D., Mehner, E., Nentwich, M., Hanzig, J., Gorfman, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2018). Nat. Commun. 9, 178.]) and the local electronic structure of selected atomic positions in crystals (Zschornak et al., 2014[Zschornak, M., Richter, C., Nentwich, M., Stöcker, H., Gemming, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2014). Cryst. Res. Technol. 49, 43-54.]).

Additionally, the variation of temperature often induces phase transitions, such as for example with strontium titanate (SrTiO3), which is an incipient ferroelectric with a low transition temperature (Lytle, 1964[Lytle, F. W. (1964). J. Appl. Phys. 35, 2212-2215.]). This ferroelectricity can be stabilized by a variety of external factors such as compressive strain, which allows the investigation of the ferroelectric phase at much higher temperatures. Here, our chamber was used to conduct a resonant XRD experiment at different low temperatures between 96 K and 300 K at nine oblique Bragg reflections to study an expected structural relationship (Nentwich et al., 2021[Nentwich, M., Richter, C., Weigel, T., Mehner, E., Zschornak, M., Novikov, D. & Meyer, D. C. (2021). In preparation.]) to a recently discovered piezo- and pyroelectric phase, the so-called migration-induced field-stabilized polar (MFP) phase (Khanbabaee et al., 2016[Khanbabaee, B., Mehner, E., Richter, C., Hanzig, J., Zschornak, M., Pietsch, U., Stöcker, H., Leisegang, T., Meyer, D. C. & Gorfman, S. (2016). Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 222901.]; Hanzig et al., 2013[Hanzig, J., Zschornak, M., Hanzig, F., Mehner, E., Stöcker, H., Abendroth, B., Röder, C., Talkenberger, A., Schreiber, G., Rafaja, D., Gemming, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2013). Phys. Rev. B, 88, 024104.], 2015[Hanzig, J., Mehner, E., Jachalke, S., Hanzig, F., Zschornak, M., Richter, C., Leisegang, T., Stöcker, H. & Meyer, D. C. (2015). New J. Phys. 17, 023036.]; Stöcker et al., 2017[Stöcker, H., Hanzig, J., Zschornak, M., Mehner, E., Jachalke, S., Richter, C., Hanzig, F., Meutzner, F., Leisegang, T. & Meyer, D. C. (2017). Cryst. Res. Technol. 52, 1600222.]) with the resonantly suppressed diffraction (RSD) approach (Richter et al., 2018[Richter, C., Zschornak, M., Novikov, D., Mehner, E., Nentwich, M., Hanzig, J., Gorfman, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2018). Nat. Commun. 9, 178.]). This new method allows sub-picometre precision by analyzing a purposely induced intensity minimum of an energy-dependent Bragg reflection. These minima originate by compensating scattered intensities of the different atomic partial structures for specific energies close to absorption edges of the constituents. Those minima depend on the structure of the sample. Thus, the shape and position of the intensity minimum of our measurements show a temperature dependence (see Fig. 9[link]), which could be fitted by a suitable model. Final results will soon be published (Nentwich et al., 2021[Nentwich, M., Richter, C., Weigel, T., Mehner, E., Zschornak, M., Novikov, D. & Meyer, D. C. (2021). In preparation.]).

[Figure 9]
Figure 9
RSD measurement of the thin film sample, exemplarily for the 025 reflection at four different temperatures.

8.2. Synchrotron study of the electroformation of strontium titanate at different temperatures

The presented sample environmental chamber was recently used for the combined variation of temperature and electric field during the study of structural symmetry reduction in the MFP phase of SrTiO3 (Hanzig et al., 2013[Hanzig, J., Zschornak, M., Hanzig, F., Mehner, E., Stöcker, H., Abendroth, B., Röder, C., Talkenberger, A., Schreiber, G., Rafaja, D., Gemming, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2013). Phys. Rev. B, 88, 024104.], 2015[Hanzig, J., Mehner, E., Jachalke, S., Hanzig, F., Zschornak, M., Richter, C., Leisegang, T., Stöcker, H. & Meyer, D. C. (2015). New J. Phys. 17, 023036.]; Khanbabaee et al., 2016[Khanbabaee, B., Mehner, E., Richter, C., Hanzig, J., Zschornak, M., Pietsch, U., Stöcker, H., Leisegang, T., Meyer, D. C. & Gorfman, S. (2016). Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 222901.]; Stöcker et al., 2017[Stöcker, H., Hanzig, J., Zschornak, M., Mehner, E., Jachalke, S., Richter, C., Hanzig, F., Meutzner, F., Leisegang, T. & Meyer, D. C. (2017). Cryst. Res. Technol. 52, 1600222.]). The application of approximately 1 MV m−1 causes a structural transition of cubic SrTiO3 with space group [Pm\bar3m\,(221)] (Hanzig et al., 2013[Hanzig, J., Zschornak, M., Hanzig, F., Mehner, E., Stöcker, H., Abendroth, B., Röder, C., Talkenberger, A., Schreiber, G., Rafaja, D., Gemming, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2013). Phys. Rev. B, 88, 024104.]) to a P4mm tetragonal structure with elongated c direction accompanied by a polar distortion of the TiO6 octahedra in the field direction (Richter et al., 2018[Richter, C., Zschornak, M., Novikov, D., Mehner, E., Nentwich, M., Hanzig, J., Gorfman, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2018). Nat. Commun. 9, 178.]). This involves the change of mechanical properties at the cathode side due to oxygen vacancy accumulation (Stöcker et al., 2010[Stöcker, H., Zschornak, M., Leisegang, T., Shakhverdova, I., Gemming, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2010). Cryst. Res. Technol. 45, 13-17.]) as well as the appearance of new physical properties in the MFP layer at the anode side such that the SrTiO3 crystal becomes partially piezo- (Khanbabaee et al., 2016[Khanbabaee, B., Mehner, E., Richter, C., Hanzig, J., Zschornak, M., Pietsch, U., Stöcker, H., Leisegang, T., Meyer, D. C. & Gorfman, S. (2016). Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 222901.]) and pyroelectric (Hanzig et al., 2015[Hanzig, J., Mehner, E., Jachalke, S., Hanzig, F., Zschornak, M., Richter, C., Leisegang, T., Stöcker, H. & Meyer, D. C. (2015). New J. Phys. 17, 023036.]). Up to now, the research of the MFP phase is limited to 284 K to 323 K (Hanzig et al., 2016[Hanzig, J., Zschornak, M., Mehner, E., Hanzig, F., Münchgesang, W., Leisegang, T., Stöcker, H. & Meyer, D. C. (2016). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 28, 225001.]). Here, we will present first low temperature XRD data of this phase.

In an experiment at beamline P23 of PETRA III, we extended the temperature range, in which the MFP phase has been investigated so far. We used the presented setup to apply 500 V to a SrTiO3 single crystal slab of the size 5 mm × 5 mm × 0.5 mm with platinum electrodes. We applied a temperature of 313 K to the sample, as we observed a faster formation of the MFP phase at slightly elevated temperatures. As we expect structural changes along the c direction, we focused on 00l reflections. At the chosen energy of ∼16 keV only reflections with l ≥ 3 were adjustable from which the strongest are still fairly weak (004 and 006 with 4.3% and 0.6% of maximal intensity, respectively). As the MFP phase is sensitive to photocurrent, the primary beam needs to be attenuated. The left frame of Fig. 10[link] shows the evolution of the 004 Bragg reflection during 8 h of formation. The developing shoulder corresponds to the tetragonal MFP phase, having a slightly larger c parameter.

[Figure 10]
Figure 10
Application of an electric field of 1 MV m−1 at different temperatures in the environment chamber to investigate strontium titanate SrTiO3 with XRD at photon energy E = 16.0 keV. Left: development of a shoulder at lower 2θ values relative to the main peak of the 004 reflection induced by the formation of the migration-induced field-stabilized polar (MFP) phase at 313 K over 8 h (time development: bright to dark). Middle: temperature dependent c parameter of cubic SrTiO3 derived from the main peak's maximum intensity of rocking scans. Right: the shoulder formed by the MFP phase at the 006 reflection is more pronounced at elevated compared with low temperatures, which indicates that part of the MFP phase volume relaxes back to the cubic state (Q corrected for thermal expansion).

Subsequently, we reduced the temperature stepwise and took a rocking scan of the 006 reflection at a time until we reached a temperature of 116 K. The middle frame of Fig. 10[link] presents the lattice parameter c derived from the main peak's maximum intensity. Linear regression gives a linear expansion coefficient of 8.65 × 10−6 K−1 deviating only 0.36% from the value 8.62 × 10−6 K−1 of Itoh et al. (1994[Itoh, K., Ochiai, K., Kawaguchi, H., Moriyoshi, C. & Nakamura, E. (1994). Ferroelectrics, 159, 85-90.]), proving a very accurate temperature control of the chamber. The 0.0048 Å difference (0.12%) in lattice parameter c can be assigned to usual uncertainties in the diffractometer setup/a polar splitting of the oxygen and titanium partial structure along the z direction. The right-hand frame of Fig. 10[link] shows a selection of the underlying rocking scans, which were corrected for the thermal expansion of the Q value to highlight the intensity shrinkage of the shoulder with decreasing T. It is evident that some volume of the crystal relaxed back from polar to cubic state. The cause of this effect is not yet clear. The experiment shows that the MFP phase remains stable at low temperatures down to 116 K.

8.3. Laboratory measurements of the ferroelectric hysteresis of lead zirconium titanate

To demonstrate the electric characterization capabilities of the setup, we chose lead zirconium titanate PbZrxTi1–xO3 (PZT) as a well known model ferroelectric (Yimnirun et al., 2007[Yimnirun, R., Ngamjarurojana, A., Wongmaneerung, R., Wongsaenmai, S., Ananta, S. & Laosiritaworn, Y. (2007). Appl. Phys. A, 89, 737-741.]; Jachalke, 2019[Jachalke, S. (2019). Dissertation, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany (https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:105-qucosa2-339698).]). Generally, ferroelectric materials offer a wide field of potential applications, ranging from pyro- and piezoelectric sensors, electro-mechanical actuators, and surface acoustic wave devices to non-volatile memory cells (Izyumskaya et al., 2007[Izyumskaya, N., Alivov, Y., Cho, S., Morkoç, H., Lee, H. & Kang, Y. (2007). Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 32, 111-202.]; Muralt, 2000[Muralt, P. (2000). IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Contr. 47, 903-915.]; Moazzami et al., 1992[Moazzami, R., Hu, C. & Shepherd, W. H. (1992). IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 39, 2044-2049.]; Muralt et al., 2005[Muralt, P., Ledermann, N., Paborowski, J., Barzegar, A., Gentil, S., Belgacem, B., Petitgrand, S., Bosseboeuf, A. & Setter, N. (2005). IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Contr. 52, 2276-2288.]). For decades, improving the properties of PZT, e.g. by minimizing fatigue and imprint, by optimizing polarity and by exploiting exaggerated material properties at the morphotropic phase boundary, has been of scientific and technical interest (Izyumskaya et al., 2007[Izyumskaya, N., Alivov, Y., Cho, S., Morkoç, H., Lee, H. & Kang, Y. (2007). Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 32, 111-202.]). In particular, the processing and improvement of thin films was of main concern (Karthik & Martin, 2011[Karthik, J. & Martin, L. W. (2011). Phys. Rev. B, 84, 024102.]). On the other hand, bulky ceramic PZT is the industry standard of piezoelectric-based actuator technology used for very precise positioning devices.

Here, we demonstrate ferroelectric hysteresis measurements of such a material to characterize the spontaneous polarization of the sample as a function of temperature. The sample was a PIC153 type ceramic from PI Ceramics Germany with a nominal Curie temperature of TC ≃ 433 K (PI Ceramics Germany, 2020[PI Ceramics Germany (2020). Modified soft lead zirconate titanate, material for special actuators ad glued bending actuators, type PIC153, https://www.piceramic.de/fileadmin/user_upload/physik_instrumente/files%/datasheets/PI_Ceramic_Werkstoffdaten.pdf.]). The pre-contacted ceramic has a thickness of 0.26 mm with an area of 19.6 mm2; it was fixed with silver conductive paint on the platinum coating (back contact) of a 500 µm-thick sapphire plate. Sapphire and sample did not project beyond the edge of the heater to guarantee a uniform heat propagation. The top contact was realized by the needle held by the SmarAct stage.

The measurements have been conducted at sample temperatures between 323 K and 440 K. 20 minutes after setting a new temperature, the conductivity and the dielectric loss factor tan(δ) were determined with a Hewlett-Packard 4284A LCR bridge at a frequency of 20 Hz with drive amplitude of 1 V to calculate the relative permittivity ɛr. Finally, the PE diagrams were recorded with the Shunt method, similarly to Jachalke et al. (2018[Jachalke, S., Schenk, T., Park, M. H., Schroeder, U., Mikolajick, T., Stöcker, H., Mehner, E. & Meyer, D. C. (2018). Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 142901.]) and Schenk et al. (2014[Schenk, T., Yurchuk, E., Mueller, S., Schroeder, U., Starschich, S., Böttger, U. & Mikolajick, T. (2014). Appl. Phys. Rev. 1, 041103.]), by continuously cycling the electric field between −1.6 MV m−1 and 1.6 MV m−1 at a frequency of 10 Hz and 128 repetitions. Simultaneously, the voltage drop over a reference resistor was measured and converted to the charging current I of the sample capacitor (Schenk et al., 2014[Schenk, T., Yurchuk, E., Mueller, S., Schroeder, U., Starschich, S., Böttger, U. & Mikolajick, T. (2014). Appl. Phys. Rev. 1, 041103.]). Finally, integration of I and division by the contact area A yields the polarization P = [1/A\textstyle\int I(t)\,{\rm d}t]. The intercepts of the hysteresis curve with the coordinate axis represent the coercive field EC and the remanent polarization PR, respectively.

Fig. 12 shows the hysteresis loops at different prominent temperatures, which are also marked in the T-dependence plots of EC, PR and ɛr in Fig. 11[link]. Here, we determined the Curie temperature as the local maximum in the relative permittivity ɛr at [T_{\varepsilon_{\rm{r}}}] = 429 K. In a second approach, we defined the average error of PR as a residual signal, which is undercut in the vicinity of the Curie temperature. We determined the remanent polarization PR for repeated measurements under the same conditions. The error of these measurements was calculated as the sum of the standard deviation of PR and a relative instrumental error of 11% (Jachalke, 2019[Jachalke, S. (2019). Dissertation, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany (https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:105-qucosa2-339698).]). The instrumental error can be further reduced by a more sophisticated acquisition system attached to the chamber. The average of these errors is ∼2.21 µC cm−2 and is undercut for temperatures above [T_{P_{\rm{R}}}] = 427 K. In addition to TC, we recorded two further phase transitions at ∼375 K and ∼412 K, visible by local maxima in EC and PR as well as a local minimum in ɛr. The hystereses of these temperatures are also shown in Fig. 12[link], besides the ones at TC, as well as at the selected range limits.

[Figure 11]
Figure 11
Temperature dependence of remanent polarization PR, coercive field EC, and relative permittivity ɛr of a PIC 153 type PZT sample. On the one hand, the Curie temperature was determined as the local maximum of the relative permittivity at [T_{\varepsilon_{\rm{r}}}] = 429 K, which is lower than the reported value of TC,lit ≃ 438 K. On the other hand, the residual signal of the measurement setup was determined for PR and the drop below this limit is associated with the phase transition ([T_{P_{\rm R}}] = 427 K). The room temperature values for PR and EC were extrapolated (orange) as 23.4 µC cm−2 and 0.65 MV m−1, respectively. Two further phase transitions are visible at ∼375 K and ∼412 K. The temperatures marked with blue asterisks were used for the hysteresis plot in Fig. 12[link].
[Figure 12]
Figure 12
PE diagrams showing the hysteresis loops of a PIC 153 type PZT sample at different prominent temperatures: lowest and highest temperatures measured (324 K and 439 K) as well as positions of local extrema in temperature dependence (366 K, 375 K and 399 K). These temperatures are also marked with asterisks in the temperature dependence plot in Fig. 11[link].

Our measurements are comparable with those performed by Kamel et al. on a PZT sample with composition PbZr0.415Ti0.585O3 and crystal size 5 mm × 5 mm × 0.2 mm (Kamel et al., 2007[Kamel, T. M., Kools, F. X. N. M. & de With, G. (2007). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27, 2471-2479.]). They determined a TC of 443 K as well as PR and EC at room temperature of 35.7 µC cm−2 and 0.75 MV m−1, respectively. Extrapolating the lowest temperature data of the present work (see Fig. 11[link]), we determined PR and EC at room temperature of 23.4 µC cm−2 and 0.65 MV m−1. We assume that our sample has a similar, but not identical stoichiometry as the one used by Kamel et al. (2007[Kamel, T. M., Kools, F. X. N. M. & de With, G. (2007). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27, 2471-2479.]), from which our results deviate by 34% and 13% for PR and EC, respectively. Similarly to our measurements, Kamel et al. found a residual PR above the Curie temperature (Kamel et al., 2007[Kamel, T. M., Kools, F. X. N. M. & de With, G. (2007). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27, 2471-2479.]), which is typical for relaxor ferroelectrics (Safari et al., 1996[Safari, A., Panda, R. K. & Janas, V. F. (1996). Key Eng. Mater. 122-124, 35-70.]).

8.4. Laboratory measurements for the electrical characterization of sapphire

To demonstrate the suitability of our chamber in terms of electrical measurements, we present the temperature-dependent characterization of the dielectric loss tan(δ) and the relative permittivity ɛr,33 of sapphire. Fig. 13[link] shows the corresponding data of an established laboratory setup in comparison with equivalent measurements using the presented chamber in a temperature range of 300 K to 700 K. In both cases a Hewlett-Packard 4275A LCR bridge was used.

[Figure 13]
Figure 13
Relative permittivity ɛr (left) and dielectric loss tan(δ) (right) of a sapphire plate measured with the presented chamber (blue) and with an established laboratory setup (red; difference of both in green).

The temperature dependence contains the imperfections of both setups. For ɛr the resulting deviations are still within the specified absolute accuracy of the used LCR bridge. The data of tan(δ) exhibit an additional loss of the setup, which is temperature dependent. However, this influence is smaller than a few 1 × 10−3 and thus negligible for most applications.

9. Conclusion and outlook

A new sample environment chamber has been designed and constructed for in situ synchrotron experiments allowing the variation of temperature and electric field over a wide range. Different dome materials, like PC, PS and PEEK, give the flexibility for distinguished applications depending on the experiment's specific demands. Table 2[link] gives an evaluation of the dome properties, including further dome materials that are considered for procurement in the near future. Currently, the PEEK dome has the best properties for most experiments, except when a visual control of the interior is desired, in which case the PC dome is preferable. An acquisition of additional domes made of beryllium and polyimide (Kapton®) is foreseen. Table 1[link] gives an overview of the dome properties that are relevant for the intended applications.

Table 2
Evaluation of the dome properties as good (+), average (0) or bad (−), depending on the material (PEEK: polyether ether ketone; PS: polystyrene; PC: polycarbonate; Be: beryllium; Kapton: polyimide)

  PC PS PEEK Be Kapton
Temperature 0 0 + 0
Transmission 0 0 + +
Diffuse scattering 0 + 0   0
Price + + 0 0
Radiation stability 0 + + +
Environmentally friendly + + + +

The chamber has already been used to characterize the formation of the MFP phase of single crystalline as well as thin film SrTiO3 applying 500 V and varying the temperature in the range of 116 K to 313 K, which showed a stability of this phase at low temperatures. Additionally, ferroelectric hysteresis loops of PZT were presented, below and above the nominal Curie temperature of 433 K with applied electric fields of up to 1.6 MV m−1. As a result, the temperature dependencies of ECPR and ɛr are given, showing Curie temperatures slightly below the nominal value and two additional phase transitions, which have been unreported until now. Both experiments demonstrate the high range of variable parameters of the environment chamber. Further experiments proved the reliability of the temperature and electric measurements conducted with our chamber.

The high-temperature limit of the sample environment is determined by outgassing of the SmarAct piezo positioner as well as the long-term power limit for operation of the button heater. Removing the SmarAct stage on demand or replacing it by a UHV version would allow the application of temperatures above 1275 K, however at the expense of shortened heater life. To protect the domes from these higher temperatures, improved thermal insulation is necessary. Furthermore, the LN hoses will be replaced by more flexible and double-walled insulated ones, to allow easier movement during diffraction measurements and to reduce thermal losses leading to a lower temperature limit more close to the boiling point of LN. A complete automation and synchronization of the chamber components using the NI cRIO and existing scripts from in-house measurements as well as additional domes made of beryllium and polyimide for enhanced performance parameters are planned in a future project.

The chamber is already available for manual within cooperation for users at beamlines P23 and P24 at PETRA III (DESY). The automatized control and measurement, especially for pyroelectric measurements, will soon be implemented.

APPENDIX A

List of available components for the NI cRIO system

The compact reconfigurable input/output system (cRIO) from National Instruments (NI) is intended to control and monitor the external physical fields like temperature and electric field. The whole system comprises the following modules:

(i) Analog input modules for Pt1000 and Pt100 resistance thermometers (NI 9217 and NI 9226).

(ii) A two-channel universal analog input module for reading thermocouples (NI 9218).

(iii) A four-channel analog input module ±10 V, allowing 50000 samples per second at 24 bit resolution (NI 9239).

(iv) A four-channel analog output module ±10 V, allowing 100000 samples per second at 16 bit resolution (NI 9263).

(v) Two digital input/output modules working at TTL voltage levels with frequencies up to 20 MHz (NI 9402 and NI 9403).

Acknowledgements

The design and construction of the chamber were part of a collaborative project with focus on the `exploration of condensed matter at large-scale facilities' funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for the construction and extension of beamline P24, PETRA III at DESY (projects 05 K10OF1 and 05 K13OF1). The construction was carried out by the employees of the mechanical/electrical workshop of the Institute of Experimental Physics, TU Bergakademie Freiberg: P. Zill, C. Irmer, S. Schneider and R. Backasch. We acknowledge DESY (Hamburg, Germany), a member of the Helmholtz Association HGF, for the provision of experimental facilities. Parts of this research were carried out at PETRA III and we would like to thank for assistance in using beamline P23 (proposals 20180461 and 20181183). Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (grant No. 05K10OF1; grant No. 05K13OF1); Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (grant No. 324641898; grant No. 409743569); DESY Photon Science (bursary No. 20180461).

References

First citationAdvanced Design Consulting (2020). XRD-1500 high temperature oven, T range: 25°C to 1000°C, vacuum down to 1 × 10−6 mbar, https://nebula.wsimg.com/8186ac9263915c9d307bc1624111aec3?AccessKeyId=6724FDA0721B120F44FE&disposition=0&alloworigin=1Google Scholar
First citationAnton Paar (2020a). Anton Paar, https://www.anton-paar.com/de-de/Google Scholar
First citationAnton Paar (2020b). Heater assembly DCS 500 for 4 circle goniometres, T range: −180°C to 500°C, https://www.anton-paar.com/de-de/produkte/details/kuehl-und-heizzusatz-fuer-vierkreis-goniometer-dcs-500/Google Scholar
First citationAnton Paar (2020c). Heater assembly DHS 1100 for 4 circle goniometres and several xyz stages, T range: 25°C to 1100°C, https://www.anton-paar.com/de-de/produkte/details/heizzusatz-fuer-vierkreis-goniometer-dhs-1100/Google Scholar
First citationDmitrienko, V. E. & Ovchinnikova, E. N. (2003). J. Synchrotron Rad. 10, 376–379.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationEdwards (2020). Edwards AIGX-S-NW25, https://shop.edwardsvacuum.com/products/d04850000/view.aspxGoogle Scholar
First citationEnsinger (2020). Halbzeuge – Technische Kunststoffe – Das Handbuch. 10/12 E9911075A011DE.  Google Scholar
First citationFEMTO Messtechnik (2020). Variable Gain Sub Femto Ampere Current Amplifier DDPCA-300, https://www.femto.de/images/pdf-dokumente/de-ddpca-300.pdfGoogle Scholar
First citationFischer Connectors (2020a). Fischer connector S 102 A018 ø4.1, core series cable mount, circular connector, coax, https://fischerconnectors.com/app/uploads/2021/10/Fischer_Connectors_Technical_Specification_Volume_1_Brass.pdfGoogle Scholar
First citationFischer Connectors (2020b). Fischer connector S 104 A086-130+, core series cable mount, circular connector, 16 pole plug, https://rodantech.com/product/fischer-connectors-s-104-a086-130/Google Scholar
First citationGarn, L. E. & Sharp, E. J. (1982). J. Appl. Phys. 53, 8974–8979.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationGiorgetti, M., Mullaliu, A. & Conti, P. (2019). Radiat. Phys. Chem. 175, 108252.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationHanzig, J., Mehner, E., Jachalke, S., Hanzig, F., Zschornak, M., Richter, C., Leisegang, T., Stöcker, H. & Meyer, D. C. (2015). New J. Phys. 17, 023036.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationHanzig, J., Zschornak, M., Hanzig, F., Mehner, E., Stöcker, H., Abendroth, B., Röder, C., Talkenberger, A., Schreiber, G., Rafaja, D., Gemming, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2013). Phys. Rev. B, 88, 024104.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationHanzig, J., Zschornak, M., Mehner, E., Hanzig, F., Münchgesang, W., Leisegang, T., Stöcker, H. & Meyer, D. C. (2016). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 28, 225001.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationHeatWave Labs (2020a). Model 104200 ø1.0′′ 1200°C O2 heater in water cooled housing. HeatWave Labs, Inc., Watsonville, CA, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationHeatWave Labs (2020b). Model 110603 ø0.5′′ 1200°C O2 heater assembly. HeatWave Labs, Inc., Watsonville, CA, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationHenke, B. L., Gullikson, E. M. & Davis, J. C. (1993). At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 54, 181–342.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationItoh, K., Ochiai, K., Kawaguchi, H., Moriyoshi, C. & Nakamura, E. (1994). Ferroelectrics, 159, 85–90.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationIzyumskaya, N., Alivov, Y., Cho, S., Morkoç, H., Lee, H. & Kang, Y. (2007). Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 32, 111–202.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationJachalke, S. (2019). Dissertation, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany (https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:105-qucosa2-339698).  Google Scholar
First citationJachalke, S., Mehner, E., Stöcker, H., Hanzig, J., Sonntag, M., Weigel, T., Leisegang, T. & Meyer, D. C. (2017). Appl. Phys. Rev. 4, 021303.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationJachalke, S., Schenk, T., Park, M. H., Schroeder, U., Mikolajick, T., Stöcker, H., Mehner, E. & Meyer, D. C. (2018). Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 142901.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationKamel, T. M., Kools, F. X. N. M. & de With, G. (2007). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27, 2471–2479.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKarthik, J. & Martin, L. W. (2011). Phys. Rev. B, 84, 024102.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationKhanbabaee, B., Mehner, E., Richter, C., Hanzig, J., Zschornak, M., Pietsch, U., Stöcker, H., Leisegang, T., Meyer, D. C. & Gorfman, S. (2016). Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 222901.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationLEMO Elektronik GmbH (2020). LEMO vacuum feedthrough, 32 pins, SJG. 2B. 332.CLASV, two plugs, https://www.lemo.com/catalog/ROW/UK_English/unipole_multipole.pdf#page=%14Google Scholar
First citationLytle, F. W. (1964). J. Appl. Phys. 35, 2212–2215.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationMatsusada Precision (2020). High voltage amplifier AMT-5B20-(230V), https://www.matsusada.com/product/psel/amp/hiv/000051/Google Scholar
First citationMehner, E., Jachalke, S., Hanzig, J., Leisegang, T., Stöcker, H. & Meyer, D. C. (2017). Ferroelectrics, 510, 132–151.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMoazzami, R., Hu, C. & Shepherd, W. H. (1992). IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 39, 2044–2049.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationMuralt, P. (2000). IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Contr. 47, 903–915.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMuralt, P., Ledermann, N., Paborowski, J., Barzegar, A., Gentil, S., Belgacem, B., Petitgrand, S., Bosseboeuf, A. & Setter, N. (2005). IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Contr. 52, 2276–2288.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationNational Instruments (2020). CompactRIO-Controller cRIO-9066, https://www.ni.com/de-de/support/model.crio-9066.htmlGoogle Scholar
First citationNentwich, M., Richter, C., Weigel, T., Mehner, E., Zschornak, M., Novikov, D. & Meyer, D. C. (2021). In preparation.  Google Scholar
First citationOmega Engineering GmbH (2020a). Omega Engineering GmbH, https://www.omega.de/Google Scholar
First citationOmega Engineering GmbH (2020b). PlatinumTM Temperatur- und Prozessregler mit PID-Regelung und USB-Port, https://www.omega.de/pptst/CNPT_SERIES.htmlGoogle Scholar
First citationOmega Engineering GmbH (2020c). Pt104A: 4 channel data acquisition module for Pt100/Pt1000 temperature sensor with USB/Ethernet port, https://www.omega.de/pptst/PT-104A.htmlGoogle Scholar
First citationOvchinnikova, E. N., Dmitrienko, V. E., Ishida, K., Kirfel, A., Collins, S. P., Oreshko, A. P., Cabaret, D., Vedrinskii, R. V., Kraizman, V. L., Novakovich, A. A., Krivitskii, E. V. & Tolochko, B. P. (2005). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 543, 122–126.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationOvchinnikova, E. N., Dmitrienko, V. E., Oreshko, A. P., Beutier, G. & Collins, S. P. (2010). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 22, 355404.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationPI Ceramics Germany (2020). Modified soft lead zirconate titanate, material for special actuators ad glued bending actuators, type PIC153, https://www.piceramic.de/fileadmin/user_upload/physik_instrumente/files%/datasheets/PI_Ceramic_Werkstoffdaten.pdfGoogle Scholar
First citationRichard, M.-I., Fernández, S., Hofmann, J. P., Gao, L., Chahine, G. A., Leake, S. J., Djazouli, H., De Bortoli, Y., Petit, L., Boesecke, P., Labat, S., Hensen, E. J. M., Thomas, O. & Schülli, T. (2017). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 093902.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationRichter, C., Novikov, D. V., Mukhamedzhanov, E. K., Borisov, M. M., Akimova, K. A., Ovchinnikova, E. N., Oreshko, A. P., Strempfer, J., Zschornak, M., Mehner, E., Meyer, D. C. & Dmitrienko, V. E. (2014). Phys. Rev. B, 89, 094110.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationRichter, C., Zschornak, M., Novikov, D., Mehner, E., Nentwich, M., Hanzig, J., Gorfman, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2018). Nat. Commun. 9, 178.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationSafari, A., Panda, R. K. & Janas, V. F. (1996). Key Eng. Mater. 122–124, 35–70.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationSawyer, C. B. & Tower, C. H. (1930). Phys. Rev. 35, 269–273.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSchenk, T., Yurchuk, E., Mueller, S., Schroeder, U., Starschich, S., Böttger, U. & Mikolajick, T. (2014). Appl. Phys. Rev. 1, 041103.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationSharp, E. J. & Garn, L. E. (1982). J. Appl. Phys. 53, 8980–8987.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationSmarAct GmBH (2020a). MSC-3H-TAB hand control module for up to three positioner, https://www.smaract.com/control-systems-and-software/product/mcs2Google Scholar
First citationSmarAct GmBH (2020b). Positioner SLC-1720-D-S-HV, 12 mm travelling distance, hv compatible, https://www.smaract.com/linear-stages/product/slc-1720Google Scholar
First citationSmarAct GmBH (2020c). Positioner SLC-2430-D-S-HV, 16 mm travelling distance, hv compatible, https://www.smaract.com/linear-stages/product/slc-2430Google Scholar
First citationSmarAct GmBH (2020d). Ultra high vacuum piezo stages, temperatures up to 150°C, https://www.smaract.com/UHV-Piezo-StagesGoogle Scholar
First citationStöcker, H., Hanzig, J., Zschornak, M., Mehner, E., Jachalke, S., Richter, C., Hanzig, F., Meutzner, F., Leisegang, T. & Meyer, D. C. (2017). Cryst. Res. Technol. 52, 1600222.  Google Scholar
First citationStöcker, H., Zschornak, M., Leisegang, T., Shakhverdova, I., Gemming, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2010). Cryst. Res. Technol. 45, 13–17.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationTerada, Y., Yasaka, K., Nishikawa, F., Konishi, T., Yoshio, M. & Nakai, I. (2000). J. Solid State Chem. 156, 286–291.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationWeigel, T. (2016). Master's thesis, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationWeigel, T., Schipper, F., Erickson, E. M., Susai, F. A., Markovsky, B. & Aurbach, D. (2019). ACS Energy Lett. 4, 508–516.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationYimnirun, R., Ngamjarurojana, A., Wongmaneerung, R., Wongsaenmai, S., Ananta, S. & Laosiritaworn, Y. (2007). Appl. Phys. A, 89, 737–741.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationYoon, W.-S., Chung, K. Y., McBreen, J. & Yang, X.-Q. (2006). Electrochem. Commun. 8, 1257–1262.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationZschornak, M., Richter, C., Nentwich, M., Stöcker, H., Gemming, S. & Meyer, D. C. (2014). Cryst. Res. Technol. 49, 43–54.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds